Druck 4Sight2 Calibration Software

4 Reasons why your plant needs calibration & asset management software
Nigel Scoggins, Global Product Manager: 4Sight2™
bhge.com
Typically implemented to increase operational
eciencies, calibration & asset
also increase protability.
Across industry, manufacturers are challenged with optimizing their return on investment, streamlining
processes and increasing eciencies.
A key way to achieve this is via the implementation of calibration and asset management strategies.
The eective monitoring of
your assets and calibration instrumentation across your sites
requires two signicant components.
Firstly, the availability of data from your equipment and, secondly, the reliability of that data.
Calibration management software can
oer the complete system solution
to many of a site’s maintenance,
process eciency and compliance
concerns. This article will cover the main reasons why site and engineering managers are increasingly turning to software solutions to manage their instrumentation, data analysis and maintenance actions.
As we begin to unpick this challenge, we recognize the obstacle we face is not how to store our data, but rather the accessibility, optimization and utilization of data. This refers to whichever process is used to interpret and pass relevant calibration and asset information to the applicable person at
the appropriate time. The eectiveness of which can
be measured in relation to reductions in unplanned
downtime, increases in eciencies and cost savings.
02
Current industry standards
and processes
For those not currently using calibration and asset management software,
in some cases alternative processes can be used to fulll certain aspects of the same role. Outside of eciency concerns, these other processes
often come with a number of unforeseen implications, with some of the most common examples below:
Paper-based systems
Typically, this process involves engineers manually logging calibration results. While relying on paper checklists sounds like an inexpensive measure, in practice it’s highly labor-intensive, time-consuming and prone to inaccuracies. Accordingly, a manual, paper-based system, generates a lot of paper and
makes nal calibration data dicult to aggregate,
access and analyze.
Spreadsheets
Although an improvement on paper-based systems, spreadsheet software still requires manual data entry, meaning human error remains a key concern. In addition, the data entry process takes up valuable time. Using this method inhibits the automization of calibration scheduling and aords limited data analysis.
DCS management system
Some plant managers do their best to stretch the capabilities of their DCS to manage plant assets. While these systems conform to certain reliability and security standards, their intended use does not directly relate to calibration and asset management. The implication of such limitations in terms of the functionality of DCS management systems results in an obvious consequence – the absence of scheduling and reporting features.
Hiring an outside service
Outsourcing is often a useful ‘stop-gap’ and provides a quick resolution in the early stages of a plant’s operational cycle. However, as a long-term solution this mode of management can prove costly and may make a plant reliant on an external service with availability concerns at critical times.
03
While any of these methods can be used across
a plant, they do not oer a complete system solution.
The ideal solution is one which positively impacts both asset management and asset optimization.
This being said, what really are the core reasons a site needs a calibration management software solution?
Loading...
+ 5 hidden pages