Fisher Management of Change Guide: Replacing Fisher CP Valves with Fisher GX Control Valves Manuals & Guides

Replacement of CP Valves with Fisher™ GX Control Valves
Table of Contents
Management of Change ..................................2
Background ....................................................2
Question & Answer Checklist ..........................2
Management of Change Guide
September 2018 / D352214X012
Fisher CP Valve and GX Valve Comparison .......4
Conclusion ......................................................8
Additional Resources ......................................9
Management of Change
Management of Change (MOC) is a procedure used to proactively manage changes that have the potential to impact safety or the process within a plant. Evaluating new techniques for improving MOC approval procedures can have an impact on
plant efciency. Historically, upgrading obsolete products or replacing existing process control equipment had been delayed or abandoned due to the extensive paperwork involved in completing a complex MOC approval sheet.

Background

The Fisher CP valve was developed to meet the specic requirements of the
chemical industry and was the primary offering for the industrial process application
segment of the chemical industry until 2005. The CP was a globe-style, single-port valve with integral anges, stem guiding, and a clamped-in seat ring. The CP valve is
an obsolete Fisher product and spare parts support for it will end in 2015.
The Fisher GX is a compact, multi-spring actuator and globe valve system that can meet the requirements of the chemical market. The GX valve is rugged, reliable, and easy to select. It requires no actuator sizing—the actuator selection is
automatic once the valve body construction and available plant air supply pressure are selected. A key feature of the GX valve is the ability to integrally mount the FIELDVUE™ DVC2000 or DVC6200 digital valve controller for linkage-less position
feedback. With a global installed base of nearly 100,000 units, the GX is a proven
and reliable control valve solution for a wide array of applications across a broad range of industries.
MOC: Replacement of CP with GX Valves
September 2018 / D352214X012
Contained in the following sections are design comparisons between the current Fisher GX control valve and obsolete Fisher CP control valve. These comparisons are intended to help end users complete MOC approval documents to understand the similarities and differences between GX and CP valves to effectively transition to the GX valve.

Question & Answer Checklist

Q: Does the proposed modication cause any changes to the piping and
1
2
instrumentation diagram (P&ID)?
A: No.
Q: Does the proposed modication change process chemistry,
technology, or operating and control philosophies?
A: No.
2
Q: Does the proposed modication change how the existing plant is
3
4
5
operated?
A: Possibly. Review capacity information to help ensure no issues will
take place.
Q: Does the proposed modication change process ows?
A: Possibly. Review capacity information to help ensure no issues will
take place.
Q: Does the proposed modication change existing pressure relief cases?
A: Possibly. If the GX replacement selection exceeds the maximum rated
Cv of the existing CP valve, then pressure relief cases will require
review. Pressure relief valve sizing when sizing and selecting Fisher control valves for end user applications is not considered. If the control valve is determined to affect upstream or downstream safety relief
cases, review by the end user or third party is recommended.
MOC: Replacement of CP with GX Valves
September 2018 / D352214X012
Q: Does the proposed modication change the process description?
6
A: No.
Q: Have the codes and standards to which the new equipment was
7
8
9
10
designed changed?
A: No.
Q: Does the proposed modication change the materials of construction,
such as a change in material form (cast, forged, or alloy)?
A: No.
Q: Does the proposed modication introduce new equipment items that
require periodic predictive maintenance?
A: No. The new equipment items will require the same periodic
maintenance as required by the previous equipment items.
Q: Does the proposed modication change existing operator training
requirements?
A: No.
3
Loading...
+ 6 hidden pages