A2A Cessna 182 User Manual

4 (1)
A2ASIMULATIONS
C182
ACCU-SIM C182 SKYLANE
ACCU-SIM C182
© 2014 A2A Simulations Inc. All rights reserved. Published by A2A Simulations Inc.
ATTENTION!
Accu-Sim C182, including sounds, aircra, and all content is under strict, and enforceable copyright law. If you suspect anyone has pirated any part of Accu-Sim C182, please contact piracy@a2asimulations.com
RISKS & SIDE EFFECTS
Ergonomic Advice
▶ Always maintain a distance of at least 45cm to
the screen to avoid straining your eyes.
▶ Sit upright and adjust the height of your chair so that
your legs are at a right angle. The angle between your upper arm and forearm should be larger than 90º.
▶ The top edge of your screen should be at eye level or
below, and the monitor should be tilted slightly back­wards, to prevent strains to your cervical spine.
▶ Reduce your screen’s brightness to lower the contrast
and use a flicker-free, low-radiation monitor.
▶ Make sure the room you play in is well lit. ▶ Avoid playing when tired or worn out and take
a break (every hour), even if it’s hard…
Epilepsy Warning
Some people experience epileptic seizures when viewing flashing lights or patterns in our daily environment. Consult your doctor before playing com­puter games if you, or someone of your family, has an epileptic condition.
Immediately stop the game, should you experience any of the following symptoms during play: dizziness, altered vision, eye or muscle twitching, mental confusion, loss of awareness of your surroundings, involuntary movements and/or convulsions.
A2ASIMULATIONS
C182
ACCU-SIM C182 SKYLANE
4
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
CONTENTS
6 THE CESSNA 182 16 DESIGNER’S NOTES 18 FEATURES 20 QUICK START GUIDE 24 ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE 30 SPECIFICATIONS 34 CHECKLISTS 40 PROCEDURES EXPLAINED 46 PERFORMANCE 62 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 68 EMERGENCIES EXPLAINED 72 AIRPLANE & SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION 86 AIRPLANE HANDLING, SERVICE & MAINTENANCE 98 ACCU-SIM AND THE C182 SKYLANE 102 CREDITS
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
5
THE CESSNA 182
The Jack of All Trades and Master of All
6
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
HE MASTER OF ALL TRADES? WELL, PERHAPS THAT IS A BIT
elaborate; however, the Cessna 182 is the proven master of a great
T
many aeronautical “trades”, indeed. So, what are the “trades” that we want a General Aviation (GA) aeroplane to be the master of? Well, we want it to be fast, carry lots of fuel, people and baggage, climb well, stall gently, be easy to land and fly, be economical to operate and maintain, and generally be a safe and pleasant ride for us and our passengers -­that’s a lot to ask of one aeroplane. Aer all, the physical world is based upon compromise and give and take; what is gained here is lost there, etc. Because of this necessary compromise, when it comes to mastering all of these “trades”, virtually every aeroplane fails to make the grade. Some exhibit very high performance but are a handful to fly for the average pilot and others are as gentle as a puppy, but do not perform so well.
That ubiquitous physical compromise is present in most instances.
NOW CONSIDER THE CESSNA 182:
It has a light and simple fixed gear but it can cruise as fast, or nearly so, as many retractable gear aircra. It can haul over 1,200 pounds of passengers, fuel and/or cargo. It will climb at nearly 1,000 fpm fully loaded and has an excellent ceiling and higher altitude perfor­mance even without turbocharging due to its generous supply of power. Due to very large and eective flaps, its slow speed and departed flight regimes are excel­lent, predictable and better in most circumstances than other aircra in its class. Accordingly, a pilot may get it in and out of very small fields with confidence. Its engine is reliable, easily maintained and not unduly thirsty for fuel or oil. While it has a constant speed propeller, it is a simple and basic aeroplane to operate that may be quickly mastered by even relatively low­time pilots. It possesses a large and comfortable cabin for four plus a capacious baggage compartment. While it is maneouverable and quick on the controls, it is also stable around all axes and possesses no dangerous or surprising traits. It is an excellent IFR aeroplane. The C-182 and feels substantial and robust; it is well-made and can operate in and out of fairly rough airstrips. Its high wing allows unlimited downward visibility. Its rear cabin window gives a pilot increased visibility and grants a more spacious and open feeling to rear passengers.
The C-182T will cruise at 140KTAS at 10,000 while burning only 12 gallons an hour or so and this while carrying full fuel (88 U. S. gallons), four adults and some baggage and being a gentle and predictable aeroplane for the weekend pilot to confidently fly with his family. Since 2005 the Garmin G1000 Glass Cockpit has been available in the C-182. This makes instrument and low visibility flying easier and safer.
While practical and simple to operate, many consider the high-performance capability of Cessna 182 to be the ultimate aeroplane for the casual, sportsman flyer.
The Master of all trades? Well, almost all. It cannot break the sound barrier or reach 40,000. However, it is the master of so many trades that really matter, that no one could reasonably ask for more.
HOW?
By now you ought to have the feeling that there is very little that the C-182 cannot do - without ease, grace and élan. So, how did Cessna achieve this aeronautical superlative?
As any dog breeder will tell you, ancestry makes a great deal of dierence. The C- 182’s immediate ancestor is the Cessna 180, the 182 being essentially the tricycle gear version of the 180. In creating the C-180, the first thing Cessna did was to borrow what was an already proven wing design from the all metal
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
7
THE CESSNA 182
C-170/172. Below its high wing, however, the C-180/182 is an entirely new aeroplane.
The C-182’s cowling is larger and fuselage is longer than the C-172’s, and the cabin does not taper rear­wards adding a good deal of useful space. The C-182’s undercarriage is sturdier and more robust to handle its heavier weight. The C-182’s six cylinder 230 h. p. engine is almost 60% more powerful than that of the C-172’s but its gross weight is only 30% greater. This gives the C- 182 a very respectable power- loading of 13.52 lb./ hp. While the C-172 and the C-182 share the same wing, that wing is more than large enough to give the C-182 a relatively light wing- loading of 17.8 lb./sq.. It is this combination of high power and low weight which produces the excellent performance that the C-182 demonstrates.
Greater power and a larger propeller produce more P-eect and torque which require appropriately sized tail surfaces to counter them. Accordingly, the C-182’s tail surfaces (fin/rudder and stabilizer/elevators) were made larger to accommodate the additional power up front. While this results in a somewhat heavy feeling elevator whilst on the ground and at slow speeds, in the air the elevator is not disproportionately heavy as compared to other aircra in its class.
Taking all of these design elements together, pound for pound the C-182 emerges as one of the most capable GA aircra of all time, a true Master of All Trades. Superlative performance has been justly rewarded, with over 23.000 having been built, the C-182 is the second most popular and numerously produced high performance GA aeroplane of all time, just aer the C-172.
WHY?
So, why did Cessna go to so much trouble to create an aeroplane with all of the ability that the C-182 pos­sesses? As usual, there is more than one answer. One reason was due to market conditions. Aer the end of World War II, there was a fast growing demand for the so-called bush plane. The simplest definition of a bush plane is one which will be primarily operated in and out of rough, short and remote fields and waterways; those which could not in any real way be considered to be airports or airfields.
It has been long established that high -wing, tail­wheel aeroplanes are best for bush flying. High wings sit well above the sometimes tall brush and far from stones and other debris which might be kicked up. The sturdy main gear of a tailwheel aeroplane is best suited for rough landings in fields which might actually damage a more delicate nosewheel strut. Also, a tailwheel aeroplane’s propeller is higher o the ground when taking o, landing and taxiing than the propeller of a nosewheel aeroplane, putting it farther away from stones, etc.
Cessna’s high wing aeroplanes, with a suicient amount
of power and a tailwheel are ready-made for bush flying. The 170 had almost all of the features required for a bush aeroplane. What was wanted was a larger, more robust airframe and an increase in power. Thus came the C-180, which, with a nose wheel is the C-182.
BUSH LEAGUE
Contrary to popular belief, bush flying did not begin aer W.W. II.; it began in Canada in 1919. Ellwood Wilson was a Canadian forester who was employed by the Laurentide Company located in Quebec. Laurentide trained foresters whom they hired out to large lumber companies. Of forester Wilson’s many duties, surely very high in importance was the hopefully early detec­tion and reportage of forest fires. One day Mr. Wilson had a brilliant idea: The forests were too vast for even hundreds of foresters like himself to properly patrol and map; however, from an aeroplane the entire forest could be well-patrolled and mapped and any sign of smoke that might indicate a burgeoning fire could be instantly detected and reported.
He obtained two surplus Curtiss HS-2L flying boats from the Canadian government. Between 4 and 8 June, 1919, the first aerial fire-patrol and photography mis­sions were piloted by RCAS Captain Stuart Graham and engineer Walter Kahre. One of their cross-country flights of 645 miles to Lac-àla- Tortue, was at that time, the longest cross-country flight in Canada.
This and subsequent forest patrol flights of the Curtiss JS-2Ls are considered to be the very first bush aircra operations. Laurentide Company initially financed these flights which received tremendous publicity in Canada. Soon thereaer a new subsidiary was formed, Laurentide Air Services, Ltd., the first exclusively bush operator in Eastern Canada.
Curtiss HS-2L in military use during W. W. I.
A Curtiss HS-2L of Laurentide Air Services in the early 1920s.
8
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
An Airco DH-4 which was used in Air Mail service in the 1920’s.
Piper J-3 “Grasshopper”.
Very popular for bush ying is the Piper Super Cub with oversized tundra tires for rough elds.
Curtiss JN-4 “Jenny”
Meanwhile, in Western Canada, in Edmonton, Wilfred May and his brother Court began the first commercial bush flying business in that area, called May Airplanes, Ltd. Flying a surplus Curtiss JN- 4 “Jenny” they, along with pilot George Gorman and mechanic Peter Derbyshire flew newspapers and small packages to outlying towns and villages.
Soon, these nascent companies were recognized to be successfully providing a vital service in the rugged and oen isolated area of central Canada. In 1919, Carl Ben Eielson, an Alaskan originally from North Dakota, began flying passengers in a surplus “Jenny” from Fairbanks to and from outlying villages. In 1924 the U.S. Post Oice granted Eielson a license to deliver mail in and around the Fairbanks area, but now in a far more powerful DH-4.
From these humble beginnings, bush flying in Canada, Alaska and the northern continental United States quickly blossomed into a major industry with thousands of aeroplanes connecting what were formerly remote and wild places with the rest of the world. Food, medicine, doctors and other vital com­modities and people were, for the first time, now able to be delivered to so many remote regions which had been formerly bere of these necessities.
Aer W. W. II, aircra manufactures recognised that bush flying companies would be operating again with­out the restrictions upon civilian aviation that the war, out of necessity, had applied. It was not long before many of the Piper Cubs and Super Cubs, Stinsons, Aeroncas, all of the so -called “Grasshoppers” of the U. S. and Canadian Air Services began to show their age
-- rough field and water flying taking its inevitable toll on them. New aircra to replace these noble veterans were wanted.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
9
THE CESSNA 182
THE CESSNA “AIRMASTER” - WHERE IT ALL BEGINS — FOR A WHILE
In 1935 Cessna introduced what was to be a very useful bush and cargo single-engine aeroplane- the C-145/165 ‘Airmaster”. These were rugged, substantial aircra made of wood and steel tubing with fabric covering. The wing was cantilever and did not require any exter­nal struts. Like virtually all aircra of that era it had a tail wheel. It was ideal for rough country operations. With its capacious fuselage and an excellent useful load of 970 lbs. and later well over 1,100 lbs, with the 165 hp (123 kW) Warner engine installed. It was a very capable rough country aeroplane.
While Cessna’s production of civilian Airmasters ended at the U. S. ’s entry on to W.W. II on December 8, 1941, a few Airmasters, now called UC-77B, UC-77C, and UC-94 entered the into the military services of the U.S. A number of them were also used by the Air Forces of Australia and Finland.
The powerful and rugged 4-place, high wing Airmaster is the direct ancestor of all post- war Cessna single –engine aircra.
Civilian 1938 Cessna C-165 “Airmaster”
Cessna C-37 Airmaster set up for bush operations with removed wheel pants and large tyres.
THE END OF THE WAR AND A NEW BEGINNING FOR CESSNA
In 1945, Cessna produced its only post-war radial­engined, five place aeroplane, the C-190/195. While Cessna had first designed and flown the 190 in 1945, it was not until 1947 that it was introduced it to the public. This is possibly because Cessna was hesitant to jump back into the post-war general aviation market with such an expensive aeroplane (which apparently did not at all daunt Beechcra). Instead, the first Cessna introduced aer the war was the modest, two-place, 65 hp C-120 which was available to the public in 1946.
The sole dierence between a C-190 and a C-195 is its engine: the C-190 having a 240 h. p. Continental W670-23 radial engine, and a C-195 a 300 h. p. Jacobs R-755 radial engine. Both engines have a diameter of 42” which makes the 190/195’s forward fuselage quite large and most capacious. With seating for five (two up front, three a) the 195’s useful load is 1,250 lbs. permitting full 75 gallon tanks plus four - 200 lb. or five
- 160 lb. souls on board. Its published cruise is 170mph (148k; 274km/h) at 70% power at 7, 500’. This was remarkable performance for a light aeroplane in 1947 and quite similar to the modern C-182.
While the 190/195’s wing is, as with the pre-war “Airmaster”, a cantilever design, unlike the “Airmaster” the C-190/195 is of all- metal construction. Cessna apparently came to the understanding (as would Piper later in the decade) that manufacturing fabric-covered aeroplanes is highly labor intensive and therefore more costly to build than an all-metal aircra. The C-190/195’s airfoil is the familiar NACA 2412 as used by Cessnas’ 170, 150, 172 and 182 to this day.
An expensive “luxury” type, the C-190/195 was not intended or expected to greatly fuel the post-war private General Aviation market. These large, 5-place aircra were intended primarily to be used for commercial char­ter and business transportation rather than as a light aeroplane for personal use. Many of the 190/195s were converted to floatplanes which made them very useful commuter aircra in areas where there were few or no airports. In this sense it could be said that the C-190/195 was a bush plane, although bush planes are generally not so well-appointed nor so elegant.
As impressive as its performance may be, the mas­sive C-190/195 was too costly, its thirsty radial engine required a good deal of maintenance, and its general appearance, while sleek and attractive, was a definite throwback to aircra of the thirties. Cessna understood that something new was wanted in the brave new era of peace.
10
A2ASIMULATIONS
SOMETHING NEW
Introduced in 1946, the basic and aordable 2-place Cessna 120 was an instant success. It spawned the C-140 which was then slightly stretched and in 1948 became the four-place 170. The 170 eventually
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
A Cessna C-195 on amphibious oats. A very capable bush aeroplane.
1949 Cessna 195. Sleek, powerful …and expensive.
morphed into the all-metal, tricycle undercarriage Cessna 172 in 1956, which is where the modern era of Cessna aircra begins.
The whole story of the how the C-172 came to be and how it evolved may be found in the A2A C-172 Manual and, accordingly, will not be repeated here. I do com­mend it to you, dear reader, even though I must admit that I wrote it. Nevertheless, you still may find it worthy of a glance or two, as therein is discussed the genesis and early development of the post- W.W. II Cessna line of light aircra.
All went swimmingly well for a while, but Cessna became inundated by the pleas of those who loved the C-170 but wanted to go faster and carry more load. Some of those were bush pilots who operated in and out of the most primitive places on earth and who required aeroplanes with lots of power, load capacity, high performance and strength. Others simply wished to take their families on trips without having to land for fuel so oen.
While the C-170 was an excellent, relatively inexpen­sive personal aeroplane for use in relatively civilized places, it did not have suicient power, load carrying capability and overal performance necessary for serious bush flying (and it is all serious). As of 1952, except for the C-190/195, Cessna did not produce an aeroplane that could be inexpensively used as a bush plane.
Surely tired and frustrated at hearing how rival Piper Cubs and Super Cubs were hauling goods and people all around the remote northern regions, in 1952 Cessna decided to satisfy these clamouring requests and began to design the C-180.
THE CESSNA 180 - A RUGGED, HEAVY HAULER
The first thing that Cessna did in designing the 180 was to slightly increase the size of the fuselage to accommodate a new, more powerful engine, the 225h. p. Continental O-470-A, O-470-J, and later a 230h. p.
Continental O-470-K engine. Some 180s have engines up to 300 h.p. The 180’s larger fuselage also gave the cabin a bit more room, particularly in width, and tail surfaces were re-designed to accommodate the increase in power.
On 26 May, 1952, with Cessna’s chief engineering test pilot William D. Thompson at the controls, the first Cessna 180, N41697, made its maiden flight. It was certified by the FAA’s predecessor, the CAA (Civil Aeronautics Authority), on 23 December of that year; a nice Christmas present indeed for Cessna to give itself. During 1953, the C-180 was made available to the public. This was the “Golden Year” of aviation, in that it was 50 years since the Wright Brothers made what is considered to be the first powered flight; something Cessna did not fail to mention in its advertisements for the 180.
C-170 tail surfaces were originally round-shaped.
The more powerful C-180 tail surfaces are square- shaped and larger. This was later adopted for the C-170.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
11
THE CESSNA 182
Even though the Cessna 180 has the same wing as the later model all-metal Cessna 170, the 180 is a very dierent aeroplane. It is heavier, more powerful and more capable in every way. Unlike the C-170, C-180 with its 1,100 lb. useful load can comfortably carry four adults and full fuel. Here is a basic comparison:
Cessna 170 Cessna 180
Empty Weight 1,205 lbs. 1,700 lbs. Useful Load 950 lbs. 1,100 lbs. Power 145 h.p. 230 h.p. Cruise 105 K 142 K Stall (Full flaps at MGW) 43 K 48 K Range (Statute miles) 590 1,024 Absolute Ceiling 15,500 . 17,700 . Rate of Climb at MGW 590 fpm 1,100 fpm
Without question the Cessna 180 performed very well with its six- cylinder horizontally opposed 230 h. p. Continental engine. It was just what the bush pilots were looking for: an economical but hardy, heavy loader that could go long distances quickly without having to re-fuel. This was a much better deal than the larger C- 190/195, which was far more expensive to purchase, maintain and operate. It was even more capable and rugged than the excellent C-37 Airmaster.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
All of this was just fine; however, Cessna was not only in the business of selling aeroplanes to bush pilots, as commercially sound as that was. The really plush market in the burgeoning and prosperous middle 1950’s was private pilots who wanted a fast aeroplane that could carry themselves and their families for long distances and not cost the Earth to do so. The C-170 was fine but its performance was, to be charitable, not spectacular.
However, the C-180 could do all that the C-170 could not. Cessna tried to sell the C-180 to private pilots but universally met with strong resistance over one matter in particular - the C-180 has a tail wheel. In the middle of the 1950’s new aeroplanes had nosewheels.
More and more private pilots of that era were no longer content nor comfortable with an aeroplane with a tail wheel with its inherent instability on the ground, the high possibility of a groundloop at landing and the poor visibility over the nose when taxiing. Once a pilot had experienced flying an aeroplane with a nosewheel, he or she was not willing to go back to the tailwheel. Accordingly, Cessna had no good argument regarding this when pilots baulked at the C-180. The solution was more than obvious and Cessna, with yawning empty coers anxiously awaiting to be filled with the loot to be gained by new purchases, went to work to remedy the deficiency.
IT LOOKS SO EASY, BUT…
Sometime during 1954, Cessna’s Board of Directors were convinced that it would be in Cessna’s best
Piper PA-22 Tri-Pacer. Note­fully steerable nosewheel
interest for the future to put nosewheels on their two top selling aeroplanes. They likely did not consider that this was going to be a big problem. Aer all, they were already manufacturing two very popular prime candidates for this modification, the C-170 and the newer C-180. It is likely that the Board had for some time resisted this rather expensive and extensive change until it was painfully pointed out to them that Cessna had indeed fallen far behind their competitors in this regard, particularly Piper with its prescient tricycle undercarriage Tri-Pacer which was introduced to the public in early 1951. Not having produced any single engine aircra with a nosewheel by 1954 was certainly a major concern for Cessna. Ultimately convinced to go ahead, the Board directed Cessna’s engineers to go to the drawing board and come up with a satisfactory solution. However, put­ting a nosewheel on an existing tailwheel aircra is much easier said than done.
SO, WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL?
First, the main gear must be moved back behind the centre of gravity (C. G.) so that the aeroplane will firmly sit forward on its new nosewheel. This may sound at first blush to be a simple and obvious matter, but it is more of a problem than it might appear with respect to a high wing aeroplane such as the Cessna 180. One reason (of many) for the complication is because the main undercarriage is necessarily attached to the bottom of the C-180’s fuselage and that fuselage has already been designed to absorb and transfer the stresses of taxiing and landing at the former, more for­ward attachment point of its main undercarriage legs. Low-wing, tailwheel aeroplanes which are re-designed for a nosewheel have many of the same problems as those of high-wing aeroplanes, however moving the main undercarriage attachment point farther a on the wing is a simpler matter.
Of course, there are a few exceptions to the bottom of fuselage location for main undercarriage attachment on a high-wing, nosewheel aeroplane, particularly with regard to some twin engine, high-wing aeroplanes such as the Aero Commander, the Mitsubishi MU-2 and the Britten-Norman BN-2
12
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
Islander. In each of these examples, the main gear assembly is located in the engine nacelles. High­wing singles such as the C-180 do not have such a convenient place to attach the main gear as do those aeroplanes. Accordingly, the internal structure of the fuselage of the formerly “standard” undercarriage C-180 had perforce to be altered. It required that the new stress points, created by the relocated main gear, adequately transfer and distribute rough-field taxiing and landing forces into the fuselage struc
­ture; forces which in the real world are not always perfectly gentle and benign.
The exact placement rearward of the main gear must also be resolved. This is a complicated matter of bal­ance and compromise that involves the consideration of a number of matters such as:
1. The location of the C. G. within a useable range
after the nosewheel is installed. This must take into account the weight of the nosewheel assembly, since its position is well forward with respect to the aircraft datum or fuselage station. While the main undercarriage sits slightly behind the C.G. and having two wheels and legs, etc. is heavier, it does not necessarily offset the forward moment arm of the new nosewheel assembly.
2. The balance of the aeroplane when on the
ground. The main undercarriage legs must be placed far enough aft to provide a stable platform for the aeroplane to sit upon. It must also be far enough aft to prevent the aeroplane from tending to easily tip back onto its tailskid under normal operating, load and wind conditions; however…
3. The main undercarriage legs must not be so far
aft so as to prevent rotation or create too high a load for the elevator to lift the nose on takeoff. A certain aft placement of the main undercarriage legs might make for a very stable aeroplane whilst on the ground, but if it is placed too far aft the resulting geometry may cause a situa­tion in which the elevator may not be powerful enough to lift the nose during the takeoff.
LEFT: Aero Commander note- main undercarriage in engine nacelle
CENTER: Britten-Norman BN-2 Islander. Note- main undercarriage attached to engine nacelle
RIGHT: Grumman AA-5B “Tiger”­note simple non-steerable, castering nosewheel
Other considerations include:
1. The nosewheel assembly’s added mass
and drag below the data line which will likely cause pitch – down.
2. The additional weight of the nosewheel
which reduces the aeroplane’s useful load.
3. The new tri-cycle geometry must allow for
precise and positive braking, taxiing.
4. The placement of the main undercar-
riage legs must not prevent and ought to aid entry into the aeroplane.
5. The transfer of forces during taxi-
ing and landing must not unduly dis­turb the pilot and passengers.
There are probably a few more considerations as
well, but I presume that the point has been made.
Once these many thorny problems are resolved to the best of the design engineers’ ability, the matter of the nose wheel assembly itself and its placement must be addressed. The area beneath the engine and its accessories where there was little to no space must now house the nosewheel assembly attach­ment. This includes a strut of suicient strength and robustness to withstand rough field taxiing and less than gentle landings. Not only that, but the nosewheel’s steering mechanism and its linkages must also be considered. In some nosewheel aircra such as the Grumman AA-5A “Cheetah” and the AA-5B “Tiger”, the Tecnam P Twenty-Ten and many homebuilt aircra, this particular problem at least has been simplified by installing a free- castering nosewheel whereby all ground steering is achieved by dierential braking and not by a direct link to the nosewheel. Additionally, free-castering nosewheel permits a very tight turning circle and many pilots report that they like it better than a steerable nosewheel. Cessna desired to provide a fully steering nosewheel as did Piper’s Tri-Pacer and many other aircra, so the complex linkages from the rudder pedals to the nosewheel had to be designed and space for all of this had to be found.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
13
THE CESSNA 182
PRESENTING: (APPROPRIATE FANFARE) THE CESSNA 182
In November 1955 the C-172 was introduced to the public, albeit as a 1956 model. Within a few months, in early 1956, the C-182 took its opening bow. It was an instant suc cess in the GA market. The following year the C-182 was upgraded and became the “Skylane”. Bush pilots, how ever, continued and continue to date to operate C-180s as even the best nose wheel system is considered to be too delicate for operations in rough country. With over 23,000 C-182/Skylanes having been produced to date the C-182/ Skylane has certainly proven to be a popular ride.
IT KEEPS GETTING BETTER, BUT THE ’PLANE REMAINS THE SAME
The C-182/Skylane did not sit dormant for very long before improvements and modifications were incorporated by Cessna. Engines, landing gear material, larger windows, and cabin appointments have changed and its useful load has steadily increased. However, even with all of these changes, the Cessna 182 remains the same simple, fast, heavy hauling, comfortable, easy to fly aeroplane that it was when it was first introduced in November, 1955.
Sure, over the years there have been a few modifica­tions to the airframe, the vertical fin and rudder being swept back with “D” model in 1960, and the most dramatic and obvious change being the cut down rear fuselage and the installation of “Omni-Vision” (a rear cabin window) with “E” model in 1961. In 1996, with the “S” model, the familiar Continental O-470-U engine was replaced by the fuel injected Lycoming IO-540 of similar power. Other than that the 182’s changes have been modest and subtle, updated radios, fancier cabin appointments and such.
The retractable gear R182 was introduced in 1977, and a turbocharged T182 was introduced in 1980. Both retractable gear and a turbocharged engine were available in the TR182 in 1978. In 2001, a turbocharged
-
-
The very rst Cessna 182 (N4966E)
ABOVE RIGHT: 1956 C-182 panel with a few radios, etc. added.
BELOW RIGHT: 1956 C-182. Even with a nosewheel ip- overs are possible.
and fuel injected engine was available in the T182T. The introduction of the Garmin G1000 “Glass Cockpit” was introduced as standard equipment in 2004. A diesel engined 182, the T182JT-A, was tested in 2012 and set for delivery to its first customer this year.
TH E C-18 2T
With each new model the Cessna 182 shows thought­ful improvements which enhance its usefulness and convenience, sometimes in large gulps, sometime in smaller ones. The “T” model 182 is no exception and displays a number of changes from the previous “S” model.
Cockpit” (not modelled) there are other electronic enhancements. Recognizing that the electrical system of the 182 had become more sophisticated as well as more capacious. The avionics master switch now con­trols a split electrical bus. Also, there is an additional main bus with a standby battery position. For safety in the event that there should occur an electrical system malfunction the avionics are divided onto two discrete, separately switchable busses. Should a particular component or group of components malfunction and it becomes necessary to shed electrical load on the main system, basic navigation and/or communication capa­bility may be preserved by shutting down power to Nav I or II and/or Com I or II while leaving the other radios operational. Bus #1 switches the Honeywell Bendix/ King KLN 94, if so equipped, plus the #1 Nav/Com. Bus #2 switches the Bendix/King KMD 550 multifunction display (MFD), if so equipped, the #2 Nav/Com and the transponder.
practice of dividing the most important instruments between electric and hydraulic power, so that if one system should fail, at least half of the instruments would still operate.The Directional Gyro (or HSI if one
Aside from the optional Garmin G1000 “Glass
The “T” model continues Cessna’s safe and wise
14
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
is installed) is powered by the electrical system while the Attitude Indicator (Artificial Horizon) is driven by the vacuum system. There are two constantly working vacuum pumps in C-182T’s with Nav I and Nav II equip­ment and one vacuum pump in Nav III 182s.
Cosmetically the 182”T” continues the practice of painting on the trim over the white base colour. Previously, and prior to 2003 the trim stripes were decals which were clear coated to preserve them from the weather, etc. Not surprisingly, this did not work out so well in all instances and more than a few decal­trimmed 182Ts are showing a bit of ragged wear. Since 2003 the 182 has painted on trim.
The 182T’s seats are available covered in either fabric or leather, at no cost dierence (A2A opted for the leather). The control yokes are leather bound for better traction when hauling back that heavy eleva­tor. The LED interior lighting makes aer dark flying a pleasure. Unlike former 182’s painted spinners the “T” model’s spinner is a spiy polished aluminium.
The “T” model also underwent a thorough aerody­namic drag reduction program that added four knots over the “S” model under the same power:
1. Sleeker undercarriage leg and
wheel-pants fairing.
2. Improved wingtips with internally
mounted navigation lights.
3. Improved cowling promoting more
efficient air movement within.
4. Draggy wire antennae on the vertical fin replaced
with flat plate antennae aligned with the airflow.
5. Sleeker cockpit entry steps on the
main undercarriage legs.
Also, the 230-horsepower Lycoming IO-540 has been de-rated to operate at 2,400 rpm max. which will surely tend to increase the practical TBO (time between over­haul) and reduce maintenance costs. The “S” model’s three-blade McCauley prop with curved leading and trailing edges is standard equipment on the “T’.
Over the years pilot ergonomics has not been ignored by Cessna. In the 182’s cockpit everything is where you might expect it to be and all controls, switches and buttons fall nicely to hand. Flap, gear and trim controls feel like what they control, and operate intuitively. However, the optional electric elevator trim button on the pilot’s control yoke is highly recommended being that the 182’s high wing and generous quotient of power on a thrust line some distance below it makes this aeroplane want trim and plenty of it upon every change of power and/or airspeed. While the C-182T has a 24 volt electrical system, in keeping up with the times for the pilot’s and passengers’ convenience, for the first time there is now a 12 volt outlet plug for an out­board electrical device such as a GPS, laptop, IPad, or whatever.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
Cessna 182S
SKYLANE
Engine
Horsepower 230 230 235
Top Speed 146 KTS. 150 KTS. 148 KTS.
Cruise speed 142 KTS. 145 KTS. 143 KTS.
Stall Speed (full flaps) 49 KTS. 49 KTS. 56 KTS.
Ground Roll 805 . 795 . 795 .
Over 50  obstacle 1,515 . 1,514 . 1,216 .
Rate Of Climb 865 fpm 924 fpm 1,010 fpm.
Ceiling 14,900 . 18,100 . 18,100 .
Gross Weight 3,100 lbs. 3,100 lbs. 3,000 lbs.
Empty Weight 1,775 lbs. 1,897 lbs. 1,608 lbs.
Useful load 1,213 lbs. 1,382 lbs.
Fuel Capacity 92 gal. 88 gal. 72 gal.
Range 817 nm. 968 nm. 650 nm.
Ground Roll 590 . 590 . 825 .
Over 50  obstacle 1,350 . 1,350 . 1,725 .
Lycoming
IO-540-AB1A5
Takeo
Landing
Cessna 182T
SKYLANE
Lycoming
IO-540-AB1A5
PIPER 235
DAKOTA
Lycoming
O-540-J3A5D
LIKE AN OLD, COMFORTABLE PAIR OF SHOES
From its inception the Cessna 182 filled a need in the GA industry that it still fills, and with distinction. Steadily evolving since its introduction 1955 it has never strayed far from its original incarnation. If a pilot who flew the very first C-182 were to fly the latest model, he or she would still find the cockpit to be a familiar environment; and with the exception, perhaps, of the flap control, originally manual and now electric, everything would still essentially be where it always had been and operate as it always did. He or she would find it just as satisfying to fly as it always has been, like putting on an old, comfortable pair of shoes; and that quality, in the end, may be the Cessna 182’s greatest achievement.
The Cessna 182 flies and operates like a basic, simple aeroplane that any low-time Private Pilot could easily check out in within an hour or two at most, while it constantly delivers the high performance of a more complex and demanding aeroplane. No doubt, as time passes, continuing improvements will be made to the venerable Cessna 182 that will surely enhance it in many ways. But the basic aeroplane, that master of virtually all aeronautic trades, will remain a familiar old friend and perhaps the greatest of all GA aeroplanes.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
15
DESIGNER’S NOTES
16
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
HE 182 TO ME, MEANS BUSINESS.
It’s large, comfortable, and tough.
T
Upon first entering the cabin, you are greeted with an expansive, wide, and especially long interior. My initial thought was, “wow, four people would be very comfortable in here, even for long cross country flights.” The rear baggage is also easily accessible just behind the rear seat, making the entire lengthy interior accessible in flight.
If you are familiar with it’s smaller brother, the Skyhawk, your eyes should catch some additional gauges including a CHT (cylinder head temp), a large fuel gallons per hour gauge, manifold pressure, a blue prop handle, a cowl flaps lever, and rudder trim. And in general, the panel is wider and more expansive.
If you are like me, when you first step into a cockpit, you will grab the yoke or stick to get a feel for the controls and linkage. When I first pulled back on the yoke in the Skylane, I thought “who put sand bags on the elevator?” It’s that heavy, and by my own measure­ments, a Skyhawk requires 6 lbs to li the elevator while the Skylane requires a whopping 25lbs. Having spoken with several 182 owners and pilots, this heavy elevator is a “love – hate” relationship, with most loving it.
Starting the powerful Lycoming 540 engine, you are greeted by a throaty exhaust note. This plane sounds mean. However, when you start to taxi, it reminds me of an old 1970’s American car power steering. While the rudders feel just as light as a feather, you’re aware that these delicate forces are moving a large and powerful vehicle.
At takeo, a 3-bladed prop has a distinctly strong pull o the line and reaches 60 mph almost twice as fast as the Skyhawk or Cherokee. As soon as you li o into a climb, you will see climb rates between 1,000-2,000  / min. And being a high performance airplane, aer takeo you will want to pull the throttle back to 23” of manifold pressure, which is about 2/3rds throttle. As you climb higher into thinner air, you can slowly increase the throttle to maintain 23”. If you are planning for a higher altitude cruise, you are in for a treat because with it’s high li wing, drooping wing tips, and 541 cu engine, it will continue to climb strong right to your desired height.
Once you settle, and begin trimming for cruise, you will see a nice increase of 15-20 KTS over the smaller GA planes and the entire time you will also enjoy a smoother ride from the higher wing loading.
Being a high wing airplane with power, any signifi­cant power or speed changes will require a strong pull or push on the yoke until you adjust trim. This can get especially heavy on final, if you don’t dial in enough nose up trim. To quote Dudley Henriques, “If someone told me they just bought a 182, my first question
When you start to slow down for your approach, you need to be mindful of the trim at all times. Because if you don’t have enough trim dialed in as you cross the threshold, you may not be able to flare this properly. This is not an airplane you fly with a thumb and finger; you fly and especially land a Skylane with a tightly clenched fist and a strong fore arm.
However, once in the flare (assuming you have it properly trimmed), the heavy elevator really counters any instinct to over flare. I find the Skylane to be one of the easiest planes to land (again, if properly trimmed) as the wing continues to fly well even at high angles of attack. If you don’t have it trimmed properly, however, you will be in for a hard touchdown.
When you do finally touch down, the feel of the wheels digging into the pavement tells you just how tough this bird’s landing gear is. Even if you did land it very hard, the feeling is this plane could take a lot more. The large tires dig into the pavement, and the gear flexes beautifully. This is no doubt a plane originally designed for some very tough terrain.
Once you have slowed down and exit the runway, the feather light taxi forces feel as if someone laid a red carpet out for you aer your flight. It’s just the easiest, most pleasurable airplane to taxi. I cannot imagine improving on this aspect.
No question, the Cessna 182 Skylane is an airplane that can do everything you ask it too, and I can see how owners can become quite attached and loyal to their Skylane. It’s also no surprise why the Skylane is the world’s most produced high performance general aviation airplane of all time. I hope you enjoy your Accu-Sim Skylane, as we have certainly enjoyed making (and flying) it.
THE AIR TO AIR SIMULATIONS TEAM
would be “does it have electric trim?” if not, I would recommend they stop what they are doing and get one installed immediately.”
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
17
FEATURES
18
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
 A true propeller simulation.
 Interactive pre-flight inspection system.
 Gorgeously constructed aircra, inside
and out, down to the last rivet.
 Physics-driven sound environment.
 Persistent airplane even when the
computer is o.
 Four naturally animated passengers that
can sit in any seat.
 3D Lights ‘M’ (built directly into the
model).
 Complete maintenance hangar internal
systems and detailed engine tests including compression checks.
 Visual Real-Time Load Manager.
 Piston combustion engine modeling.Air
comes in, it mixes with fuel and ignites, parts move, heat up, and all work in harmony to produce the wonderful sound of a Lycoming 540 engine. Now the gauges look beneath the skin of your aircra and show you what Accu-Sim is all about.
 Authentic Bendix King Avionics stack
including the KMA 26 Audio Panel, two KX 155A NAV/COMMS, KR 87 ADF, KT 76C Transponder, KN 62A DME, and KAP 140 Two Axis Autopilot with altitude pre­selection. Optional KI 525 HSI.
 Three in-sim avionics configurations
including no GPS, GPS 295, or the GNS
400. Built-in, automatic support for 3rd party GNS 430 and 530, GTN 650 and 750.
 Pure3D Instrumentation.
 In cockpit pilot’s map.
 Authentic fuel delivery includes priming
and proper mixture behavior. Mixture can be tuned by the book using the EGT or by ear. It’s your choice.
 A2A specialized materials with authentic
metals, plastics, and rubber.
 Oil pressure system is aected by oil
viscosity (oil thickness). Oil viscosity is aected by oil temperature. Now when you start the engine, you need to be careful to give the engine time to warm.
 Eight commercial aviation sponsors have
supported the project including Phillips 66 Aviation, Champion Aerospace, and Knots2u speed modifications.
 And much more …
 Electric starter with accurate cranking
power.
 Dynamic ground physics including both
hard pavement and so grass modeling.
 Primer-only starts.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
19
QUICK START GUIDE
20
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
HANCES ARE, IF YOU ARE
reading this manual, you
C
have properly installed the A2A Accu-Sim C182 Skylane. However, in the interest of customer support, here is a brief description of the setup process, system requirements, and a quick start guide to get you up quickly and eiciently in your new aircra.
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim C182 Skylane requires the following to run:
▶ Requires licensed copy of
Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
OPERATING SYSTEM:
▶ Windows XP SP2 ▶ Windows Vista ▶ Windows 7
PROCESSOR:
2.0 GHz single core processor (3.0GHz and/or multiple core processor or better recommended)
HARD DRIVE:
250MB of hard drive space or better
VIDEO CARD:
DirectX 9 compliant video card with at least 128 MB video ram (512 MB or more recommended)
OTHER:
DirectX 9 hardware compatibility and audio card with speakers and/or headphones
INSTALLATI ON
Included in your downloaded zipped (.zip) file, which you should have been given a link to download aer pur­chase, is an executable (.exe) file which, when accessed, contains the automatic installer for the soware.
To install, double click on the executable and follow the steps provided in the installer soware. Once com­plete, you will be prompted that installation is finished.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
21
CHAPTER NAME
IMPORTANT: If you have Microso Security Essentials installed, be sure to make an exception for Lockheed Martin Prepar3D as shown right.
REALISM SETTINGS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim C182 Skylane was built to a very high degree of realism and accuracy. Because of this, it was developed using the highest real­ism settings available in Lockheed Martin Prepar3D.
The following settings are recommended to provide the most accurate depiction of the flight model. Without these settings, certain features may not work correctly and the flight model will not perform accurately. The figure below depicts the recommended realism settings for the A2A Accu­Sim C182 Skylane.
FLIGHT MODEL
To achieve the highest degree of realism, move all sliders to the right. The model was developed in this manner, thus we cannot attest to the accuracy of the model if these sliders are not set as shown above. The only exception would be “Crash tolerance.”
INSTRUMENTS AND LIGHTS
Enable “Pilot controls aircra lights” as the name implies for proper control of lighting. Check “Enable gyro dri” to provide realistic inaccuracies which occur in gyro compasses over time.
“Display indicated airspeed” should be checked to provide a more realistic simulation of the airspeed instruments.
ENGINES
Ensure “Enable auto mixture” is NOT checked. The C182 has a fully working mixture control and this will interfere with our extensively documented and modeled mixture system.
FLIGHT CONTROLS
It is recommended you have
“Auto-rudder” turned o if you have a means of controlling the rudder input, either via side swivel/twist on your specific joystick or rudder pedals.
ENGINE STRESS DAMAGES ENGINE
(Acceleration Only). It is recommended you have this UNCHECKED.
22
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
QUICK FLYING TIPS
 To Change Views Press A or SHIFT + A.
 Keep the engine at or above 800 RPM. Failure to do
so may cause spark plug fouling. If your plugs do foul (the engine will sound rough), try running the engine at a higher RPM. You have a good chance of blowing them clear within a few seconds by doing so. If that doesn’t work, you may have to shut down and visit the maintenance hangar.
 Reduce power aer takeo. This is standard procedure
with high performance aircra.
 On landing, raise your flaps once you touch down to
settle the aircra, pull back on the stick for additional elevator braking while you use your wheel brakes.
 Be careful with high-speed dives, as you can lose
control of your aircra if you exceed the max allowable speed.
 For landings, take the time to line up and plan your
approach. Keep your eye on the speed at all times.
 Using in-sim accelerated time may cause
odd system behavior.
 Keep throttle above  when flying at high RPM to avoid
fouling plugs.
 A quick way to warm your engines is to use auto start
(CTRL-E) or re-load your aircra while running.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
23
ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
The piston pulls in the fuel / air mixture, then compresses the mixture on its way back up.
24
A2ASIMULATIONS
The spark plug ignites the compressed air / fuel mixture, driving the piston down (power), then on it’s way back up, the burned mixture is forced out the exhaust.
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
HE COMBUSTION ENGINE IS BASICALLY AN AIR PUMP. IT CREATES
power by pulling in an air / fuel mixture, igniting it, and turning the
T
explosion into usable power. The explosion pushes a piston down that turns a cranksha. As the pistons run up and down with controlled explosions, the cranksha spins. For an automobile, the spinning cranksha is connected to a transmission (with gears) that is connected to a drivesha, which is then connected to the wheels. This is literally
“putting power to the pavement.” For an aircra, the cranksha is
connected to a propeller sha and the power comes when that spinning propeller takes a bite of the air and pulls the aircra forward.
The main dierence between an engine designed for an automobile and one designed for an aircra is the aircra engine will have to produce power up high where the air is thin. To function better in that high, thin air, a supercharger can be installed to push more air into the engine.
OVERVIEW OF HOW THE ENGINE WORKS AND CREATES POWER
Fire needs air. We need air. Engines need air. Engines are just like us as – they need oxygen to work. Why? Because fire needs oxygen to burn. If you cover a fire, it goes out because you starved it of oxygen. If you have
ever used a wood stove or fireplace, you know when you open the vent to allow more air to come in, the fire will burn more. The same principle applies to an engine. Think of an engine like a fire that will burn as hot and fast as you let it.
Look at these four images on the le and you will
understand basically how an engine operates.
The piston pulls in the fuel / air mixture, then
compresses the mixture on its way back up.
The spark plug ignites the compressed air / fuel mixture, driving the piston down (power), then on it’s way back up, the burned mixture is forced out the exhaust.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
25
ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
AIR TEMPERATURE
Have you ever noticed that your car engine runs smoother and stronger in the cold weather? This is because cold air is denser than hot air and has more oxygen. Hotter air means less power.
Cold air is denser and so provides more
WEAK
oxygen to your engine. More oxygen means more power.
STRONG
MIXTURE
Just before the air enters the combustion chamber it is mixed with fuel. Think of it as an air / fuel mist.
A general rule is a 0.08% fuel to air ratio will produce the most power. 0.08% is less than 1%, meaning for every 100 parts of air, there is just less than 1 part fuel. The best economical mixture is 0.0625%.
Why not just use the most economical mixture all the time?
Because a leaner mixture means a hotter running engine. Fuel actually acts as an engine coolant, so the richer the mixture, the cooler the engine will run.
However, since the engine at high power will be nearing its maximum acceptable temperature, you would use your best power mixture (0.08%) when you need power (takeo, climbing), and your best economy mixture (.0625%) when throttled back in a cruise when engine temperatures are low.
So, think of it this way:
▶ For HIGH POWER, use a RICHER mixture. ▶ For LOW POWER, use a LEANER mixture.
THE MIXTURE LEVER
Most piston aircra have a mixture lever in the cockpit that the pilot can operate. The higher you fly, the thinner the air, and the less fuel you need to achieve the same mixture. So, in general, as you climb you will be gradually pulling that mixture lever backwards, leaning it out as you go to the higher, thinner air.
How do you know when you have the right mixture?
The standard technique to achieve the proper mixture in flight is to lean the mixture until you just notice the engine getting a bit weaker, then richen the mixture until the engine sounds smooth. It is this threshold that you are dialing into your 0.08%, best power mixture. Be aware, if you pull the mixture all the way back to the leanest posi tion, this is mixture cuto, which will stop the engine.
-
26
A2ASIMULATIONS
Just before the air enters the combustion chamber it is mixed with fuel. Think of it as an air / fuel mist. When you push the throttle forward, you are opening a valve allowing your engine to suck in more fuel / air mixture.
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
INDUCTION
As you now know, an engine is an air pump that runs based on timed explosions. Just like a forest fire, it would run out of control unless it is limited. When you push the throttle forward, you are opening a valve allowing your engine to suck in more fuel / air mixture. When at full throttle, your engine is pulling in as much air as your intake system will allow. It is not unlike a watering hose – you crimp the hose and restrict the water. Think of full power as you just opening that water valve and letting the water run free. This is 100% full power.
In general, we don’t run an airplane engine at full power for extended periods of time. Full power is only used when it is absolutely necessary, sometimes on takeo, and otherwise in an emergency situation that requires it. For the most part, you will be ‘throttling’ your motor, meaning you will be be setting the limit.
MANIFOLD PRESSURE = AIR PRESSURE
You have probably watched the weather on television and seen a large letter L showing where big storms are located. L stands for LOW BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (low air pressure). You’ve seen the H as well, which stands for HIGH BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (high air pressure). While air pressure changes all over the world based on weather conditions, these air pressure changes are minor compared to the dierence in air pressure with altitude. The higher the altitude, the much lower the air pressure.
On a standard day (59°F), the air pressure at sea level is 29.92 in. Hg BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. To keep things simple, let’s say 30 in. Hg is standard air pres­sure. You have just taken o and begin to climb. As you reach higher altitudes, you notice your rate of climb slowly getting lower. This is because the higher you fly, the thinner the air is, and the less power your engine can produce. You should also notice your MANIFOLD PRESSURE decreases as you climb as well.
Why does your manifold pressure decrease as you climb?
Because manifold pressure is air pressure, only it’s measured inside your engine’s intake manifold. Since your engine needs air to breath, manifold pressure is a good indicator of how much power your engine can produce.
Now, if you start the engine and idle, why does the manifold pressure go way down?
When your engine idles, it is being choked of air. It is given just enough air to sustain itself without stalling. If you could look down your carburetor throat when an engine is idling, those throttle plates would look like they were closed. However if you looked at it really closely, you would notice a little space on the edge of the throttle
valve. Through that little crack, air is streaming in. If you turned your ear toward it, you could probably even hear a loud sucking sound. That is how much that engine is trying to breath. Those throttle valves are located at the base of your carburetor, and your carburetor is bolted on top of your intake manifold. Just below those throttle valves and inside your intake manifold, the air is in a near vacuum. This is where your manifold pressure gauge’s sensor is, and when you are idling, that sensor is reading that very low air pressure in that near vacuum.
As you increase power, you will notice your manifold pressure comes up. This is simply because you have used your throttle to open those throttle plates more, and the engine is able to get the air it wants. If you apply full power on a normal engine, that pressure will ultimately reach about the same pressure as the outside, which really just means the air is now equal
­ized as your engine’s intake system is running wide open. So if you turned your engine o, your manifold pressure would rise to the outside pressure. So on a standard day at sea level, your manifold pressure with the engine o will be 30”.
IGNITION
The ignition system provides timed sparks to trig­ger timed explosions. For safety, aircra are usually equipped with two completely independent ignition systems. In the event one fails, the other will continue to provide sparks and the engine will continue to run. This means each cylinder will have two spark plugs installed.
An added advantage to having two sparks instead of one is more sparks means a little more power. The pilot can select Ignition 1, Ignition 2, or BOTH by using the MAG switch. You can test that each ignition is working on the ground by selecting each one and watching your engine RPM. There will be a slight drop when you go from BOTH to just one ignition system. This is normal, provided the drop is within your pilot’s manual limitation.
The air and fuel are compress by the piston, then the ignition system adds the spark to create a controlled explosion.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
27
ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
ENGINE TEMPERATURE
All sorts of things create heat in an engine, like fric­tion, air temp, etc., but nothing produces heat like COMBUSTION. The hotter the metal, the weaker its strength.
Aircra engines are made of aluminum alloy, due to its strong but lightweight properties. Aluminum maintains most of its strength up to about 150°C. As the temperature approaches 200°C, the strength starts to drop. An aluminum rod at 0°C is about 5× stronger than the same rod at 250°C, so an engine is most prone to fail when it is running hot. Keep your engine temperatures down to keep a healthy running engine.
LUBRICATION SYSTEM (OIL)
An internal combustion engine has precision machined metal parts that are designed to run against other metal surfaces. There needs to be a layer of oil between those surfaces at all times. If you were to run an engine and pull the oil plug and let all the oil drain out, aer just minutes, the engine would run hot, slow down, and ultimately seize up completely from the metal on metal friction.
There is a minimum amount of oil pressure required for every engine to run safely. If the oil pressure falls below this minimum, then the engine parts are in danger of making contact with each other and incurring damage. A trained pilot quickly learns to look at his oil pressure gauge as soon as the engine starts, because if the oil pressure does not rise within seconds, then the engine must be shut down immediately.
Without the layer of oil between the parts, an engine will quickly overheat and seize.
Above is a simple illustration of a cranksha that is located between two metal caps, bolted together. This is the very cranksha where all of the engine’s power ends up. Vital oil is pressure-injected in between these surfaces when the engine is running. The only time the cranksha ever physically touches these metal caps is at startup and shutdown. The moment oil pressure drops below its minimum, these surfaces make contact. The cranksha is where all the power comes from, so if you starve this vital component of oil, the engine can seize. However, this is just one of hundreds of moving parts in an engine that need a constant supply of oil to run properly.
28
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
MORE CYLINDERS, MORE POWER
The very first combustion engines were just one or two cylinders. Then, as technology advanced, and the demand for more power increased, cylinders were made larger. Ultimately, they were not only made larger, but more were added to an engine.
Below are some illustrations to show how an engine may be configured as more cylinders are added.
The more cylinders you add to an engine, the more heat it produces. Eventually, engine manufactur­ers started to add additional “rows” of cylinders. Sometimes two engines would literally be mated together, with the 2nd row being rotated slightly so the cylinders could get a direct flow of air.
THE PRATT & WHITNEY R4360
Pratt & Whitney took this even further, creating the R4360, with 28 Cylinders (this engine is featured in the A2A Boeing 377 Stratocruiser). The cylinders were run so deep, it became known as the “Corn Cob.” This is the most powerful piston aircra engine to reach produc­tion. There are a LOT of moving parts on this engine.
TORQUE VS HORSEPOWER
Torque is a measure of twisting force. If you put a foot long wrench on a bolt, and applied 1 pound of force at the handle, you would be applying 1 foot-pound of torque to that bolt. The moment a spark triggers an explosion, and that piston is driven down, that is the moment that piston is creating torque, and using that torque to twist the cranksha. With a more powerful explosion, comes more torque. The more fuel and air that can be exploded, the more torque. You can increase an engine’s power by either
making bigger cylinders, adding more cylinders, or both.
Horsepower, on the other hand, is the total power that engine is creating. Horsepower is calculated by combin ing torque with speed (RPM). If an engine can produce 500 foot pounds of torque at 1,000 RPM and produce the same amount of torque at 2,000 RPM, then that engine is producing twice the horsepower at 2,000 RPM than it is at 1,000 RPM. Torque is the twisting force. Horsepower is how fast that twisting force is being applied.
If your airplane has a torque meter, keep that engine torque within the limits or you can break internal com­ponents. Typically, an engine produces the most torque in the low to mid RPM range, and highest horsepower in the upper RPM range.
-
The “Corn Cob,” the most powerful piston aircraft engine to reach production.
www.a2asimulations.com C182 MANUAL
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
29
SPECIFICATIONS
30
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
C182 MANUAL www.a2asimulations.com
Loading...
+ 74 hidden pages