A2A Bonanza User Manual

A2ASIMULATIONS
BONANZA
ACCU−SIM V35B BONANZA
ACCU-SIM V35B BONANZA
© 2018 A2A Simulations Inc. All rights reserved. Published by A2A Simulations Inc.
ATTENTION!
Accu-sim V35B Bonanza, including sounds, aircraft, and all content is under strict, and enforceable copyright law. If you suspect anyone has pirated any part of Accu-sim V35B Bonanza, please contact piracy@a2asimulations.com
RISKS & SIDE EFFECTS
Ergonomic Advice
• Always maintain a distance of at least 45cm to the screen to avoid straining your eyes.
• Sit upright and adjust the height of your chair so that your legs are at a right angle. The angle between your upper and forearm should be larger than 90º.
• The top edge of your screen should be at eye level or below, and the monitor should be tilted slightly back­wards, to prevent strains to your cervical spine.
• Reduce your screen’s brightness to lower the con-
trast and use a icker-free, low-radiation monitor.
• Make sure the room you play in is well lit.
• Avoid playing when tired or worn out and take a break (every hour), even if it’s hard…
Epilepsy Warning
Some people experience epileptic seizures when viewing ash­ing lights or patterns in our daily environment. Consult your doctor before playing computer games if you, or someone of your family, have an epileptic condition.
Immediately stop the game, should you experience any of the following symptoms during play: dizziness, altered vision, eye or muscle twitching, mental confusion, loss of awareness of your sur­roundings, involuntary movements and/or convulsions.
A2ASIMULATIONS
BONANZA
ACCU−SIM V35B BONANZA
CONTENTS
6 FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
36 DEVELOPERS NOTES
38 FE ATUR ES
40 FSX QUICKSTART GUIDE
42 P3D QUICKSTART GUIDE
44 ACCU-SIM
48 ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
54 PROPELLERS
59 GENERAL
64 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
69 NORMAL PROCEDURES
74 PERFORMANCE CHARTS
86 WEIGHT AND BALANCE
90 SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
100 AUTOPILOT
106 2D PANE LS
110 CREDITS
4
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
5
BEECHCRAFT BONANZA

Flying Into The Future

by Mitchell Glicksman © 2018
irtually everyone who gazes upon the fair proportions of a “V”- tail Beechcraft Bonanza has come to feel deeply about its striking appearance. All who have had the
V
ing and performance. From its 30º (later 33º) “V”- tail to its tight and trim cowling Bonanza stands out from the rest.
Bonanza is unlike any other General Aviation (GA) aero-
plane. In the pilot’s seat Bonanza feels dierent than other
similar aeroplanes, more solid, sturdy and substantial. All who may be so fortunate as to y in a Bonanza immedi­ately perceive the extraordinarily high quality of everything therein, from the seats, windows and curtains, to the t­tings, switches, knobs and levers. Flying a “V”- tail Bonanza is a unique and satisfying experience. From engine start to
shut- down and throughout the ight “V”- tail Bonanza handles surely, lightly and quickly, more like a ne- tuned piston- engine ghter than any other GA aeroplane of its
kind. Whilst Bonanza’s handling characteristics are likely to get low- time pilots into trouble in a hurry, experienced and knowledgeable pilots have universally found Bonanza to be a joy to y. However, none of this came about acci­dentally but was a direct result of Beech’s deliberate concept and design.
Upon its introduction to the public in March 1947 it was clear to all that this aeroplane was miles and years ahead of any other light civilian aeroplane, past or present. All
Bonanzas feature a ush- riveted NACA 23000 airfoil wing
which Beech had also used on its Model 18 “Twin Beech,”
a circular, ush riveted stressed aluminium fuselage, fully
enclosed electrically retractable undercarriage, a retractable
privilege to y a Bonanza have come to
appreciate its excellent and unique hand-
boarding step, gap- sealed recessed ap tracks, cockpit­adjustable cowl aps, internally hinged control sur­faces and, at rst, an electrically pitch- adjustable 2- blade
wooden propeller which soon afterwards was replaced by a metal constant- speed prop. Most of these features were
commonplace for ghter aircraft of the 1940s but had rarely
ever before appeared on a light civilian aeroplane.
When it was introduced Bonanza did not merely look
supremely clean and fast, its overall drag coecient (Cd)
was, in fact, the lowest of any light aeroplane in the civil­ian market.
Beech publicity has often attributed much of Bonanza’s
excellent performance to its unusual “V”- tail. However, as
we shall see, it played virtually no part in contributing to such and actually had more than a small negative impact on the aeroplane’s reputation.
SETTING THE SCENE
In January 1945, company ocers and engineers at Beech
Aircraft Company, Inc. began to have serious discussions about what kind of aeroplane they were going to produce when World War II was over and crucial materials such as aluminium, steel, rubber and such once again became avail­able for civilian use.
By this time most of the world had been engaged in the
most savage and deadly war in all of human history in
excess of six years, four months since the Nazi invasion of
Poland, 1 September 1939. Since 7 December 1941 The United States had been engaged in all theatres of this worldwide
conict for more than three years and would ultimately suer 1,076,245 casualties, the great majority of which had already been inicted by January 1945.
6
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
However, by January 1945, seven
months after the Allied invasion of
France at Normandy on 6 June 1944,
the hoped- for light of peace in Europe, which for six years had but dimly twinkled down at the distant end of the war’s terribly long, dismal tunnel, now burned ever more clearly and brightly as a bold torch of triumph.
The rolling collapse of Nazi mili­tary forces put them nally and irre-
vocably in full retreat after the fail­ure of one last, desperate Wehrmacht
oensive (The Battle of the Bulge - 16
December 1944 - 25 January 1945). By the middle of January 1945 Soviet armed forces, having essentially
ground the Nazis’ eastern armies and
amour to dust, casting their survivors into a frozen, deadly retreat, were in Poland and were pushing rap­idly, inexorably and mercilessly towards the very heart of Germany. Daily and nightly thousands of Allied bombers were pounding Germany’s factories and cities into rubble, bringing the American public’s appreciation and awareness of aviation to its zenith.
By January 1945 in the Pacic Theatre the largest part of
Imperial Japan’s army, naval and air forces, save for a few isolated battalions which were left alone, bereft of support to haplessly and hopelessly defend the innermost Japanese islands, had been utterly destroyed, essentially neutral­izing Japanese aggression. During January 1945 U. S. and
Allied forces, suering great casualties, landed at Luzon,
Philippines and liberated Manila.
AT HOME
Even in the years before the war began for the United States a sober look at that which was occurring in Europe engen­dered a ramping up of industry throughout the country which facilitated the end of the Great Depression. Once at war, virtually all industries, workplaces and factories in the United States were intensely focused upon producing what­ever was required to assure the ulti­mate victory. This was no less true in the aircraft industry. By January 1945 the Allies’ spectacular military advances on all fronts were a clear indication to even the most hard­ened cynic that victory was forth-
coming. Whilst horric combat would
still continue for a time in Europe and
even longer in the Pacic, by January
1945 the general feeling was that an end to this monstrous blood bath was indeed nigh.
Meanwhile, as 1,000 plane bomber raids were regularly reported in
N192D, the onl y still- f lying “Aerocar”.
newspapers and shown in news­reels between features in cinemas, the public in the U.S. became more and more air- minded. Accordingly, articles speculating on the future of civilian aviation were published in many magazines and Sunday supple­ments particularly regarding what was called, among other things, the “Everyman Airplane.” In the late 1940s and early 1950s this often took the shape of a new and then highly misunderstood type of aircraft, the helicopter.
In the February 1951 issue of Popular Mechanics an illustration of a two- seat, jet- powered helicopter was shown being pushed back into its garage by a suburban man in his hat and overcoat having ostensibly just own it back from work. An identi-
cal red helicopter is seen above his neighbour’s house. The
article “reported” that anyone could learn to y one of these
machines in only two hours.
Along with this kind of nonsense, fanciful drawings of boat- aeroplanes and automobile- aeroplanes abounded. One of these, designed to be a true- functioning automo­bile as well as a true- functioning aeroplane, “Aerocar” towed its folded wings and tail section behind whilst on
the road which, when ight was desired, were assembled and own away. Sounds crazy, does it not? The thing is,
it actually worked. Taylor “Aerocar,” the exception to the wildly improbable contraptions that had been permeating
the press, was both successfully driven and own in 1949.
Along with so many less practical conceptions, “Aerocar” was also intended to be the “Everyman Airplane”, however, only six were built and sold. All six still exist, four of them
are reportedly in yable condition and one, N102D, is still own.
It was in this chimerical aeronautical atmosphere that aircraft manufacturers planned to sell (real) aeroplanes to the public in huge quantities as soon as the war ended.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
7
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
A beautifully res tored Belgian­registered Beech Model 17S “Staggerwing.” This unique an d strik ing design is a mass ive and complicated fabr ic- covere d wood and steel struc ture powered by a 450 hp Pratt & Whitn ey R- 985 - AN- 1 “Wasp Junior” radial engine . With a top airspeed of 212 mph (184 knots, 341 km/h,) it was a fast biplane in the 1930 s, but became less and less competitive as an executive transport with the e mergence of the ne w and more eicient all- metal aviation technology of the 1940s.
Be ech Model 18, he re as
Royal Canadian Air Fo rce (RCAF ) transpor t. This aeroplane’s resemblance to the larger Lockheed “Elect ra” is likely not entirely a coincide nce.
Be ech AT- 11 “Kans an”
bomber trainer over Texas in 1943 . One of 49 military variants of Model 18 , AT- 11 w as the U. S. Army A ir Force’s (USAAF) primary bombing traine r during the war in which mor e than 40,000 bombardiers were trained. Modifications included a transp arent bomber ’s nose, an internal bo mb bay and bomb racks and a dorsal gun turre t for gunner y training. Photo from “We stern Trips”
The second an d last
protot ype Beechcra XA- 38 “Gr izzly” shown here was p roduced with an operational 75 mm cannon . It beggars one’s imagination to think that the s ame company which was s till producing the fabric- covered “Staggerwing” biplane also de signed and built this formidable- looking and per forming modern warplane. Photo from “Old Machine Pr ess”
19 47 Piper J- 3 “Cub.”
The great progenitor of all general aviati on light airc ra, what Piper oered in 1947 was indistinguishable from the pre- war “Cub.”
A TWINKLE IN WALTER BEECH’S EYE
By 1945, along with virtually every U. S. manufacturer Beech Aircraft Company which was founded in Wichita, Kansas in 1932 by Walter Beech, his wife Olive Ann Beech and a few
others began to plan for the coming post- war era. However,
by the late 1930s Beech had designed and produced only two aeroplane types in any quantity, the 1933 Model 17 “Staggerwing” and the 1937 Model 18, commonly called “Twin Beech.”
The 1933 Model 17 is called “Staggerwing” because the upper wing is placed rearward of the lower wing. Model 17’s airframe is fabric- covered wood and steel, typical of aircraft
of the early- to- mid 1930s, It initially had a xed and later a
retractable undercarriage.
Along with most of the aircraft manufacturers in the United States in the early 1930s a number of circumstances, particularly the deadly crash of TWA Flight 599 in which the
beloved Notre Dame University football coach Knute Rockne
was killed,
wave of the future. Not content to merely build a simple
all- metal single- engine light aeroplane Beech jumped into these new waters with both feet by producing Model 18, a far heavier and more complex aeroplane than it had ever built.
Beech’s second aeroplane, Model 18, is an all- metal twin- engine light transport which, since its introduction in January 1937 has been a popular and highly successful civil-
ian and military aeroplane. The rst Model 18s were pow­ered by two 330- hp (250- kW) Jacobs L- 6 or by two 350- hp (260- kW) Wright R- 760E radial engines turning cockpit­adjustable- pitch Hamilton Standard propellers. Model 18’s engines were soon upped to 450- hp (336- kW) Pratt & Whitney R- 985 radial engines turning the new Hamilton Standard three- blade constant- speed propellers. However,
the construction and manufacturing methods required for building Model 18 were entirely new to Beech. In fact, Beech Model 18 was a quantum leap from Model 17 in every way.
1
informed Beech that all- metal aircraft were the
8
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
Model 17 seats a pilot and three passengers, is a single­engine, fabric- covered biplane with a wingspan of thirty­two feet weighing 4,250 lbs. fully loaded. By comparison, a typical late 1930s Model 18 seats two pilots and up to eight passengers, is a twin- engine, all- metal, cantilever (no external struts) monoplane with a wingspan of forty- seven feet, eight inches weighing 7,500 lbs, fully loaded.
After selling only thirty- eight Beech 18s before the United
States’ entry into W.W. II including one to Sweden as an air
ambulance and six to the Nationalist Chinese Government as M18R Light Bombers, once the war began the various U. S.
armed forces, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) and the Royal Air Force (RAF) purchased more than 4,000 Beech 18s.
Beech built two other aeroplanes during the war. One
of these was the twin- engine Beech Model 26 AT- 10/11
“Wichita”/”Kansan,” a militarized derivative of Model 18. This aeroplane was built in response to the U. S. Army Air Corps’ (USAAC) requirement for a twin- engine, retract­able undercarriage, multi- engine trainer similar to Cessna’s AT- 8.
The second military aeroplane that Beech designed and built during the war was the remarkable 1944 Beech XA- 38 “Grizzly”, an experimental twin- engine ground attack ghter of which only two prototypes were con­structed. “Grizzly” was a completely original design cre­ated in response to the USAAF’s requirement for a replace-
ment for the Douglas A- 20 “Havoc” which by 1944 was
long past showing its age “Grizzly” was powered by two 2,300 hp Wright R- 3350- 43 air- cooled radial engines. Unfortunately these engines were already in use by Boeing B- 29 Superfortress which had the highest priority for them.
In early 1944 an invasion of Japan was deemed to be likely and the USAAF wanted a fast, powerful and lethal ground attack aeroplane which could be employed to neutralize
Japanese fortied ground installations and artillery. For this
purpose Beech designed XA- 38 around the most powerful engines available (or unavailable as it turned out) install­ing a 75 mm cannon in its nose as the aeroplane’s primary
weapon in the same fashion as North American B- 25G/H
“Mitchell.” “Grizzly” also had two remotely operated
machine gun turrets similar to those in B- 17, P- 61, B- 29, Me- 210 and He- 177A. With a total 4,600 hp, it had a blister-
ing top speed of 370 mph at sea level, faster than most of the
Japanese ghters that it was likely to encounter. Although
the war ended before XA- 38 “Grizzly” could go into pro­duction and prove its worth in combat, it was, in its day, an extraordinary and unmatched achievement in design and sophisticated construction technique for what had previ­ously been a light aeroplane company. Beech’s production of both Model 18 and “Grizzly” set the stage for another aeronautical achievement still to come.
The extraordinarily prolic Beech Model 18 “Twin Beech” was produced in 25 USAAF variants, 14 U. S. Navy (USN)/U.
S. Marine Corps (USMC) variants and 9 RAF and RCAF vari­ants as well as being in operation in 43 foreign air forces. But for this versatile and excellently performing modern aircraft Beech might have continued to produce only its
19 46 Taylorcr a BC- 1 2D. C. G. Taylor’s clean design made BC-
12DA a slight refine ment of his 1938 Model “BC,” whic h was itself a refinement of the 1938 Piper J- 3 “Cub.” BC- 12 has dua l control wheel s instead of control columns and a d oor on each side of the cabin for easy entr ance and exit. Whilst Taylorcr a’s side- by- si de seating is better for instr uction as well as for pilot- passenger communic ation in general, these a eroplanes are not very wi de and their snug interiors are insuicient for two “full- sized” adults.
19 47 Stinson 108- 2 “Station Wagon.” A roomy four- seater,
interio r wood panels and a r einforced floor permit 6 00lb (272kg) of bagga ge to be carried in t he passenger compartment. It s 165 hp Franklin 6A4- 165- B3 engine ca n use automotive fuel with th e installation of a converter k it. The Stinson’s wings’ fixed leading­edge slat s make the 108 seri es excellent and re liable slow flier s, enabling them to easily get into and o ut of small tree- lined fields.
19 47 Aeronca “Champ.” Another ref inement of the J - 3 “Cub”
design with similar t andem seating an d similar perfo rmance. Solo from the f ront seat is a definite improvement over “C ub’s” rear seat solo station a nd “Champ’s” large wind ows make visibilit y in all directions much better. Having had a number of hour s in a “Champ,” this wr iter has found this respons ive and sprightl y aeroplane to be the b est of the lot of this t ype.
19 47 Luscombe 8A “Sil vaire” on float s. Rather fast f or its 65 hp
engine wi th a top airspeed of 85 mph or so, the aerop lane in the photo is identical to t he “Silvaire” in which this writer firs t received instr uction and lear ned to fly the age of 1 2. Luscombe “Silvaire” has dual control sticks rath er than control wheels making it a ver y fun and responsive aeroplane.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
9
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
Ryan (originally Nor th American L- 145 ) Navion B Super 26 0 C-
FCTI. It i s not merely a coincidence that airfra me of this excellent four- seat aeroplane is reminiscent of P- 51 “Mus tang” upon which it s design was base d. Introduced in 1948, the retra ctable tricycle undercarriage Navion is powerful and fast . 260 hp Navion variants have a useful load of 920 lbs, a top airspeed of 175 mph, can car ry four pass engers in comfor t over a range of 595 miles , take- o  in 400 feet and la nd in 466 feet. Navion was Bonanz a’s closes t rival in the late 19 40’s and during th e 1950s, outperforming Bonanz a in many ways. Celeb rities Veronic a Lake, Ar thur Godfrey, Mickey Roone y and Bill Cullen were among those wh o owned and flew Navions. Many are still f lying and whilst oering something of an awkward climb to ente r they are conside red to be a great barg ain on the used aer oplane market. Photo by Barry Gr iiths.
Piper Pa- 2 2 “Tri- Pacer.” Introduced in February 1951, this
comfor table four- s eat aeroplane is e ssentially a Pip er PA- 20 “Pacer ” with a nose wheel . Although rather a throwb ack with its fab ric- cover ed aluminium fram e and stodgy app earance (derisively nicknamed “Fly ing Milk Stool,”) 160 hp ver sions of this fine aeroplane give it us eful load of 890 lbs, a top airs peed of 141 mph, an 800 fpm climb rate and a range of 650 miles, all with four 170 lb passengers on board. This writer ha s enjoyed many pleasant hours f lying Tri- Pacers as well a s its two- seat version, PA- 22- 108 “Colt .” Tri- Pacer was introduced six years ahea d of its chi ef tricycle- undercarriage riv al, the all- metal Cessna
172. As good as Tri- Pacer was and is, it has neve r been serious competition for Bonanza. A John Marco photograph
fabric- covered “Staggerwing” bi- plane as it had before
the war. As it was, Beech produced 16 variants of Model 17 “Staggerwing” for the USAAF, the USN/USMC and for fteen foreign air forces. However, it was Beech’s mass production
of the sophisticated Model 18 “Twin Beech” which consid­erably informed the company regarding modern metal con­struction methods and gave it otherwise unobtainable and invaluable experience regarding the construction and pro­duction of complex all- metal aircraft. This precious experi­ence gave Beech a great advantage over virtually all of the other U. S. light aircraft manufacturers when it conceived and designed Model 35 “Bonanza” in 1944.
Whilst Model 18 was a great success, the production of which continued until 1970 with more than 9,000 ultimately produced, Walter Beech and his sta had been optimisti­cally looking toward the post- war civilian aviation world to come. The plan they developed was to produce a high­performance, luxury, all- metal, four seat, single- engine light executive aeroplane that would be relatively simple
and ecient to operate.
Except for Cessna’s AT- 8/AT- 17/UC- 78/JRC “Bobcat”/ “Crane” primarily wooden “Bamboo Bomber” bomber trainers during the war, the other light aeroplane manu-
facturers primarily produced only slightly modied military
versions of what they had been producing before, i.e., light, low- powered, two- seat, “low and slow” fabric- covered aeroplanes.
Piper produced O- 59/L- 4, the military version of its
“Cub” and few glider trainers. Stinson produced a military
version of its 105 “Voyager’ designated L- 5 “Sentinel,” a
military version of its pre- war SR- 10 “Reliant,” designated
UC- 81, as well as Model 74/L- 1 “Vigilant,” a larger, more
powerful light observation aeroplane. Aeronca produced a military version of its tandem- seat trainer, “Champ.” des-
ignated O- 58/L- 3 “Defender” and like Piper, a number of
glider trainers. Taylorcraft produce a military version of its
Model D, designated O- 57/L- 2.
After the war these manufacturers made few if any modi-
cations to their aeroplanes and those which simply were
essentially their early 1940s designs were put back onto the market. Photographs on Page 9 show some of Beech’s
“competition” were oering in the post- war, late 1940s:
Of course, more powerful and sophisticated aeroplanes
such as Cessna 190/195 (see further discussion of this aero-
plane below,) Ryan Navion, Piper Tri- Pacer, Cessna 172
and Bellanca 14- 19 would soon be produced; however, until Piper’s 1958 PA- 24 “Comanche 250,” nothing came close to ousting Bonanza from its position at the top of the heap.
“I SEE A NEW SUN UP IN A NEW SKY”2
It is an oft- told tale that by the end of W.W. II, U. S. light aeroplane manufacturers, all of whom had been forced to curtail their usual retail businesses during the war to supply aircraft for the armed services, looked forward with anxious
hearts and open coers to the soon- to- come peace during
which they hoped and believed that the tens of thousands of returning military pilots, having experienced the “joy”
of ight, would wish to continue the same and would gladly
purchase low- priced, simple aeroplanes by the bushel- full.
The Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944, popularly
3
10
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
known as the “G. I. Bill,” designed and largely drafted by
the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars, was
a Federal entitlement program which provided a range of
nancial benets, including free ight instruction all the
way to an Airline Transport Rating, for returning WWII vet­erans. Aircraft manufacturers were all quite aware of this and they saw it as a boost to what they believed would be a glorious new, commercially lucrative general aviation boom.
The aeroplanes that they had been producing before being interrupted by the war - Piper J- 3 “Cubs”, Taylorcrafts. Stinsons and the like would be just perfect, or so they thought. What was not spoken of if it was thought of at all was that immediately after the end of the war a tremendous glut of surplus “grasshoppers” (all of those high- wing, low powered, mostly two- seat aircraft) would be oered as sur­plus to the public at very low prices. For instance, in 1945
the Oce of Price Administration (OPA) made surplus two­seat Aeronca L- 3B “Champs” in virtually unused condition available for $1,788.00 ($19,963.94 in 2018 at a cumulative rate of ination of 1,016.6%) and four- seat Stinson UC- 81/ AT- 19 “Reliants” available for $6,736.00 ($75,210.91 in 2018 at the same rate of ination.)
However, Walter Beech and his sta had a completely dierent view of what Beech’s role would ideally be in the
post- war future. Their experience with light aircraft had solely been with Model 17 “Staggerwing”, a fairly large and expensive executive aeroplane. Beech’s plan was that its
new post- war aeroplane would well- t this role.
In 1945 and for a decade and a half thereafter, the now-
familiar culture of the casual weekend pilot who usually ies
locally in good weather with friends and family to sight­see and perchance to purchase a few of those $100 dollar
hamburgers at a far- o little airport’s snack bar, the vast majority of whom have little ight time and are not instru-
ment (IFR) rated, did not yet exist. Accordingly, once plans for what became Bonanza began to develop, an important aspect of this aeroplane’s design was that it did not include compromises which would make it especially forgiving or gentle- ying, particularly not at the expense of perfor­mance. Thus, Bonanza was not intended to cater to the aforementioned not- yet- existent culture of casual pilots. Rather, it was designed to be a business tool, an executive transport aeroplane which would be owned by success-
ful businesses and own by professional pilots who would
transport those executives who required quick, private and convenient transportation to places that were too distant or
inconvenient for ecient ground travel. Oh yes, and lest we
forget, Bonanza was also intended to be an exclusive, con-
spicuous totem of nancial accomplishment.
Since its introduction in 1936, and into the early 1940s,
Walter Beech and Co. had been well and painfully aware of their greatest competitor in the corporate aviation genre: Spartan Aircraft Company’s 7W “Executive.” This highly advanced aeroplane is a sleek and muscular- looking, all­metal, retractable undercarriage, low- wing monoplane which exhibited spectacular performance for its time, with a top airspeed of 257 mph (223 knots, 414 km/h) whilst
19 49 Bellanca 14- 19 “Cruis emaster.” An upgrade of the pre - war
Bellanca 14- 7 an d the post- w ar Bellanca 14- 13, 14- 19 has a large, comfor table cabin for four and is powered by a Fran klin 6A4- 335- B3 190 hp engine. “Cruisemaster’s” triple tail and its wooden wing garnered it the nickname “Cardboard Constellation” aer Lockheed’s “Constellation.” However, like Lockheed’s triple- tail marvel, “Cruise master’s” per formance was in many ways bet ter than its similar contemporarie s, including Bonanza, with a u seful load of 1,02 5 lbs, a top airspeed of 174 mph, a rate of climb of 1,2 50 fpm and a fully­loaded r ange of 435 miles. A t ailwheel aeroplane with r etractable main underc arriage in the new t ricycle under carriage world, its ret ro wood and fabr ic construc tion and undeniab ly quirky appearance did not aid its over all public accept ance. Whilst in 19 59 14- 1 9 would be converted to a retra ctable tric ycle undercarriage by “Dow ner Aircra” (B ellanca’s new name, ) only around 600 of the original 14- 19 “Cruisem asters” were produce d. Whilst in many ways “Cruisemaster ” is a better- perfor ming aeroplane, Bonanza remained unchallenged.
Cessna 172. Introduced in 1 956, it was the direct competitor of Pip er
Tri- P acer. All metal and looking far more moder n than Tri- Pacer, C- 172 is a Cessna 170 with a nose wheel. Despite its sleek appe arance, C- 172 does not p erform as well as Tri- Pacer in many areas. 160 hp ver sions of C- 172 give it a useful loa d of only 758 lbs, a top airspeed of 140 mph, a rate of climb of 721 fpm an d a possible range of 696 miles , but with only two rather slim passengers on board. Ces sna 172 might have well­compete d with Tri- Pace r but it, too, was no competiti on for Bonanza.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
11
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
Spartan 7W “E xecutive.” The name says it all. Sleek, modern, powerful and sensual, this was top shelf, first- class personal transportation for the supe r- r ich corporate executive in the mid 1930s an d early 1940s. Photo fro m Flickr.
Restor ed Spartan 7 W “Execu tive” previously owned by Texaco, Inc. in t he late 1930s.
comfortably carrying up to four with a range of 1,000 miles. Spartan “Executive” boasted such notable owners as indus­trialist and lm mogul Howard Hughes, oil magnate, nan­cial wizard and overall S. O. B., J. Paul Getty, and no less
than His Royal Highness, King Ghazi of Iraq. To Beech’s chagrin, from its rst appearance Spartan “Executive” was
universally considered to be the “Rolls- Royce” of pre- war executive aeroplanes which even Walter Beech would have had to reluctantly admit, deservedly so.
Compared to the potent and swift- looking Spartan 7W
“Executive,” Beech’s contemporary Model 17’s top speed
is 45 mph slower and its range of 670 miles is 330 miles
less. Walter Beech had to admit, at least inwardly, that his Model 17, while an excellent aeroplane in its own right, was clearly and eminently inferior to Spartan 7W. To make mat­ters even worse for Beech, both Model 17 and Spartan 7W
were powered by the same Pratt & Whitney R- 985- AN- 1
“Wasp Junior” radial engine producing 450 hp (340 kW) at 2,300 rpm.
Whilst Model 17 was attractive to the military in small batches during the war and each of fourteen foreign nations operated a scant few of them, Model 17 never arose to the level of a truly mass- produced aeroplane with a total of only 785 examples having been produced from 1933 to 1949.
Spartan 7W was in production for only ve years (1936 to
1940) and only 34 examples were produced; however, 7W’s spectacular, striking appearance and blazing performance epitomised the value of the practical application of advanced aerodynamics, modern construction methods and materials and the latest concepts in aeronautical structural engineer­ing in the arena of executive aircraft. While no- doubt pain­ful, this lesson was not lost on Walter Beech, who would soon put it to good use.
To be fair, Model 17 “Staggerwing” is a unique and extraor­dinary design particularly for a biplane, and it is certainly impressive to the eye (many consider “Staggerwing” to be the most beautiful biplane ever built.) Despite its inherent disabilities, the extra wing along with the struts and wires required to keep it in place, “Staggerwing” performed very well indeed. However, aside from its inferior overall perfor­mance compared to Spartan 7W whilst powered by the same engine, “Staggerwing” was also very costly to build and delicate to maintain. Its old- school wood and steel- tube construction with thousands of intricate structural parts and connectors covered by stitched and doped fabric, the entirety of which must be meticulously assembled by many skilled hands, was highly labour- intensive (i.e., expensive) to construct. Additionally, “Staggerwing” and all fabric­covered aeroplanes’ owners always have a terrible “Sword of Damocles” hanging over them in the form of an inevita­ble and expensive re- covering and paint job awaiting them in the future. Altogether, it is no wonder that by mid- war Beech was beginning to have serious thoughts about a more
modern, more ecient and less complicated replacement
for Model 17.
Walter Beech, a man of a considerably forceful person­ality was, to his credit, not at all hidebound to the past or by traditional methods of building aeroplanes. Additionally, he was determined that his “star” aeroplane would never again be so outperformed as had been Model 17. In January 1945, with the war still raging all around the world but with imminent peace and a bright, shimmering future clearly in sight, Beech, unlike virtually every other light general aviation aeroplane manufacturer, began to draw plans for something entirely new that would be an icon for and of that bright future.
12
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
Rolled ou t of the factor y on 9 September 1940, this was the last Spar tan 7W, later calle d “Mrs. Mennen.” It was originally purchased by Texaco, Inc. (now a subsidia ry of Chevron Corporation) for corporate use in the New York State/N ew England area. This magnificent aeroplane cost $26 ,200.40 in 19 40 ($467,029.62 in 2018 at a cumulati ve rate of inflatio n of 1,682.5%) and was o ne of five Spartan 7Ws owned by Texaco, who based this aircra at Roosevelt Field lo cated in Mineola (now Garden City), New York.
This aeroplane was p urchased by Geo rge Mennen of the Menne n Company, Morris town, New Jersey in the sp ring of 1969. It was then painted “M ennen Green” and named “Mrs. Mennen .” “Mrs. Mennen” was so ld, traded and bought by m any dierent owne rs over the years unt il it was purchase d in October 200 4 by Will Mennen, George Mennen’s grandson.
“A BUILT- IN TAILWIND”
Walter Beech wanted his new aeroplane to set the standard for quality and performance. It was to be something not yet
seen, something that one might to y into the future.
He told his design sta to come up with something not
merely of 1945, but of 1955 and 1965 - and beyond. It had
to be a sleek, clean design, all- metal, simple (inexpensive) to build, look sexy, go fast, carry four in comfort and have a range of around 700 miles. These factors were imperative if Beech was going to lead the post- war pack and attract wealthy corporate customers.
It is well to recall that in 1945, as Walter Beech and his team’s ideas for a new light aeroplane were accumulat­ing, the current stars of aviation were all- metal, single-
engine, retractable undercarriage piston- engine ght­ers – Mustangs, Corsairs, Spitres, etc. These powerful,
sleek aeroplanes appeared fast even when sitting still and they made the blood rush and the imagination soar just to look upon them. Beech was determined that his new aero-
plane would be just like that. He wanted to build a high-
performance, light executive transport aeroplane with, as he put it, “a built- in tailwind.”
At Walter Beech’s behest, Ted Wells, Beech’s Vice­President of Engineering who had been instrumental in the design of both the Model 17 “Staggerwing” and Model 18 “Twin Beech,” together with project engineer Ralph
Harman, set about the task of putting together a team of
creative aircraft designers. Their mission was to design an entirely new single- engine aeroplane not only for the post­war era, but for decades to come. Such an aeroplane had also
been Harman’s dream and he was highly delighted to have
the opportunity to be able to make it a reality.
It is reported that Beech’s employees and company ocers
were extremely optimistic about Beech’s future given its wartime experiences building powerful and sophisticated all- metal aeroplanes. They rightly felt that they had a sig­nicant “leg- up” on their competition and they were anx­ious and ready to prove what they could do.
The design of what was to become “Bonanza” was very
much a team eort. Ralph Harmon was the overall Project
Engineer, also taking on responsibility for the design of the interior and undercarriage. Jerry Gordon, Beech’s Chief of Aerodynamics, created the shape of the wing and tail sur­faces. Wilson Erhart designed the interior structure of the
wings. Alex Oderse designed the fuselage. Noel Naideno
designed the fuel system and engine compartment. It is a great compliment to the skills of these engineers that Bonanza ultimately appeared to be the conception of a single brilliant individual rather than the product of a com­mittee that it was.
No doubt greatly inuenced by Beech’s past success with
Model 17 as well as the success of rival Spartan Corporation, Walter Beech decided from the outset not to include a trainer or low- cost cruiser in Beech’s post- war menu.
4
That eld, it was thought, would soon be overlled with “Cubs”, “Champs” and the like. No, Beech’s new aeroplane was to
be aimed solely at the highest end of the light general avia­tion aeroplane market. It was to be more than a means of transportation; it was to be an objet de prestige like a Rolex or a Rolls- Royce, something literally exclusive which only the
wealthiest could aord to obtain, the possession of which
would openly attest to the owner’s prosperity, sophistica­tion and good taste.
As mentioned, Walter Beech was known to be a very for-
ward character in both his conceptions and his mode of
expression. Who else but such a very condent “Type A”
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
13
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
individual would plan for his company to enter a new and unknown aviation market with the most advanced and
expensive aeroplane of the lot? Whilst Beechcraft would eventually see the ecacy of producing less sophisticated and less expensive aircraft (see endnote 4,) this rst post­war Beech was intended to come out of the box rmly sit­ting atop of the aviation mountain, condently and reso-
lutely daring all comers to topple it. As history has shown,
despite a most valiant but ultimately failed eort by Piper
to do just that with its superb PA- 24 “Comanche,” no aero­plane, so far, has quite been able to do so.
WHY “BONANZA”?5
In Walter Beech’s own words in 1946, “Airplanes have been named after stars, galaxies, constellations, animals, sh,
birds, and natural phenomena such as hurricanes, lightning and thunderbolts. For our new Model 35, Beech Aircraft has
sought to nd a name that would be descriptive of the extra value oered in the way of economy, performance, and
pleasure to the owner. We examined the word ‘Bonanza’, which in English has a common meaning of a rich source of
prot or gain or an unusual value.”
Whilst there is no evidence to the contrary that Mr. Beech sincerely intended that owners of his new aeroplane would feel that they had indeed purchased a “bonanza”, I think that we may be forgiven if we strongly suspect that he sincerely intended that his new aeroplane would be a “bonanza” for Beech Aircraft as well – and so it has been on both counts.
Additionally, Mr. Beech said, “We found that it (‘bonanza’) ... also has an additional meaning of ‘fair weather’ in cer­tain foreign languages.”
In Spanish and Portuguese, “bonanza” means prosperity, success and fair weather;
In French, “bonance” means calm, tranquil and smooth seas.
In Italian, “bonaccia” means prosperity, calmness and tranquillity.
elevator at its trailing edge, often split into left and right horizontal stabilizer/elevator units acting in unison, one on each side of the rearmost end of the fuselage. Accordingly, the position of the rudder aects the yaw axis and is con­trolled by the pilot by pushing the left (left yaw) or right (right yaw) rudder pedals in the cockpit. The position of the
elevator aects the pitch axis and is controlled by the pilot
by either pushing (nose down) or pulling (nose up) a control stick or a yoke. Conventional rudder and elevator control surfaces are completely independent of each other.
On a “V”- tailed aeroplane, however, the rudder and ele­vator are not separate and independent control surfaces. Instead, the moveable control surfaces at the trailing edge of the two tail surfaces, the ruddevators, act just as the name indicates, each one controlling both the yaw and pitch axes simultaneously. A fairly complex system of rigging the
ruddervators permits a pilot to y a “V”- tailed aeroplane exactly as he or she ies a conventional- tailed aeroplane
using normal rudder pedals and control stick/yoke inputs.
Note: What follows is a description of the operation of an
aeroplane’s movable control surfaces where these surfaces are located at the rear of the aeroplane and does not apply to aircraft with elevators ahead of the wing (canard) or air­craft equipped with elevons or ailevators (elevator and aile­ron operating in a single control surface as found on many “Delta” winged aircraft).
ELEVATOR/PITCH CONTROL
The following drawings show the control surface move­ments and tail forces for “V”- tailed aircraft when the stick/ yoke and rudder pedals are operated as viewed from the rear.
As shown, because the control surfaces are oset from
horizontal and vertical, the forces created when the rudder-
vators are displaced are similarly oset.
THE “V”
During WWII, as aeronautical engineers in Great Britain and the United States began to think about how the airspeed of currently operational aircraft might be increased, the idea of using a “V”- tail as a replacement for a conventional tail arrangement was raised. “V’- tail was not, however, a new concept at that time.
The rst “V” or “Buttery” tail surface arrangement (an
aircraft tail- surface conguration combining rudders and
elevators into two, single control surfaces called “rudder­vators” was invented and patented in 1930 (Patent Polksi #
115938) by Polish pilot and aeronautical/aerospace engineer Jerzy Rudlicki (14 March 1893 – 18 August 1977.)
(For the purpose of this discussion, the term “rudder­vator” will refer to each separate “V” surface as well as to the hinged, movable control surfaces at their trailing edges)
A conventional- tailed aeroplane has one or more vertical ns with a hinged, movable rudder(s) at its (their) trail­ing edge and a horizontal stabilizer with a hinged movable
14
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
1. When the yoke is pushed forward to lower the nose, the ruddervators move downward as does a conventional elevator
control surface. However, they
also necessarily create additional forces which push and pull to each side (yaw axis) as well.
Each ruddervator osets the
other’s yaw force, but because of the dual direction of forces created by ruddevators, they are functionally less aerodynami-
cally ecient than a similarly
sized and displaced horizon­tal control surface. Accordingly, rudddervators must be larger and/or be displaced farther than a conventional horizontal ele­vator surface to create an equal force in the pitch axis.
“V”- tail mixing linkage: The blue section shown is the fuselage’s rearmo st end looking up from under neath. There are t wo rods exten ding o to the le of this photogra ph that connect to t he actual rudder vators. Rightward motion of the top rod (due to either r ightward motion of the ent ire mixer assembly due to a pitch command, or cloc kwise rotation of the ass embly due to a yaw comman d) will deflect the rudd ervator one directio n; lewa rd motion will def lect it the othe r direction. This is the sam e for the other rudd ervator similarly conne cted past the b ottom of the photo graph. Simple, eh?
2. When the yoke is pulled rearward to raise the nose, the ruddervators move upward as
does a conventional elevator control surface. However, they
also create additional forces which push and pull to each
side as well, as described above. The ineciency caused by the oset forces is similar to when the ruddervators are
pushed downward.
3. When the right rudder pedal is pushed to yaw the nose to the right the ruddevators both move to the right. In order for the left ruddervator to move to the right it must also move upward creating an additional nose up force, and when the right ruddervator moves to the right it must also move downward creating an additional downward pitch force. The ruddervators’ up and down pitch forces cancel each other out so that only a right yawing force is created. The canceled- out upward and downward forces create inef-
ciency as stated above.
4. When the left rudder pedal is pushed to yaw the nose to the left, the ruddevators both move to the left. In order for the left ruddervator to move to the left it must also move downward creating an additional nose down force, and when the right ruddervator moves to the left it must also move upward creating an additional nose up force. Each of the ruddervators’ up and downward pitch forces cancel each other out so that only a left yawing force is created. The canceled- out upward and downward forces create ine­ciency as stated above.
5. When both the yoke and either rudder pedal are moved a combination of the above control surface movements is cre­ated so that the nose may be raised or lowered while simul­taneously yawing the nose to the left or right as desired.
As you may imagine, the linkages required to move the ruddervators to comply with the exact forces which a pilot may require are quite complicated.
On a “V”- tail Bonanza, with full up elevator and with no
rudder input, the left rudderva­tor is displaced 22½º upward. With full right rudder and with the elevator neutral, the left ruddervator is displaced 23º upward, and with full up eleva­tor and with right rudder simul­taneously, the left ruddervator is displaced 44º upward. By con­trast, the elevator of the con-
ventional tail of an A36 Bonanza
is limited to 23º upward and 20º downward displacement, while the rudder is limited to 25º left or right displacement.
“V”- TAIL DISADVANTAGES:
■ Weight
While Bonanza’s “V”- tail is leg­endary, the myriad aeronautical claims that Beech has perenni­ally made for it do not entirely or even partially live up to that
legend. Bonanza’s “V”- tail is not lighter than a conventional tail arrangement as the two ruddervators must each be larger than any of the three con­ventional tail surfaces. Because the control force of the two ruddervators must equal the control force of the conven­tional three- surface design, the two ruddervators, in sum, must have approximately equal or greater area because of
“V”- tail’s aerodynamic ineciencies when compared to a
conventional tail. Additionally, the complex control linkage of the “V”- tail arrangement is heavier than the far simpler conventional- tail linkage and is located at the most rear-
ward position. For example, a 1968 E33A Debonair, which is virtually identical to a similarly equipped 1968 V35A “V”-
tail Bonanza except for the tail surfaces, is 45 lbs lighter than V35A. However, this is not the total story of the disad­vantages of the “V.”
■ Greater interference drag
NACA wind- tunnel studies of the generic “V”- tail design
have found that a small amount of interference drag is reduced by the reduction of one intersection of tail surfaces
(two instead of three.) However, what small advantage may
be gained thereby is virtually eliminated by the increase of interference drag created at the proximate inside surfaces of the “V” surfaces where they are attached to the aft fuselage. Interference drag caused by the proximity of the inside base of each “V” surface occurs in this manner: Air molecules moving past the lower inside surfaces of the ruddervators become commingled and disorganized creating a disturbed
airow which creates interference drag.
■ Greater induced drag
In order to ensure pitch stability, the aft pitch controlling surfaces of any aeroplane must be set at such a positive
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
15
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
(nose up) incidence when the elevator is neutral that suf-
cient “decalage” (also known as “horizontal dihedral”) is
created relative to the wing’s angle of incidence. The non-
horizontal ruddervators, when at neutral, are less ecient in creating sucient decalage than a conventional horizon-
tal stabilizer/elevator and therefore must be set at a greater positive incidence. Being at greater incidence puts each of the ruddervators under a greater positive aerodynamic load at all times and thereby creates greater induced drag (drag which occurs whenever an aeroplane’s wing and/or tail sur­faces positively redirect the oncoming airow) than are cre­ated by conventional horizontal surfaces.
Additionally, in Bonanza, the right ruddervator is oset a
few degrees more to the right than the left ruddervator to
counter P- factor, also called “asymmetric blade eect” and “asymmetric disc eect” (relocation of a spinning propel-
ler’s centre of thrust when the propeller disc is at a positive angle of attack [Alpha] which in a right hand- turning pro­peller exerts a left yawing moment on the aircraft and vice
versa). To reiterate, because each ruddervator is oset from
vertical, they must be set at a greater degree to the right to counter P- eect than a conventional single n/rudder sur­face would need to be to exert the same force.
■ Form/pressure drag
In order to preserve pitch and yaw stability as well as to
grant ecient control displacement forces, the wetted area
(the area exposed to the oncoming air) of the ruddervators must be roughly equal to that of conventional tail surfaces. Accordingly, each of the “V” surfaces must be larger both in chord and/or span than that of equally- eective conven­tional tail surfaces. Accordingly, the ruddervators’ wetted area produces form/pressure drag equal to or greater than that produced by conventional tail surfaces.
■ Yaw/Roll Instability or “Dutch Roll”
Properly applied, a small amount of dihedral creates a stabi­lising force in a wing or horizontal tail surface so that when it is displaced in the roll axis by turbulence, a gust of wind or after the aircraft is deliberately banked, it will tend to
return to level ight. However, when tail surfaces are radi­cally oset upward (as in a “V”- tail,) a very strong dihedral
force is created at the rear of the aeroplane.
Some aircraft are designed with some amount of horizon-
tal tail surface dihedral to increase roll- axis stability. Less
commonly, some aircraft are designed with some negative (downward) horizontal tail surface dihedral, called “anhe­dral” or “cathedral,” to decrease what is considered to be an excess of roll- axis stability. It is understood that extreme dihedral (or extreme sweepback) tends to instigate a con­dition called “Dutch Roll,” a series of out- of- phase turns in which an aeroplane tends to roll from side to side whilst also yawing in the opposite direction of the roll and not
remaining at or returning to level ight without engaging
a yaw and/or pitch damper, an auto pilot and/or the pilot’s corrective control input.
Accordingly, Bonanza’s 30º- 33º ruddervators tend to
cause Dutch Roll at the rear of the aeroplane, which has been reported to cause both yaw and pitch “wandering” and pitch “seeking” at cruise airspeeds.
ADVANTAGES:
■ Airspeed?
Beech’s claim that a “V”- tail design suciently reduces
drag so that it increases the aircraft’s airspeed as com­pared to the same aircraft with a conventional tail has been shown not to be so. If any such advantage exists at all, it is de minimus at best. Even Beech (which some have claimed has not always been known to have played entirely fairly with regard to its aeroplanes’ published airspeed speci­cations) lists the cruising airspeeds of the last “V”- tail Bonanza, V35B, as being the same (172 knots) as an equally powered F33A (a conventionally- tailed Bonanza.)
■ Appearance
Many would agree that the undisputed advantage that a “V”- tail has over a conventional tail is its appearance. It is certainly eye- catching and unless the truth of the matter is known to the observer, a “V”- tail appears to be cleaner and
more ecient. Beechcraft apparently heavily relied upon this erroneous assumption and armatively added to it for
decades in order to generate Bonanza sales. As stated before, despite its exotic appearance and appeal, the “V”- tail actu­ally does not improve aircraft performance in any measur­able amount as compared to a conventional tail.
A RARELY ADOPTED TAIL DESIGN
There are so many ineciencies and control rigging com­plications involved with the “V”- tail design that it is not a surprise that it has been so rarely used.
Whilst at least 15 jet engine- powered military aero­planes and at least one helicopter incorporating a “V”- tail are known to exist at this time (2018,) the only piston-
engine ghter known to have been built with a “V”- tail is the experimental Bell P- 63A- 8 “Kingcobra”. This one- o aeroplane was a test bed to nd out if such a tail congu-
ration might increase the top airspeed of the already quite
fast P- 63D “Kingcobra”. Powered by an Allison V- 1710- 109
engine producing 1,425 hp and with a top airspeed of 437 mph at 30,000 feet (on par with P- 51 “Mustang’ and P- 47
“Thunderbolt”), P- 63A- 8 was already ying nearly as fast as a propeller- driven ghter could be made to y. This P- 63D was so modied and was designated P- 63A- 8. It
broke up during diving tests before it could be determined whether the substitution of the “V”- tail produced less drag than the conventional tail surface arrangement and accord­ingly produced any increase of airspeed. It is not reported
whether the “V”- tail was the cause of P- 63A- 8’s in- ight
breakup but speculation thereof abounds. Experiments with “V”- tails were not made thereafter.
In 1944 Beech built an interesting experimental Model 18 “Twin Beech” designated A- 19 on the airframe of a USAAF A- 10 “Wichita.” A large “V”- tail was substituted for the conventional tail surfaces. Extensive stability and control
16
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
1944 Beech built a one- o A- 19, wh ich was a USAAF A- 10 “Wichita” with an exper imental “V”- tail . A- 19 was the first and la rgest Beech aircra to that date with such. At the time, many might have won dered why Beec h was experime nting with a “V”- tail . Time would soon s olve that myster y. A- 19 would cert ainly be a challenging subjec t for a “can you name this aeroplane” contest. USA AF archive photo, circa 194 4.
19 48 Beech Mod el 34
“Twin- Quad”
Bell P- 63A- 8 (also
designated RP- 6 3G). This one­o experimental aeropla ne was base d upon the basic airfr ame and engine of P- 63D “Kingcob ra” which usually ha s a bubble canopy in place of P- 39 “Airacobra’s” automotive­style doors. However, P- 63A- 8 retained the old- style doo rs, possib ly to ensure a safer emergency in- flight exit.
Eclipse Aviati on 400. If you’re going to put a single
jet engine on top of the f uselage a “V”- tail s eems like your bes t, if not your only be t.
Rob in ATL Beyond a ppearance, the re seems to
be no real need for a “ V”- tail in this design . As can be seen , the rudder vators are so large that they are surel y as heavy and pro duce as much drag as a conventional cruciform tail.
H- 101 Salto aerobatic sailpl ane. Here, the “V”- tail
makes some sense. Without t he need to oset a spinning propeller’s P- Factor, the ruddervators can be smalle r (as they clearly are in this design) than on a propeller- driven aircra, and accordingly may, in fact , be lighter and les s drag- producing th an a conventi onal tail would be.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
17
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
1947 Beech Model 35 Bonanz a prototype version 4 of the 5 Bonanza air frames which Beech built and tested . Version 4 was submitted to ob tain Model 35’s cert ificate and was e xtensively f light tested, including a dive test to 2 86 mph in the manner in which military aircra of that era were tested. This very a eroplane is pictured in num erous Beech promotional advertisements and, as usual regarding such promotions, Beech populated it with the sma llest people i t could find in order to make its cabin appear more capacious.
In March 19 49, Bonanza prototype ve rsion 4, named “Waikiki Be ech” and piloted by C aptain William Odom, flew from Honolulu, Hawaii to Teterboro, New Jerse y, establishing the existing non- stop long­distan ce record for light ge neral aviation a ircra of 4,957 miles. Bet ween 7 Octobe r 1951 and 27 January 1952, Congressman Peter F. Mack, Jr. comp leted a solo, eas terly around the world flight from an d back to Spring field, Illinois in this sam e aeroplane, which he named “Friendship Flame,” flying 33,789 miles in 223 hours (113 days) an d stopping at 45 citi es in 35 countries.
tests were made, the ndings of which were that the “V”
empennage was altogether satisfactory. These tests con­tinued into 1945 and provided valuable information for the design of the “V”- tail Model 35 “Bonanza.”
With its strange appearance and confusing name, Beech produced “Twin- Quad” to meet the newly re- born post­war need for short- haul airline transport aircraft. Quite innovative, its name comes from its four air- cooled, eight
cylinder horizontally opposed Lycoming GSO- 580 (GSO
denoting Geared Supercharged and Opposed engines,) each producing 400 hp at 3,300 rpm. Two engines are mounted inside each wing, each pair of engines driving a single pro­peller through a gear- box. Model 34’s enormous “V”- tail,
while visually fascinating, was somewhat o- putting to
conservative airline purchasing executives in 1948, many of
whom thought that passengers might balk at ying in such
a curious- looking contraption.
Whilst timing may not be everything, it is a very important thing. With spacious seating for 20 and/or cargo, excellent performance (top airspeed of 240 mph and a fully- loaded
range of 1,456 miles,) Beech 34 fell victim to the post- war
era’s enormous military surplus of similar aircraft such as the larger and ubiquitous Douglas DC- 3/C- 47 “Skytrain,”
Lockheed’s rugged and better performing Model 18/C- 60 Lodestar, as well as, ironically, Beechcraft’s own smaller
Model 18. In the face of this formidable array of relatively inexpensive and readily available surplus aircraft, Model 34 was ultimately not a viable alternative.
These aeroplanes aside, a few light aeroplanes have adopted the “V”- tail. Some of these are: Eclipse Aviation
400, a single engine, four- seat light jet; Robin ATL, a single piston- engine, two- seat Avion Très Léger (“Very Light Aircraft,”) and H- 101 Salto, a single- seat aerobatic pure
sailplane (no engine).
TO “V” OR NOT TO “V?”
When designing Bonanza, Beech’s engineers considered
both a conventional and a “V”- tail until Beech aerodynami­cist Jerry Gordon convinced the rest of the team that a “V”­tail, such as had been successfully installed on the experi­mental A- 19 variant of Model 18 (see above,) would save weight and reduce drag by eliminating an entire surface and might possibly be helpful regarding spin prevention and recovery. Unfortunately, none of Mr. Gordon’s speculative claims for Bonanza’s “V”- tail turned out to have any basis in reality. Whatever Walter Beech may have thought of the
“V”- tail’s aerodynamic benets, he was most enthusiastic about it for aesthetic and commercial reasons. He correctly
understood that even if the “V”- tail did nothing at all about improving performance, it certainly made Bonanza the most distinctive light general aviation aeroplane in the world. So it was and so it remains.
BONANZA’S GRAND DESIGN
Beech’s team set about creating the new aeroplane in the
usual way, drawing various congurations and concepts until one emerged which was deemed best. However, one
aspect in the creation of Bonanza was unique for its time:
Model 35 was the rst light general aviation aeroplane to
be thoroughly and extensively wind- tunnel tested before its
rst ight.
Many are not aware that there were actually ve pre-
production airframe prototypes of what became Model 35, all which were designed, built and tested before Model 35 Bonanza became Beech’s general aviation standard bearer.
All ve of these pre- production airframes were tested in
Beech’s ten- foot diameter wind tunnel for, amongst other
things, structural integrity, utter and the integrity of the
“V”- tail surfaces. Pre- production airframes 1, 2 and 5 were
built and so tested but not own. Airframe version 3 was the rst Bonanza to be actually ight tested on 22 December
1945. It was powered by a 4- cylinder Lycoming GO- 290
which was an experimental, geared version of the 125 hp,
horizontally opposed Lycoming 0- 290 CP, which was in this
18
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
way coaxed and prodded into producing 160 hp. One may
justly imagine that this engine was greatly and unhealth­ily stressed by its gearing in order to produce so much more power than its design rating. Airframe version 3 also had
a laminar- ow wing to reduce drag, an airfoil innovation made famous for its use by the USAAF’s then rst- line ghter, North American P- 51 “Mustang.”
Pre- production airframe 4, which became the prototype for the production Model 35 Bonanza, was the second of the
Model 35 airframe versions to y; however, its wing has a
conventional airfoil.
The rst 40 or so production Model 35s were not all­metal as advertised. Their ruddervators, aps and ailerons
were fabric- covered, a common practice for many military aircraft at that time. Fabric instead of metal covering for control surfaces was considered to be a reasonable way to save weight, and it was also believed to help to lighten the
ailerons’ feel. However, after a time, the control surfaces of high- speed ghter aircraft were metal- covered because, as the British discovered when Spitre Mk. I ew at air­speeds greater than 260 mph and the fabric covering on its
ailerons ballooned away from their underlying frame adding
drag and reducing their eectiveness. Whilst Beech Model 35 is not capable of ying at airspeeds where this phenom-
enon would occur, the ailerons on all Bonanzas after the
rst 40 were covered with thin magnesium alloy plate and
later with aluminium.
Bonanza pre- production airframe 3’s original lami-
nar ow wing did not appear on production Model 35s. All Bonanzas, except the experimental one- o laminar- ow wing 1961 O35, have conventional airfoils derived from the popular and often used NACA 23000 series, specically NACA 23016.5
6
at the wing root and NACA 23012 at the tip.
Maximum camber of both of these airfoils is located at 15%
of chord aft of the leading edge, which is a bit more forward
that the usual 25 % of chord aft of the leading edge common
to most similar airfoils. A conventional airfoil’s point of maximum camber is far more forward than that of a lami-
nar airfoil in which it is typically near 50% of the chord aft of the leading edge. Maximum thickness of NACA 23016.5
The fir st Model 35 Bonanz a, prototype 4 during it s final testin g stage. T his is a rare photogr aph of this aeroplane at rest. Note the laminated wooden two- blade propeller. It was pilot- variable but not a consta nt- pitch unit . The pilot had to manually set the desired propeller pitch for any power setting. It curiously seem s to be particularly o ut of place on such an ot herwise sleek an d modern aeroplane. Bee ch factory photograph, March 1947
at the wing root is 16.5% of the chord and the maximum thickness of the thinner NACA 23012 at the wing tip is only 12% of the chord.
This airfoil has been used on all Bonanza wings as well as
on other Beech aircraft. The NACA 23000 series’ rather thick
forward section provides a capacious place for the retracted undercarriage and fuel tanks while still showing an excel­lent lift/drag ratio and close to a neutral pitching moment
coecient, providing a stable and predictable pitch axis
throughout its wide Alpha range although, as we shall see, this stability was somewhat undone by the mildly destabi­lizing characteristics of the “V”- tail.
Early Bonanza’s narrow weight and balance envelope makes it all- too- easy to accidentally aft- load them beyond its safe limit (see further discussion below.) Aft- loading beyond an aircraft’s envelope creates a destabilized and over sensitive condition in the pitch axis at all airspeeds. At
lower airspeeds, as when taking o and landing, over aft-
loading greatly exacerbates this condition. Accidental and/ or negligent over aft- loading has been a continuing and serious concern for Bonanza owners and operators, particu­larly with regard to the later, long cabin “V”- tail” models which require particular care and planning when loading the aeroplane.
Bonanza’s wing root is set at +4º and the tip of the wing set at +1º to the datum line. This provides the wing with a 3º washout (leading edge lower than the trailing edge at the outer portion of the wing.) Washout is commonly applied in wing designs to reduce the tendency for tip stalling at low airspeeds and in steep turns; i.e., in situations of high Alpha.
Other familiar aircraft of the WWII era known to use
the NACA 23016.5 airfoil are: Avro bombers (Lancaster, Manchester, Lincoln, etc.) Curtiss SB2C Helldiver; Douglas
DB- 7 “Boston;” DC- 4 (C- 54, R5C); Focke- Wulf Ta- 152;
Grumman F- 4- F “Wildcat,” F- 6- F “Hellcat,” F- 7- F
“Tigercat,” F- 8- F “Bearcat” and TBF “Avenger;” Kawasaki
Ki- 56, 60, 102 and 108; Lavochkin La 5- 7; Lockheed “Electra Junior” and P- 38 “Lightning;” Martin PBM “Mariner;” Messerschmitt Me- 210, 310 and 410; North American
B- 25/PBJ series; Sikorsky VS- 44;
Taylorcraft BC- BL- 12; Vought VS­326 (a straight wing “Corsair;”) and
Westland “Whirlwind.”
Bonanza’s airfoils provide it with a laterally stable, if some­what abrupt, stall. This kind of stall, whilst unpleasant but acceptable in a
ghter/pursuit type, is an undesirable
and possibly dangerous characteris­tic for a general aviation aeroplane. It has been reported that Bonanza’s stall has dangerously caught low- time pilots unaware and suddenly nd­ing themselves in a stalled aeroplane at low altitude, always a blueprint for calamity.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
19
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
However, it is well to remem-
ber that Beech did not expect
their Bonanza to be own by amateur weekend sports lers. It was expected to be own by
professional, highly experienced ex- military pilots who would not (it was supposed) be at all challenged or put at risk by this or any other of Bonanza’s less­than- benign ight character­istics. It is surely an impor­tant factor regarding Bonanza’s poor initial safety record
7
.
1940 ERCO “Ercoupe”, a very cozy side- by- s ide two- seater. Ercoupe’s can still be s een from time- to - time at airport s throughout the US.
Notwithstanding Beech’s expec­tations, from its introduc­tion Bonanza was neverthe-
less owned and own by many
pilots whose training and experience in such a spirited and
demanding thoroughbred was woefully insucient.
The engine powering prototype #4 and the rst produc-
tion Bonanzas is the now- familiar horizontally opposed,
six- cylinder, 165 horsepower, Continental E- 165. This
engine is reliable, cool running, economical and relatively inexpensive to maintain. It does not require uncommonly available aviation fuel and does not tend to burn oil at a high rate. Only this engine’s six cylinders, two more than
in a Lycoming of similar power, might be a cause for some
objection regarding maintenance and inspection expenses.
However, compared to the contemporary 1947 Cessna 195’s
seven- cylinder radial 300 hp Jacobs R- 755A2, Bonanza’s
Continental E- 165 engine is simplicity and economy itself.
Unusual for a light general aviation aeroplane of this time
and a rst in its class, Model 35 has an electrically and fully
retractable tricycle (nosewheel) undercarriage. Even more unusual for a light aeroplane and another rst, the under­carriage when retracted is completely enclosed.
Whilst every USAAF bomber after the 1935 B- 17 had tricy-
cle undercarriage, most American WWII era ghter aircraft had a tail- wheel, the few exceptions being Lockheed P- 38 “Lightning,” Bell P- 39 “Airacobra” and P- 63 “Kingcobra,” and Northrop P- 61 “Black Widow” night ghter. However,
by 1945, the emerging jet aircraft all utilised a nosewheel. Thus, tricycle undercarriage was clearly the arrangement that virtually all military as well as general aviation aircraft would come to adopt. In this light, it was Walter Beech’s most fervent desire that this new aeroplane would be asso-
ciated with and dene the future of general aviation.
It is well to remember that up until 1945, tricycle under­carriage was virtually an unknown feature on general aviation aeroplanes. One of the very few of those with a nosewheel was the brilliant Fred Weick’s innovative and
prescient ERCO “Ercoupe.” First own in 1937, it remained in production by one manufacturer or another until 1969.
A nosewheel for Model 35 was an innovative feature for an aeroplane of its type. Even rival Spartan 7W had a tailwheel.
However, Beech surprisingly held back a bit from complete
modernity by designing a freely swiveling nosewheel, requiring
dierential braking for ground
steering. This was done, per­haps, for economy of construc­tion, or possibly because the nose of Model 35 leaves little room for steering linkages. As one might suss, Bonanza’s lack of direct nosewheel steer­ing was unpopular in what was
loudly purported to be a rst-
class, top shelf and very expen­sive machine. Apparently Beech
received sucient complaints to
warrant a change and as a result the 1949 Model 35A had a rudder pedal- steerable nosewheel as
well as a slightly higher permissible takeo weight (and
concurrently, a slightly lower top airspeed.)
With the exception of “Ercoupe,” all other mass pro­duced pre- war light general aviation aircraft had a tail­wheel. As mentioned, virtually every US aeroplane manu­facturer who had survived the war planned to re- introduce the same or very similar aeroplanes as those they had built and sold before the war, tailwheels, fabric covering, strut-
braced high wings and all. Even Cessna’s rst post- war
aeroplane, the 1947 Cessna 190/195, which was introduced almost simultaneously with Bonanza, has a tailwheel. While C- 190/195’s bow to modernity is its all- metal construction
and cantilever (no strut) high wings, its overall design, xed undercarriage, radial engine(s) and tail wheel are most de-
nitely reminiscent of pre- war aircraft.
Bonanza’s nosewheel has always been and remains mounted ahead of the engine, as far forward as possible. It was placed there so that the direct weight of the engine would not be upon it and a larger proportion of the aircraft’s
1947 Ces sna 195. Produce d in 1947, this sleek and truly beautiful aer oplane surely lo oks classic – that is, a classic from th e 1930s. Like Bonanza, C- 190/195 was intended to be a high- end business trans port. Also like Bonanz a, it was sleek, fast and e xpensive. Unlike Bonanza , however, C- 190/195 wa s never a popular ride and re latively few were s old during its seven year production perio d. In fact, Bee ch sold more Bona nzas in 1947, over 1,500, than all of the Cessna 190/195s ever built (approximately 1,180.)
20
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
overall weight would sit on the main undercarriage. This
arrangement facilitates easier rotation on takeo, better
braking after touchdown, lighter steering on the ground and promotes less wear on the nosewheel system itself.
Additionally, Bonanza sits relatively higher o the ground
for its wingspan than other similar tricycle retractable air­craft. Beech engineers wished to design good landing char­acteristics into Bonanza; a fast aeroplane that was a bear to land would not do, not even amongst the ex- military pilots
whom Beech expected would primarily be ying Bonanzas
and who, surprisingly, turned out to be largely ex- bomber
and transport pilots. Most ex- ghter pilots apparently had enough of the “joy of ying” - see footnote 3. Beech engi-
neers’ idea was that a shorter undercarriage would put the wing so low to the ground that it would be deep into ground
8
eect
upon landing
When an aeroplane is in ground eect, airspeed tends to decrease more slowly and the aeroplane tends to oat just above the runway for a time, complicating the air and
touchdown and making the exact moment of touchdown
more dicult to anticipate. Beech’s engineers believed that
by lengthening Bonanza’s undercarriage, the consequences
of ground eect would be diminished and landings would
therefore be far more predictable. The fact is, however, that
a few inches, more or less, makes little dierence in this matter. Bonanza oats along in ground eect pretty much
the same as other similar low- wing aircraft do, and does so particularly when the approach and landing airspeed is a bit on the higher side (which Bonanza’s clean airframe makes all the more likely.)
ersonal side note: There was a Cessna 195 on floats (coincidentally in the same colours
P
as the one in the above photo but whose home was certainly not such a bucolic environment, to be sure) based at a seaplane base near my home where I first learned to fly at the age of 12. That C- 195 was not used for instruction, of course – that big Jacobs radial cost a bunch to run and maintain. It was used for morning and aernoon commuter flights in and out of New York City. I flew their two Luscombe Silvaire 8A floatplanes (one at a time) that went for $16.00 per hour with an instructor. One day when I was just hanging around the base, there was an empty seat on a scheduled flight. The C- 195’s most kindly pilot asked me if I
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
would like a ride in the “old girl.” My big grin was answer enough. I sat up front with the pilot with three passengers in the wide back seat. If there had been a fourth passenger, he or she would have sat up front where I was. I recall that the dual control wheels were both attached to a single, large “V” yoke. Takeo was a thrilling, hard push- back into my seat and it was a short, fast ride to the city, all at very low altitude (airspace regulations in the area of then Idlewild, now Kennedy International Airport were not nearly as restrictive as they are today.) We passed (just) over the 59th Street Bridge (now the Ed Koch Queensboro Bridge) and landed in the East River at NY Skyports Seaplane Base (now Midtown Skyport) at the end of East 23rd Street. On the way
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
back, with just the pilot and me on board, I had an opportunity to fly this aeroplane. The pilot told me to just fly straight and level. I remember that the 195 was much easier to keep on an even track than the lighter Luscombe which I was familiar with. When we were near home base, he took back control and climbed to a respectable altitude whereupon he returned control to me and said, “Do what you like, but no aerobatics.” For the next 15 minutes or so I steep turned, chandelled, lazy eighted, and generally wrung the 195 out as much as I was then able. All that power and speed and the he of this aeroplane was a new experience for me. I remember that it was a responsive, satisfying, solid and overall enjoyable aeroplane to fly.
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
21
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
From May 1947 Holiday Magazine. This adve rt pictures protot ype version 4 of th e five original Model 35 protot ypes.
Anothe r 1947 Beech advert showing how easily Model 3 5 could beat all that snail­like automobile traic below. Pictured here again i s prototype 4.
The design of Model 35 Bonanza had an unusually long
gestation period of almost twelve months between its initial
conception in January 1945 and its rst ight on December
22, 1945. Beech then announced that Model 35 would not
go into full- scale production for a further fteen months so that Bonanza could be further tested and rened before
commencing production. Between the initial announcement of Model 35 by the publication of press releases and adver-
tisements and its rst accrual sales day, approximately
1,500 pre- orders had been placed.
What had excited the aviation public so greatly, and par­ticularly those who were in a position to purchase a very expensive aeroplane, were Model 35’s unique design fea-
tures. Nothing like this aeroplane had ever before existed.
In 1947, here was an (almost) all- aluminium, monocoque fuselage, low all- metal cantilever wing, electrically retract­able fully- enclosed tricycle undercarriage, cabin seating for
four, 165 hp Continental six- cylinder engine aeroplane and,
oh, that “V”- tail, soon to be referenced by some, more ele-
gantly and aeronautically, as a “Buttery” tail.
Peculiarly, whilst the 1947 Model 35 was surely chock- full of excellent and innovative light general aviation aeroplane design features, there are other features of Model 35 which, despite its long period of development, may not have been as carefully or as wisely conceived.
AN EXCELLENT AIRCRAFT, BUT NOT WITHOUT ITS QUIRKS
■ Bonanza’s First Propeller
Rather than install a metal two or three- blade constant­speed propeller which would have greatly enhanced Bonanza’s performance, Model 35’s original equipment
instead included a laminated, wooden, two- blade, electri­cally manually variable- pitch (not constant- speed) pro­peller. Constant- speed propellers were nothing new in
1945. Beech itself was quite familiar with them as they were installed on its Model 18s, had been proven reliable and were in general usage on high- performance aircraft
since 1935. However, Beech curiously installed this throw­back and inecient propeller system on its new agship high- performance aeroplane. Acting much like a xed-
pitch propeller, Model 35’s wooden propeller requires the pilot to most inconveniently manually re- set the pitch of the propeller upon every power change in order to obtain the desired R.P.M. You may be sure that it was not long after Bonanza’s introduction that those original wooden pro-
pellers were replaced with more ecient and appropriate
metal, two or sometimes three- blade constant- speed types.
■ Aileron/Rudder Interconnect
All “V”- tail Bonanzas from the rst to the last share an
unusual feature: the yoke and rudder pedals are intercon­nected by a system of bungee cords that assist coordinated turns. The bungee system allows the pilot to make shallow
coordinated turns using the yoke alone during cruise ight.
This feature also was installed in Piper Tri- Pacer, intro­duced in 1950. Of course, right- rudder input is still required
on takeo to overcome P- factor and the exible bungee
system allows for this. In the landing phase, the bungee system can easily be manually overridden by the pilot when making crosswind landings, which require cross- control inputs to keep the nose of the airplane aligned with the runway centreline whilst preventing the aeroplane from drifting to the left or right.
22
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
D17S “Stagger wing” instrument pane l and its throw- over control
wheel. Note: No rudder peda ls at the right seat.
Late 195 0s Bonanza ins trument panel with its throw- over contro l
wheel an d with no right seat rudder pedals or to e brakes. This aeroplane has non - standa rd gyro instr uments installed and a very old- school “Radio Compass” indicator, but no instrument o r receiver for ILS ( glide slope) oper ations and a single p rimitive, ver y elementar y combination communications and navigation Narco Omnirange radio.
Throw- over Single Control Wheel
Beech’s unique throw- over single control wheel and lack of rudder pedals and toe brakes at the right seat in early Model 35 Bonanza variations were similar to “Staggerwing” and certainly make a bold statement regarding what this aero-
plane was intended for. However, the lack of dual control
yokes, rudder pedals and toe brakes makes dual instruction
and FAA test ights in Bonanzas with a throwover yoke ille­gal, with exceptions for instrument ight instruction under specic conditions as stated in the footnote below according
to The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) side rudder pedals and toe brakes helped somewhat, but still did not satisfy the appurtenant CFR restrictions.
Even beyond actual dual instruction, this writer can report from personal experience that checking out in a Bonanza with a throw- over control wheel is an awkward and unpleasant experience, especially, I suss, for the check­out pilot.
10
This “the pilot is solely in command” system has been and remains unpopular with many prospective Bonanza owners, and has precluded such Bonanzas from use as an
advanced training aircraft in many ying clubs and schools.
9
. Adding right-
1950 Model B35 Bonanza.
1974 Model A 36 Bonanza with i ts longer fuselage.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
23
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
■ A Short Weight and Balance Envelope
All Model 35 Bonanzas until the introduction of the
conventional- tail Bonanza Model 36 (really a Debonair) in 1968 had the original design’s 25’ 1 ¼” short fuselage.
As mentioned, short- fuselage Model 35 Bonanzas suer
from a severe aft limitation in its weight and balance enve­lope. It is all too easy to load these aeroplanes too far aft without realizing it. The fact is that too often, casual gen­eral aviation pilots are not as careful about aft overloading as they ought to be. As mentioned, even under perfect load conditions, Model 35 Bonanza’s pitch axis control is already highly sensitive; however, in all aeroplanes as the centre of gravity CG moves aft, pitch sensitivity increases. If an aero­plane is aft overloaded, pitch control becomes more sensitive than it usually is (as mentioned Bonanza’s pitch control is quite sensitive under ordinary conditions) and the aeroplane becomes quite unstable in the lateral axis. This combination of control sensitivity and instability greatly increases the chance of over- controlling into a sudden accelerated stall/ spin. As mentioned, Bonanza already has a rather abrupt stall. Additionally, as if this isn’t bad enough, pitch sen­sitivity and instability caused by aft overloading becomes greatly exacerbated at lower airspeeds, such as when rotat-
ing and climbing out after takeo and during approach and
landing – both being low altitude conditions in which stall/ spin recovery is unlikely.
CG’s position forward of the Cl. As weight (fuel, passengers, and baggage) is loaded forward or aft of the unloaded aero­plane’s CG, the CG moves forward or aft accordingly. When the aeroplane’s CG is within a particular range of positions forward of the Cl, the aeroplane is within its weight and balance envelope (see below) and is longitudinally stable. As
the CG moves aft and approaches the CL, the aeroplane’s
longitudinal stability begins to diminish until at some point the aft load puts the CG so close to the Cl that the aeroplane will be longitudinally unstable in pitch and, accordingly, loaded outside of its weight and balance envelope.
■ A Brief Primer Regarding Longitudinal Stability
The lateral (pitch) axis of an aeroplane is that axis around which the nose rises and descends. An aeroplane’s CG is that point at which aircraft longitudinally balances on the lateral axis. An aeroplane’s centre of lift (Cl) is that point at which all of the aeroplane’s lifting forces (wing and horizontal stabilizer) are focused. The distance between the locations of the Cl and the CG determines the longitudinal stability of the aeroplane.
When the aeroplane is fully loaded and ready for takeo,
the safe and normal position of the CG is always ahead of
the CL. The horizontal stabilizer at the rear of the aeroplane produces sucient nose up (tail down) force to counter the
This is a typical (not Bonanza’s) loading graph. The pilot determines the weight of each item to be loaded (left side) and notes the moment arm (bottom).
24
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
This is a typical (not Bonanza’s) loading calculator. When the weight and moment arm of all the items to be loaded are added together, the aeroplane must be within its weight and
balance envelope (below) or it is unsafe to y.
Here is an actual diagram of the weight and balance enve­lopes of all Bonanzas from Model 35 to A36. The numbers
running along the left side of the diagram indicate the gross weight of the aeroplane and the numbers running along the bottom of the diagram indicate the moment arm of the aero­plane from forward (left) to aft (right) measured in inches
from a specic datum point near the nose and divided by
1,000 inch- pounds. The weight and moment arm must fall
within its envelope or the aeroplane is unsafe to y.
It can be seen that earlier Bonanza models had a very
limited fore- aft loading envelope. However, as Bonanza
evolved and it carried more useful load, its weight and bal­ance envelope expanded and aerodynamic improvements
permitted greater fore and aft loading. However, it is not recommended that any aeroplane be own very close or
exactly at the aft edge of its weight and balance envelope
and NEVER own beyond it, even if by a tiny margin.
All Model 35 Bonanzas carry their fuel in the leading edge of the wing which is forward of the aeroplane’s unloaded CG and at the forward end of its weight and balance envelope.
This means that as fuel burns o, Bonanza’s CG moves aft.
Accordingly, a well- fuelled Bonanza may have been loaded
within its weight and balance envelope at takeo, however, whilst in ight and as fuel is consumed, its CG moves aft,
possibly to or beyond the edge of its permissible aft weight and balance limit. This Bonanza is now in a longitudinally unstable condition and pitch control and has become highly sensitive, perhaps actually or very nearly uncontrollable (see above discussion). It hardly needs to be stated that a too light and overly sensitive pitch control at landing is a de
facto unsafe ight condition.
Bonanzas up to S and V models have a rather short pas­senger cabin with only four seats, two up front and two behind and a small baggage compartment behind the rear seats. Whilst earlier Bonanzas models’ weight and balance envelopes are quite narrow, one might expect that their shorter cabins tended to keep aft load conditions within safe CG limits, but apparently this was not the case in too many situations. The last two Model 35 variants, S and V,
have optional fth and sixth passenger seats in the rear which if lled greatly increases the chance of an aft over-
load condition. Bonanza Models S and V’s rearmost safe CG is only slightly farther aft than earlier four seat, short- cabin Bonanza models (see weight and balance envelope diagram
above). Recognizing this potential hazard, Beech specically and rmly forewarned S and V model Bonanza pilots and
operators to take extra care not to load the aeroplane beyond its published aft load limits and advised them to consider the two rearmost seats to be child’s seats only and not to seat adults so far aft.
A practical solution to Bonanza’s limited weight and bal­ance envelope was largely resolved in the next major Bonanza
model, Model A36. This aeroplane is a conventional- tail
E33 Debonair with a ten- inch fuselage stretch and is pow­ered by a 285 hp Continental IO- 520- B engine, with four cabin windows on each side, rear starboard double entry doors and seating for six, including the pilot. Stretching an aeroplane’s fuselage has traditionally been a common and eective method to increase its load capacity and exibil­ity as well as to move the aft edge of its weight and balance envelope further aft. Among other things, a stretched fuse­lage places the horizontal stabilizer father aft, increasing its
moment arm as well as moving the aeroplane’s CL farther
aft. This widens its weight and balance envelope permitting increased aft loading. Accordingly, stretched Bonanza Model A36’s weight and balance envelope is far wider than all ear­lier Bonanza models (see envelope diagram above).
■ The Elevator Downspring
From the rst Model 35 to the latest Model 36, Bonanza has
a downspring incorporated in its elevator control system. The downspring, as its name implies, provides gentle, con­stant, positive forward pressure on the control wheel. This unusual addition to the control system helps to desensitize Bonanza’s very light pitch control and give it more “feel” in all situations..
THE BONANZA BONANZA
The initial price of the Bonanza was $7,345 (the equiva-
lent of $82,010.71 in 2018 with a cumulative ination rate of 1.016.6%.) A lavishly- equipped 2018 Beechcraft G36
Bonanza was recently placed on sale for $913,105, although earlier and more modestly equipped Bonanzas are regularly purchased for a fraction of that.
In its class and for its time, Bonanza was the epitome of aeronautical design and engineering - fast, sturdy, and looking like nothing which had come before. The particu­lar historical time that Bonanza came into being and went
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
25
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
before the American aviation public is a crucial reason for its immediate and enormous commercial success.
One important reason for Bonanza’s success when it was introduced is that in the United States, for entirely under­standable reasons, in the immediate post- war years there was an innate and urgent desire for freshness and newness as a sign that the coming new, more peaceful world was going to be far better than that in which so recently and so tragically entire nations and populations had been utterly destroyed.
While it took most countries in Europe and Asia many years, and in some cases, decades after the end of the war,
to signicantly recover and move forward again, the United
States, whose cities and civilian population had been spared the cruel ravaging and devastation that had befallen most of the rest of the world during the war, even before the war ended was ready and able, to begin anew.
From the late summer of 1945 and throughout the 1950s people all over the world deeply desired and worked hard to create a new beginning. A new, clean, peaceful and
prosperous world had been promised, and now, for some, it was in their grasp. In the United States, everything from buildings to automobiles to kitchen appliances to furni­ture to the new, retractable ballpoint pens took on a clean, “streamlined” and modern look. The stodgy, old, heavily riveted, ornately carved, massive, dark antique appearance
of much of what had dened the pre- war world was now
considered more than simply “old- fashioned.” In a tacit but very substantial way, the artifacts of the pre- war world and culture were a sore and uncomfortable reminder of how that world and culture had so utterly failed humanity. Many of these things were thrown or given away or were put in the attic or the basement, out of sight. Accordingly, decades passed before “antique” or “used” furniture and objects regained popular appreciation and value. After the war all that was “new” and, most particularly, that which was not at all like what was old, was in high demand.
These are a few magazine advertisements which give a
good sense of the avour of this post- war feeling:
It was into this supercharged, sociologically, historically
No wonde r he’s smiling.
A2ASIMULATIONS
26
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
27
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
Still sleek and mode rn looking, this is Beech Model 35 version 4. I t is currently being displaye d in the Nati onal Air and Space Museum of the S mithsonian on the National Ma ll in Washington D. C. as Cap tain William Odom’s “Waikiki Be ech.” Whilst this is the oldes t flyable Bee ch Model 35, it is not currentl y flight- worthy. Note the large tip - tanks installe d for the record 19 49 flight.
and psychologically nova- venerating American culture that Beechcraft introduced its Bonanza in 1947. It was no coin­cidence that Bonanza was ready- made for those times. It epitomized them. Those who were in the market for the
nest and most modern of personal or business aeroplanes and could aord its price lined up to place their orders.
In fact, it was this enormously positive response to the Bonanza in 1947 that fueled many GA aircraft manufactur­er’s starry- eyed optimism and belief in an aviation sales boom that never happened.
Beechcraft’s goal and expectations for the Bonanza were clear from the outset – to create the fastest aeroplane for its horsepower that could carry up to four in comfort and which would be purchased primarily by corporations and businesses for use as a luxury executive transport. Visually stunning, made of the same materials and being of the same design philosophy as current front- line ghter air­craft, promising spectacular performance whilst powered by a modestly- sized and economical- to- operate engine and presenting a futuristic “new world” look and attitude, Beech Model 35 Bonanza hit every note and nerve, clicked on every button and twanged every heart string.
Unfortunately for most, although a part of Beech’s plan, only those with a great deal of hard cash could buy into the Bonanza club. Of course, nancial ability does not necessar­ily imply aeronautical ability or experience. Far too many
private Bonanza owners in those rst post- war years were woefully unprepared to y it safely.
IS THE “V”- TAIL BONANZA SAFE?
Let me say at the outset of this topic discussion that “V”-
tail Bonanza, and all properly designed and competently built aeroplanes for that matter, are ultimately only as safe as the competency and diligence of their pilots. Proper maintenance and inspection along with careful and knowl-
edgeable piloting are the requisites for all safe ight.
cient cruisers. They get the most out of the power avail­able and they go fast. Unfortunately, that is not the totality of the matter. “Clean” aeroplanes, like Bonanza, also tend to be challenging for those pilots who are unfamiliar with
the ight characteristics of such aircraft. The problem is
that when a clean aeroplane’s nose goes below its normal cruising attitude with power on, the aeroplane accelerates at a very high rate, far faster than anything in which most casual general aviation pilots might have trained or previ-
ously own. As the airspeed indicator rapidly winds past the end of the green arc (VNO – maximum structural cruising
speed) into and through the yellow arc (cautionary maneou-
vering airspeeds) and towards and beyond the red line (VNE
– never exceed airspeed,) the situation is often already too late for all but the most careful and knowledgable pilots to correct (and likely too late for even them, as well).
All pilots know that to reduce airspeed, the nose must be raised by pulling back on the control stick/yoke, increas­ing the aeroplane’s Alpha which, in turn, creates a positive g- force (accelerative force applied in addition to the force
of gravity) on the aeroplane and those onboard. However,
when airspeed is at a critically high level, it is possible, perhaps likely, that even the smallest amount of rearward control stick/yoke pressure will create a powerful positive
g- force sucient to overload the aeroplane’s wings and tail
structures, causing a catastrophic failure thereof. In extreme circumstances, even the gentlest pull on the controls when the airspeed needle is at, or worse, beyond the red line will
instantly cause such dire consequences. Not doing anything
is no solution either.
Once the aeroplane is past the redline it is under tremen­dous structural stress. Every second is crucial and recov-
ery which safely and eectively lowers the airspeed must be done right now! Closing the throttle is, of course, the rst thing to do in such a situation, but that might not be su-
cient to avoid a tragedy. If you have a speed brake, of course,
However, it is not a secret that
early “V”- tail Bonanzas have had a poor safety record. Many have blamed the “V”- tail for this, but that is not entirely fair. Other more important factors have been found to have been responsible for this record. It appears that the greatest reason why there were so many early fatal Bonanza accidents is that the aeroplane was simply ahead of its time and more of a handful than most general aviation pilots could then handle. General avi­ation pilots in the late 1940s and early 1950s were not used to aircraft as clean and demanding as Bonanza, and
why should they have been? Nothing
like Bonanza had previously been available to them.
Aerodynamically “clean” (low drag)
aeroplanes are excellent and e-
28
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
extend it immediately, but speed brakes are not installed in Bonanzas nor in virtually any other general aviation air-
craft. Trying to lower the undercarriage and/or aps to slow
down at such a high airspeed is very risky may not work. Additionally, doing this is likely to cause just the serious structural damage you are trying to avoid. In fact, once you are hurtling past the redline there may be no way to avoid a tragedy.
With this in mind, it is well to be aware that in nearly all fatal Bonanza accidents in which a failure of the air­craft’s structure was involved, it was determined that the
aeroplane had been own outside its normal ight enve­lope (i.e., ying too damn fast). In most instances these
accidents were preceded by loss of control due to the pilot’s apparent misinterpretation of the aeroplane’s situation causing him/her to make incorrect control inputs, exacer­bating rather than correcting the problem.
When Bonanza was introduced in 1947, very few pilots
were trained or competent to y in what is called “instru­ment ight rules” (IFR) conditions, which are essentially
those in which the pilot is unable to see the horizon and is
unable to accurately and safely y the aeroplane without
reference to instruments. At this time not even many ex­military pilots had much IFR training or experience and the vast majority of civilian pilots had even less. The IFR navi-
gation system, so sophisticated, ecient and ubiquitous in
modern times, was in its bare infancy in early 1950s and virtually non- existent in the late 1940s. In that era gyro­scopic instruments, common today and which are a crucial
aid during IFR ight, were not standard or even available
equipment in early Bonanzas and most of the other general aviation aeroplanes.
When the weather obscures or completely hides the hori-
zon, safe ight becomes dependant upon the pilot’s abil­ity to y the aeroplane with sole reference to and reliance upon what instruments may be on the panel. Yes, IFR ying
can be done without gyros and learning to do so is a part of
IFR training, but doing this eectively requires professional
instruction and lots of practice.
Unless an auto- pilot has been engaged, even a well­trimmed aeroplane will not maintain straight and level
ight by itself for very long. Even assuming perfectly calm
winds (which is rarely the case, particularly at altitude,) the torque of the engine and propeller causes a steady left bank­ing tendency which is likely to go unnoticed unless the pilot has reference to the horizon (real or gyroscopic), the terrain and/or notices that the aircraft’s compass heading is slowly changing.
An ordinary magnetic compass (sometimes called a “whisky compass” for its visible yellow/brown- coloured lubricating oil) is notoriously inaccurate and misleading under many ight conditions and is considered to be unre­liable as the sole source of heading information during IFR ight. An aeroplane out of true rigging, subtle trim inaccu­racies, gusts of wind and/or turbulence may cause pitch and roll changes as well, all of which may also go unnoticed by a
pilot not trained to y in IFR conditions.
As mentioned, pilots have reported that “V”- tail
Bonanzas are very light and sensitive in pitch to the extent
that ying a “V”- tail Bonanza has been described as being
“sportscar- like.” Also, “V”- tail Bonanzas are notoriously unsteady in pitch and roll, tending to constantly “seek”
pitch position and laterally wander from level ight. Beech
designed Bonanza for maximum performance with little to
no considerations or compromises for ight by low- time
pilots. Whilst Bonanza’s “sportscar- like” – perhaps even “warbird- like” – ight characteristics may be quite satis­fying to an experienced pilot, when in IFR conditions these characteristics are likely to create an unintended and unno­ticed banked, nose down condition. When these are com­bined what is called a “spiral dive” is likely to occur.
Over many decades of close and diligent study of fatal
general aviation aircraft accidents and reports from ight
instructors, the loss of a visual horizon has been cited as the most common cause of the spiral dive phenomenon and the fatal accident which soon and inevitably follows. It has been
determined by a number of ight instructors that if a pilot
without an instrument rating tries to turn around in IFR
conditions to y back to clear weather he /she is likely to mishandle the turn by not applying sucient back pressure
on the yoke/stick, thereby allowing the nose to drop. Add to this banked attitude the aerodynamically clean Bonanza’s tendency to quickly accelerate to and beyond its redline (Vne) when the nose drops, and therein exists a formula for catastrophe that is, as is said, “Just waiting to happen.”
What happens all- too- often is this: a pilot inadvertently and/or negligently ies into a low - visibility weather con­dition and soon loses sight of the horizon. If not trained to
y in IFR conditions and relying upon his/her “senses,”
11
he/she “feels” that all is well all whilst the left wing has already slightly dropped and, because the aeroplane is no longer ying level, the nose has also begun to drop. As men­tioned, this situation is exacerbated if this pilot attempts a turn in IFR conditions. What this pilot usually then hears
is the rising sound of the outside air ow and immediately sees the airspeed indicator needle quickly rising. He/she
naturally pulls back on the control wheel to alleviate this but, because the aeroplane’s wings are no longer level, up elevator input only steepens the left bank which, accord­ingly, causes the nose to drop further. Meanwhile, airspeed continues to increase until it is quickly well past the redline as the pilot frantically but vainly pulls back even harder on the control wheel to slow the airplane. This continues for only a short while until either the wings and/or tail struc­tures fail or the aeroplane contacts the ground in a sharp nose- down left bank at a very high speed.
This is, in fact, what apparently happened to John
Kennedy, Jr. on July 16, 1999 when his high- performance,
high- powered and aerodynamically clean Piper PA32R “Saratoga,” which he had recently purchased and in which
he had little ight time, crashed into the Atlantic Ocean o the coast of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, kill-
ing all three on board (Kennedy, his wife Carolyn and his
sister- in- law Lauren Bessette). On that day, Kennedy had
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
29
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
been delayed by business and did not takeo from Essex County Airport, near Faireld, New Jersey to attend the
wedding of his cousin Rory Kennedy at Martha’s Vineyard,
Massachusetts until almost sunset. He soon found him­self ying in the dark of the evening in very hazy, humid low- visibility weather, always a perilous ight condition for VFR ying. At some point he apparently lost clear sight
and sense of the horizon and became spatially disoriented (see footnote below.) The installed sophisticated three­axis autopilot was not engaged and he was not instrument rated. Kennedy’s “Saratoga” crashed into the ocean at an extremely high speed in a steep left bank and with the nose steeply down.
All of the foregoing is not to say that Model 33 Debonairs
and later the Model 36 Bonanzas with conventional tails
did not occasionally have fatal accidents, including those involving a pilots’ loss of control in IFR weather. The dif­ference was that in these accidents, the tail surfaces were
found not to have failed in ight and were not considered to be a signicant factor in these accidents. It was determined
that the ruddervators of the early “V”- tail Bonanzas tended to fail early in the course of an over- speed situation, whilst conventional- tail Bonanzas and Debonairs were discovered to have granted a bit more time for a pilot to extricate him/ herself from the overspeed situation before the tail surfaces departed.
Of course, Beech took this matter extremely seriously and from Bonanza C35 (late 1950 to 1952) onward, the chord (leading to trailing edge) of the ruddervators was increased by seven inches, putting the non- moving stabilizer part of the ruddervator sixteen inches ahead of its main spar. On early Bonanzas up to model C- 35 the ruddervators’ main
spars were their sole attachment points to the fuselage. The problem was that with this increase in area, an even larger part of the ruddervator was now unattached to the fuselage.
This redesign was a logical attempt to create a more stable and less sensitive pitch control by increasing the overall area of the ruddervators. Unfortunately, the ruddervators’ inter­nal structure was not similarly enhanced, which some have speculated was because of Beech’s apparent reluctance to
ocially and publicly acknowledge that there was anything
fundamentally wrong with the original “V”- tail design to begin with.
In addition to the increase in the ruddervators’ area, Bonanza C35 has a more powerful Continental E- 185- 11
engine, upping the hp from 165 hp to 205 hp for one minute
and 185 hp continuous, all of which make it a very desirable and sought- after early Bonanza.
Unfortunately, not anchoring the ruddervators more securely in C35, such as at their leading edges as well as the spar, caused a number of in- air ruddervator failures which, in turn, caused the wings to fail as well. All of these acci­dents occurred after the aeroplane had been own at air­speeds beyond the redline (Vne,) as occurs in an uncon­trolled spiral dive. Based upon inspection of the wreckage of these crashed aeroplanes, Beech ultimately determined that Bonanza’s ruddervators would henceforth be required to be attached to the fuselage at both the spar and leading edge.
This x was eective and thereafter the number of
Bonanzas which crashed due to tail surface collapse or departure decreased. Recovering to level ight from air­speeds higher than the redline no longer tended to cause immediate airframe disintegration and in some instances with careful handling, a pilot could now extricate such a
hurtling Bonanza from its dive to level
ight without incident.
Piper PA- 32R “Saratoga.” This adv anced and very high- perfo rmance aeroplane was initially called “Piper Lance,” a retra ctable undercarriag e Piper PA- 32 Che rokee Six. As this aeroplane evolved it becam e known as Piper “Saratoga.” Similar to Lance in m ost ways, Saratoga has a tap ered wing, whilst Lance’s wing is Cherokee Six’s un- tapered “Hershey Bar” t ype.
30
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
“ALRIGHT, WE GET IT”
Whilst spokespersons for Beech are not known to have actually publicly said this or acknowledged “V” - tail Bonanza’s deciencies, Beech cer­tainly tacitly made such a statement when, in 1959, Model 33 “Debonair”, essentially a conventional- tail Bonanza, was introduced. Surely this was a strong response to the bur­geoning criticism and the histori­cally poor safety record of “V”- tail Bonanza. At this or any time Beech could have simply changed to a con­ventional tail arrangement whilst retaining the Bonanza name, as it actually did in 1968 with the intro­duction of the conventional- tail Model 36 “Bonanza.” The introduc­tion of “Debonair,” a new non- “V”­tail Beech aeroplane, was Beech’s clear invitation to “V”- tail sceptics
and critics to purchase a Beech aeroplane that in every sub­stantial way is everything that Bonanza is, but with a reas­suring (for some) conventional- tail.
As the years passed fewer and fewer Bonanza fatal acci­dents were reported and its accident rate became comparable to other similar aircraft. In addition to the mentioned struc­tural improvements in Bonanza perhaps the most impor­tant reason for this improvement in safety has nothing to do with Bonanza at all. What happened was that throughout
the 1950s and into the 1960s private pilot training greatly
improved, and FAA checkout requirements for pilots who
ew or sought to y high- performance aircraft such as
Bonanza was made more rigourous. Wealthy “Doctors” and
others who purchased or regularly ew Bonanzas were care­fully taught how to y such a high- performance aeroplane. Equally important, as time passed, moiré and more elemen-
tary IFR and “extreme attitude recovery” training was added to the private pilot training curriculum (FAR- 14 CFR Part
61 ;). Whilst not in any way comparable to or a replacement
for an Instrument Rating, even this rudimentary instrument training on many occasions was a life- saving aid to many pilots who found themselves in low visibility weather. Most
ying clubs and aircraft rental businesses wisely require
that a pilot must hold a current Instrument Rating in order
to y high- performance aircraft such as Bonanza.
To be fair to Bonanza, all aircraft are and always have been
in danger of airframe destruction when own beyond their ight envelopes, a condition which clean, high- powered
aircraft tend to enter with greater ease and frequency than other less slippery and less powerful aircraft, and/or when
own by pilots whose aeronautical experience is not equal to the aeroplane which they are ying.
Bonanza’s improved accident rate throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s did not, however, prevent certain fac­tions, who had reasons of their own, to continue to dispar-
age “V”- Tail Bonanzas. Not the least of these was William T. Piper and Co. who in 1956 was developing Piper PA- 24
“Comanche,” which Mr. Piper hoped and publicly stated would be “The Bonanza Killer.” Whilst Comanche is a superb aeroplane, in every way comparable and in some ways supe­rior to Bonanza, neither it nor any other aeroplane has ever been able to “kill” Bonanza. Since Bonanza’s introduction it has been the icon at the top of the hill of general aviation aircraft and is likely to remain so for quite some time.
THE BONANZA LEGACY
Still in production, since 1947 more than 17,000 Beech Bonanzas have been produced. Of these, more than 12,000 Bonanzas of every variation are currently listed in FAA’s aircraft registry which well- attests to Beech build qual­ity. In all of its 37 variations (and counting,) Bonanza is the sixth most numerously produced general aviation aero­plane, not far behind the 20,000- plus Piper J- 3 “Cubs.” To date (2018,) Bonanza is the 15th most numerous aeroplane of any kind.
Many of the earliest Bonanzas have gone the way of normal attrition due to age and wear, but a good number
Beech cra Bonanza V 35B – a study in gra ce and power. The last “V ”- tail Bonanza, not at all coincidentall y designated V3 5 was introdu ced in 1966. Mino r improvements to it were made in V35A (19 68- 69) and many more in V35B (1970- 8 2.)
of these have been and are being restored back to ight-
worthy condition by loving owners and operators. Over the
71 years since Bonanza was rst introduced, it has justly
earned the respect of the general aviation community as
well as the deep aection of its owners and pilots.
THE END OF AN ERA - BEECHCRAFT MODEL V35B “BONANZA”
V35B, rst produced in 1970, is the specic aircraft that A2A has developed as our latest ight simulation oering. From its rst iteration in 1947 as Model 35, Bonanza has
constantly been improved and has greatly evolved. Almost every year or so a new letter model Bonanza has been pro­duced, each one an improvement over those which came before. After sixteen “V”- tail model Bonanzas, from the 1947 Model 35 to the 1964- 65 S35, every aspect of the aero­plane has been upgraded to maintain Bonanza’s reputation as the highest quality and best performing aeroplane in its class.
On 29 November 1950, Olive Ann Beech, a co- founder
of Beech Aircraft Company, became its President after her
husband and co- founder, Walter Herschel Beech, suered a
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
31
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
sudden and fatal heart attack. She remained at Beech’s helm until it was purchased by Raytheon Company on 8 February
1980. With this sale Beech Aircraft Corporation was, for the
rst time, no longer headed by a Beech family member. In
1982, Raytheon Company decided to close the era of the “V”- tail Bonanza. Whether this would have occurred if Olive had still been Beech’s president is a matter for inter­esting speculation.
Appropriately, Raytheon/Beech skipped Model 35T and 35U designations and went right to Model V35 for the last “V”- tail Bonanza. V35B retains the basic V35 nomencla­ture; however, the 35B is, in fact, a new model. V35B fea­tures a completely new interior with additional headroom including redesigned and improved seats, a new instrument
32
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
panel and a more ecient ventilation system. The exte­rior remains essentially the same as V35, however V35B has
a new paint scheme. The price of a V35B was $41,600 in 1972 ($248,359.96 in 2018 with an a cumulative ination of 497%).
Model V35B, along with a turbo- charged variant, V35B- TC,
was produced from 1970 - 82. It would be the last of the
breed. The rst conventional- tailed Bonanza (an oxymoron to some) was the 1968- 69 Model E33, basically a re- named continuation of the Debonair line. Model 36 Bonanza is an
E33A with ten inches added to the fuselage, four cabin win­dows on each side, right- side double- doors and six seats. From that time to the present there have been no new “V”­tail Bonanzas.
SPECIFICATION
Model Model V35B Engine 1 x Continental IO- 520- BB flat- six piston engine, 213kW Weights Take- o weight 1,542 kg 3,400 lb Empty weight 955 kg 2,105 lb
DIMENSIONS Wingspan 10.21 m 34  6 in Length 8.05 m 26  5 in Height 2.31 m 8  7 in Wing area 16.81 m2 180.94 sq 
PERFORMANCE Max. speed 338 km/h 210 mph Cruise speed 253 km/h 157 mph Ceiling 5445 m 17850  Range 1,648 km 1,024 miles
BEECHCRAFT BONANZA V35B
PRODUCTION YEARS: 1970- 1982 SERIAL NUMBERS: D- 7977 thru D- 8598 ENGINE: Continental IO- 520B 285 hp
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES
• Trapezoidal long rear windows
• Long- chord stabilators
• Stinger tail cone
• One- piece windshield (no center strip)
• Ventilation inlet scoop between stabilators
• Single, throw- over control yoke
• Vernier (twist operation) engine and mixture controls
• Gear handle on right, flap on left
• Gear- driven alternator
• Extended aft baggage area
COMMON OPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS
• Long- range fuel (two 40- gallon tanks)
• V35TC - TSIO- 520D STC
• Other engine upgrades
• Forward facing “family” 5th and 6th seats in aft baggage area
• Tip tanks
• Large aft baggage door
• Improved cabin ventilation system
OUR NEW BIRD
We hope that you will nd ying A2A’s Bonanza V35B to be
an enjoyable, authentic and satisfying experience. Many of those on our Beta Development Team, including this writer,
have cumulatively had many hundreds of hours ying a
number of full- size Bonanza variants, including V35B and some of us have instructed in them. It is universally held amongst us that all Bonanzas are high- quality, beautifully
performing aeroplanes which y with grace and élan. We
have put all of our collective experience into assuring that A2A’s V35B Bonanza is as accurate and enjoyable a simula-
tion of the full- size aeroplane as possible. We are condent that once you, too, have own A2A’s V35B “Bonanza,” you
will come to feel this way as well.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
• Dual control yoke
• Avionics upgrades
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
33
FLYING INTO THE FUTURE
ENDNOTES
TWA (Transcontinental and Western
Airlines) Flight 599 was a ight
1
from Kansas City, Missouri to Los
Angeles, California on 31 March 1931. There were a number of stops sched-
uled along the way. The rst stop after taking o from Kansas City was to be
Wichita, Kansas. The Fokker F.10 Tri­motor with eight passengers aboard never made it to Wichita. It crashed into
a wheat eld a few miles southwest of
Bazaar, Kansas, a little more than half­way to Wichita, killing all on board, including Knute Rockne. The nation mourned as if a President had died, and
President Hoover called Rockne’s death
“a national loss,” such was Rockne’s popularity and fame.
Public outcry at Rockne’s death in the
crash prompted aviation ocials and experts to commence what was the rst extensive ocial study of a crashed
aircraft’s wreckage as well as a detailed
scientic analysis of the cause of the
crash, setting an intensive aeronauti­cal forensic standard that continues to
this day. TWA’s rst explanation was
that the Fokker was brought down by extreme turbulence. The evidence pre­sented for this theory was that the co­pilot had made a radio call to Wichita
after an hour into the ight, saying,
“The weather here is getting tough. We’re going to turn around and go back to Kansas City.” Another theory that TWA posited was that the Tri- motor
ew into undetectable and unreported
clear- air turbulence which overstressed its wing, causing it to fail. At that time clear- air turbulence was not nearly as well understood as it became in later years.
Before long it was clear that the
actual and ocially recognized cause
of the crash of TWA Flight 599 was the break- up and departure of the Fokker’s wooden wings. TWA’s attempts to blame weather conditions for the crash were quickly shown to be erroneous. Upon close inspection, the cause of the wings’ break- up was determined to be the partial interior delaminating of the wings’ plywood skin which was bonded to the ribs and spars with water- based
aliphatic- resin glue. The aircraft’s pre-
vious ights in rain and its exposure to
rain and moisture on the ground had deteriorated the glue bond inside the wing to the extent that sections of the plywood covering had eventually sepa-
rated from its under- structure in ight.
It was deemed that given the type of glue and the materials used in the con­struction of the wing that the eventual separation of the wings’ plywood skin and the wings’ subsequent catastrophic break- up was inevitable. The acci­dent was, of course, a terrible misfor­tune; however, the tragic loss of such a
beloved public gure and the publicity
that it created sparked the beginning of a new and more enlightened era in aviation accident forensics and caused the immediate institution of dozens of safety regulations.
One of the positive changes which were made was with regard to more regular and intensive inspection of commercial aircraft. As might be expected, after the Rockne crash and
the widely published ocial report of
its cause, wooden- winged aeroplanes went distinctly out of favour. In partic­ular, the wooden- wing Fokker F.10 was no longer trusted by the public, most of
who refused to y in them. TWA, which
operated many Fokkers, nearly went out of business. The slower but all­metal Ford Tri- Motor was substituted for Fokkers in many instances, set­ting the stage for future all- metal air­liners such as Boeing 247 and Douglas DC- 2/3.
Lyric from the song, “New Sun in the Sky” appearing in the 1953 lm
2
“The Band Wagon” written by Betty Comden, Adolph Green and Alan Jay
Lerner
Medal of Honor recipient U. S.
Marine Corps Colonel Gregory
3
“Pappy” Boyington may have put it
best when he said, “(Combat) ying is
hours and hours of boredom sprinkled with a few seconds of sheer terror.”
It was not until 1963 that Beechcraft produced its rst “sport” type
4
aeroplane to compete with Piper’s PA- 28 “Cherokee” line and Cessna’s
172 “Skyhawk.” The rst of Beech’s
low- to- middle line aeroplanes was
the xed tricycle- undercarriage entry-
level Model 23 “Musketeer,” a number of versions of which were produced
during the 1960s with increased power
and seating intended for the low- to­middle level sport aircraft market.
In 1966 Beech Model 19, “Musketeer
Sport,” a toned- down, lower- powered, lower- priced version of Model 23 “Musketeer” was produced, intended to be a trainer which would be attractive to
ying schools and clubs as competition
to the wildly popular Piper Cherokee
140 and Cessna 150. From 1966 to 1979,
models A19, B 19 and M19 “Musketeer Sport” versions were built with engine and interior upgrades. Simultaneously with the Model 19 trainer, Beech pro­duced Beechcraft 23- 24 Musketeer Super III, an upgraded, more power­ful xed tricycle- undercarriage ver­sion of Model 23. The last of the Beech “Musketeer” aircraft was the retract­able undercarriage Model 24 “Sierra,” developed to be similar to and compete with the popular Piper PA- 28R- 200 “Arrow” which was essentially a retractable undercarriage Cherokee 180/Archer with a 200 hp fuel injected engine turning a constant- speed propeller.
Whilst Beech Bonanza and Debonair have ruled the high- end, high perfor­mance light aeroplane market since their inceptions, none of the excellent “Musketeer/Sierra” series were nearly as popular, commercially successful or as market competitive as their Piper and Cessna counterparts.
English usage of “bonanza” dates back to at least 1829, primarily
5
in the United States. Basic denitions
include “a thing that produces excel­lent results” and “a great quantity of something of value.” It was also com­monly used, particularly in the 19th century American West to describe a
34
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
large deposit of rich minerals such as gold or silver. This usage seems likely to be that which generated the name of the popular American television series (1959- 73) of that name.
Etymology- The English word “bonanza” is taken from the modern Spanish language. In Spanish, “bonanza” literally means “calm sea,” which implies prosperity and also refers
to a rich cargo or nd. This is derived from the Vulgar Latin [Vulgar Latin
or Sermo Vulgaris meaning “common speech” was the non- standard form(s)
of Latin (as opposed to the classical]
spoken in the Mediterranean region during and after the classical period of the Roman Empire) “bonacia.”.
“Bonacia” is a combination of the Latin
“bonus,” which means “good,” and “malacia,” which means “calm sea.” In turn, “malacia” comes from the Greek “malakia,” which means “softness.”
Beech Baron B55 and B58 twins also use this airfoil
6
As has been said of Messerschmitt BF- 109, also not considered to be
7
a particularly pilot- friendly aeroplane, “The pilot is not to expect it to perform, it expects the pilot to.”
As calculated by both Beech and the CAA, (forerunner of the FAA) Beech Model 35’s fatal accident rate was, from 1947 through 1952, a whopping 4.90
per 100,000 ight hours. The following
Models A35, B35 and C35 were reported to have a fatal accident rate over the
same period of 2.50 per 100,000 ight
hours. By comparison, the contemporary Cessna 195’s fatal accident rate over the same period was reported to be approxi-
mately 2.0 per 100,000 ight hours and
Beech 18’s fatal accident rate over the same period was reported to be only .80 per 100,000 ight hours. As a com­parison to a current high- performance aeroplane, studies show that as of 2018 a modern day Bonanza equivalent, Cirrus SR- 20, has averaged a fatal accident rate
of 1.63 per 100,000 hours, less than ⅓
the rate of the 1947 Model 35 Bonanza
during its rst six years.
Ground Eect is that condi-
tion which begins when an aero-
8
plane is approximately the length of its wingspan above the ground and is maximized when it is at approxi­mately 1/5th of its wingspan above the
ground. When in ground eect, the aeroplane glides more eciently and
airspeed decreases more slowly. This may cause touchdown to occur much farther down he runway than the pilot anticipated, sometimes so far that the aeroplane could be in danger of running
out of runway. Ground Eect is caused
by the disruption of the wingtip vor­tices and the downwash at the wing’s trailing edge (which are always gen-
erated by the wing when in ight) by
contact with the ground. This disrup­tion limits the size of the vortices and alters the direction of the downwash which becomes more vertical, increas­ing lift but also reducing drag (oppo­site and equal reaction). The altered angle of lift reduces Induced Drag which accordingly reduces the rate at which the aeroplane decelerates. It is the combination of additional lift and reduced drag which causes the aero-
plane to oat above the runway when in Ground Eect.
4 CFR 91.109 states: “No person
may operate a civil aircraft (except
9
a manned free balloon) that is being
used for ight instruction unless that
aircraft has fully functioning dual
controls. However, instrument ight
instruction may be given in a single­engine airplane equipped with a single, functioning throwover control wheel in place of xed, dual controls of the ele­vator and ailerons when—
(1) The instructor has determined
that the ight can be conducted safely;
and
(2) The person manipulating the
controls has at least a private pilot cer-
ticate with appropriate category and
class ratings.
3) Except in the case of lighter- than­air aircraft, that aircraft is equipped with fully functioning dual controls.
However, simulated instrument ight
may be conducted in a single- engine airplane, equipped with a single, func­tioning, throwover control wheel, in place of xed, dual controls of the ele­vator and ailerons, when—
(i) The safety pilot has determined
that the ight can be conducted safely;
and
(ii) The person manipulating the
controls has at least a private pilot cer-
ticate with appropriate category and
class ratings.”.
The Bonanza/Baron/Travel- Air
Pilot Prociency Program, Inc.
10
(BPPP), created and overseen by the American Bonanza Society Air Safety Foundation, holds a CFR exemp­tion allowing the use of single- yoke equipped aircraft (single- and multi­engine) for recurrency training. The exemption is valid only during approved
BPPP classes. Like many others, I took
my Bonanza check ride before this exemption was instituted.
E xtensive studies dating from as early as the 1930s have shown that
11
a pilot in a moving aeroplane without reference to the horizon and/or with­out a clear view of the outside world will often completely misinterpret the actual attitude of the aeroplane, and how it is actually moving. This phe­nomena is called “spatial disorienta­tion”, i.e., the failure to maintain body orientation and posture in relation to the surrounding environment (physi­cal space) when at rest and especially during motion. This is caused by the incorrect response of the pilot’s ves­tibular (organs of equilibrium located in the inner ear) and proprioceptive (muscle spindles in skeletal striated muscles and tendons) systems as fol­lows: the aeroplane’s acceleration and turning as well as centrifugal and iner­tial forces all act upon the pilot’s inner ear which informs the net gravitoiner­tial force which the pilot perceives. The pilot’s Otolith organs, the Utricle and Sacculus become misaligned with grav­ity which leads to spatial misjudgement and disorientation.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
35

DEVELOPER’S NOTES

36
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
ome say the hardest thing for an artist to draw is the human hand, because it is the part of our body that we are all most familiar with. Simulating the
S
ing that human hand. Additionally, there are many Bonanza variants through history with owners that know their airplane in some ways better than they know themselves.
Yet we all interpret life around us dierently,
including how an airplane feels to each pilot. It is up to us, at A2A, to not just create an airplane that objectively performs in line with the actual airplane, but to capture that human feel and interaction with the real airplane. We have to somehow magically capture that experience that applies to all pilots. And Accu-Sim technology allows us to achieve this better than anything we’ve used before.
Beyond modeling a specic airplane, the Bonanza
history is surrounded with tales and stories devel­oped over many decades, some are true and some not. Probably the most common nick name the Bonanza V-tail is known for is being the “doctor
killer.” When the Bonanza was rst introduced, it
was unlike anything anyone has ever seen in the general aviation market. And for the decade follow­ing it’s release, successful businessmen and pro­fessionals were buying the Bonanza in great num­bers. Many of these pilots had primary careers that demanded a great deal of their time, not leaving
much room for ying. And like many “weekend
warriors” today who spend the whole week sitting behind a desk then go out and play a sport on the weekend, injuries erupt. The same holds true for the busy professional working all week who then
Beechcraft Bonanza V-tail is like draw-
decides to occasionally y a high performance air­plane like the Beechcraft Bonanza V-tail.
The V-tail Bonanza was built from World War II
ghter technology, which was designed for highly
trained professional pilots. And like most Warbirds,
the Bonanza want so y fast, all the time. Unlike
general aviation aircraft that were developed in
later years to have benign ight characteristics,
the Bonanza inherently has all of the challeng-
ing qualities of the World War II ghter. From my point of view, ying a Bonanza is just like ying a
Warbird. It rumbles, shakes, rattles, is heavy and can bite the low time pilot in a heart beat. Therefore it’s this writer’s opinion that the new pilot should
approach ying a V-tail Bonanza exactly the same
as approaching an aircraft like a P-51 Mustang. The V-tail Bonanza, like the Warbird, is designed for experienced pilots who take the time to study and
y and operate such an aircraft with organization,
patients, and preparedness.
For those pilots who do approach the V-tail Bonanza with the respect it deserves, it will reward the pilot with an experience unlike any other air-
craft in the general aviation eet today. It is for this
reason the V-tail Bonanza still stands alone today,
as it did on the rst day it was introduced to the
public.
We hope our work on this aircraft meets and exceeds all of our customers expectations, and also hope this aircraft delivers not weeks or months, but years of excitement, wonder, surprise, and the most complete simulated aviation experience to date.
Thank you to all of our customers for allowing us to pursue our dreams, and hopefully help pass our dreams onto you too.
A2A Simulations Inc.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
Scott
Founder
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
37

FEATURES

n Aircraft DNA technology re-creates actual
engine and airframe vibrations.
n V-tail physical modeling captures the
character of this classic aircraft.
n New analog gauge physics delivers a
living cockpit unlike ever before.
n Install a 285 Hp or 300 Hp Continental
engine in the maintenance hangar.
n Native Accu-Sim rain eects (P3D)
n Directional cockpit and dynamic
exterior lighting (P3D)
n A true propeller simulation.
n Experience the world's most recognizable high
performance general aviation airplane.
n Hand towing.
38
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
n Immersive pre-ight inspection system designed by
pilots while operating the actual Bonanza V-35B.
n Electric starter with accurate cranking power.
n Dynamic ground physics including both
hard pavement and soft grass modeling.
n Primer-only starts are now possible. Accu-
Sim monitors the amount of fuel injected and
it’s eectiveness to start and run the engine.
n Persistent airplane where systems,
corrosion, and temperatures are simulated
even when the computer is o.
n Immersive in-cockpit, physics-driven sound
environment from A2A engineered recordings.
n Complete maintenance hangar internal systems and
detailed engine tests including compression checks.
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
n Visual Real-Time Load Manager, with the ability
to load fuel, people, and baggage in real-time.
n Four naturally animated passengers that
can sit in any seat including the pilot’s.
n 3D Lights ‘M’ (built directly into the model).
n P3D’s support of directional lighting allows
a more advanced lighting system.
n Pure3D Instrumentation now with natural 3D
appearance with exceptional performance.
n A total audible cockpit and sound engineered
by A2A sound professionals.
n In cockpit pilot’s map for handy in-ight navigation.
n Authentic fuel delivery includes priming and proper
mixture behavior. Mixture can be tuned by the book
using the EGT, Fuel ow or by ear. It’s your choice.
n All models include A2A specialized materials
with authentic metals, plastics, and rubber.
n Airow, density and its temperature not
only aect the way your aircraft ies, but
how the internal systems operate.
n Real-world conditions aect system
conditions, including engine temperatures.
n Piston combustion engine modeling. Air comes in,
it mixes with fuel and ignites, parts move, heat up, and all work in harmony to produce the wonderful sound of a Continental 520 and 550 cubic inch
engine. Now the gauges look beneath the skin of your
aircraft and show you what Accu-Sim is all about.
n Actual avionics used in real Bonanza
V35B's ying today.
n The TSO’d King KFC 200 Flight Director/
Autopilot with complete 2-axis (pitch and roll with altitude hold) integrated system with professional 3-inch Flight Director displays.
n Three in-sim avionics congurations including
no GPS, GPS 295, or the GNS 400. Built-in,
automatic support for 3rd party avionics.
n As with every A2A aircraft, it is gorgeously
constructed, inside and out, down to the last rivet.
n Designed and built to be own “By The Book.”
n Spark plugs can clog and eventually foul if
the engine is allowed to idle too low for too long. Throttling up an engine with oil-soaked spark plugs can help clear them out.
n Overheating can cause scoring of cylinder head
walls which could ultimately lead to failure if warnings are ignored and overly abused
n Engine, airframe, cockpit panel and individual
gauges tremble from the combustion engine.
n Authentic drag from the airframe and aps
n System failures, including aps that can
independently jam or break based on the actual forces put upon them. If you deploy
your aps at too high a speed, you could nd
yourself in a very dangerous situation.
n Authentic battery. The battery capacity
is based on temperature. The major draw comes from engine starting.
n Oil pressure system is aected by oil viscosity
(oil thickness). Oil viscosity is aected by oil temperature. Now when you start the engine, you
need to be careful to give the engine time to warm
n Eight commercial aviation sponsors have supported
the project including Phillips 66 Aviation, Champion Aerospace, and Knots2u speed modications.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
39

FSX QUICKSTART GUIDE

hances are, if you are reading this manual, you have properly installed the
A2A Accu-sim V35B Bonanza. However,
in the interest of customer support, here is a brief description of the setup
C
and eciently in your new aircraft.
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza requires the following to run:
• Requires licensed copy of Microsoft Flight Simulator X
• Service Pack 2 (SP2) required
NOTE: While the A2A Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza may work with SP1 or
earlier, many of the features may not work correctly, if at all. We cannot attest to the accuracy of the f light model or aircra systems under such conditions, as it was built using the SP2 SDK. Only Service Pack 2 is required. The Acceleration expansion pack is fully suppor ted but is NOT REQUIRED.
OPERATING SYSTEM:
• Windows XP SP2
• Windows Vista
• Windows 7
Windows 8 & 8.1
• Windows 10
PROCESSOR:
2.0 GHz single core processor (3.0GHz and/or multiple core
processor or better recommended)
process, system requirements, and a quick start guide to get you up quickly
HARD DRIVE:
250MB of hard drive space or better
VIDEO CARD:
DirectX 9 compliant video card with at least 128 MB video ram (512 MB or more recommended)
OTHER:
DirectX 9 hardware compatibility and audio card with speakers and/or headphones
INSTALLATION
Included in your downloaded zipped (.zip) le, which you
should have been given a link to download after purchase, is
an executable (.exe) le which, when accessed, contains the
automatic installer for the software.
To install, double click on the executable and follow the
steps provided in the installer software. Once complete, you
will be prompted that installation is nished.
Important: If you have Microsoft Security Essentials installed, be sure to make an exception for Microsoft Flight Simulator X as shown on the right.
REALISM SETTINGS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza was built to a very high degree of realism and accuracy. Because of this, it was developed using the highest realism settings available in Microsoft Flight Simulator X.
The following settings are recommended to provide the
most accurate depiction of the ight model. Without these
settings, certain features may not work correctly and the
ight model will not perform accurately. The gure below
40
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
depicts the recommended realism settings for the A2A Accu­Sim V35B Bonanza.
FLIGHT MODEL
To achieve the highest degree of realism, move all sliders to the right. The model was developed in this manner, thus we cannot attest to the accuracy of the model if these sliders are not set as shown below.
INSTRUMENTS AND LIGHTS
Enable “Pilot controls aircraft lights” as the name implies for proper control of lighting. Check “Enable gyro drift” to provide realistic inaccuracies which occur in gyro compasses over time.
“Display indicated airspeed” should be checked to provide a
more realistic simulation of the airspeed instruments.
ENGINES
Ensure “Enable auto mixture” is NOT checked.
FLIGHT CONTROLS
It is recommended you have “Auto-rudder” turned o if you
have a means of controlling the rudder input, either via side
swivel/twist on your specic joystick or rudder pedals.
ENGINE STRESS DAMAGES ENGINE
(Acceleration Only). It is recommended you have this
UNCHECKED.
DISPLAY SETTINGS
Under Aircraft, “High Resolution 3-D cockpit” must be checked.
NOTE: It is recommended that the aircra is NOT set as the default aircra/flight in FSX.
SUPPORT AND QUESTIONS?
Please visit us and post directly to the A2A support and com­munity forums; https://a2asimulations.com/forum/index.php
QUICK FLY ING TIPS
▶ To Change Views Press
A or SHIFT + A.
▶ Keep the engine at or above 800
RPM. Failure to do so may cause spark plug fouling. If your plugs do foul (the engine will sound rough), try running the engine at a higher RPM. You have a good chance of blowing them clear within a few seconds by doing so. If that doesn’t work, you may have to shut down and visit the maintenance hangar.
▶ On landing, once the airplane
settles slowly pull back on the yoke for additional elevator braking while you use your wheel brakes. Once the airplane has slowed down you can raise your flaps.
▶ Be careful with high-speed
power-on dives (not recommended in this type of airca), as you can lose control of your aircra if you exceed the max allowable speed.
▶ For landings, take the time to line
up and plan your approach. Keep your eye on the speed at all times.
▶ Using a Simulation Rate higher than
4× may cause odd system behavior.
▶ A quick way to warm your
engine is to re-load your aircra while running.
▶ In warm weather, use reduced
power and higher speed, shallow climbs to keep engine temperatures low.
▶ Avoid fast power reductions
especially in very cold weather to prevent shock cooling the engine.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
41

P3D QUICKSTART GUIDE

hances are, if you are reading this manual, you have properly installed the A2A Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza.
However, in the interest of customer
support, here is a brief description of
C
you up quickly and eciently in your new aircraft.
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza requires the following to run:
Requires licensed copy of Lockheed Martin Prepar3D
OPERATING SYSTEM:
• Windows 7
Windows 8 & 8.1
• Windows 10
PROCESSOR:
2.2 GHz single core processor (3.5 GHz and/or multiple core
processor or better recommended)
HARD DRIVE:
600MB of hard drive space or better
VIDEO CARD:
DirectX 11 compliant video card with at least 2 GB video ram (8 MB or more recommended)
the setup process, system require ments, and a quick start guide to get
-
INSTALLATION
Included in your downloaded zipped (.zip) le, which you
should have been given a link to download after purchase, is
an executable (.exe) le which, when accessed, contains the
automatic installer for the software.
To install, double click on the executable and follow the steps provided in the installer software. Once complete, you
will be prompted that installation is nished.
Important: If you have Microsoft Security Essentials
installed, be sure to make an exception for Lockheed Martin
Prepar3D as shown on the right.
REALISM SETTINGS
The A2A Simulations Accu-Sim V35B Bonanza was built to a very high degree of realism and accuracy. Because of this, it was developed using the highest realism settings available
in Lockheed Martin Prepar3D.
The following settings are recommended to provide the
most accurate depiction of the ight model. Without these
settings, certain features may not work correctly and the
ight model will not perform accurately. The gure below
depicts the recommended realism settings for the A2A Accu­Sim V35B Bonanza.
FLIGHT MODEL
To achieve the highest degree of realism, move all sliders to the right. The model was developed in this manner, thus we cannot attest to the accuracy of the model if these sliders are not set as shown below.
OTHER:
DirectX 11 hardware compatibility, audio card with speak­ers and/or headphones and scroll wheel mouse. Joystick strongly recommended
42
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
INSTRUMENTS AND LIGHTS
Enable “Pilot controls aircraft lights” as the name implies for proper control of lighting. Check “Enable gyro drift” to provide realistic inaccuracies which occur in gyro compasses
over time.
“Display indicated airspeed” should be checked to pro-
vide a more realistic simulation of the airspeed instruments.
ENGINES
Ensure “Enable automixture” is NOT checked.
QUICK FLY ING TIPS
FLIGHT CONTROLS
It is recommended you have “Auto-rudder” turned o if
you have a means of controlling the rudder input, either via
side swivel/twist on your specic joystick or rudder pedals.
ENGINE STRESS DAMAGES ENGINE
It is recommended you have this UNCHECKED.
DISPLAY SETTINGS
Texture resolution should be set to “Ultra 4096x4096” for
best visual quality.
NOTE: It is recommended that the aircra is NOT set as the default aircra/flight in P3D.
SUPPORT AND QUESTIONS?
Please visit us and post directly to the A2A support and commu­nity forums; https://a2asimulations.com/forum/index.php
▶ To Change Views Press
A or SHIFT + A.
▶ Keep the engine at or above 800
RPM. Failure to do so may cause spark plug fouling. If your plugs do foul (the engine will sound rough), try running the engine at a higher RPM. You have a good chance of blowing them clear within a few seconds by doing so. If that doesn’t work, you may have to shut down and visit the maintenance hangar.
▶ On landing, once the airplane
settles slowly pull back on the yoke for additional elevator braking while you use your wheel brakes. Once the airplane has slowed down you can raise your flaps.
▶ Be careful with high-speed
power-on dives (not recommended in this type of airca), as you can lose control of your aircra if you exceed the max allowable speed.
▶ For landings, take the time to line
up and plan your approach. Keep your eye on the speed at all times.
▶ Using a Simulation Rate higher than
4× may cause odd system behavior.
▶ A quick way to warm your
engine is to re-load your aircra while running.
▶ In warm weather, use reduced
power and higher speed, shallow climbs to keep engine temperatures low.
▶ Avoid fast power reductions
especially in very cold weather to prevent shock cooling the engine.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
43

ACCU-SIM

44
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
ccu-Sim is A2A Simulations’ growing
ight simulation engine, which is
now connectable to other host simu­lations. In this case, we have attached our V35B Bonanza to Microsoft Flight
A
amount of realism and immersion possible.
WHAT IS THE PHILOSOPHY BEHIND ACCU-SIM?
Pilots will tell you that no two aircraft are the same. Even taking the same aircraft up from the same airport to the
same location will result in a dierent experience. For
example, you may notice one day your engine is running a bit hotter than usual and you might just open your cowl
aps a bit more and be on your way, or maybe this is a
sign of something more serious developing under the hood. Regardless, you expect these things to occur in a simula­tion just as they do in life. This is Accu-Sim, where no two
ights are ever the same.
Realism does not mean having a dicult time with your
ying. While Accu-Sim is created by pilots, it is built for
everyone. This means everything from having a profes­sional crew there to help you manage the systems, to an intuitive layout, or just the ability to turn the system on or
o with a single switch. However, if Accu-Sim is enabled
and the needles are in the red, there will be consequences. It is no longer just an aircraft, it’s a simulation.
Simulator X and Lockheed Martin’s
Prepar3D to provide the maximum
and sometimes not so subtle, unpredictability of it all. The
end result is when ying in an Accu-Sim powered aircraft,
it just feels real enough that you can almost smell the avgas.
YOUR AIRCRAFT TALKS
We have gone to great lengths to bring the internal physics
of the airframe, engine, and systems to life. Now, when the engine coughs, you can hear it and see a pu of smoke. If you
push the engine too hard, you can also hear signs that this is happening. Just like an actual pilot, you will get to know the sounds of your aircraft, from the tires scrubbing on landing to the stresses of the airframe to the window that is cracked opened.
BE PREPARED – STAY OUT OF TROUBLE
The key to successfully operating almost any aircraft is to stay ahead of the curve and on top of things. Aircraft are not like automobiles, in the sense that weight plays a key role in the creation of every component. So, almost every system on your aircraft is created to be just strong enough to give you, the pilot, enough margin of error to operate safely, but these margins are smaller than those you nd in an auto­mobile. So, piloting an aircraft requires both precision and respect of the machine you are managing.
It is important that you always keep an eye on your oil pressure and engine temperature gauges. On cold engine starts, the oil is thick and until it reaches a proper operat­ing temperature, this thick oil results in much higher than
ACTIONS LEAD TO CONSEQUENCES
Your A2A Simulations aircraft is quite complete with full system modeling and
ying an aircraft such as this requires
constant attention to the systems. The
innite changing conditions around you
and your aircraft have impact on these systems. As systems operate both inside and outside their limitations, they behave dierently. For example, the tempera­ture of the air that enters your carbure­tor has a direct impact on the power your engine can produce. Pushing an engine too hard may produce just slight damage that you, as a pilot, may see as it just not running quite as good as it was on a pre-
vious ight. You may run an engine so hot, that it catches re. However, it may not catch re; it may just quit, or may
not run smoothly. This is Accu-Sim – it’s both the realism of all of these systems working in harmony, and all the subtle,
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
45
ACCU-SIM
normal oil pressure. In extreme cold, once the engine is started, watch that oil pressure gauge and idle the engine as low as possible, keeping the oil pressure under 100psi.
PERSISTENT AIRCRAFT
Every time you load up your Accu-sim V35B Bonanza, you
will be ying the continuation of the last aircraft which
includes fuel and oil, along with all of your system condi­tions. So be aware, no longer will your aircraft load with full fuel every time, it will load with the same amount of fuel
you left o when you quit your last ight. You will learn the
easy or the hard way to make, at the very least, some basic
checks on your systems before jumping in and taking o,
just like a real aircraft owner.
Additionally, in each ight things will sometimes be dif­ferent. The gauges and systems will never be exactly the same. There are just too many moving parts, variables, changes, etc., that continuously alter the condition of the airplane, its engine and its systems.
NOTE: Signs of a damaged engine may be lower RPM (due to increased friction), or possibly hotter engine temperatures.
SOUNDS GENERATED BY PHYSICS
Microsoft Flight Simulator X and Lockheed Martin’s
Prepar3D, like any piece of software, has its limitations. Accu-Sim breaks this open by augmenting the sound
46
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
system with our own, adding sounds to provide the most
believable and immersive ying experience possible. The
sound system is massive in this Accu-sim V35B Bonanza and includes engine sputter / spits, bumps and jolts, body
creaks, engine detonation, runway thumps, and aps,
dynamic touchdowns, authentic simulation of air including
bueting, shaking, broken aps, primer, and almost every
single switch or lever in the cockpit is modeled. Most of these sounds were recorded from the actual aircraft and this sound environment just breaks open an entirely new world.
However, as you can see, this is not just for entertainment
purposes; proper sound is critical to creating an authentic
and believable ying experience. Know that when you hear
something, it is being driven by actual system physics and not being triggered when a certain condition is met. There
is a big dierence, and to the simulation pilot, you can just
feel it.
GAUGE PHYSICS
Each gauge has mechanics that allow it to work. Some
gauges run o of engine suction, gyros, air pressure, or
mechanical means. The RPM gauge may wander because
of the slack in the mechanics, or the gyro gauge may uc
tuate when starting the motor, or the gauge needles may vibrate with the motor or jolt on a hard landing or tur
bulent buet.
The gauges are the windows into your aircraft’s
-
-
systems and therefore Accu-Sim requires these to behave authentically.
LANDINGS
Bumps, squeaks, rattles, and stress all happens in an air-
craft, just when it is taxiing around the ground. Now take
that huge piece of lightweight metal and slam it on the pavement. It’s a lot to ask of your landing gear. Aircraft engineer’s don’t design the landing gear any more rugged
than they have too. So treat it with kid gloves on your nal
approach. Kiss the pavement. Anything more is just asking too much from your aircraft.
Accu-Sim watches your landings, and the moment your wheels hit the pavement, you will hear the appropriate sounds (thanks to the new sound engine capabilities). Slam it on the ground and you may hear metal crunching, or just kiss the pavement perfectly and hear just a nice chirp or scrub of the wheels. This landing system part of Accu-Sim makes every landing challenging and fun.
YOUR TURN TO FLY SO ENJOY
Accu-Sim is about maximizing the joy of ight. We at A2A
Simulations are passionate about aviation, and are proud to be the makers of the A2A Simulations V35B Bonanza. Please feel free to email us, post on our forums, or let us know what you think. Sharing this passion with you is what makes us happy.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
47

ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE

The piston pulls in the fue l / air mixture, then compresses the mixture on its way back up.
48
A2ASIMULATIONS
The spar k plug ignites the compr essed air / fuel mix ture, driving t he piston down (power), then on it s way back up, the burned mixt ure is forced out the exha ust.
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
he combustion engine is basically an air pump. It creates power by pull­ing in an air / fuel mixture, igniting it, and turning the explosion into usable power. The explosion pushes a piston down that turns a crankshaft. As the
T
trolled explosions, the crankshaft spins. For an automobile, the spinning crankshaft is connected to a transmission (with gears) that is connected to a driveshaft, which is then con­nected to the wheels. This is literally “putting power to the pavement.” For an aircraft, the crankshaft is connected to a propeller shaft and the power comes when that spinning propeller takes a bite of the air and pulls the aircraft forward.
The main dierence between an engine designed for an
automobile and one designed for an aircraft is the aircraft engine will have to produce power up high where the air is thin. To function better in that high, thin air, a super­charger can be installed to push more air into the engine.
OVERVIEW OF HOW THE ENGINE WORKS AND CREATES POWER
Fire needs air. We need air. Engines need air. Engines are
just like us as – they need oxygen to work. Why? Because re needs oxygen to burn. If you cover a re, it goes out
because you starved it of oxygen. If you have ever used a
wood stove or replace, you know when you open the vent to allow more air to come in, the re will burn more. The
same principle applies to an engine. Think of an engine like
a re that will burn as hot and fast as you let it.
Look at these four images on the left and you will under-
stand basically how an engine operates.
The piston pulls in the fuel / air mixture, then compresses
the mixture on its way back up.
The spark plug ignites the compressed air / fuel mixture, driving the piston down (power), then on its way back up, the burned mixture is forced out the exhaust.
pistons run up and down with con-
AIR TEMPERATURE
Have you ever noticed that your car engine runs smoother and stronger in the cold weather? This is because cold air is denser than hot air and has more oxygen. Hotter air means
less power.
Cold air is denser
WEAK
and so provides more ox ygen to your engine. More oxygen means more power.
STRONG
MIXTURE
Just before the air enters the combustion chamber it is mixed with fuel. Think of it as an air / fuel mist.
A general rule is a 0.08% fuel to air ratio will produce the
most power. 0.08% is less than 1%, meaning for every 100
parts of air, there is just less than 1 part fuel. The best eco-
nomical mixture is 0.0625%.
Why not just use the most economical mixture all the time?
Because a leaner mixture means a hotter running engine. Fuel actually acts as an engine coolant, so the richer the mixture, the cooler the engine will run.
However, since the engine at high power will be nearing
its maximum acceptable temperature, you would use your
Just before the air e nters the combustion chamber it is mixed wi th fuel. Think of it a s an air / fuel mist. When you p ush the throttle forward, you are op ening a valve allowing your eng ine to suck in more fuel / air mixture.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
49
ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
best power mixture (0.08%) when you need power (take­o, climbing), and your best economy mixture (.0625%)
when throttled back in a cruise when engine temperatures are low.
So, think of it this way:
For HIGH POWER, use a RICHER mixture.
For LOW POWER, use a LEANER mixture.
THE MIXTURE LEVER
Most piston aircraft have a mixture lever in the cockpit that
the pilot can operate. The higher you y, the thinner the
air, and the less fuel you need to achieve the same mixture. So, in general, as you climb you will be gradually pulling that mixture lever backwards, leaning it out as you go to the higher, thinner air.
HOW DO YOU KNOW WHEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT MIXTURE?
The standard technique to achieve the proper mixture in
ight is to lean the mixture until you just notice the engine
getting a bit weaker, then richen the mixture until the engine sounds smooth. It is this threshold that you are dial-
ing into your 0.08%, best power mixture. Be aware, if you
pull the mixture all the way back to the leanest position,
this is mixture cuto, which will stop the engine.
INDUCTION
As you now know, an engine is an air pump that runs based
on timed explosions. Just like a forest re, it would run out
of control unless it is limited. When you push the throttle forward, you are opening a valve allowing your engine to suck in more fuel / air mixture. When at full throttle, your engine is pulling in as much air as your intake system will allow. It is not unlike a watering hose – you crimp the hose and restrict the water. Think of full power as you just opening that water valve and letting the water run
free. This is 100% full power.
In general, we don’t run an airplane engine at full power for extended peri­ods of time. Full power is only used when it is absolutely necessary, some-
times on takeo, and otherwise in an
emergency situation that requires it. For the most part, you will be ‘throt­tling’ your motor, meaning you will be setting the limit.
HIGH BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (high air pressure). While
air pressure changes all over the world based on weather conditions, these air pressure changes are minor compared
to the dierence in air pressure with altitude. The higher
the altitude, the much lower the air pressure.
On a standard day (59°F), the air pressure at sea level
is 29.92 in. Hg BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. To keep things simple, let’s say 30 in. Hg is standard air pressure. You have just taken o and begin to climb. As you reach higher alti-
tudes, you notice your rate of climb slowly getting lower.
This is because the higher you y, the thinner the air is, and
the less power your engine can produce. You should also
notice your MANIFOLD PRESSURE decreases as you climb
as well.
Why does your manifold pressure decrease as you climb?
Because manifold pressure is air pressure, only it’s mea­sured inside your engine’s intake manifold. Since your engine needs air to breath, manifold pressure is a good indi­cator of how much power your engine can produce.
Now, if you start the engine and idle, why does the mani­fold pressure go way down?
When your engine idles, it is being choked of air. It is given just enough air to sustain itself without stall­ing. If you could look down your carburetor throat when an engine is idling, those throttle plates would look like
they were closed. However if you looked at it really closely,
you would notice a little space on the edge of the throttle valve. Through that little crack, air is streaming in. If you turned your ear toward it, you could probably even hear a loud sucking sound. That is how much that engine is trying to breath. Those throttle valves are located at the base of your carburetor, and your carburetor is bolted on top of your
MANIFOLD PRESSURE = AIR PRESSURE
You have probably watched the weather
on television and seen a large letter L
showing where big storms are located.
L stands for LOW BAROMETRIC
PRESSURE (low air pressure). You’ve
seen the H as well, which stands for
50
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
intake manifold. Just below those throttle valves and inside your intake manifold, the air is in a near vacuum. This is where your manifold pressure gauge’s sensor is, and when you are idling, that sensor is reading that very low air pres­sure in that near vacuum.
As you increase power, you will notice your manifold pres­sure comes up. This is simply because you have used your throttle to open those throttle plates more, and the engine is able to get the air it wants. If you apply full power on a normal engine, that pressure will ultimately reach about the same pressure as the outside, which really just means the air
The air and f uel are compres sed by the piston , then the ignition system adds the s park to create a contr olled explosion.
is now equalized as your engine’s intake system is running
wide open. So if you turned your engine o, your manifold
pressure would rise to the outside pressure. So on a standard
day at sea level, your manifold pressure with the engine o
will be 30”.
IGNITION
The ignition system provides timed sparks to trigger timed explosions. For safety, aircraft are usually equipped with two completely independent ignition systems. In the event one fails, the other will continue to provide sparks and the engine will continue to run. This means each cylinder will have two spark plugs installed.
An added advantage to having two sparks instead of one is
more sparks means a little more power. The pilot can select
Ignition 1, Ignition 2, or BOTH by using the MAG switch.
You can test that each ignition is working on the ground by selecting each one and watching your engine RPM. There will be a slight drop when you go from BOTH to just one igni­tion system. This is normal, provided the drop is within your pilot’s manual limitation.
ENGINE TEMPERATURE
All sorts of things create heat in an engine, like friction, air
temp, etc., but nothing produces heat like COMBUSTION.
The hotter the metal, the weaker its strength.
Aircraft engines are made of aluminum alloy, due to its strong but lightweight properties. Aluminum maintains most of its strength up to about 150°C. As the temperature
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
51
ACCU-SIM AND THE COMBUSTION ENGINE
Without the layer of oil between the par ts, an engine will quickly overheat and seize.
approaches 200°C, the strength starts to drop. An aluminum rod at 0°C is about 5× stronger than the same rod at 250°C, so an engine is most prone to fail when it is running hot. Keep your engine temperatures down to keep a healthy run­ning engine.
LUBRICATION SYSTEM (OIL)
An internal combustion engine has precision machined metal parts that are designed to run against other metal surfaces. There needs to be a layer of oil between those sur­faces at all times. If you were to run an engine and pull the oil plug and let all the oil drain out, after just minutes, the engine would run hot, slow down, and ultimately seize up completely from the metal on metal friction.
There is a minimum amount of oil pressure required for every engine to run safely. If the oil pressure falls below this minimum, then the engine parts are in danger of
making contact with each other and incurring damage. A trained pilot quickly learns to look at his oil pressure gauge as soon as the engine starts, because if the oil pressure does not rise within seconds, then the engine must be shut down immediately.
Above is a simple illustration of a crankshaft that is located between two metal caps, bolted together. This is the very crankshaft where all of the engine’s power ends up. Vital oil is pressure-injected in between these surfaces when the engine is running. The only time the crankshaft ever physically touches these metal caps is at startup and shutdown. The moment oil pressure drops below its mini­mum, these surfaces make contact. The crankshaft is where all the power comes from, so if you starve this vital compo-
nent of oil, the engine can seize. However, this is just one of
hundreds of moving parts in an engine that need a constant supply of oil to run properly.
MORE CYLINDERS, MORE POWER
The very rst combustion engines were just one or two
cylinders. Then, as technology advanced, and the demand for more power increased, cylinders were made larger. Ultimately, they were not only made larger, but more were added to an engine.
Below are some illustrations to show how an engine may
be congured as more cylinders are added.
The more cylinders you add to an engine, the more heat it produces. Eventually, engine manufacturers started to add additional “rows” of cylinders. Sometimes two engines would literally be mated together, with the 2nd row being
rotated slightly so the cylinders could get a direct ow of air.
52
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
THE PRATT & WHITNEY R-4360
Pratt & Whitney took this even further, creating the R-4360,
with 28 Cylinders (this engine is featured in the A2A Boeing 377 Stratocruiser). The cylinders were run so deep, it became known as the “Corn Cob.” This is the most power­ful piston aircraft engine to reach production. There are a
LOT of moving parts on this engine.
TORQUE VS HORSEPOWER
Torque is a measure of twisting force. If you put a foot long wrench on a bolt, and applied 1 pound of force at the handle, you would be applying 1 foot-pound of torque to that bolt. The moment a spark triggers an explosion, and that piston is driven down, that is the moment that piston is creating torque, and using that torque to twist the crankshaft. With a more pow erful explosion, comes more torque. The more fuel and air that can be exploded, the more torque. You can increase an engine’s power by either making bigger cylinders, adding more cylinders, or both.
Horsepower, on the other hand, is
the total power that engine is creat­ing. Horsepower is calculated by com­bining torque with speed (RPM). If an engine can produce 500 foot pounds of torque at 1,000 RPM and produce the same amount of torque at 2,000 RPM, then that engine is producing twice the horsepower at 2,000 RPM than it is at
1,000 RPM. Torque is the twisting force. Horsepower is how
fast that twisting force is being applied.
If your airplane has a torque meter, keep that engine torque within the limits or you can break internal compo­nents. Typically, an engine produces the most torque in the low to mid RPM range, and highest horsepower in the upper RPM range.
-
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
53

PROPELLERS

54
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
efore you learn about how dierent propellers work, rst you must under-
stand the basics of the common airfoil, which is the reason why a wing creates lift, and in this case, why a propeller
B
cussing Bernoulli and Newton and how they relate to lift,
that both theories on how lift is created were presented by each man not knowing their theory would eventually become an explanation for how lift is created. They both were dealing with other issues of their day.
THE BERNOULLI THEORY
This has been the traditional theory of why an airfoil cre-
ates lift. Look at the image below which shows you how the
shape of an airfoil splits the oncoming air. The air above is forced to travel further than the air at the bottom, essen­tially stretching the air and creating a lower pressure, or vacuum. The wing is basically sucked up, into this lower pressure. The faster the speed, the greater the lift.
THE NEWTON THEORY
As the air travels across the airfoil’s upper and lower sur-
faces, lift is created by BENDING the air down with great force at its trailing edge, and thus, the Newtonian force of
opposite and equal reaction apply.
WHAT WE DO KNOW (AND WHAT THE PILOT NEEDS TO KNOW)
The airfoil is essentially an air diverter and the lift is the reaction to the diverted air. An airfoil’s lift is dependent
creates thrust.
It is interesting to note when dis-
upon its shape, the speed at which it is traveling through the air, and its angle to the oncoming air (angle of attack).”
It is important that you note that we have deliberately not entered into the details and complete aerodynamics involved with either of the above explanations for lift as they go beyond the scope of this manual.
Unfortunately over time, the Bernoulli theory speci­cally has been misrepresented in many textbooks causing
some confusion in the pilot and ight training community.
Misrepresentations of Bernoulli such as the “equal tran­sit theory” and other incorrect variations on Bernoulli have caused this confusion. Rather than get into a highly tech­nical review of all this we at A2A simply advise those inter­ested in the correct explanation of Bernoulli to research that area with competent authority.
The main thing we want to impress upon you here is that when considering lift and dealing with Bernoulli and
Newton, it is important and indeed critical to understand that BOTH explanations are COMPLETE EXPLANATIONS for how lift is created. Bernoulli and Newton do NOT add to form a total lift force. EACH theory is simply a dierent way of COMPLETELY explaining the same thing.
BOTH Bernoulli and Newton are in fact in play and acting
simultaneously on an airfoil each responsible completely and independently for the lift being created on that airfoil.
Hopefully we have sparked your interest in the direction
of proper research.
WHAT IS A STALL?
In order for a wing to produce ecient lift, the air must ow
completely around the leading (front) edge of the wing, fol-
lowing the contours of the wing. At too large an angle of attack, the air cannot contour the wing. When this happens, the wing is in a “stall.”
Typically, stalls in aircraft occur
when an airplane loses too much air
speed to create a sucient amount
of lift. A typical stall exercise would be to put your aircraft into a climb, cut the throttle, and try and main tain the climb as long as possible. You will have to gradually pull back harder on the stick to maintain your climb pitch and as speed decreases, the angle of attack increases. At some point, the angle of attack will become so great, that the wing will stall (the nose will drop).
-
-
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
55
PROPELLERS
CROSS SECTION OF A PROPELLER BLADE
CAMBERED SIDE, OR FRONT
LEADING
EDGE
FLAT LOWER SIDE
TRAILING EDGE
Level Flight. A wing cr eating moder ate li. Air vortices (lines) stay close to the wing .
Climb. Wing creating significant li force. A ir vortices s till close to the wing .
Stall. A wing that is st alled will be unab le to create significant li.
56
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
STALL
The angle of attack has become too large. The boundary layer vortices have separated from the top surface of the
wing and the incoming ow no longer bends completely
around the leading edge. The wing is stalled, not only cre-
ating little lift, but signicant drag.
Can a propeller stall? What do you think? More on this below.
LIFT VS ANGLE OF ATTACK
Every airfoil has an optimum angle at which it attacks the air (called angle of attack, or AoA), where lift is at its peak. The lift typically starts when the wing is level, and increases until the wing reaches its optimum angle, let’s say 15-25
degrees, then as it passes this point, the lift drops o. Some
wings have a gentle drop, others can actually be so harsh, as your angle of attack increases past this critical point, the
lift drops o like a cli. Once you are past this point of lift
and the angle is so high, the air is just being plowed around in circles, creating almost no lift but plenty of drag. This is what you experience when you stall an aircraft. The buet­ing or shaking of the aircraft at this stall position is actually the turbulent air, created by your stalling wing, passing over your rear stabilizer, thus shaking the aircraft. This shaking can sometimes become so violent, you can pop rivets and damage your airframe. You quickly learn to back o your stick (or yoke) when you feel those shud­ders approaching.
Notice in the diagram on the right, how the
airfoil creates more lift as the angle of attack increases. Ideally, your wing (or propeller) will spend most of its time moving along the left hand side of this curve, and avoid passing over the edge. A general aviation plane that comes to mind is the Piper Cherokee. An older version has what we call
a “Hershey bar wing” because it is uniform from the root to the tip, just like a Hershey chocolate bar. Later, Piper introduced the tapered wing,
which stalled more gradually, across the wing. The
Hershey bar wing has an abrupt stall, whereas the
tapered wing has a gentle stall.
A propeller is basically a wing except that instead of relying on incoming air for lift, it is spinning around to create lift, it is perpendicular to the ground, creating a backwards push of air, or thrust.
Just remember, whether a propeller is a xed pitch,
variable pitch, or constant speed, it is always attack­ing a variable, incoming air, and lives within this lift curve.
while the plane is not moving. This eect is known as prop
stall, and is part of the Accu-Sim prop physics suite.
Once done with your power check, prepare for takeo.
Once you begin your takeo run, you may notice the aircraft
starts to pull harder after you start rolling forward. This is the propeller starting to get its proper “bite” into the air, as the propeller blades come out of their stalled, turbulent state and enter their comfortable high lift angles of attack it was designed for. There are also other good physics going
on during all of these phases of ight, that we will just let you experience for the rst time yourself.
PROP OVERSPEED
A xed pitch prop spends almost all of its life out of its peak
thrust angle. This is because, unless the aircraft is travelling
at a specic speed and specic power it was designed for, it’s either operating too slow or too fast. Let’s say you are ying a P-40 and have the propeller in MANUAL mode, and you are cruising at a high RPM. Now you pitch down, what is going to happen? The faster air will push your prop faster,
and possibly beyond its 3,000 RPM recommended limit. If you pitch up your RPM will drop, losing engine power and
propeller eciency. You really don’t have a whole lot of
room here to play with, but you can push it (as many WWII pilots had to).
FROM STALL TO FULL POWER
With brakes on and idling, the angle at which the prop attacks the still air, especially closer to the propeller hub, is almost always too great for the prop to be creating much lift. The prop is mostly behaving like a brake as it slams its side into the air. In reality, the prop is creating very little lift
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
57

GENERAL

GROUND TURNING CLEARANCE
A Radius for Wing Tip 26 feet 4 inches B Radius for Nose Wheel 12 feet 2 inches
C Radius for Inside Gear 5 feet 1 inch D Radius for Outside Gear 14 feet 8 inches
Turning radii are calculated using full steering, one brake and partial power.
ENGINE
One Teledyne Continental Motors Corporation engine model IO-520-BA or IO-520-BB. These are fuel-injected,
direct-drive, air-cooled, horizontally opposed, 6-cylinder,
520-cubic-inch-displacement, 285-horsepower-rated engines.
TAKE-OFF AND MAXIMUM
Continuous Power: Full Throttle, 2700 rpm
Maximum Normal Operating Power: Full Throttle, 2550 rpm
PROPELLER
One McCauley constant-speed, 3-blade propeller using
3A32C406 hub with 82NDB-2 blades.
FUEL
Aviation Gasoline Grade 100LL (blue),or Grade 100 (green)
minimum grade.
Main Tanks Capacity 80 Gallons Main Tanks Usable 74 Gallons Tip Tanks Capacity 40 Gallons Tip Tanks Usable 40 Gallons Total Capacity 120 Gallons Total Usable 114 Gallons
OIL
Oil Capacity 12 Quarts
MAXIMUM CERTIFICATED WEIGHTS
Max. Ramp Weight 3412 lbs
Max. Take-o Weight 3400 lbs Max. Landing Weight 3400 lbs
Max. Zero Fuel Weight Max. Weight in Baggage Compartment 270 lbs
No Structural Limit
CABIN AND ENTRY DIMENSIONS
Cabin Width (max.) 3 ft 6 in. Cabin Length (max.) 10 ft 1 in. Cabin Height (max.) 4 ft 2 in. Cabin Door 37 in. wide by 36 in. high
BAGGAGE SPACE AND ENTRY DIMENSIONS
Compartment Volume 35 cu ft Door Width (min.) 18.5 in.
Door Height (min.) 22.5 in. Volume Above Hat Shelf 1.7 cu ft
SPECIFIC LOADINGS
Wing Loading at Max. Take-o Weight 18.8 lbs/sq ft Power Loading at Max. Take-o Weight 11.9 lbs/ hp
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
59
GENERAL
SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
GENERAL AIRSPEED
CAS Calibrated Airspeed is the indicated speed of an
KCAS Calibrated Airspeed expressed in knots.
GS Ground Speed is the speed of an
IAS Indicated Airspeed is the speed of an airplane as
KIAS Indicated Airspeed expressed in knots.
TAS True Airspeed is the airspeed of an airplane relative
V
V
V
V
V
V V
V
V
V
V
airplane, corrected for position and instrument error. Calibrated airspeed is equal to true airspeed in standard atmosphere at sea level.
airplane relative to the ground.
shown on the airspeed indicator when corrected for instrument error. IAS values published in this handbook assume zero instrument error.
to undisturbed air which is the GAS corrected for altitude, temperature, and compressibility.
Maneuvering Speed is the maximum speed at
A
which application of full available aerodynamic control will not overstress the airplane.
Maximum Flap Extended Speed is the
FE
highest speed permissible with wing flaps in a prescribed extended position.
Maximum Landing Gear Extended Speed is the
LE
maximum speed at which an airplane can be safely flown with the landing gear extended.
Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed is
LO
the maximum speed at which the landing gear can be safely extended or retracted.
Never Exceed Speed is the speed limit that
NE
may not be exceeded at any time.
Maximum Structural Cruising Speed is the
NO
speed that should not be exceeded except in
C
smooth air and then only with caution.
Stalling Speed or the minimum steady flight
S
speed at which the airplane is controllable.
Stalling Speed or the minimum steady flight speed at which
SO
the airplane is controllable in the landing configuration.
Best Angle-of-Climb Speed is the airspeed
X
which delivers the greatest gain of altitude in the shortest possible horizontal distance.
Best Rate-of-Climb Speed is the airspeed which delivers
Y
the greatest gain in altitude in the shortest possible time.
METEOROLOGICAL
ISA International Standard Atmosphere in which:
OAT Outside Air Temperature is the free air
Indicated Pressure Altitude
Pressure Altitude
Station Pressure
Wind The win9 velocities recorded as variables on the charts
1. The air is a dry perfect gas;
2. The temperature at sea level is 15° Celsius (59° Fahrenheit);
3. The pressure at sea level is 29.92 inches Hg (1013.2 millibars);
4. The temperature gradient from sea level to the altitude at which the temperature is
-56.5°C (-69.7° F) is -0.00198°C (-0.003566° F) per foot and zero above that altitude.
static temperature, obtained either from inflight temperature indications adjusted for instrument error and compressibility eec ts or ground meteorological sources.
The number actually read from an altimeter when the barometric subscale has been set to
29.92 inches of mercury (1013.2 millibars)
Altitude measured from standard sealevel pressure (29 .92 in. Hg) by a pressure or barometric altimeter. It is the indicated pressurealtitude corrected for position and instrument error. In this handbook, altimeter instrument errors are assumed to be zero. Position errors may be obtained I from the Altimeter Correction graph.
Actual atmospheric pressure at field elevation.
of this handbook are to be understood as the headwind or tailwind components of the reported winds.
60
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
POWER
Take-o and Maximum Continuous
Maximum Normal Operating Power (MNOP)
Cruise Climb Power recommended for cruise climb.
Highest power rating not limited by time.
Highest power rating within the normal operating range. Noise characteristics requirements of FAR 36 have been demonstrated at this power rating.
ENGINE CONTROLS AND INSTRUMENTS
Throttle Control
Propeller Control
Mixture Control
EGT (Exhaust Gas Temperature Indicator)
Tachometer Indicates the rpm of the engine/propeller.
Propeller Governor
Used to control power by introducing fuel-air mixture into the intake passages of the engine. Settings are reflected by readings on the manifold pressure gage.
This control requests the propeller governor to maintain engine/propeller rpm at a selected value by controlling propeller blade angle.
This control is used to set fuel flow in all modes of operation and cuts o fuel completely for engine shut down.
This indicator is used to identify the lean and best power fuel flow mixtures for various power settings during cruise.
Regulates the rpm of the engine/ propeller by increasing or decreasing the propeller pitch through a pitch change mechanism in the propeller hub.
AIRPLANE PERFORMANCE AND FLIGHT PLANNING
Climb Gradient The ratio of the change in height during a
Demonstrated Crosswind Velocity
MEA Minimum enroute IFR altitude.
Route Segment A part of a route. Each end of that part
GPH U.S. Gallons per hour.
portion of a climb, to the horizontal distance traversed in the same time interval.
The demonstrated crosswind velocity is the velocity of the crosswind component for which adequate control of the airplane during takeo and landing was actually demonstrated during certification tests. The value shown is not limiting.
is identified by: (1) a geographical location; or (2) a point at which a definite radio fix can be established.
WEIGHT & BALANCE
Reference Datum
Station A location along the airplane fuselage usually given
Arm The horizontal distance from the reference
Moment The product of the weight of an item multiplied
Airplane Center of Gravity (CG)
CG Arm The arm obtained by adding the
CG Limits The extreme center of gravity locations
Usable Fuel Fuel available for flight planning.
Unusable Fuel Fuel remaining aer a runout test
Standard Empty Weight
Basic Empty Weight
Payload Weight of occupants, cargo and baggage.
Useful Load Dierence between Take-o Weight (or Ramp
Maximum Ramp Weight
Maximum Take-o Weight
Maximum Landing Weight
Maximum Zero Fuel Weight
Tare The weight of chocks, blocks, stands, etc., used
Leveling Points
Jack Points Points on the airplane identified by the
An imaginary vertical plane from which all horizontal distances are measured for balance purposes.
in terms of distance from the reference datum.
datum to the center of gravity (C.G.) of an item.
by its arm (Moment divided by a constant is used to simplify balance calculations by reducing the number of digits.)
The point at which an airplane would balance if suspended. Its distance from the reference datum is found by dividing the total moment by the total weight of the airplane.
airplane’s individual moments and dividing the sum by the total weight.
within which the airplane must be operated at a given weight.
has been completed in accordance with governmental regulations.
Weight of a standard airplane including unusable fuel, full operating fluids and full oil.
Standard Empty Weight plus optional equipment.
Weight, if applicable) and Basic Empty Weight.
Maximum weight approved for ground maneuvering. {It includes weight of start, taxi, and take-o fuel).
Maximum weight approved for lio.
Maximum weight approved for the landing touchdown.
Maximum weight exclusive of usable fuel.
on the scales when weighing an airplane.
Those points which are used during the weighing process to level the airplane.
manufacturer as suitable for supporting the airplane for weighing or other purposes.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
61
GENERAL
LIMITATIONS
AIRSPEED LIMITATIONS
SPEED KCAS KIAS REMARKS
Never Exceed V
NE
Maximum Structural Cruising VNO or V
C
Maneuvering V
A
Maximum Flap Extension/Extended V
FE
Approach (15°) Full Down (30°)
Maximum Landing Gear Operating/Extended V
LO/VLE
195 196 Do Not Exceed This
165 167 Do Not Exceed This Speed
132 134 Do Not Make Full
152 122
152 154 Do Not Extend, Retract
Speed in Any Operation.
Except in Smooth Air and Then Only With Caution.
or Abrupt Control Movements Above This Speed.
Do Not Extend Flaps or Operate With Flaps Exended Above
154
This Speed.
123
or Operate With Gear Extended Above This Speed, Except in Emergency.
POWER PLANT LIMITATIONS
Engine
One Teledyne Continental Motors Corporations model IO-520-BB engine.
Operating Limitations
Take-o & Max. Continuous Power: Cylinder Head Temperature 238°C Oil Temperature 116°C
• Oil Pressure Minimum 30 psi Maximum 100 psi
• Fuel Pressure Minimum 1.5 psi Maximum 17.5 psi
• Fuel Flow Maximum 24.3 gph
Full Throttle, 2700 rpm
Fuel Grades
Aviation Gasoline 100 LL (blue) or 100 (green) minimum
grade.
Oil Specifications
Ashless dispersant oils meeting Teledyne Continental
Motors Corporation Specication MHS-248 or the latest revision of MHS-24.
Propeller Specifications
On 10-520-88 engines only, one McCauley constant-speed,
three-blade propeller using 3A32C406 hub with 82ND8-2
blades. Pitch setting at 30-inch station: low, 13.3° ± .2° ; high, 29.0° ± .5°.
Diameter: Maximum, 80 in.; Minimum, 78-1/2 in.
AIRSPEED INDICATOR MARKINGS*
MARKING
White Arc 53-122 52-123 Full Flap Operating Range
Green Arc 67-165 64-196 Normal Operating Range
Yellow Arc 165-195 167-196 Operate With Caution,
Red Line 195 196 Maximum Speed For
*The airspeed indicator is marked in IAS values.
KCAS
VALUE OR
RANGE
KIAS
VALUE OR
RANGE
SIGNIFICANCE
Only in Smooth Air
All Operations
POWER PLANT INSTRUMENT MARKINGS
Oil Temperature
Caution (Yellow Radial) 38°C
Operating Range (Green Arc) 38° to 116°C Maximum (Red Radial) 116°C
Oil Pressure
Minimum Pressure (Red Radial) 30 psi
Operating Range (Green Arc) 30 to 60 psi
Maximum Pressure (Red Radial) 100 psi
Tachometer
Operating Range (Green Arc) 1800 to 2700 rpm Maximum rpm (Red Radial) 2700 rpm
Cylinder Head Temperature
Operating Range (Green Arc) 93° to 238°C Maximum Temperature (Red Radial) 238°C
Manifold Pressure
Operating Range (Green Arc) 15 to 29.6 in. Hg Maximum (Red Radial) 29.6 in. Hg
Fuel Flow
Minimum (Red Radial) 1.5 psi
Operating Range (Green Arc) 6.9 to 24.3 gph
Maximum (Red Radial) 24.3 gph
MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUMENT MARKINGS
Instrument Pressure
Operating Range (Green Arc) 4.3 to 5.9 in. Hg
Fuel Quantity
Yellow Band E to ½ full (44-gallon system) Yellow Band E to
3
8 full (74-gallon system)
62
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
WEIGHT LIMITS
Maximum Ramp Weight 3412 lbs
Maximum Take-o Weight 3400 lbs Maximum Landing Weight 3400 lbs Zero Fuel Weight No Structural Limit Max. Baggage Compartment Load Refer to Weight and
Balance Section
NOTE: With tip tanks gross weight is increased to 3600 lbs
APPROVED MANEUVERS (3400 POUNDS)
MANEUVER ENTRY SPEED
KCAS KIAS Chandelle 132 134 Steep Turn 132 134
Lazy Eight 132 134
Stall (Except Whip) Use Slow Deceleration Minimum fuel for above maneuvers-10 gallons each main tank
CENTER OF GRAVITY LIMITS (LANDING GEAR EXTENDED)
Loading calculations shall be checked before each ight to
ensure that the Weight and Center of Gravity remain within
the approved limits during ight.
Forward Limits
77.0 inches aft of datum to 2900 pounds with straight line
variation to 82.1 inches at 3400 pounds.
Aft Limits
85.7 inches aft of datum to 3000 pounds with straight line
variation to 84.4 inches at 3400 pounds.
Reference Datum
Datum is 83.1 inches forward of center line through for­ward jack points.
MAC leading edge is 66.7 inches aft of datum. MAC length is 65.3 inches.
MANEUVER LIMITS
This is a utility category airplane. Spins are prohibited. No
acrobatic maneuvers are approved except those listed below. Maximum slip duration is 30 seconds.
FLIGHT LOAD FACTOR LIMITS (3400 POUNDS)
Positive Maneuvering Load Factors:
Flaps Up 4.4 G Flaps Down 2.0 G
MINIMUM FLIGHT CREW
One (1) Pilot
KINDS OF OPERATION LIMITS
1. VFR day and night
2. IFR day and night
FUEL
Capacity 80 gallons Usable 74 gallons
FUEL MANAGEMENT
Do not take o when Fuel Quantity Gages indicate in Yellow
Band or with less than 13 gallons in each wing fuel system.
Maximum slip duration is 30 seconds.
SEATING
All occupied seats must be in the upright position for
takeo and landing.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
63

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

64
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
All airspeeds quoted in this section are indicated airspeeds (IAS)
EMERGENCY AIRSPEEDS (3400 LBS)
Emergency Descent 154 KTS Maximum Glide Range 105 KTS
Emergency Landing Approach 83 KTS
he following information is presented to enable the pilot to form, in
advance, a denite plan of action for coping with the most probable
emergency situations which could occur in the operation of the air-
T
familiarization. Other situations, in which more time is usually permitted to decide on and execute a plan of action, are discussed at some length.
plane. Where practicable, the emergencies requiring immediate cor­rective action are treated in check list form for easy reference and
ENGINE FAILURE
DURING TAKE-OFF GROUND ROLL
1. Throttle - CLOSED
2. Braking - MAXIMUM
3. Fuel Selector Valve - OFF
4. Battery and Alternator Switches - OFF
AFTER LIFTOFF AND IN FLIGHT
Landing straight ahead is usually advisable. If sucient
Altitude is available for maneuvering, accomplish the followmg:
1. Fuel Selector Valve - SELECT OTHER
TANK (feel for detent)
2. Auxiliary Fuel Pump - ON
3. Mixture - FULL RICH, then LEAN AS REQUIRED
4. Magnetos - CHECK RIGHT, LEFT, then BOTH ON
NOTE: The most probable cause of engine failure would be
loss of fuel flow or improper functioning of the ignition system.
If No Restart:
1. Select most favorable landing site.
2. The use of landing gear is dependent on the
terrain where landing must be made.
ENGINE DISCREPANCY CHECKS
CONDITION: ROUGH RUNNING ENGINE
1. Mixture - FULL RICH, then LEAN as required
2. Magneto/Start Switch - “BOTH”
position (check to verify)
CONDITION: LOSS OF ENGINE POWER
1. Fuel Flow Gage - CHECK If fuel ow is abnormally low:
a. Mixture - FULL RICH b. Auxiliary Fuel Pump - ON (then OFF if
performance does not improve in a few moments)
2. Fuel Quantity Indicator - CHECK for
fuel supply in tank being used If tank being used is empty:
a. Fuel Tank Selector Valve - SELECT
OTHER FUEL TANK (feel for detent)
AIR START PROCEDURE
1. Fuel Selector Valve - SELECT TANK MORE NEARLY FULL (feel for detent)
2. Throttle - RETARD
3. Mixture Control - FULL RICH
4. Auxiliary Fuel Pump - ON until power is
regained, then OFF (Leave On if Engine
Driven Fuel Pump is inoperative.)
5. Throttle - ADVANCE to desired power
6. Mixture - LEAN as required
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
65
EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
ENGINE FIRE
IN FLIGHT
The red FIREWALL AIR control on the outboard side of the left lower subpanel should be pulled to close o all heating
system outlets so that smoke and fumes will not enter the
cabin. In the event of engine re, shut down the engine as
follows and make a landing:
1. Firewall Air Control - PULL TO CLOSE
2. Mixture - IDLE CUT-OFF
3. Fuel Selector Valve - OFF
4. Battery, Alternator, and Magneto/Start Switches - OFF
(Extending the landing gear can be accomplished manually if desired.)
5. Do not attempt to restart engine. (See GLIDE and LANDING WITHOUT POWER Procedures)
ON THE GROUND
1. Fuel Selector Valve - OFF
2. Mixture - IDLE CUT-OFF
3. Battery, Alternator and Magneto/Start Switches - OFF
4. Fire Extinguisher - USE TO EXTINGUISH FIRE
EMERGENCY DESCENT
1. Power - IDLE
2. Propeller - HIGH RPM
3. Landing Gear - DOWN
4. Airspeed - ESTABLISH 154 KTS
MAXIMUM GLIDE CONFIGURATION
1. Landing Gear - UP
2. Flaps - UP
3. Cowl Flaps - CLOSED
4. Propeller - PULL for LOW RPM
5. Airspeed - 105 KTS
Glide distance is approximately 1.7 nautical miles (2 statute miles) per 1000 feet of altitude above the terrain.
LANDING EMERGENCIES
LANDING WITHOUT POWER
When assured of reaching the landing site selected, and on
nal approach:
1. Airspeed - ESTABLISH 78 to 83 KTS
2. Fuel Selector Valve - OFF
3. Mixture - IDLE CUT-OFF
4. Magneto/Start Switch - OFF
5. Flaps - AS REQUIRED
6. Landing Gear - DOWN or UP (depending on terrain)
7. Battery and Alternator Switches - OFF
LANDING GEAR RETRACTED - WITH POWER
If possible, choose rm sod or foamed runway. Make a normal approach, using aps as necessary. When sure of
reaching the selected landing spot:
1. Throttle - CLOSED
2. Mixture - IDLE CUT-OFF
3. Battery, Alternator and Magneto/Start Switches - OFF
4. Fuel Selector Valve - OFF
5. Keep wings level during touchdown.
6. Get clear of airplane as soon as possible after it stops.
SYSTEMS EMERGENCIES
PROPELLER OVERSPEED
1. Throttle- RETARD TO RED LINE
2. Airspeed - REDUCE
3. Oil Pressure - CHECK
WARNING: If loss of oil pressure was the cause of overspeed,
the engine will seize aer a short period of operation.
4. Land - SELECT NEAREST SUITABLE SITE and follow LANDING EMERGENCIES procedure.
66
A2ASIMULATIONS
STARTER ENERGIZED WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED (IF INSTALLED)
After engine start, should the starter relay remain engaged, the starter will remain energized and the starter energized warning light will remain illuminated. Continuing to supply power to the starter will result in eventual loss of electri­cal power.
On the Ground:
1. Battery and alternator switches - OFF
2. Do not take o.
In Flight After Air Start:
1. Battery and alternator switches - OFF
2. Land as soon as practical.
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
ALTERNATOR-OUT PROCEDURE
An inoperative alternator will place the entire electrical operation of the airplane except engine ignition on the bat­tery. An alternator failure will be indicated by illumination of the warning light, located on the instrument panel below
the ight instruments.
The warning light will not illuminate until the alternator output is almost zero. A verication of alternator malfunc­tion would be a discharge shown on the ammeter. There is no indication of overvoltage except that the warning light will illuminate as though the alternator is out.
Alternator Warning Light Illuminated:
1. Verify alternator out with ammeter
- will show discharge.
After emergency landing gear extension, do not move any landing gear controls or reset any switches or circuit break­ers until airplane is on jacks, as failure may have been in the gear-up circuit and gear might retract.
LANDING GEAR RETRACTION AFTER PRACTICE MANUAL EXTENSION
After practice manual extension of the landing gear, the gear can only be retracted electrically, as follows:
1. Handcrank - CHECK, STOWED
2. Landing Gear Motor Circuit Breaker - IN
3. Landing Gear Switch Handle - UP
SPINS
NOTE: If the ammeter does not show a discharge, a malfunction in the warning light system is indicated, and the alternator switch should be le ON.
2. If ammeter shows a discharge, Alternator Switch
OFF MOMENTARILY, THEN ON (this resets the
overvoltage relay). If the warning light does not illuminate, continue to use the alternator.
3. If the warning light illuminates, Alternator Switch - OFF
4. Nonessential Electrical Equipment -
OFF to conserve battery power
LANDING GEAR MANUAL EXTENSION
Manual extension of the landing gear can be facilitated by
rst reducing airspeed. Then proceed as follows:
1. LOG GR MOTOR Circuit Breaker (Right
Subpanel) - OFF (pull out)
2. Landing Gear Switch Handle - DOWN position
3. Handcrank Handle Cover (at rear
of front seats) - REMOVE
4. Handcrank - ENGAGE and TURN COUNTERCLOCKWISE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE (approximately 50 turns)
CAUTION: The manual extension system is designed to lower the landing gear only. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RETR ACT THE GEAR MANUALLY.
Spins are prohibited. If a spin is entered inadvertently: Immediately move the control column full forward and simultaneously apply full rudder opposite to the direction of the spin; continue to hold this control position until rotation stops and then neutralize all controls and execute a smooth pullout. Ailerons should be neutral and throttle in idle posi­tion at all times during recovery.
EMERGENCY SPEED REDUCTION
In an emergency, the landing gear may be used to create additional drag. Should disorientation occur under instru­ment conditions, the lowering of the landing gear will reduce the tendency for excessive speed buildup. This pro­cedure would also be appropriate for a non-instrument rated pilot who unavoidably encounters instrument condi­tions or in other emergencies such as severe turbulence.
Should the landing gear be used at speeds higher than the maximum extension speed, a special inspection of the gear doors in accordance with maintenance manual procedures is required,with repair as necessary.
5. If electrical system is operative, check landing gear position lights and warning horn (check
LOG GR RELAY circuit breaker engaged).
6. Handcrank - DISENGAGE. Always
keep it stowed when not in use.
WARNING: Do not operate the landing gear electrically with the handcrank engaged, as damage to the mechanism could occur.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
67
68
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY

NORMAL PROCEDURES

All airspeeds quoted in this section are indicated airspeeds (IAS)
AIRSPEEDS FOR SAFE OPERATION (3400 LBS)
Maximum Demonstrated Crosswind Component 17 KTS
Takeo: Lift-o 71 KTS
50-ft Speed 77 KTS Best Angle-of-Climb (Vx) 77 KTS
Best Rate-of-Climb (Vy) 96 KTS
Cruise climb 107 KTS Turbulent Air Penetration 134 KTS
Landing Approach 70 KTS Balked Landing Climb 70 KTS
PRE-FLIGHT INSPECTION
The Pre-Flight Inspection is another advancement in bring­ing real life standard operating procedures into FSX and P3D.
The inspection system is done in such a way as to emu-
late making your walkaround inspection prior to ight.
For more information for how to peform your Pre-Flight Inspection, please see the 2D Panals Section.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
69
NORMAL PROCEDURES
BEFORE TAKEOFF
UPON ENTERING CABIN
1. Preight - Complete
2. Passengers - Briefed
3. Seat belts, shoulder harness - ON
4. Flaps - UP
5. Radios - OFF
6. Circuit breakers - IN
7. All Electrical Switches - OFF
8. Auto Pilot - OFF
9. Roatating Beacon - ON
10. Fuel Selectors - Desired Tank
11. Gear Switch - DOWN
ENGINE STARTING
1. Mixture - RICH
2. Prop - FULL
3. Throttle - FULL
4. BAT and ALT switches - ON
5. Check Gear Lights - GREEN
6. AUX Pump - ON until  goes into the green then OFF
7. Throttle - Cracked ¼” (Clear prop!)
8. Mag/Start Switch - START
9. Oil Pressure - CHECK
10. Ammeter - CHECK
11. Mixture - LEAN
12. Avionics - ON
13. Cowl Flaps - OPEN
TAXI
1. Radios - ON
2. Transponder - ALT
3. Altimeter - SET
4. Heading Indicator - SET
5. Landing Gear Indicator - GREEN
6. Radio - ATIS
7. Parking Brake - RELEASE
8. Breaks - Test on Inital Roll
9. Lights - AS REQUIRED
RUNUP
1. Brakes - HOLD
2. Fuel Quantity - CHECK
3. Fuel Selectors - DESIRED TANK
4. Mixture - SET
5. Throttle - 1700 rmp
6. Engine Instruments - CHECK
Oil press., Oil temp., Fuel Flow, Ammeter, Vacuum, CHT, EGT
7. Magnetos - CHECK
Max drop: 150 rpm / max di.: 50 rpm
8. Prop Cycle - 1 to 3 times
70
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
TAKEOFF
LANDING
BEFORE TAKEOFF
1. Controls - FREE and CORRECT
2. Fuel Selectors - Desired Tank
3. Fuel Pump - ON
4. Mixture - RICH or as req. for elevation
5. Prop - FULL IN
6. Engine Gauges - CHECK
7. Trim Tab - Neutral
8. Flaps - SET
9. Cowl aps - OPEN
10. Doors and Windows - SECURE
11. Slowly advance throttle
12. Manifold, FF, RPM - CHECK
TAKEOFF
1. Throttle - FULL
2. Rotate - 77 kts
3. Positive Climb - CHECK
4. Gear - UP
5. Flaps Up - CHECK
6. Climb Out at Vy - 96 kts
7. Verify safe landing area
FLIGHT
CLIMB
1. Fuel Pump at 1000 feet AGL - OFF
2. Fuel Pressure - CHECK
3. MAX - 2,500 rpm, 25 MP
4. SPEED: Best angle - 77 kts
Best rate - 96 kts
Best en route - 107 kts
5. CHT - CHECK
6. Mixture - SET FUEL FLOW
APPROACH/LANDING
1. Autopilot - OFF
2. Fuel Pump - ON
3. Fuel Selectors - Desired Tank
4. Fuel Levels - CHECK
5. Mixture - RICH
6. Altimeter - SET
7. Cowl Flaps - CLOSED
8. If airport elevation is over 4,000 ft -LEAN
9. Gear - DOWN (max. speed 154 kts)
10. GUMP - CHECK
11. Flaps - FULL DOWN (max. speed 123 kts)
12. Propeller - HIGH RPM
13. Final - GEAR DOWN CHECK
AFTER LANDING
1. Landing and Taxi lights - AS REQIRED
2. Flaps - UP
3. Trim - Neutral
4. Cowl Flaps - OPEN
SHUTDOWN
1. Breakes - SET
2. Electrical and Radios - OFF
3. Throttle - CLOSE
4. Mixture - OFF
5. Magnetos - OFF
6. Battery and Alternator - OFF
7. Controls - LOCK
8. Parking Brake - RELEASE
9. Wheel Chocks - INSTALL
CRUISE
1. Cowl Flaps - CLOSED
2. Power - SET
3. RPM - AS DESIRED (2,100-2,500)
4. Mixture - SET FUEL FLOW
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
71

PERFORMANCE CHARTS

ISA CONVERSION
25,000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE vs OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE
20,000
15,000
10,000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
74
ISA - 30°C
ISA - 20°C
5,000
-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
ISA
ISA - 10°C
TEMPERATURE ~ °C
ISA + 10°C
ISA + 20°C
ISA + 30°C
ISA + 40°C
PRESSURE ALITUDE
DISTANCE ~ FEET
EXAMPLE:
OAT ....................................15°C (59°F)
Pressure Altitude ........................5650 FT
Take-O Weight .........................3400 LBS
Head Wind Component ..................9.5 KTS
Ground Roll ............................1600 FT
Total Distance Over A 50 FT Obstacle ......3000 FT
Take-O Speed At Li-O ................71 KTS (82 MPH)
At 50 FT ...............77 KTS (89 MPH)
6000
5000
FOR INTERMEDIATE
GUIDE LINE
NOT APPLICABLE
4000
OBSTACLE HEIGHTS
3000
REFERENCE LINE
HEAD WIND
TAIL WIND
REFERENCE LINE
2000
1000
0
OBSTACLE HEIGHT ~ FEETWIND COMPONENT ~ KNOTSWEIGHT ~ POUNDSOUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºC
TAKE-OFF DISTANCE
Associated Conditions:
Take-O Speed
Li-O 50 FT
KTS MPH KTS MPH
(lbs.)
Weight
Power ...........Full Throttle at 2700 RPM
Mixture ..........Lean to Appropriate Fuelflow
Flaps ............UP
3400 71 82 77 89
Landing Gear ....Retracted Aer Positive Climb Established
Cowl Flaps ......OPEN
3200 69 79 75 86
3000 66 76 73 84
2800 64 74 70 81
2600 61 70 67 77
2400 59 68 64 74
REFERENCE LINE
50 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 0 10 20 30 0 50
30 40
20
10
40 60 80 10 0 120
ISA
SL
2,000
~ FEET
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
-10 0
-30 -20
-50 -40
20
0
-20
-40
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºF
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
75
PERFORMANCE CHARTS
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
POWER FULL THROTTLE AT
MIXTURE LEAN TO APPROPRIATE
FLAPS UP LANDING GEAR COWL FLAPS
2700 RPM
FUEL FLOW
UP AS REQUIRED
SL
2000
22.5
4000
20.9
6000
19.7
8000
18.6
10,000
17.5
12,000
16.4
14,000
15.4
16,000
PRESSURE
ALTITUDE
~ FEET
14.6
FUEL FLOW
~ GAL/HR
-70 -60-80
-50 -40
-30
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºC
-80-100
-60
-40
-20
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºF
CLIMB SPEED 96 KNOTS (110 MPH) IAS (ALL WEIGHTS)
(SERIALS D-9948 THRU D-10312 WITH 2- OR 3-BLADE
PROPELLER INSTALLED AND D-10313 AND AFTER WITH
McCAULEY 3-BLADE PROPELLER INSTALLED)
24.2
ISA
-20 - 10 0010 202030 40
40 60 80 100 120
CLIMB
EXAMPLE:
OAT PRESSURE ALTITUDE WEIGHT
RATE-OF-CLIMB CLIMB GRADIENT CLIMBSPEED
REFERENCE LINE
50
3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400
WEIGHT ~ POUNDS
1400
1300
1200
110 0
1000
900
800
700
600
500
RATE-OF-CLIMB ~ FT/MIN
400
300
200
100
0 0
-5ºC (23ºF) 11,500 FT 3380 LBS
470 FT/MIN
3.8% 96 KTS (110 MPH)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
CLIMB GRADIENT ~ %
3
2
1
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
POWER MIXTUE FLAPS LANDING GEAR COWL FLAPS
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
13.9
FULL THROTTLE AT 2550 RPM LEAN TO APPROPRIATE FUEL FLOW UP UP AS REQUIRED
PRESSURE ALTITUDE
~ FEET
SL
2000
4000
20.0
6000
18.8
8000
17.7
16.6
15.6
14.7
-50-60 -40 -30 -20 -10
CLIMB SPEED 96 KNOTS (ALL WEIGHTS)
CLIMB
(SERIALS D-10313 AND AFTER
WITH 2-BLADE PROPELLER INSTALLED)
FUEL FLOW ~
GAL/HR
22.9
21.3
REFERENCE LINE
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºC WEIGHT ~ POUNDS
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
OAT PRESSURE ALTITUDE WEIGHT
RATE OF CLIMB CLIMB GRADIENT
-5oC (23oF) 11,500 FT 3380 LBS
375 FT/MIN
3.3%
1400
1200
1000
800
600
RATE OF CLIMB ~ FT/MIN
400
200
0
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
CLIMB GRADIENT ~ %
76
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 -80
A2ASIMULATIONS
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ ºF
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
PRESSURE
15oC
-5oC
5650 FT
11,500 FT
3400 LBS
13 MIN
3.6 GALS
27 NM
3400
EXAMPLE:
OAT AT TAKE-OFF
OAT AT CRUISE
AIRPORT PRESSURE ALTITUDE
CRUISE PRESSURE ALTITUDE
INITIAL CLIMB WEIGHT
TIME TO CLIMB (21-8)
FUEL TO CLIMB (6.25-2.65)
DISTANCE TO CLIMB (42-15)
3100
2800
2400
WEIGHTS ~ LBS
8 9 10 11 12 13
7
TIME TO CLIMB ~ MINUTES
FUEL TO CLIMB ~ GALLONS
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 0 110
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
DISTANCE TO CLIMB ~ NAUTICAL MILES
CLIMB SPEED - 107 KNOTS (123 MPH)
TIME, FUEL AND DISTANCE TO CLIMB
ISA
19.4
18.7
17.6
16.5
15.6
25 IN. HG OR FULL THROTTLE, 2500 RPM
6.0 LBS/GAL
LEAN TO APPROPRIATE FUEL FLOW
CLOSED
~ GAL/HR
FUEL FLOW
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
POWER
FUEL DENSITY
MIXTURE
COWL FLAPS
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
13.7
~ FEET
ALTITUDE
14.7
12,000
14,000
16,000
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
10,000
6000
8000
18.8
19.2
SL
2000
4000
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATUE ~ oC
-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
40 60 80 10 0 120
-40 -20 0 20
-60
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATUE ~ oF
77
PERFORMANCE CHARTS
CRUISE POWER SETTINGS
75% MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS POWER (OR FULL THROT TLE) 2500 RPM, 3200 POUNDS
PRESS
A LT.
FEET
10000 -8 -22 2500 20.0 83.7 14.0 167 150 28 -2 2500 20.0 81.0 13.5 168 145 64 18 2500 20.0 78.3 13.1 168 140
11000 -12 -24 2500 19.2 80.9 13.5 166 146 24 -4 2500 19.2 78.3 13.1 167 142 60 16 2500 19.2 75.7 12.6 167 137
12000 -15 -26 2500 18.3 76.2 13.0 165 143 21 -6 2500 18.3 75.7 12.6 165 138 57 14 2500 18.3 73.1 12.2 165 133
13000 -19 -28 2500 17.6 75.4 12.6 163 139 17 -8 2500 17.6 73.0 12.2 164 135
14000 -23 -30 2500 16.8 72.9 12.2 162 136 13 -10 2500 16.8 70.6 11.8 162 131 49 10 2500 16.8 68.3 11.4 162 126
15000 -28 -32 2500 16.1 70.4 11.7 160 133 10 -12 2500 16.1 68.2 11.4 160 127 46 8 2500 16.1 66.0 11.0 159 122
16000 -30 -34 2500 15.4 68.1 11.4 158 129 8 -14 2500 15.4 65.9 11.0 158 124 42 6 2500 15.4 63.7 10.6 156 118
IO AT
°F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH
SL 27 -3 2500 23.9 91.4 15.2 159 165 63 17 2500 24.6 91.4 15.2 163 163 100 38 2500 25.1 91.4 15.2 166 161
1000 24 -5 2500 23.6 91.4 15.2 161 164 60 16 2500 24.3 91.4 15.2 164 162 96 36 2500 24.8 91.4 15.2 168 160
2000 20 -7 2500 23.4 91.4 15.2 162 163 56 14 2500 24.1 91.4 15.2 166 161 93 34 2500 24.6 91.4 15.2 169 159
3000 17 -8 2500 23.1 91.4 15.2 164 163 53 12 2500 23.8 91.4 15.2 167 160 89 32 2500 24.3 91.4 15.2 171 158
4000 13 -10 2500 22.8 91.4 15.2 165 162 49 10 2500 23.5 91.4 15.2 169 159 86 30 2500 24.0 91.4 15.2 172 157
5000 10 -12 2500 22.5 91.4 15.2 167 161 46 8 2500 23.2 91.4 15.2 170 158 82 28 2500 23.7 91.4 15.2 173 156
6000 6 -14 2500 22.2 91.4 15.2 168 160 43 6 2500 23.0 91.4 15.2 172 157 79 26 2500 23.5 89.7 15.0 174 153
7000 3 -16 2500 22.0 91.4 15.2 169 159 39 4 2500 22.6 89.7 15.0 172 155 75 24 2500 22.6 86.7 14.5 172 150
8000 -1 -18 2500 21.7 89.4 14.9 169 156 35 2 2500 21.7 89.5 14.4 170 151 71 22 2500 21.7 83.6 13.9 171 147
9000 -4 -20 2500 20.8 86.5 14.4 168 153 32 0 2500 20.8 83.7 14.0 169 148 68 20 2500 20.8 81.0 13.5 170 143
Full throttle manifold pressure settings are approximate. Red shaded area represents operation with full throttle
ISA - 36°F (-20°C) STANDARD DAY (ISA) ISA +36°F (+20°C)
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
53 12 2500 17.6 70.6 11.8 163 129
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
CRUISE POWER SETTINGS
65% MA XIMUM CONTINUOUS POWER (OR FULL THROTTLE) 2 300 RPM, 3200 POUNDS
PRESS
A LT.
FEET
10000 -8 -22 2300 20.0 76.2 12.7 159 153 28 -2 2300 20.0 73.8 12.3 160 138 64 18 2300 20.0 71.4 11.9 159 132
11000 -12 -24 2300 19.2 73.8 12.3 159 139 24 -4 2300 19.2 71.4 11.9 158 134 60 16 2300 19.2 69.1 11.5 158 129
12000 -16 -27 2300 18.4 71.3 11.9 157 136 20 -7 2300 18.4 69.0 11.5 157 131 56 13 2300 18.4 66.8 11.1 156 125
13000 -19 -29 2300 17.6 68.8 11.5 155 132 17 -9 2300 17.6 66.6 11.1 155 127
14000 -23 -31 2300 16.9 66.4 11.1 153 129 13 -11 2300 16.9 64.4 10.7 152 123 49 9 2300 16.9 62.4 10.4 151 117
15000 -27 -33 2300 16.1 64.0 10.7 151 125 9 -13 2300 16.1 62.1 10.4 150 119 45 7 2300 16.1 60.2 10.0 147 113
16000 -30 -35 2300 15.5 61.9 10.3 148 121 6 -15 2300 15.5 60.0 10.0 147 115
IO AT
°F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH
SL 27 -3 2300 23.3 80.0 13.3 150 156 63 17 2300 23.9 80.0 13.3 154 153 99 37 2300 24.5 80.0 13.3 156 151
1000 23 -5 2300 23.1 80.0 13.3 152 155 59 15 2300 23.6 80.0 13.3 155 153 96 35 2300 24.2 80.0 13.3 158 150
2000 20 -7 2300 22.8 80.0 13.3 153 154 56 13 2300 23.4 80.0 13.3 156 152 92 33 2300 24.0 80.0 13.3 159 149
3000 16 -9 2300 22.5 80.0 13.3 154 153 52 11 2300 23.1 80.0 13.3 157 151 89 31 2300 23.7 80.0 13.3 160 148
4000 13 -11 2300 22.3 80.0 13.3 155 152 49 9 2300 22.9 80.0 13.3 159 150 85 29 2300 23.5 80.0 13.3 161 147
5000 9 -13 2300 22.0 80.0 13.3 157 151 45 7 2300 22.6 80.0 13.3 160 148 82 28 2300 23.2 80.0 13.3 163 146
6000 6 -15 2300 21.8 80.0 13.3 158 150 42 6 2300 22.4 80.0 13.3 161 147 78 26 2300 23.0 80.0 13.3 164 145
7000 2 -17 2300 21.5 80.0 13.3 159 149 38 4 2300 22.1 80.0 13.3 162 146 75 24 2300 22.6 79.0 13.2 164 143
8000 -1 -18 2300 21.3 80.0 13.3 160 148 35 2 2300 21.7 80.0 13.3 163 144 71 22 2300 21.7 76.3 12.7 163 139
9000 -5 -20 2300 20.9 78.1 13.0 160 145 31 0 2300 20.9 76.4 12.7 161 141 67 20 2300 20.9 73.9 12.3 161 136
Full throttle manifold pressure settings are approximate. Red shaded area represents operation with full throttle
ISA - 36°F (-20°C) STANDARD DAY (ISA) ISA +36°F (+20°C)
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
53 11 2300 17.6 64.5 10.8 153 121
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
78
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
CRUISE POWER SETTINGS
55% MA XIMUM CONTINUOUS POWER (OR FULL THROTTLE) 2100 RPM, 3200 POUNDS
PRESS
A LT.
FEET
10000 -9 -23 2100 20.1 68.0 11.3 149 133 27 -3 2100 20.2 65.8 11.0 148 126 63 17 2100 20.1 63.8 10.6 147 122
11000 -13 -25 2100 19.3 66.0 11.0 147 130 23 -5 2100 19.3 64.0 10.7 147 124 59 15 2100 19.3 62.0 10.3 145 119
12000 -16 -27 2100 18.5 64.0 10.7 146 126 20 -7 2100 18.5 62.1 10.4 145 121 56 13 2100 18.5 60.2 10.0 142 114
13000 -20 -29 2100 17.7 62.0 10.3 144 123 16 -9 2100 17.7 60.2 10.0 142 117
14000 -24 -31 2100 16.9 59.8 10.0 141 119 12 -11 2100 16.8 57.9 9.7 139 112
15000 -27 -33 2100 16.2 57.6 9.6 138 114
16000 -31 -35 2100 15.6 55.6 9.3 135 110
IO AT
°F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH
SL 26 -3 2100 23.0 68.8 11.5 140 145 62 17 2100 23.6 68.8 11.5 143 143 99 37 2100 24.2 68.8 11.5 145 140
1000 23 -5 2100 22.8 68.8 11.5 141 144 59 15 2100 23.3 68.8 11.5 144 142 95 35 2100 24.0 68.8 11.5 146 139
2000 19 -7 2100 22.5 68.8 11.5 142 143 55 13 2100 23.1 68.8 11.5 145 141 91 33 2100 23.7 68.8 11.5 147 138
3000 16 -9 2100 22.3 68.8 11.5 143 142 52 11 2100 22.9 68.8 11.5 146 140 88 31 2100 23.5 68.8 11.5 148 137
4000 12 -11 2100 22.1 68.8 11.5 144 141 48 9 2100 22.6 68.8 11.5 147 138 84 29 2100 23.2 68.8 11.5 149 135
5000 9 -13 2100 21.8 68.8 11.5 145 140 45 7 2100 22.4 68.8 11.5 148 137 81 27 2100 23.0 68.8 11.5 150 134
6000 5 -15 2100 21.6 68.8 11.5 146 139 41 5 2100 22.1 68.8 11.5 148 136 77 25 2100 22.7 68.8 11.5 150 133
7000 2 -17 2100 21.3 68.8 11.5 147 138 38 3 2100 21.9 68.8 11.5 149 135 74 23 2100 22.5 68.8 11.5 151 132
8000 -2 -19 2100 21.1 68.8 11.5 148 137 34 1 2100 21.6 68.8 11.5 150 133 70 21 2100 21.9 67.5 11.3 151 129
9000 -5 -21 2100 20.9 68.4 11.4 149 135 31 -1 2100 21.0 67.3 11.2 149 131 67 19 2100 21.0 65.6 10.9 149 126
Full throttle manifold pressure settings are approximate. Red shaded area represents operation with full throttle
ISA - 36°F (-20°C) STANDARD DAY (ISA) ISA +36°F (+20°C)
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
52 11 2100 17.7 58.4 9.7 139 110
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
CRUISE POWER SETTINGS
45% MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS POWER (OR FULL THROT TLE) 2100 RPM, 3200 POUNDS
PRESS
A LT.
FEET
10000 -10 -23 2100 17.3 57.6 9.6 136 122 26 -3 2100 17.8 57.6 9.6 1374 118 63 17 2100 18.2 57.6 9.6 138 115
11000 -13 -25 2100 17.0 57.6 9.6 136 120 23 -5 2100 17.5 57.6 9.6 138 117 59 15 2100 17.9 57.6 9.6 138 113
12000 -17 -27 2100 16.7 57.6 9.6 137 119 19 -7 2100 17.1 57.6 9.6 138 115 55 13 2100 17.6 57.6 9.6 138 111
13000 -20 -29 2100 16.4 57.6 9.6 137 117 16 -9 2100 16.8 57.6 9.6 138 113
14000 -24 -31 2100 16.0 57.6 9.6 138 116 12 -11 2100 16.5 56.6 9.6 136 110
15000 -27 -33 2100 15.7 57.6 9.6 138 114
16000 -31 -35 2100 15.4 55.6 9.3 135 110
IO AT
°F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH °F °C PPH GPH
SL 26 -4 2100 20.4 57.6 9.6 127 132 62 17 2100 20.8 57.6 9.6 130 130 98 37 2100 21.2 57.6 9.6 132 127
1000 22 -5 2100 20.1 57.6 9.6 128 131 58 15 2100 20.5 57.6 9.6 131 129 94 35 2100 20.9 57.6 9.6 133 126
2000 19 -7 2100 19.8 57.6 9.6 129 130 55 13 2100 20.2 57.6 9.6 131 128 91 33 2100 20.6 57.6 9.6 133 125
3000 15 -9 2100 19.4 57.6 9.6 130 129 51 11 2100 19.9 57.6 9.6 132 127 87 31 2100 20.3 57.6 9.6 134 124
4000 12 -11 2100 19.1 57.6 9.6 161 128 48 9 2100 19.6 57.6 9.6 133 126 84 29 2100 20.0 57.6 9.6 135 123
5000 8 -13 2100 18.8 57.6 9.6 162 127 44 7 2100 19.3 57.6 9.6 134 124 80 27 2100 19.7 57.6 9.6 136 122
6000 5 -15 2100 18.5 57.6 9.6 133 126 41 5 2100 19.0 57.6 9.6 135 123 77 25 2100 19.4 57.6 9.6 136 120
7000 1 -17 2100 18.2 57.6 9.6 134 125 37 3 2100 18.7 57.6 9.6 135 122 73 23 2100 19.1 57.6 9.6 137 119
8000 -3 -19 2100 17.9 57.6 9.6 134 124 34 1 2100 18.4 57.6 9.6 136 121 70 21 2100 18.8 57.6 9.6 137 118
9000 -6 -21 2100 17.6 57.6 9.6 135 123 30 -1 2100 18.1 57.6 9.6 137 120 66 19 2100 18.5 57.6 9.6 138 116
Full throttle manifold pressure settings are approximate. Red shaded area represents operation with full throttle
ISA - 36°F (-20°C) STANDARD DAY (ISA) ISA +36°F (+20°C)
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
IO AT
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
MAN.
PRESS.
IN. HG
FUEL FLOW
TAS
KTS
CAS
KTS
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
79
PERFORMANCE CHARTS
156.8 BHP 2100 RPM (55% MCP)
128.3 BHP 2100 RPM (45% MCP)
185.3 BHP 2300 RPM (65% MCP)
213.8 BHP 2500 RPM (75% MCP)
AVERAGE CRUISE WT. TEMPERATURE
16,000
15,000
CRUISE SPEEDS
3200 LBS STANDARD DAY (ISA)
EXAMPLE:ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS
PRESSURE ALTITUDE POWER SETTING
TRUE AIRSPEED
11,500 FT FULL THROTTLE 2500 RPM
166 KTS
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
10,000
9000
8000
7000
6000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
5000
4000
3000
FULL THROTTLE 2100 RPM
FULL THROTTLE 2300 RPM
FULL THROTTLE 2500 RPM
80
2000
1000
SL
A2ASIMULATIONS
120
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
130 140 150 16 0 170 180
TRUE AIRSPEED ~ KNOTS
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
EXAMPLE:
MANIFOLD PRESSURE VS RPM
2450 RPM
24.5 IN. HG
ENGINE SPEED
MANIFOLD PRESSURE
WITHIN RECOMMENDED LIMITS
RECOMMENDED VALUES OF
MANIFOLD PRESSURE AND
RPM FOR CRUISE SETTING
2300 2400 2500 2600 270 0 280 0
ENGINE SPEED ~ RPM
NOT RECOMMEDED FOR
CRUISE POWER SETTINGS
25
24
23
22
21
MANIFOLD PRESSURE ~ IN. HG
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
1800 190 0 2000 210 0 2200
1700
20
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
81
PERFORMANCE CHARTS
FUEL FLOW VS BRAKE HORSEPOWER
30
29
28
27
26
EXAMPLE:
BRAKE HORSEPOWER 213.75
1
CONDITION LEVEL FLIGHT CRUISE
FUEL FLOW
FUEL FLOW
2
CONDITION
BRAKE HORSEPOWER
75% MCP
15.25 GAL/HR
14.6 GAL/HR LEVEL FLIGHT CRUISE
204
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
FUEL FLOW ~ GAL/HR
16
15
14
13
12
2
45%
65%
55%
PERCENT MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS POWER
5000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
7000
75%
TAKE-OFF AND CLIMB
CRUISE
SL
3000
82
11
10
9
8
7
6
120
A2ASIMULATIONS
1
140 16 0 180 200
220 240 260 280
BRAKE HORSEPOWER
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
11,500 FT
FULL THROTTLE, 2500 RPM
800 NM
EXAMPLE:
STANDARD DAY (ISA)
RANGE PROFILE — 74 GALLONS
RANGE
PRESSURE ALTITUDE
POWER SETTING
3412 LBS BEFORE ENGINE START
AVIATION GASOLINE
6.0 LBS/GAL
74 U.S. GAL (444 LGS)
CRUISE TRUE AIRSPEED ~ KTS
138
145157165
136
150163170
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2100 RPM
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2300 RPM
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2500 RPM
169 159 147 133
45% MCP
55% MCP
65% MCP
75% MCP
POWER SETTINGS
900 950 1000 1050
RANGE ~ NAUTICAL MILES (ZERO WIND)
700 750 800 850
NOTE: RANGE INCLUDES START, TAXI AND CLIMB WITH 45 MINUTES RESERVED FUEL AT 45% MCP
20,000
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
WEIGHT
FUEL
FUEL DENSITY
INITIAL FUEL LOADING
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
15,000
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
10,000
5000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
SL
600 650
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
83
PERFORMANCE CHARTS
POWER SETTINGS
11,500 FT
FULL THROTTLE, 2500 RPM
STANDARD DAY (ISA)
ENDURANCE PROFILE — 74 GALLONS
EXAMPLE:
PRESSURE ALTITUDE
POWER SETTING
3412 LBS BEFORE ENGINE START
AVIATION GASOLINE
ENDURANCE 4.9 HRS (4 HRS 54 MIN)
6.0 LBS/GAL
74 U.S. GAL (444 LBS)
CRUISE TRUE AIRSPEEDS ~ KNOTS
133147159169
136150163170
138145157165
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2300 RPM
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2100 RPM
45% MCP
6.5 7. 0 7. 5 8.0 8.5
ENDURANCE ~ HOURS
55% MCP
5.0 5.5 6.0
65% MCP
84
A2ASIMULATIONS
FULL THROTTLE ~ 2500 RPM
75% MCP
NOTE: ENDURANCE INCLUDES START, TAXI AND CLIMB WITH 45 MINUTES RESERVE FUEL AT 45% MCP
20,000
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS
WEIGHT
FUEL
FUEL DENSITY
INITIAL FUEL LOADING
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
15,000
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
10,000
5000
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
4.0 4.5
SL
DISTANCE ~ FEET
PRESSURE ALTITUDE ~ FEET
ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS:
LANDING GEAR
APPROACH SPEED
25oC (77oF)
3965 FT
EXAMPLE:
OAT
PRESSURE ALTITUDE
763 FT
1324 FT
3242 LBS
WEIGHT
8179767371
69 KTS (80 MPH)
9 KTS
HEADWIND COMPONENT
GROUND ROLL
TOTAL OVER 50 FT OBSTACLE
APPROACH SPEED
68
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
50
OBSTACLE HEIGHTS
FOR INTERMEDIATE
NOT APPLICABLE
GUIDE LINES
REFERENCE LINE
HEAD WIND
TAIL WIND
REFERENCE LINE
SPEED AT 50 FT
KTS MPS
WEIGHT ~ LBS
LANDING DISTANCE
7068666361
3400
RETARDED TO MAINTAIN
900 FT/MIN ON FINAL APPROACH
DOWN
POWER
FLAPS
3200
DOWN
3000
PAVED, LEVEL, DRY SURFACE
RUNWAY
2800
IAS AS TABULATED
59
2600
2400
MAXIMUM
BRAKING
REFERENCE LINE
ISA
20 30 40 50 340 0 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 0 10 20 30 0
SL
2000
4000
6000
8000
10,000
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ oC WEIGHT ~ POUNDS WIND COMPONENT ~ KNOTS
-40 -30 -20 - 10 0 10
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE ~ oF
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
-40
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
85

WEIGHT AND BALANCE

LOADING INSTRUCTIONS
WARNING
This airplane is easily loaded above the maximum take-
o weight and/or beyond the aft center of gravity ight
limits. Flight safety dictates that the airplane weight and center of gravity be within the approved envelope during
ight.
Passengers, baggage and fuel should not be loaded indiscriminately. The operator is directed to the following loading instructions. A total airplane incremental weight and center of gravity loading for each ight should be pre­pared. In addition, it is recommended that additional load­ings be computed to explore the potential problems asso­ciated with using the aft seats and compartments.
It is the responsibility of the airplane operator to ensure that the airplane is properly loaded. At the time of deliv­ery, Beech Aircraft Corporation provides the necessary weight and balance data to compute individual loadings. All subsequent changes in airplane weight and balance are the responsibility of the airplane owner and/or operator.
The basic empty weight and moment of the airplane at the time of delivery are shown on the airplane Basic Empty Weight and Balance form. Useful load items which may
be loaded into the airplane are shown on the Useful Load
Weight and Moment tables. The minimum and maximum
moments are indicated on the Moment Limits vs Weight
table. These moments correspond to the forward and aft
center of gravity ight limits for a particular weight. All
moments are divided by 100 to simplify computations.
SEATING, BAGGAGE AND EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENTS
NOTE: The floor structure load limit is 100 pounds per square foot, except for the area between the front and rear spars, where the floor structure load limit is 50 pounds per square foot.
NOTE: All baggage/cargo must be secured with an approved cargo net.
1 Maximum weight 270 pounds including
equipment and baggage.
2 Maximum weight 200 pounds forward of
rear spar including equipment and cargo with 3rd and 4th seats removed.
3 Maximum weight 270 pounds aft of rear
spar including equipment and cargo with 3rd and 4th seats removed.
86
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
WEIGHT AND BALANCE RECORD
Serial No. Registration No. Page No.
Weight Change Added (+)
or Removed (-)
WT
(lbs)
ARM (in.)
MOM
100
Date
Item No.
IN OUT
Description of Article or Change
Running Basic Empty Weight
WT
(lbs)
MOM
100
MOMENT LIMITS VS WEIGHT
2800
2700
2600
2500
2400
2300
2200
2100
2000
MOMENT/100
1900
1800
1700
1600
1500
74
2900
76 78 80 82 84 86 88
CENTER OF GRAVITY ~ INCHES AFT OF DATUM
3000
3600
3500
3400
3300
3200
3100
3000
2900
2800
2700
2600
2500
2400
2300
2200
2100
2000
Envelope Based on the following Weight and Center of Gravity Limit Data (Landing Gear Down)
Weight Condition Forward C.G. Limit AFT C.G. Limit
3400 LB. (MAX. TO & LDG) 82.1 84.4 3000 LB. 78.0 84.7 2900 LB. OR LESS 77.0 85.7
WEIGHT ~ POUNDS
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
87
WEIGHT AND BALANCE
COMPUTING PROCEDURE
1. Record the Basic Empty Weight and Moment
from the Basic Empty Weight and Balance form (or from the latest superseding form) under the Basic Empty Condition block. The moment must be divided by 100 to correspond
to Useful Load Weights and Moments tables.
2. Record the weight and corresponding moment from
the appropriate table of each of the useful load items (except fuel) to be carried in the airplane.
3. Total the weight column and moment column.
The SUBTOTALS are the Zero Fuel Condition.
4. Determine the weight and corresponding moment for
the fuel loading to be used. This fuel loading includes
fuel for the ight, plus that required for start, taxi, and takeo. Add the Fuel Loading Condition to Zero Fuel Condition to obtain the SUB-TOTAL Ramp Condition.
5. Subtract the fuel to be used for start, taxi, and take-
o to arrive at the SUB-TOTAL Take-o Condition.
6. Subtract the weight and moment of the fuel in the
incremental sequence in which it is to be used from the
take-o weight and moment. The Zero Fuel Condition, the Take-o Condition, and the Landing Condition
moments must be within the minimum and maximum
moments shown on the Moment Limit vs Weight
graph for that weight. If the total moment is less than the minimum moment allowed, useful load items must be shifted aft or forward load items reduced. If the total moment is greater than the maximum moment allowed, useful load items must be shifted forward or aft load items reduced. If the quantity or location of load items is changed, the calculations must be revised and the moments rechecked.
WEIGHT AND BALANCE LOADING FORM
Bonanza: Date:
Serial No.: Reg No.:
Item Weight MOM/100
1. Basic Empty Condition
2. Front Seat Occupants
3. 3rd and 4th Seat Occupants
4. Baggage
5. Cargo
6. Sub Total Zero Fuel Condition
7. Fuel Loading
8. Sub Total Ramp Condition
9. Less Fuel For Start Taxi, and Takeo*
10. Sub Total Takeo Conditon
11. Less Fuel to Destination
12. Landing Conditon
*Fuel for start, taxi and take-o is normally 12 lbs. at an average MOM/100 of 9.
88
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
USEFUL LOAD WEIGHTS AND MOMENTS
OCCUPANTS
FRONT SEATS 3RD & 4TH SEATS
FWD.
POSITION
ARM 85
WEIGHT
120 102 107 145 152
130 110 116 157 165
140 119 125 169 178
150 128 134 182 190
160 136 142 194 203
170 144 151 206 216
180 153 160 218 229
190 162 169 230 241
200 170 178 242 254
NOTE: Occupant Positions for Adjustable Seats are shown at their extreme positions. Intermediate Positions will require interpolation of the Moment/100 Values.
AFT
POSITION
ARM 89
MOMENT/100
FWD.
POSITION
ARM 121
AFT
POSITION
ARM 127
USEFUL LOAD WEIGHTS AND MOMENTS
USABLE FUEL
LEADING EDGE TANKS
ARM 75
GALLONS WEIGHT MOM/100
5 30 23
10 60 45
15 90 68
20 120 90
25 150 113
30 180 135
35 210 158
40 240 180
44 264 198
50 300 225
55 330 248
60 360 270
65 390 293
70 420 315
74 444 333
SAMPLE LOADINGS
The following sample loading show some of the problems associated with load­ing the aft seats and compartments. Similar loadings should be made for your airplane. Follow the loading instructions in this chapter plus those on the sample loading form.
Sample Loading Only Do Not Fly With This Loading
Item Weight
1. Basic Empty Condition** 2088 77.9 1626
2. Occupant - Front (1)
3. Occupant - Front (1)
4. Occupant - Center (1)
5. Occupant - Center (1)
6. Baggage
190
2278
1970 2468
190
2658
190
2848
120
2968
ARM
(C.G.*)
87.0
78.6
87.0
79.3
123.0
82.4
123.0
85.1
150.0
87.7
MOM/
100*
1791
1956
2190
2424
2604
165
165
234
234
180
*Use the C.G., MOM/100 for the occupants as they are
positioned in your airplane. Consult the POH Weight and
Balance Section for the latest occupant positions. If the seats are adjustable fore and aft, use the position in which
that seat is located during ight.
**The Basic Empty Weight Data shall be current and
accurate for the airplane as equipped.
NOTE: The addition of fuel to the above loading will move the center of gravit y (C.G.) forward. Conversely, using fuel during flight will move the airplane center of gravity a. Flight safety requires that during flight the airplane weight and center of gravity be within the approved limits.
NOTE: Four 190-pound occupants plus 30 pounds of baggage per person cannot be loaded and remain within the a C.G. limit of F.S. 85.7. Ninety-four pounds of baggage must be removed to place the airplane C.G. on the a C.G. limit.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
89

SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION

AIRFRAME
The BEECHCRAFT V35B Bonanza is an all-metal, low-wing,
single-engine airplane with retractable tricycle landing gear.
The Bonanza V35B has all the control surfaces of a con­ventional airplane, except the vertical tail surface.
The “Vee” tail movable control surfaces are arranged to act as both elevator and rudder. The two surfaces work together for elevator action and opposite each other in rudder action. The “Vee” tail operates like a conventional tail in response to elevator and rudder control action.
SEATING ARRANGEMENTS
The Bonanza V35B is a 4-place airplane.
FLIGHT CONTROLS
CONTROL SURFACES
Control surfaces are operated through push-pull rods and conventional cable systems terminating in bellcranks.
CONTROL COLUMN
The throw-over type control column for elevator and aile­ron control can be placed in front of either front seat. Pull the T-handle latch at the back of the control arm and posi­tion the control wheel as desired. The aileron trimmer on the control column hub should be held until the column is repositioned.
RUDDER PEDALS
To adjust the rudder pedals, press the spring-loaded lever on the side of each pedal and move the pedal to its forward
or aft position. The adjustment lever can also be used to
place the right set of rudder pedals against the oor (when
the copilot brakes are not installed) when not in use.
TRIM CONTROLS
Elevator trim is controlled by a handwheel located to the left of the throttle. An elevator tab position indicator dial is located above and to the left of the trim control.
The aileron trimmer on the control column hub displaces the ailerons. Displacement is maintained by cable loads imposed by the trimmer.
ELECTRIC ELEVATOR TRIM
The optional electric elevator trim system controls include
the ON-OFF switch located on the instrument panel, a
thumb switch on the control wheel and a circuit breaker on
the right subpanel. The ON-OFF switch must be in the ON
position to operate the system. The thumb switch is moved forward for nose down, aft for nose up, and when released returns to the center OFF position. When the system is not being electrically actuated, the manual trim control wheel may be used.
INSTRUMENT PANEL
The standard instrument panel of the Bonanza V358 con­sists of the oating instrument panel on the upper left por­tion, the engine instrument grouping on the center of the panel above the control wheel yoke, a radio grouping to the right of the engine instruments, and a subpanel which pro­vides tor a compact circuit breaker group on the right side and switching panel on the left.
90
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
FLIGHT INSTRUMENTS
The oating instrument panel contains all ight instru­ments except the magnetic compass. On this panel are the airspeed indicator, gyro horizon, altimeter, turn coordina­tor, directional gyro, and vertical speed indicator, with pro­visions tor an ADF indicator and a clock. Additional nav­igation equipment, such as dual omni indicators, can be
mounted in the panel directly below the ight instrument
grouping.
ENGINE INSTRUMENTS
The engine instruments, located on the center panel, include a fuel ow/manifold pressure indicator, an engine tachom­eter, a fuel quantity indicator tor each side, and a cluster which includes an oil pressure indicator, an oil tempera­ture indicator, a cylinder head temperature indicator, and an ammeter.
CLUSTER TYPE ENGINE INSTRUMENTS
The cluster type instruments, as shown in the accompa­nying illustration, are located in the center of the panel
just below the fuel ow/manifold pressure indicator and
tachometer. Included in the square cluster are the cylin­der head temperature and oil temperature (both calibrated in degrees centigrade), ammeter, and oil pressure. A fuel quantity indicator is located on each side of the cluster, the left indicator tor the left wing fuel and the right indicator tor the right wing fuel.
MANIFOLD PRESSURE AND FUEL FLOW INDICATOR
The manifold pressure portion of this instrument indi­cates the pressure in the engine manifold and is calibrated in inches of mercury. By observing the manifold pressure
indication and adjusting the propeller and throttle con­trols, the power output of the engine can be adjusted. To avoid excessive cylinder pressures during cruise opera­tions, observe the maximum recommended rpm and mani­fold pressure limits as indicated on the Manifold Pressure vs
RPM graph in the PERFORMANCE Section.
The fuel ow portion of the indicator senses fuel pressure at the fuel distributor and is calibrated to indicate fuel ow
in gallons per hour. The green arc indicates the normal fuel ow operating range while the red radials indicate the min­imum and maximum allowable fuel pressures.
The higher end of the green arc includes a sawtooth seg-
ment to indicate the approximate fuel ow required for takeo and climb at sea level, 3000, 5000 and 7000 feet.
The pilot should use performance charts for the exact fuel
ow requirements.
The lower end of the green arc includes a sawtooth seg-
ment labeled”% CRUISE POWER” which indicates the approximate fuel ows for powers ranging from 45% to 75% of max continuous power. The lower fuel ow of each sawtooth corresponds to the cruise - lean fuel ow while the higher fuel ow of each sawtooth corresponds to the best power fuel ow. When power is set in accordance with the cruise power setting tables in the PERFORMANCE sec-
tion, these sawtooth markings provide approximate percent power information.
The fuel ow portion of the indicator is controlled electri­cally and indicates fuel ow in gallons per hour. A turbine
meter installed in the fuel line rotates in proportion to the
fuel ow. The speed of rotation is converted into an electri­cal signal which is then interpreted by the fuel ow indi-
cator. The green arc indicates the normal operating range while the red radial indicates the maximum allowable fuel
ow.
Fuel ow values at the higher end
of the green arc are labeled “TAKE-
OFF AND CLIMB” and indicate the approximate fuel ow required for takeo and climb at sea level,
3000, 5000 and 7000 feet. The pilot should use these markings as a guide only and refer to the tables in the
PERFORMANCE section for the exact fuel ow requirements.
AVIONICS PANEL
Tuning and selecting equipment for the radios, adjacent to the engine instrument grouping, is mounted in block form with switching on the left edge of the block and radio heads and tuning on the right.
SWITCHES
The magneto/start switch and switches for the battery, alterna­tor, pitot heat, propeller deicer, and
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
91
SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
lights are located on the left end of the subpanel. Flap and
tab position indicators, the cowl ap control, and the ap
switch are near the center of the subpanel. On the right end of the subpanel are the circuit breakers, as well as the land­ing gear switch and landing gear position indicator lights. Attached to the lower center section of the subpanel are the power plant controls and auxiliary fuel pump switch.
ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM
WARNING LIGHTS
A warning light placarded ALT OUT is located on the pilot’s oating instrument panel below the ight instruments. The
warning light for the alternator will illuminate when the output from the alternator is nearly zero or when an alter­nator overvoltage occurs.
WARNING LIGHTS (D-10354 AND AFTER)
Two warning lights, placarded ALT and STARTER ENERGIZED, are located on the pilot’s oating instrument panel below the ight instruments.
The warning light for the alternator will illuminate when the output from the alternator is nearly zero or when an alternator overvoltage occurs.
The starter energized warning light will remain illumi­nated after starting if the starter relay remains engaged after starting.
WARNING LIGHT CONTROL SWITCH
Located on the pilot’s oating instrument panel near the
warning light(s) is a switch placarded TEST-BRT-DIM-
WARN LIGHTS. When the switch is held upward in the
spring-loaded TEST position, the warning light(s) and the four landing gear position indicator lights will illuminate if none of the lamps require replacement. When released, the switch will return to the BRT position.
If the switch is in the bright (BRT) position, the warn­ing light(s) and the landing gear position indicator lights will illuminate at high intensity. This position should be selected during the daytime and at other times when high ambient light levels are present in the cabin.
The DIM position allows the lamps to illuminate to a lower intensity. This position is generally reserved for night operations.
GROUND CONTROL
Steering is accomplished by use of the rudder pedals through a linkage arrangement which connects the nose gear to the rudder pedal shaft. Nose wheel straightening is accom­plished by engagement of a roller with a track as the nose wheel is retracted. The steering link attaches to the steering mechanism on the nose gear with a swivel connection which permits the mechanism to disengage when the nose gear is retracted and operation of the rudder pedals will have no tendency to turn the nose wheel with the gear retracted.
The minimum wing tip turning radius, using full steer-
ing, one brake and partial power, is 26 feet 4 inches.
WING FLAPS
On airplanes prior to D-10179 the wing aps are controlled by a three-position switch, UP, OFF and DOWN, located in
the subpanel, above the power quadrant. The switch must be pulled out of detent before it can be repositioned. A dial
type indicator has markings for UP, 10° , 20° and DN. The
indicator is located to the left of the control column.
Limit switches automatically turn o the electric motor when the aps reach the extremes of travel. Intermediate ap positions can be obtained by placing the switch in the OFF position as the aps reach the desired position during ap extension or retraction.
On airplanes D-10179 and after the wing aps have three positions; UP (0°), APPROACH (15°), and DOWN (30°), with no intermediate positions. A ap position indicator and a
control-switch are located on the subpanel, above the power quadrant. The switch must be pulled out of a detent to
change the ap position.
LANDING GEAR
The landing gears are operated through adjustable linkage connected to an actuator assembly mounted beneath the front seats. The actuator assembly is driven by an electric motor. The landing gears may be electrically retracted and extended, and may be lowered manually.
CONTROL SWITCH
The landing gear is controlled by a two-position switch on the right side of the subpanel. The switch handle must be pulled out of the safety detent before it can be moved to the opposite position.
POSITION INDICATORS
The landing gear position indicator lights are located adja­cent to the landing gear switch handle. Three green lights, one for each gear, are illuminated whenever the landing gears are down and locked. The red light illuminates any time one or all of the landing gears are in transit or in any intermediate position. All of the lights will be out when the gears are up.
Testing of the landing gear position indicator lamps, as well as selection of either bright or dim illumination inten­sity, is accomplished with the warning light control switch
located on the pilot’s oating instrument panel.
92
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
01
02 03 04 05
06
07 08 09
10
12
14
15
13
11
16
17
18
19 20
23
21
22
24 25 26 27
1. Annunciator Panel
2. Clock
3. Airspeed Indicator
4. Attitude Indicator
5. Altimeter
6. ADF Indicator
7. Turn and Slip
8. Compass System
9. Vertical Speed Indicator
10. Warning Light Test Switch
11. Outside Air Temperature
12. Autopilot Altitude Selector
13. Autopilot Mode Controller
14. VOR Indicator
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
15. Altimeter
16. Slave and Align
17. Ignition
18. Battery and Altenator
19. Propeller De-Ice
and Pitot Heat
20. Exterior Lights
21. Interior Lights
22. Elevator Trim Wheel
23. Cowl Flap
24. Firewall Air
25. Wing Shield Defrost
26. Cabin/Rear Heat
27. Parking Brake
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
Fuel Tank Selector
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
93
SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SAFETY SWITCH
To prevent inadvertent retraction of the landing gear on the ground, two main strut safety switches open the control circuit when the struts are compressed.
MANUAL EXTENSION
The landing gear can be manually extended by operating a handcrank at the rear of the front seats. This procedure is
described in the EMERGENCY PROCEDURES Section.
WARNING HORN
With the landing gear retracted, if the throttle is retarded
below approximately 12 in. Hg manifold pressure, a warning
horn will sound intermittently.
BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT
The baggage compartment is accessible through the baggage door on the right side of the fuselage. This area extends aft of the pilot and copilot seats to the rear bulkhead. Because of structural limitations, this area is divided into two sec-
tions, each having a dierent weight limitation. Loading
within the baggage compartment must be in accordance
with the data in the WEIGHT AND BALANCE Section. All
baggage must be secured with a Beech approved cargo net.
WARNING
Never rely on the safety switch to keep the gear down during taxi or on takeo, landing roll, or in a static position. Always make certain that the landing gear switch is in the down position during these operations.
CIRCUIT BREAKER
The landing gear circuit breaker is located on the right sub­panel. This circuit breaker is a pull-and-reset type breaker. The breaker will pop out under overload conditions.
BRAKES
The brakes on the main landing gear wheels are operated by applying toe pressure to the top of the rudder pedals. The parking brake T-handle control is located just left of the elevator tab wheel on the pilot’s subpanel. To set the park­ing brakes, pull the control out and depress each toe pedal
until rm. Push the control in to release the brakes.
NOTE
The parking brake should be le o and wheel chocks installed if the airplane is to be le unattended. Changes in ambient temperature can cause the brakes to release or to exert excessive pressures.
On serials D-9948 through D-10208 with shuttle valve brake system installed only the pilot’s brake pedals can be used in conjunction with the parking brake system to set the parking brake.
CAUTION
On serials D-9948 through D-10208 with shuttle valve brake system installed, continuous brake application of either the pilot’s or copilot’s brake pedals, in conjunction with an overriding pumping action from the opposite brake pedals could result in the loss of braking action on the side which continuous pressure is being applied.
POWER PLANT
The BEECHCRAFT V358 Bonanza is powered by a Continental
1O-520-BA or 1O-520-8B six- cylinder, horizontally opposed, fuel-injected engine rated at 285 horsepower.
ENGINE CONTROLS
THROTTLE, PROPELLER, AND MIXTURE
The push-pull throttle, propeller, and mixture controls are located on the control console below the center of the upper subpanel. These controls are released for repositioning by pushing a button on the knob. With the button extended,
ne adjustments are accomplished by rotating the knob,
clockwise to increase and counterclockwise to decrease.
COWL FLAPS
The push-to-close, pull-to-open cowl ap control is located
above and to the left of the control console on the subpanel.
Except in extremely low temperatures, the cowl aps should be open during ground operation, takeo, and as required during ight.
LUBRICATION SYSTEM
The engine oil system is the full-pressure, wet sump type and has a 12-quart capacity. Oil operating temperatures are controlled by an automatic thermostat bypass control. The
bypass control will limit oil ow through the oil cooler when
operating temperatures are below normal and will permit the oil to bypass the cooler if it should become blocked.
STARTER
The starter is relay controlled and is actuated by a rotary­type, momentary-on switch incorporated in the magneto/ start switch. To energize the starter circuit, rotate the mag-
neto/start switch beyond the BOTH position to START. After starting, release the switch to the BOTH position.
The warning light placarded STARTER ENERGIZE D (D-
10354 and after) will illuminate whenever electrical power
94
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
01
02
20
21
09
03
11
12
04
06
22
23
05
07
18
08
19
24
10
25
26
27
14
15
17
28
16
13
18. Avionics Master
19. NAV/GPS Mode
20. Audio Control Panel
21. Nav / Com Radio #1
22. Nav / Com Radio #2
24. Transponder
25. Fuel Tip Tank
26. Suction
27. Tip Tank Selector
28. Left/Right Tip
23. ADF Receiver
1. Manifold Pressure/
Fuel Flow
2. Tachometer
3. Left Fuel Tank
4. Cylinder Head
Tempurature
5. Oil Temperature
6. Ammeter
7. Oil Pressure
8. Right Fuel Tank
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
9. DME Mode
10. Exhaust Gas
Temperature
11. Flaps Lever
12. Throttle
13. Mixture
14. Fuel Pump
15. Engine RPM
16. Alternator Air
17. Landing Gear Level
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
29
30
Tank Fuel Pump
29. GPSMAP 295
30. GPS 400
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
95
SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
is being supplied to the starter. If the light remains illumi­nated after starting, the starter relay has remained engaged and loss of electrical power may result. The battery and
alternator switches should be turned o if the light remains
illuminated after starting. If the light does not illuminate during starting, the indicator system is inoperative and the ammeter should be monitored to ensure that the starter does not remain energized after starting. The starter ener­gized warning light can be tested with the TEST-BAT-DIM-
WARN LIGHTS switch adjacent to the warning lights on the oating instrument panel.
PROPELLER
Installed as standard equipment on the Bonanza is a con­stant speed, variable pitch, 84”-diameter propeller with two aluminum alloy blades. The pitch setting at the 30-inch station is 13.3° low and 29.2° high pitch.
Propeller rpm is controlled by a governor which regulates hydraulic oil pressure to the hub. A push-pull knob on the control console allows the pilot to select the governor’s rpm range.
If oil pressure is lost, the propeller will go to the full high rpm position. This is because propeller low rpm is obtained by governor boosted engine oil pressure working against the centrifugal twisting moment of the blades.
FUEL SYSTEM
The airplane is designed for operation on 100/130 grade
(green) aviation gasoline. However, the use of 1 00LL (blue)
is preferred.
FUEL CELLS
The 74-gallon usable (80-gallon capacity) system only is available on D-10303 and after. The fuel system consists of
a rubber fuel cell in each wing leading edge with a ush
type ller cap. A visual measuring tab is attached to the ller neck of the
optional system. The bottom of the tab indicates 27 gallons of usable fuel and the detent on the tab indicates 32 gallons of usable fuel in the tank. The engine driven fuel injector pump delivers approximately 1 0 gallons of excess fuel per hour, which bypasses the fuel control and returns to the tank being used. Three fuel drains are provided, one in each fuel sump on the underside of each wing and one in the fuel selector valve inboard of the left wing root. These points should be
drained daily before the rst ight.
An additional 40 gallons of fuel and 200lbs of gross weight capacity can be added when tip tanks are installed.
FUEL QUANTITY INDICATION SYSTEM
Fuel quantity is measured by oat operated sensors, located
in each wing tank system. These transmit electrical signals to the individual indicators, which indicate fuel remaining in the tank. There are sensors in each wing tank system connected to the individual wing tank indicator.
AUXILIARY FUEL PUMP
The electric auxiliary fuel pump is controlled by an ON-OFF
toggle switch on the control console and provides pres­sure for starting and emergency operation. Immediately after starting, the auxiliary fuel pump can be used to purge the system of vapor caused by an extremely high ambient temperature or a start with the engine hot. The auxiliary fuel pump provides for near maximum engine fuel require­ments, should the engine driven pump fail.
FUEL TANK SELECTION
The fuel selector valve handle is located forward and to
the left of the pilot’s seat. Takeos and landings should be
made using the tank that is more nearly full.
On airplanes D-10404 and after, the pilot is cautioned to observe that the short, pointed end of the handle aligns with the fuel tank position being selected. The tank positions are located on the aft side of the valve. The OFF position is forward and to the left. An OFF position lock-out fea­ture has been added to prevent inadvertent selection of the OFF position. To select OFF, depress the lock-out stop and rotate the handle to the full clockwise position. Depression of the lock-out stop is not required when moving the handle
counterclockwise from OFF to LEFT MAIN or RIGHT MAIN. When selecting the LEFT MAIN or RIGHT MAIN fuel tanks,
position handle by sight and feeling for detent.
If the engine stops because of insucient fuel, refer to the EMERGENCY PROCEDURES Section for the Air Start
procedures.
96
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
FUEL REQUIRED FOR FLIGHT
It is the pilot’s responsibility to ascertain that the fuel quantity indicators are functioning and maintaining a rea­sonable degree of accuracy, and to be certain of ample fuel for a ight. Takeo is prohibited if the fuel quantity indi­cators do not indicate above the yellow arc. An inaccurate indicator could give an erroneous indication of fuel quan­tity. A minimum of 13 gallons of fuel is required in each tank before takeo. The caps should be removed and fuel quan­tity checked to give the pilot an indication of fuel on board. The airplane must be approximately level for visual inspec­tion of the tank. If it is not certain that at least 13 gallons are in each tank, fuel shall be added so that the amount of fuel
will be not less than 13 gallons per tank at takeo. Plan for an ample margin of fuel for any ight.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The system circuitry is the single-wire, ground-return type, with the airplane structure used as the ground return.
The battery ON-OFF switch, the alternator ON-OFF switch
and the magneto/start switch are located on the left sub­panel. The circuit breaker panel is located on the right sub­panel and contains circuit breakers for the various electrical systems. Some switch-type circuit breakers are located on the left subpanel.
BATTERY
A 15.5-ampere-hour, 24-volt battery is located on the
right forward side of the rewall. Battery servicing pro­cedures are described in the HANDLING, SERVICING, AND MAINTENANCE Section.
ALTERNATOR
The airplane is equipped with a 50-, 60- or 100-ampere,
gear-driven alternator. The alternators are designed to
maintain approximately 50-, 60- or 100-amperes output
respectively at 1700 rpm, to provide airplane electrical power.
A transistorized electronic voltage regulator adjusts alter­nator output to the required electrical load, including battery recharge. Charging or discharging of the battery is indicated by the ammeter. A zero reading, which is normal for cruis-
ing ight, indicates that the battery is fully charged and that
alternator output has been adjusted by the voltage regu­late to balance the load of the electrical equipment in use. The alternator-out warning light, located on the instrument
panel, can be tested with the TEST WARN LIGHTS switch
adjacent to the warning lights.
INTERIOR LIGHTING
Lighting for the instrument panel is controlled by thumb-
rotated, disc-type rheostats, located on the pilot’s sub-
panel to the left of the control column. The rst rheostat is labeled RADIO and ENG and controls the lighting of the
avionics panel and the multiple readout engine instrument.
The second rheostat, labeled INST, is optional and controls the lighting for the ight instruments and the instrument
pressure gage.
On the lower subpanel are two more lighting rheostats.
The rst, labeled SUB, controls the intensity of the complete subpanel lighting. The second rheostat is labeled FLOOD and
controls the glare shield lighting, which illuminates the full upper panel.
The cabin dome light is operated by an ON-OFF switch
adjacent to the light. The optional reading lights above the rear seats have individual switches at the lights. The optional map light has a press-type switch on the control wheel. The OAT, map, and compass lights are controlled by
a push-on, push-o switch located adjacent to the OAT or
on the control wheel.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
The switches for all of the exterior lights are located on the pilot’s left subpanel. Each switch is a circuit-breaker-type switch, which will open if it becomes overloaded or shorted.
The exterior lights consist of navigation lights on the wing tips and tail cone, a landing light in the fuselage nose section, and a taxi light attached to the nose strut. The landing light can be used for approach and taxiing. Use the landing light for approach and the taxi light for taxiing. For longer battery and lamp life, use the landing light and the taxi light sparingly; avoid prolonged operation which could cause overheating during ground maneuvering.
NOTE
Particularly at night , reflections from anti- collision lights on clouds, dense haze or dust can produce optical· illusions and intense ver tigo. Such lights, when installed, should be turned o before entering an overcast; their use may not be advisable under instrument or limited VFR conditions.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
97
SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
CABIN HEATING
A heater muer on the right exhaust stack provides for heated air to ve outlets in the forward and aft areas of the
cabin. The two forward outlets are located above and forward of each set of rudder pedals. The two aft outlets are installed
behind the right front seat and the right rear seat. The fth
outlet provides heated air for windshield defrosting.
In ight, ram air enters an intake on the right side of the nose, passes through the heater muer, then into a mixer valve on the forward side of the rewall. In the mixer valve,
the heated air is combined with a controlled quantity of unheated ram air picked up at an intake at the rear engine
bae. Air of the desired temperature is then ducted from
the mixer valve to the outlets in the cabin.
HEATER AND DEFROSTER OPERATION
The heater controls are located on the lower left pilot’s sub­panel. To obtain heated air to the cabin outlets, pull the
CABIN HEAT control. The control regulates the amount of cold air that is mixed with the air from the heater mu. When the control is pulled fully out, the cold air is shut o
and only heated air enters the cabin. The forward vents,
located on the rewall forward of the rudder pedals, deliver heated air to the forward cabin when the CABIN HEAT con-
trol is pulled out. To deliver heated air to the aft seat outlets
pull the AFT CABIN HEAT control. For maximum heat, the
control is pulled fully out. To obtain heated air for defrost­ing the windshield pull the DEFROST control out. It may be
necessary to vary or close the AFT CABIN HEAT control to obtain maximum air ow for defrosting. To close o all air
from the heater system, pull the red FIREWALL AIR control
located to the extreme left of the pilot’s lower subpanel.
CABIN VENTILATION
In moderate temperatures, ventilation air can be obtained from the same outlets used for heating, by pushing the
CABIN HEAT control full forward. However, in extremely
high temperatures, it may be desirable to pull the red
FIREWALL AIR control and use only the fresh air outlets
described in the following paragraphs.
CABIN FRESH AIR OUTLETS
A duct in each wing root is connected directly to an adjust­able outlet in the upholstery panel forward of each front
seat. Airow from each outlet is controlled by a center knob. The direction of airow is controlled by rotating the lou-
vered cover with the small knob on the rim.
OPTIONAL FRESH AIR VENT BLOWER
An optional fresh air vent blower controlled by an ON-OFF
switch on the subpanel is available on serials D-10348, D-
10364 and after. It provides ventilation through the indi­vidual overhead outlets during both ground and in-ight
operations.
INDIVIDUAL OVERHEAD FRESH AIR OUTLETS
Fresh ram air from the air intake on the upper side of the aft fuselage is ducted to individual outlets above each seat. Each
outlet can be positioned to direct the ow of air as desired.
The volume of incoming air can be regulated by rotating
the outlet. A system shuto valve is installed in the duct
98
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
between the overhead fresh air scoop and the individual fresh air outlets. The valve is operated by turning a knob on the overhead panel.
EXHAUST VENT
A xed exhaust vent is located in the aft cabin.
PITOT AND STATIC SYSTEMS
PITOT SYSTEM
The pitot system provides a source of impact air for opera­tion of the airspeed indicator. The pitot mast is located on the leading edge of the left wing.
PITOT H E AT
The pitot mast is provided with an electric heating element
which is turned on and o with a switch on the instrument panel. The switch should be ON when ying in visible mois-
ture. It is not advisable to operate the pitot heating element on the ground except for testing or for short intervals of time to remove ice or snow.
NORMAL STATIC AIR SYSTEM
The normal static system provides a source of static air to
the ight instruments through a ush static tting on each
side of the airplane fuselage. Aft of the rear closure bulk­head (rear seat panel) is a drain plug, located at the low point of the normal static system. It is provided in order to drain moisture accumulations from the system. The closure bulkhead is held in place with Velcro and may be removed by pulling forward. The drain plug should be removed and the moisture drained from the clear plastic line every 100 hours and after exposure to visible moisture, either in the air or on the ground.
EMERGENCY STATIC AIR SYSTEM
An emergency static air source may be installed to provide air for instrument operation should the static ports become
blocked. Refer to the EMERGENCY PROCEDURES Section for
procedures describing how and when to use this system.
INSTRUMENT PRESSURE SYSTEM
Instrument pressure is supplied by an engine driven pres­sure pump. Pressure is controlled by an adjustable pressure
regulator on the forward side of the rewall.
A gage located in the upper right corner of the instrument panel indicates the system pressure in inches of mercury. The pressure should be maintained within the green arc for proper operation of the pressure operated instruments.
STALL WARNING
A stall warning horn on the forward side of the instrument panel sounds a warning signal (the battery switch must be ON for serials 0-10097, 0-10120 and after) as the air­plane approaches a stall condition. The horn is triggered by a sensing vane on the leading edge of the left wing and is
eective at all attitudes. The warning signal will become
steady as the airplane approaches a complete stall.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
99

AUTOPILOT

100
A2ASIMULATIONS
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
he TSO’d King KFC 200 Flight Director/ Autopilot is a complete 2-axis (pitch and roll with altitude hold) integrated system with professional 3-inch Flight Director displays.
T
damper mode is available for some aircraft at slightly higher
cost. (Not included in A2A V35 Bonanza).
The basic 2-axis system provides all standard operat­ing modes and functions, plus important pilot-oriented features usually found only in larger, more expensive equipment.
The “brain” behind this whole system is the solid-state KC 295 Flight Computer. It provides computed pitch and roll commands which are displayed as visual guidance com-
mands on the V-bar of the KI 256 Flight Command Indicator.
Electric trim is also provided, along with an automatic autopilot trim system.
An optional 3-axis conguration with yaw
SYSTEM PANEL
1. The KA 285 Annunciator Panel annunciates all
vertical and lateral Flight Director/Autopilot system modes, including all “armed” modes prior to capture. It tells the pilot when his selected mode has been received and accepted by the system and if an “armed” mode is selected when capture has been initiated It also has integral marker beacon lights and trim failure warning.
2. The KI 256 Flight Command Indicator (FCI)
displays the following information:
• Pitch and roll attitude.
• Flight Director pitch and roll commands.
DH (decision height) annunciation when used with a radar altimeter.
The KI 256 contains an air-driven vertical gyro.
Engine must be running, pressure or vacuum system operating and gyro up to speed before the system will operate.
3. The KI 525A is the display portion of the KCS 55A Slaved Compass System and displays the following:
• Slaved gyro magnetic heading information.
Selected heading (HDG “bug”).
VOR/LOC/RNAV course deviation.
• Glideslope deviation.
4. The KC 290 Mode Controller contains six pushbutton switches for turning on the Flight Director and selection of all FD modes; a solenoid­held switch for Autopilot engagement; a vertical
trim rocker switch and a preight test button.
5. The KAS 297 Altitude Selector allows the pilot to select an altitude and, upon approaching that selected altitude, obtain an automatic visual pitch command on the FCI to capture and hold the preselected altitude. It also provides altitude alerter.
www.a2asimulations.com ACCU- SIM V35 B BONAN ZA
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
:::
A2ASIMULATIONS
101
AUTOPILOT
OPERATING THE KFC 200 SYSTEM
There are eleven (11) modes of operation that are provided,
by the KFC 200 system to oer the pilot Flight Director/
Autoprlot commands in response to his selection of desired modes on the Mode Controller.
Most of these modes are activated by pushbutton switches
on the Mode Controller. These pushbuttons operate with
alternate action. The rst depression of the pushbutton
activates a mode; the second depression cancels it, if it has not already been automatically deactivated. Annunciation of the mode selected appears on the annunciator panel.
Any operating mode not compatible with a newly-selected
mode will be automatically cancelled in favor of the pilot’s
latest selection. This lets the pilot advance along his ight
sequence without the inconvenience of having to manually
cancel modes. For example, if in NAV CPLD mode, selection of Heading will automatically cancel NAV.
The system will be in the Basic Attitude Reference or “Gyro” mode with engine running and aircraft “power on,” but no modes selected (Annunciator Panel blank). This provides indication of aircraft heading on the Pictorial
Navigation Indicator. and roll and pitch attitude on the
Flight Command indicator. The FCI Command V-bar is biased out of view.
PREFLIGHT TEST
With power on, ail circuit breakers in, and engine running, allow 3 minutes for the gyros to come up to speed.
Check the slaving switch position on the KA 51 B Slaving Meter, making sure you are in slaved gyro mode, and com­pare the compass card on the KI 525A with your magnetic
compass. With no modes engaged, depress the Preight Test
button on the Mode Controller. All modes will be annunci­ated on the Annunciator Panel, including Marker lights, and
the red Autotrim light will ash. At least four ashes are
needed to indicate proper Autotrim monitor operation.
The pilot rst engages the Flight Director, either by
depressing the FD button or Pitch Sync (CWS) button. This will synchronize the Command Bars with the existing air-
craft pitch and command wings level. Next, engage the
Autopilot and apply force to the controls to determine if the Autopilot can be overpowered.
NOTE: The Autopilot will not engage when the Flight
Director is not operating.
To conrm proper operation of all servos synchronize the
Flight Director for wings level. Command nose up with FD Vertical Trim control. After 3 seconds you should observe the elevator trim wheel turning in the direction com­manded. Re-synchronize the FD for wings level by using the CWS button, then command nose down with FD Vertical Trim control. After 3 seconds you should again observe the elevator trim wheel turning in the direction commanded.
Re-sync the FD. Now set the heading bug under the lubber line on your PNI and engage HDG SEL mode. Move the
heading bug to the right and to the left and observe if the controls operate as commanded.
Disengage the AP and check aircraft manual pitch trim.
Set trim to takeo position.
This concludes the preight test.
FLIGHT DIRECTOR MODE (FD)
The Flight Director mode is activated by depressing the “FD” button on the Mode Controller.
The FCI Command V-bar will appear and provide the pilot with steering commands to maintain wings level and the pitch attitude that existed at the time of Flight Director
engagement. To y the Command V-bar, the pilot will bank
and pitch the aircraft to put the orange delta wing ‘aircraft”
into the V-bar. The command is satised when the V-bar
aligns symmetrically at the top of the orange delta wing If pitch attitude is changed, recycling the FD button will syn­chronize the Command V-bar to the new pitch attitude. If a change only in the commanded pitch attitude is desired, the Control Wheel Steering (CWS) button installed on the pilot’s control wheel allows the pilot to synchronize the Command V-bar (in the FD mode with Autopilot disengaged) with­out removing his hand from the control wheel. The Flight Director can also be activated by direct selection of any
specic mode which will activate the Command V-bar.
Such selection will illuminate both FD and the appropriate annunciator mode.
Special note: The FD mode must be activated before the Autopilot can be engaged.
The Vertical Trim switch may be used to adjust the selected pitch attitude up or down at 1 degree/second.
102
A2ASIMULATIONS
AUTOPILOT ENGAGEMENT (AP)
The Autopilot is engaged by moving the solenoid-held AP
switch on the Mode Controller to the “ON” position.
CAUTION Prior to Autopilot engagement, the pilot should make
sure the V-bar commands are satisfied This will prevent any changes in the aircra’s flight path when the Autopilot is engaged.
:::
ACCU- SIM V3 5B BONA NZA www.a2asimulations.com
FOR SIM ULATIO N USE ONLY
Loading...