Waygate Technologies MIC 10 Application Guide

GE
Inspection Technologies

Mobile Hardness Testing

Application Guide for

Hardness Testers

Dr. Stefan Frank

GE Inspection Technologies

2

Ultrasonics

Mobile Hardness Testing –
Application Guide

Dr. Stefan Frank

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4

1.1 What is hardness? .................................................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Why hardness testing? .............................................................................................................................................. 5

1.3 On-site mobile hardness testing? ............................................................................................................................... 5

2. The UCI method (MIC 10, MIC 20) ........................................................................................................................... 5

2.1 The method ........................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Selecting the suitable UCI probe ................................................................................................................................6

3. The Rebound method

(DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC, MIC 20) ............................................................................................................................. 8

3.1 The method ............................................................................................................................................................ 8

3.2 Selection of the suitable impact device ....................................................................................................................... 9

4. The optical Through-Indenter-Viewing method (TIV).................................................................................................... 10

4.1 The method .......................................................................................................................................................... 10

4.2 Selection of the suitable probe ................................................................................................................................12

5. The Hardness Testers – an Overlook ......................................................................................................................... 13

5.1 The DynaPOCKET .................................................................................................................................................. 13

5.2 The DynaMIC ........................................................................................................................................................ 13

5.3 The MIC 10 .......................................................................................................................................................... 13

5.4 The MIC 20 .......................................................................................................................................................... 14

5.5 The TIV ................................................................................................................................................................ 14

6. The different methods in the field ............................................................................................................................ 14

6.1 Selecting the test method ....................................................................................................................................... 14

6.2 Significance of indentation size ............................................................................................................................... 15

6.3 Relation between penetration depth and minimum thickness for coatings ...................................................................... 16

6.4 Hardness testing on welds (HAZ) ............................................................................................................................. 16

6.5 Test piece mass requirements .................................................................................................................................. 17

6.6 Wall thickness requirements .................................................................................................................................... 17

6.7 Surface quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 18

6.8 Handling, alignment, and fixing ............................................................................................................................... 18

6.9 Calibration ............................................................................................................................................................ 18

6.10 Verifying instrument performance............................................................................................................................. 20

7. Summary and help in choosing

the suitable test method ......................................................................................................................................... 20

7.1 The UCI method (MIC 20 / MIC 10) ......................................................................................................................... 21

7.2 Rebound method (MIC 20 / DynaMIC / DynaPOCKET) ................................................................................................ 21

7.3 Optical method – Through-Indenter-Viewing (TIV) ....................................................................................................... 21

7.4 Fundamental questions to the user .......................................................................................................................... 22

3

GE Inspection Technologies

1. Introduction

Mobile hardness testing is on the ad-

vance: in these times of cost pressure

and higher quality requirements, it repre-

sents not only a quick but most of all an

economical supplement to stationary

hardness testing in the modern produc-

tion process. The application possibilities

are far ranging - this refers to both large

and smaller components, especially at

positions which are difficult to access.

There are three different physical methods

which are particularly recognized in the

field: the static UCI (Ultrasonic Contact

Impedance) method and the dynamic

rebound hardness testing method, as well

as the optical TIV (Through-Indenter-

Viewing) method. The decision as to which

method is to be used depends on the test

problem. Krautkramer offers five instru-

ment series for mobile hardness testing,

operating according to the UCI, the re-

bound or the TIV methods: DynaPOCKET,

DynaMIC, MIC 10, MIC 20, and TIV.

This Application Guide explains the basic

principles of these test methods and

compares them, using examples from the

field, e.g. hardness testing in the heat-

affected zone (HAZ) of welds.

In addition to this, the subjects critically

discussed are the factors liable to influ-

ence the measured values, such as sur-

face preparation at the test location or

the mass of parts to be tested as well as

their thickness.

1.1 What is hardness?

With regard to metallic materials, hard-

ness has always been (and still is) a sub-

ject of much discussion among metallur-

Fig. 1:

Hardness testing using the MIC 20 in combination with the test support
MIC 227 and a UCI probe in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of a weld.

Fig. 3:

Hardness testing using the DynaPOCKET on the chain of an open-pit mining
excavator.

4

Fig. 2:

Hardness testing with a rebound hardness tester (DynaMIC) on the drive wheel
of a large hydraulic excavator.

Fig. 4:

Optical hardness testing using the TIV tester. Checking before final assembly.

Ultrasonics

gists, engineers, and material scientists.

It is no wonder therefore that there is a

wide range of definitions for the term

hardness. Attributes like wear resistance,

deformation behavior, tensile strength, as

well as modulus of elasticity or Young’s

modulus are connected with the term

hardness.

An exact description of the method must

be made if one wishes to compare the

obtained readings with each other in

order to achieve a usable hardness value.

However, if the reading depends on the

method, then the conclusion may quite

clearly be drawn that hardness is no

physical quantity but that it must be a

parameter.

Hardness testing is almost nondestructive

and in many cases used for determining

parameters to differentiate and describe

materials. For example, hardness values

can easily provide data on the strength

properties of a material.

The term hardness is generally understood

as being the resistance of a material

against the penetration of a body made of

a stronger material.

Hardness is therefore not a fundamental

quantity of a material but always a re-

sponse of the material to a certain load or

test method. A hardness value is calculat-

ed on the basis of the response of the

material to this load.

Depending on the test method, other

numerical values are then determined

which are due to and characterized by

• the shape and material of the indenter

• the type and size of the load,

e.g. test load.

The different test methods can be roughly

divided into two groups:

a) Static test method:

With this method of testing, the load is

applied statically or quasi-statically. After

removing the test load, the hardness

value is defined as a ratio of test load and

the surface or projected area of the per-

manent test indentation (Brinell, Vickers,

or Knoop). In tests according to Rockwell,

the hardness is determined by means of

the permanent penetration depth of a

body due to the test load.

b) Dynamic test method

As opposed to the static method, the load

is applied in the impact mode in this

case, and the hardness is determined on

the basis of the indenter’s ”loss of energy”.

It is normal practice – and often neces-

sary – to indicate the hardness values

using another scale than the one used for

measuring them. The following should

always be taken into account regarding

this:

• There are no generally applicable relati-

onships for the conversion of hardness

values from one to another

• Conversions are possible whenever the

conversion relationship has been deter-

mined by statistically backed compari-

son measurements

• Conversion relationships from national

and international standards apply to

certain material groups to a limited

extent.

The various conversion relationships, as

specified in standards DIN 50 150 and

ASTM E 140, are stored and can be

selected in the instruments of the

MICRODUR series (MIC 10 and MIC 20)

and in the rebound hardness testers

(DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC, MIC 20), as

well as in the optical TIV hardness

tester.

1.2 Why hardness testing?

Within the production and assembly

lines, the hardness of materials or com-

ponents is mainly tested for two reasons:

firstly, to determine the characteristics of

new materials, and secondly, for the

purpose of quality assurance by meeting

the required specifications.

1.3 On-site mobile hardness testing?

Conventional hardness testers according

to Rockwell, Brinell, or Vickers always

require the test piece be brought to the

tester. As this is not always possible for

practical reasons and, most of all, for

reasons of geometry, small and portable

hardness testers were developed that

enable quick on-site testing on the

component.

Different methods are applied here.

Most of all the portable hardness testers

according to the UCI, rebound, and TIV

method are successfully used in practical

operations in the field.

2. The UCI method (MIC 10, MIC 20)

Standardized according to ASTM A 1038

2.1 The method

As in Vickers or Brinell hardness testing,

the question as to the size of the test

indentation left in the material by a

Vickers diamond after applying a fixed

test load also arises in Vickers hardness

testing according to the Ultrasonic Contact

Impedance method (UCI for short).

However, the diagonals of the test inden-

tation are not determined optically for

the hardness value as usual, but the

indentation area is electronically detected

5

GE Inspection Technologies

by measuring the shift of an ultrasonic

frequency. The UCI method can be illus-

trated by a small imaginary experiment. A

UCI probe essentially consists of a Vickers

diamond attached to the end of a metal

rod (Fig. 5). This rod is excited into longi-

tudinal oscillation by piezoelectric trans-

ducers. Imagine instead of the metal rod

(we refer to it as oscillation rod) a large

spiral spring held at one end and oscillat-

Piezo

Transducer

Piezo

Receiver

Oscillating

Rod

Vickers Diamond

Fig. 5:

Schematic description of the UCI method
(Test load / Oscillation rod / Vickers diamond /
Material to be tested).

ing at a resonant frequency of 70 kHz at

the free end. At the very top of this spring,

there is a contact plate, the Vickers dia-

mond. The test material, with which the

Vickers diamond comes into contact, can

also be imagined as being a system of

smaller spiral springs positioned vertically

to the surface - an atomic bond, two

atoms inter-linked via a “spring“. If only

one of these “atomic springs“ is touched

by the Vickers diamond - with very hard

material in which the diamond can only

slightly penetrate and consequently pro-

duce a small indentation – then an addi-

tional spring, i.e. mass, is coupled to the

large spiral spring. This produces a shift

in resonant frequency.

larger. Analogously, the largest frequency

shift is produced on soft test materials;

the diamond penetrates deeper into the

material leaving a large indentation.

The frequency shift is proportional to the

size of the test indentation produced by

the Vickers diamond. Therefore, the

diagonals of the test indentation are not

optically determined for the hardness

value, as is usually done, but the inden-

tation area is electronically detected by

measuring the frequency shift – taking

just a few seconds.

This is the whole secret of UCI hardness

testing: the frequency shift is proportional

to the size of the Vickers test indentation.

Equation 1 describes this basic relation in

comparison to the definition of the Vickers

hardness value.

Naturally, such a frequency shift likewise

depends on the spring constant of our

small ”atomic springs”.

When applied to the material to be tested,

this is known as the modulus of elasticity

or Young’s modulus. After completing the

calibration, the UCI method can be used

900

700

500

300

100

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

for all materials showing this modulus of

elasticity. The probes are factory-calibrated

on low-alloy or unalloyed steels; however,

modern test instruments can also be

quickly calibrated to other materials, such

as titanium or copper, at the test location.

2.2 Selecting the suitable UCI probe

To carry out a test according to the UCI

principle, a probe containing a rod with a

Vickers diamond attached to the contact

end is oscillated by piezoelectric ceramic

transducers at an ultrasonic frequency.

= frequency shift

A = area of indentation

E

= effective Young´s modulus

eff

HV = Vickers hardness value

F = Test Load

Equation 1:

The frequency shift is proportional to the indentati­on size of a Vickers indenter.

This frequency shift will become greater

when additional “springs“ are touched,

that means if the diamond penetrates

deeper into a material of medium hard-

ness, and the test indentation becomes

6

Frequency shift (kHz)

Fig. 6:

Frequency shift of the oscillation rod as a function of hardness (HV).

Ultrasonics

A spring applies the load, and the fre-

quency of the rod changes in proportion

to the contact area of the indentation

produced by the Vickers diamond. There-

The instrument constantly monitors the

frequency, calculates the value, and

instantaneously displays the hardness

value.

fore, the hardness value is not optically

determined by the diagonals of the in-

dentation, as would normally be the case

with a hardness tester measuring statically,

but by an electronic measurement of the

frequency shift within seconds.

The UCI method is best suited for testing

homogeneous materials. Six test loads are

employed by the various models of UCI

probes (table 1).

Fig. 7:

UCI-probes – different models.

Testload Available Probe Models Advantage or Benefit Typical Applications

98 N MIC 2010 Largest indentation; requires Small forgings, weld testing, HAZ
(10 kgf) Standard Length minimal surface preparation

Handheld Style

50 N MIC 205 Solves most general Induction or carburized
(5 kgf) Standard Length application problems mechanical parts, e.g. camshafts,

Handheld Style turbines, welds, HAZ.

MIC 205L 30 mm extended length Measurement in grooves, gear
Extended Length tooth flanks and roots
Handheld Style

10 N MIC 201 Load easy to apply; enables Ion-nitrided stamping dies and
(1 kgf) Standard Length controlled testing on a sharp molds, forms, presses, thin walled

Handheld Style radius parts

MIC 201L Measurement on complicated Bearings, tooth flanks
Extended Length geometries
Handheld Style

8 N MIC 211 Automatic load application Finished precision parts, gears,
(0.9 kgf) Motor Probe Style bearing raceways

3 N MIC 2103 Automatic load application Layers, e.g. copper or chromium
(0.3 kgf) Motor Probe Style layers on steel cylinders

(≥ 40 µm),
rotogravure cylinders, coatings,
hardened layers
(≥ 20µm)

1 N MIC 2101 The shallowest indentation These layers with a polished surface
(0.1 kgf) Motor Probe Style

Table 1:

UCI probe models, benefits, and typical applications.

7

GE Inspection Technologies

3. The Rebound method (DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC and MIC 20)
standardized according ASTM A 956

3.1 The method

Even with hardness testers operating

according to the Leeb’s or rebound

method, the size of the test indentation

generated is depended on the hardness

of material. However, it is in this case

indirectly measured via the loss of

Impact

m

▲

h

I

▲

m

▲

V

I

E

pot

= mgh

E

I

= mv

kin

2

/2

I

energy of a so-called impact body.

Figure 8 illustrates the physical principle

of rebound hardness testing.

A mass, in this case the impact body with

a tungsten carbide ball attached to its

tip, is fired against the test surface at a

Rebound

V

▲

m

R

m

▲

h

R

▲

d

= mv

2

/2 E

R

= mgh

pot

R

E

kin

defined speed by spring force. The im-

pact creates a plastic deformation of the

surface due to which the impact body

loses part of its original velocity, viz. i.e.

the softer the material, the greater the

loss in velocity. The velocity before and

after the impact is measured in a non-

contact mode. This is done by a small

permanent magnet within the impact

body (Fig. 9) generating an induction

voltage during its passage through a coil,

this voltage being proportional to the

velocity (refer to Fig. 10).

The Leeb’s hardness value HL, named

after the inventor of the rebound method

D. Leeb, is calculated from the ratio of

the impact and rebound velocities. Leeb

defined the hardness value as follows:

HL = VR / V1 · 1000

Fig 8:

The basic principle of rebound hardness testing:
d = diameter of indentation
E

= potential energy

pot

E

= kinetic ennergy.

kin

Impact body

Magnet

Tungsten

carbid ball

Coil

Fig 9:

Cross-section of an impact device.

Equation 2:

Hardness according to Leeb

m = mass
h

, hR = height before/after the impact

I

V

, VR = speed before/after the impact

I

Hardness Leeb

Time

Before Impact After impact

Fig 10:

Schematic course of the voltage signal generated by the impact body traveling through the coil. The signal
shows the voltage before and after the impact. (VDI Report No. 208, 1978).

8

Ultrasonics

With respect to this relatively young hard-

ness testing method, the question never-

theless arises as to the extent to which

the Leeb’s scale is accepted or applied by

the user. Up until now, it has only been

used in a few cases for specifications and

test certificates. The measured speed

ratio has mostly been converted into one

of the conventional hardness scales (HV,

HB, HS, HRB, HRC, or N/mm2). It was

only this conversion possibility which

increased acceptance of rebound hard-

ness testers in the field.

If one wishes to convert a measured hard-

ness value into another scale (i.e. possibly

into the result of a completely different

hardness test method), there is no mathe-

matical formula for this purpose. So-

called conversion tables are therefore

empirically determined by carrying out a

corresponding number of experiments. To

do this, the hardness of a certain material

is measured using the different test meth-

ods, and the relationship between the

individual scales is determined (Fig. 10).

A correct and reliable conversion requires

the application of a conversion table

produced from the results of a sufficiently

large number of hardness measurements

using both scales and carried out on the

corresponding material of interest.

The main cause for the necessity to have

different material groups is the influence

of elastic properties (Young’s modulus) on

the hardness test using the rebound

method. Two materials having the same

”real hardness” indicate, under certain

conditions, different Leeb’s hardness

values owing to different values of Young’s

modulus. That is the reason why no uni-

versal conversion relationship exists from

the rebound hardness HL into the con-

ventional hardness scales. In order to do

justice to these facts, several material

groups, beneath which the corresponding

conversion tables are hidden, can be

selected in modern rebound hardness

testers (refer to Table 2).

Material group

Low-alloy/unalloyed steel
and cast steel

Tool steel

Corrosion-resistant steel

Gray cast iron

Nodular graphite iron

Aluminum cast alloys

Brass / CuZn

Bronze / CuAl, CuSn

Wrought copper alloys

Table 2:

Stored material groups in the hardness testers
DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC, and MIC 20.

3.2 Selection of the suitable
impact device

The rebound hardness tester variants

include the instruments MIC 20 TFT and

DynaMIC / DynaMIC DL with three impact

device versions, and the compact

DynaPOCKET. The operation of these

instruments is based on Leeb’s method.

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

HRC

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

500 600 700 800 900

HL

D

Fig 11:

Conversion of Leeb’s hardness HL into Rockwell C (HRC) as a typical example of conversion curves as they
are stored in rebound hardness testers. These curves are experimentally determined by measuring different
test objects having varying hardness values in HL and HRC.

To apply this principle, an impact device

uses a spring to propel an impact body

through a guide tube towards the test

piece. As it travels towards the test piece,

a magnet contained within the impact

body generates a signal in a coil encir-

cling the guide tube. After the impact, it

rebounds from the surface inducing a

second signal into the coil. The instru-

ment calculates the hardness value using

the ratio of the voltages and analyzes their

phases to automatically compensate for

changes in orientation.

The Krautkramer hardness testers MIC 20,

DynaMIC, and DynaPOCKET are the only

rebound hardness testers to have this

patented signal processing feature enab-

ling an automatic direction correction.

9

GE Inspection Technologies

The question as to which instrument and

which impact device is suitable for the

corresponding application depends on the

required impact energy and on the type

or size of the indenter. Apart from Dyna-

POCKET, with integrated impact device D,

there is a choice between three impact

devices: Dyna D, Dyna E, and Dyna G for

MIC 20 and DynaMIC (refer to table 3).

Model Indenter Impact Energy Typical Application

(Nmm)

Dyna D 3 mm Tungsten 12 General-purpose testing of homogeneous materials

Carbide Ball

Dyna E 3 mm Diamand 12 > 50 HRC, e.g. forged and hardened steel mill rolls

Dyna G 5 mm Tungsten 90 < 650 HB, e.g. large castings and forgings,

require

Carbid Ball lower surface requirements (as opposed to Dyna D)

DynaPOCKET 3 mm Tungsten 12 Compact rebound hardness tester

Carbid Ball

Table 3:

Impact devices for rebound hardness testing, benefits, and typical applications.

4. The optical Through-Indenter-Viewing
method (TIV)

4.1 The method

TIV is a portable test instrument for opti-

cal hardness testing according to Vickers

under test load (Fig. 11). An optical

system including a CCD camera enables

viewing “through the diamond” (Through-

Indenter-Viewing). For the first time this

new method makes it possible to directly

watch the process of the Vickers diamond

penetrating the test material on the display.

The TIV technique can be used to carry

out a hardness test without any additional

calibration on different materials thanks

to the optical method of measurement.

Moreover, the static test load application

also makes it possible to carry out mea-

surements on both thin and small objects,

as well as on coatings.

As soon as the test load is reached, the

diagonal lengths of the indentation are

determined and converted into a hardness

value according to the Vickers definition.

This evaluation can be done both manually

and automatically. The TIV hardness tester

contains stored tables according to

DIN 50150 and ASTM E 140 that can be

selected to convert the measured hardness

value into other scales.

The picture of the indentation or Vickers

diamond on the display does not only allow

an immediate verification and assessment

of the quality of the measured value but

also enables direct checking of the

indenter’s (Vickers diamond) condition.

TIV can be used to open up new fields of

application for mobile hardness testing in

which conventional instruments could not

produce any reliable results up to date,

owing to the optical hardness testing

method.

Fig.12:

The TIV hardness tester in field use.

10

Ultrasonics

“Through-Indenter-Viewing” enables a

hardness test:

• independent of measurement direction,

• on different materials without any cali-

bration (independent of the material),

• on thin and light components,

• on elastic materials.

TIV is the first portable hardness tester

that does not determine the indentation

size of the Vickers diamond and conse-

quently the hardness of the material

indirectly but directly: “Through-Indenter-

Viewing” means that one can simulta-

neously see the indentation of the Vickers

diamond “grow” on the test object’s

surface while the test load is being ap-

plied. This is ensured by a special optical

lens combination including a CCD camera

to digitize the indentation picture. As

soon as the test load is attained, the

picture of the indentation or of the dia-

mond is stored in the instrument and

automatically evaluated.

A special software is used in a first step to

determine the edges of the indentation.

The intersection points with the edges of

the Vickers diamond (roof angle 136°)

displayed on the screen are finally taken

as a basis to determine the lengths of the

two diagonals. The average of the two

diagonals is then used for calculating the

hardness value according to the Vickers

definition. The automatic evaluation is

not only fast compared to the use of a

conventional measuring micro-scope but

subjective effects due to the user are also

excluded which become noticeable, espe-

cially in manual evaluation of the Vickers

indentation.

Figure 12 shows the result of a hardness

test using the Through-Indenter-Viewing

method. The optical verification of the

shape of the indentation is the only method

to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn

with regard to the quality of the measure-

ment. One look on the display is enough

to recognize whether the measurement

has been influenced by the surface quality,

Fig. 13:

Measurement of hard­ness using the TIV. The
indentation of the Vickers
diamond is displayed on
the screen and automati­cally evaluated.

the material’s micro-structure or by other

effects.

In addition to the automatic evaluation,

the instrument also makes it possible to

evaluate the Vickers indentation manually.

The edges of the indentation are adjusted

by hand in an enlargement of the picture

on the display. The length of the diago-

nals is automatically updated, and the

corresponding hardness value is dis-

played.

The display of the Vickers diamond pre-

sents the additional possibility of directly

checking the condition of the indenter.

Any defects on the indenter, such as

edge breaks, are identified at once,

Fig. 14:

Graphic display of the measurement results as a curve.

Fig. 15:

Display of the measurements results in tabular form, including statistical data
such as e.g. range, standard deviation, and minimum or maximum.

11

GE Inspection Technologies

therefore avoiding any incorrect measure-

ments from the very start.

The results of a test series can be graphi-

cally represented as a curve, or even in

tabular form, including statistical data

(see Figures 13 and 14). All the necessary

data such as average, single value, or

statistical data are displayed or updated

during the measurement.

The essential benefits of the Through-

Indenter-Viewing method are achieved by

the static application of the test load and

to the direct as well as automatic determi-

nation of the diagonal lengths of the in-

dentation made by the Vickers diamond:

a) The TIV enables mobile and on-site

measurement of hardness on different

materials without having to carry out any

additional adjustments and calibration

procedures (see Figure 15).

b) Due to the static test load application,

TIV also enables measurements on both

thin and small parts, such as coils, sheet

metal, etc.

c) The “live” picture of the indentation on

the display enables immediate analysis of

measurement quality.

d) The TIV is provided with an automatic

evaluation of the Vickers indentation, i.e.

the diagonal lengths are directly and

automatically determined.

e) The display of the diamond edges on

the screen enable condition checks to be

made on the indenter.

Steel

Brass Glass

Sheet steel

The TIV opens up a large variety of new

application fields which were previously

not accessible to mobile hardness testers.

Hardness tests are not only independent

of test positions and directions but now

also of the test object’s material and mass

or geometry.

4.2 Selection of the suitable probe

Two different handheld probes, having

test loads of 10 N / 1 kgf and 50 N / 5 kgf

respectively, are available for the optical

TIV hardness tester. Table 4 shows the

corresponding ranges of measurement for

the two probes. The measuring range of

the two TIV probes is essentially limited

by the optical system used. The size of

the CCD sensor only allows a certain

maximum size of indentation so that a

minimum value of the measuring range

is predefined by the optics in this case.

Fig.16:

Hardness testing on different
materials using the Through­Indenter Viewing method.

In the case of larger hardness values,

i.e. with smaller test indentations, the

resolution of the CCD camera limits the

range of measurement. Although reliable

and reproducible measurements have

been carried out on ceramic materials

within the hardness range of 1500 HV

using the TIV105 probe; an upper limit

value of 1000 HV is nevertheless generally

specified because a clear effect of the

test object’s surface quality and of the

test load application on the measurement

result is to be expected at higher hardness

values.

Probe Test Load Hardness range Typical application

TIV 101 10 N / 1kgf approx. 30 – 500 HV Optical hardness testing on thin components

made of aluminum, copper, or brass.
Hardness testing on thin layers

TIV 105 50 N / 5 kgf approx. 100 – 1000 HV Hardened surfaces, mechanical parts, semi-finished products

Table 4:

Probes for TIV hardness testing, benefits, and typical applications.

12

5. The Hardness Testers – an Overlook

5.1 The DynaPOCKET

Method: Rebound hardness testing

Typical application

• solid, coarse-grained test objects

• forgings having an inhomogeneous

surface structure

• cast materials

Accessories: e.g.

• test attachments for curved surfaces

• hardness reference blocks

Fig. 17:

The DynaPOCKET.

Ultrasonics

5.2 The DynaMIC

Method: Rebound hardness testing

Typical application

• mechanical parts or motor units made

of steel and aluminium cast alloys

• solid components with surface as rolled

• large serial products during production

Accessories: e.g.

• impact devices D, G, and E

• test attachments for curved surfaces

• hardness reference blocks

• software UltraHARD

5.3 The MIC 10

Method: UCI hardness testing

Typical application

• fine-grained material

• hardened materials

• thin layers

• hardness progress: on curve on

welds, etc.

Fig. 18:

The DynaMIC.

Accessories: e.g.

• supports

• guides (probe attachment)

• hardness reference plates

• software UltraHARD

Fig. 19:

The MIC 10.

13

GE Inspection Technologies

5.4 The MIC 20

Method: UCI and rebound hardness testing

Typical application

• all UCI applications

• all rebound applications

Accessories: e.g.

• all UCI probes

• all rebound impact devices

• supports

• guides (probe attachment)

• hardness reference plates

• software UltraDAT

5.5 The TIV

Method: Optical hardness testing

Typical application

• hardness testing on different materials

without calibration

• hardness testing on thin components

(e.g. sheet metal, coils)

• hardened surfaces

Fig. 20:

The MIC20.

Accessories: e.g.

• supports

• guides (probe attachment)

• hardness reference plates

• software UltraDAT

Fig. 21:

The TIV.

6. The different Methods in the Field

6.1 Selecting the test method

The UCI method is recommended for

testing fine-grained material having almost

any shape and size. It is especially used

where material properties are to be deter-

mined within narrow tolerances, e.g. for

determination of the strain-hardening

process on drop forgings.

The TIV method is almost independent of

test material and geometry. It, therefore,

can be used everywhere, where conven-

tional portable hardness testing failed so

far: different materials without calibration,

thin lightweight parts, sheet metal and

coils, etc.

Rebound hardness testing is mainly carried

out on large, coarse-grained materials,

forgings, and all types of cast materials

because the spherical tungsten carbide

tip of the impact device produces a larger

indentation than the Vickers diamond

and therefore reveals the characteristics

of the cast structure better.

On the other hand, the relatively small

test indentations of UCI probes enable

hardness testing on welds, and especially

in the critical area of the heat-affected

zone, viz. HAZ.

A large number of UCI probes and re-

bound impact devices having different

test loads or indenter diameters enable

an application-oriented selection of a

suitable method and of a suitable probe /

impact device. The following applies to

the use of impact devices available for

DynaMIC and MIC 20: in addition to the

Dyna D, which is suitable for most fields

of application, the Dyna G – provided

14

Ultrasonics

Application UCI hardness testing Rebound hardness testing

MIC 10, MIC 20 DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC, MIC 20 TIV

Solid parts + ++ ++

Coarse-grained materials – ++ o

Steel and aluminum cast alloys o ++ o

HAZ with welds ++ – ++

Tubes: wall thickness > 20 mm ++ ++ ++

Tubes: wall thickness < 20 mm ++ – ++

Sheet metal, coils o – ++

Inhomogeneous surfaces – + –

Thin layers ++ – +

Hard-to-get-at-positions ++ + –

++ especially well-suited / + well-suited / o sometimes suitable / - not recommended

Table 5:

Applications for UCI and rebound hardness testing.

with an impact energy which is nine times

higher and with a larger spherical tungsten

carbide tip as indenter - can be used,

especially on relatively inhomogeneous

surfaces, e.g. on cast materials or forgings.

Fig. 22:

Comparison of indentation areas for DynaD impact
device and UCI probes MIC 2010, MIC 205, MIC 201.

For hard materials (650 HV/56 HRC),

causing the spherical tungsten carbide

tip to wear faster, we recommend the

impact device Dyna E provided with a

diamond tip as indenter.

6.2 Significance of indentation size

In general, the larger the area of indenta-

tion the more consistent the test results.

The variations in microstructure of inho-

mogeneous materials or in coarse-grained

materials are averaged out so that consis-

tent hardness values can be achieved.

A larger indentation area also sets less

demands on the surface finish and

requires less surface preparation.

In comparison, the resulting indentation

areas yielded by the various impact devices

are much larger than those created by

any UCI or TIV probe. The rebound tester

is recommended when testing large cast-

ings and forgings. Testing small areas of

homogenous materials that are surface-

hardened requires the shallower indenta-

tions produced by UCI or TIV probes.

Tables 6 a + b are provided to compare

the indentation size of rebound impact

devices, UCI and TIV probes at three

levels of hardness.

Dyna G Dyna D HV 10 HV 5 HV 1 HV 0,3

5 mm 3 mm MIC 2010 MIC 205 MIC 201 MIC 2103

90 Nmm 12 Nmm TIV 105 TIV 101

64 HRC 350 152 107 48 25

55 HRC 898 449 175 124 56 28

30 HRC 1030 541 249 175 79 41

Table 6 a:

Approximate indentation area (in mm).

15

GE Inspection Technologies

Dyna G Dyna D HV 10 HV 5 HV 1 HV 0,3

5 mm 3 mm MIC 2010 MIC 205 MIC 201 MIC 2103

90 Nmm 12 Nmm TIV 105 TIV 101

800 HV 16 22 16 7 4

600 HV 63 28 25 20 9 5

300 HV 83 35 35 25 11 6

Table 6 b:

Approximate indentation depth (in mm).

6.3 Relation between penetration

depth and minimum thickness for
coatings

For Vickers hardness testing, the thick-

ness or depth of hardened layer or coat-

ing, e.g. chromium on steel rolls, must

be substantial enough to support the

indentation. As a rule, the thickness

should be a minimum of ten times the

indentation depth.

Hardness (HV)

You can easily calculate the penetration

depth of the Vickers diamond if you know

the force of the probe and approximately

the hardness by using equation 3. This

formula is based on the geometry of

the Vickers diamond. Therefore, it only

applies to a Vickers hardness test.

Remember: 10 N ≈ 1 kgf.

d = 0,062 · F / HV

HV = Vickers hardness in HV

F = Test Load in N

d = Penetration depth in mm

Minimum thickness s = 10 · d

Equation 3:

Penetration depth of a Vickers diamond.

6.4 Hardness testing on welds (HAZ)

With the small test indentations made by

Microdur-UCI probes, it is possible for

example to determine the hardness of a

welded component, above all in the criti-

cal area of the weld, viz. the heat-affected

zone (HAZ). The result of the hardness

test gives information about the proper

welding of a material. For example, if

there is an excessive martensite content

in the heat-affected zone (HAZ), a very

hard zone will be formed there often

causing cracks.

Penetration (µm)

Fig. 23:

Penetration depth of the Vickers diamond vs. the hardness of material (for different test loads).

16

Naturally, only hardness testing methods

can be used which reliably cover the

critical area of the weld, viz. the HAZ,

with indentations which are not too large.

Only low test loads (HV5 or HV10) pro-

duce a Vickers indentation which is still

situated in the critical area of the HAZ.

HV30, HB, and test indentations from the

rebound hardness test, as well as measure-

ments using the Poldi hammer go beyond

this zone. Only an average value over the

Ultrasonics

Dyna D & E Dyna G UCI-Probes TIV

No holder / support required > 5 kg > 15 kg > 0.3 kg no

Requires holder / support 2 bis 5 kg 5 bis 15 kg 0.1 bis 0.3 kg restrictions

Requires holder / support & coupling 0.05 bis 2 kg 0.5 bis 5 kg 0.01 bis 0.1 kg
paste

Table 7:

Mass requirements for test piece

whole weld area is determined in these

cases. This leads to lower hardness values

due to the fact that the adjacent areas are

also detected with lower hardness. Today,

Poldi hammers can still be encountered in

weld testing. It is evident that a low hard-

ness value results from this test indentation,

which, for the operator means, that further

heat treatment of the HAZ is no longer

necessary. Whether this is a wise decision,

must be left to the opinion of the reader.

Fig. 24:

Hardness testing in the heat-affected zone (HAZ).

6.5 Test piece mass requirements

Consideration must be given to the mass

of the test piece. Although the mass

criteria for Leeb’s method are higher than

those for the UCI method, the results of

both methods can be influenced by the

mass and thickness of the test piece.

contour of the back surface of the part.

The support reinforces the part to make it

rigid and stable. Extremely thin materials

may also require the use of a slight film of

grease or paste to couple the test object

to the support.

The UCI method is based on measuring

a frequency shift. Test objects weighing

less than about 0.3 kg can go into self-

oscillation causing erroneous or erratic

readings. The support plate and coupling

technique described above are also an

effective method to avoid oscillations with

small components. If the use of a support

plate is not feasible, select a probe with

a lower test load to reduce the effects of

self-oscillation.

Table 7 is provided as a guideline for

determining holder or support require-

ments. The effectiveness of the holder or

support is determined by how precisely it

matches the contour of the test piece.

There are – in principle – no limitations

regarding the test piece mass for the TIV,

as long as the probe can be positioned

properly and the load can be applied

without any movements of the test piece.

6.6 Wall thickness requirements

The wall thickness of tubes, pipelines,

or valves is critical for mobile hardness

testing, especially for the rebound method.

For example, a thin wall will start to oscillate

like the skin of a drum when it’s hit by the

impact body in a rebound test.

In addition to the mass (Section 6.5), it’s

mainly the wall thickness which also plays

an important part when choosing the test

methods. It can influence the hardness

value even when the test object is solid

and weighs a few tons.

Despite the small mass of the impact

device Dyna D and the low impact energy,

there is a large force of about 900 N

(90 kgf) produced at the time of impact

(compared to that, the maximum force of

a UCI probe is 98 N / 10 kgf). That is

sufficient to produce vibrations with a

wall thickness of under 20 mm. This can

Hardness testing method Wall thickness Wall thickness

in mm in inch

Rebound 20 mm 0.79

Leeb’s method creates a large force of

short duration during the impact. Thin

and lightweight materials yield causing

erroneous values. A solution for testing

small components having a simple geometry

is a machined support that matches the

UCI 2 – 3 mm 0.08 – 0.12

TIV 10 x penetration depth of diamond

Table 8:

Recommended minimum wall thickness. By coupling to a support plate, small test pieces can be made rigid
and stable to enable measurement of small wall thicknesses.

17

GE Inspection Technologies

cause incorrect hardness values and large

amounts of scatter. In such cases, the

UCI method should be preferred to the

rebound method.

Figure 25 shows the hardness values

measured by a standard Vickers test with

a 10 kgf (98N) force in relation to those

measured by a Dyna D impact device.

For a wall thickness beyond 20 mm, both

tests show the same results. Below 20 mm,

the Vickers value measured using the

rebound test method is lower than the

true value resulting in a deviation from

the horizontal line.

6.7 Surface quality

All hardness testing methods require

smooth surfaces free of oxide scale, paint,

lubricants, oil, plastic coating due to

corrosion protection, or metal coating for

better conductivity. The indentation depth

should be large in comparison to the sur-

face roughness.

If surface preparation is necessary, care must

be taken not to alter the surface hardness

by overheating or strain-hardening.

More practical results can be achieved by

using a battery-driven, high-speed

(>12000 rpm) handheld grinder, e.g. the

1.6

1.4

1.2

1.0

MIC 1060. Use 180 grain to get a smooth

surface. It takes just 10 seconds.

6.8 Handling, alignment, and fixing

Move the MIC probe at a slow and steady

speed. The probe should be rectangular

with respect to the surface. Maximum

angular deviation from the straight axis

should be less than 5 degrees. Avoid

turning, don’t drill. There should be no

lateral forces on the diamond.

The rebound impact device must be

within one or two degrees of being

perpendicular to the surface.

Test attachments in the form of support

rings for the impact devices and probe

shoes for the UCI probe ensure proper

alignment.

The standard support rings provided with

each Dyna D and Dyna E are used to test

convex or concave radii greater than 30 mm.

The larger diameter of the Dyna G standard

support ring requires the radius to be greater

than 50 mm. Support rings for the Dyna D

and Dyna E impact devices are available to

cover the range of r = 10-30 mm for

testing the ID’s or OD’s of cylindrical and

spherical shaped parts (see Dyna 41 and

Dyna 42). Customized support rings are

available on request.

For standard length UCI probes, the

MIC 270 and MIC 271 probe shoes are

offered as accessories. The MIC-271

probe shoe is recommended for testing

cylindrical parts with radii from 3 to 75 mm.

The flat probe shoe is designed to test

flat surfaces but is also useful in testing

radii greater than 75 mm.

Position the TIV probe perpendicular to

the test piece. Probe attachements for flat

and curved surfaces are available. Apply

the load at a slow and steady speed. On

the screen the “growing” indentation can

be observed. The indentation is evaluated

automatically when the load is applied.

6.9 Calibration

The modulus of elasticity (or Young’s

Modulus) is a material property that can

influence instrument calibration. Proper

calibration is required to ensure the

accuracy of the test results.

To calibrate the DynaMIC or the MIC 20

for rebound hardness testing, the operator

must first select one of nine material

groups (refer to Table 9). Selecting the

appropriate material provides a rough

calibration, and the type of impact device

connected to the instrument determines

the available conversions. A more precise

calibration is possible for a specific material

if samples of known hardness are used to

calibrate the instrument. To perform the

calibration, several readings are taken on

the sample and the displayed average

value is adjusted to the actual hardness.

This enables to achieve precise calibration

and a calibration offset value for that

specific material that can be used to

recalibrate the instrument.

0.8

0.5
020406080

Wall thickness (mm)

Fig. 25:

Standard Vickers values (HV10) compared with rebound Vickers values (HVR)
for different wall thicknesses of tubes.

18

UCI probes compatible with the MIC10

and MIC20 series are calibrated on steel

reference blocks having a modulus of

elasticity or Young’s modulus of 210,000

MPa. Because unalloyed or low-alloy

steels have a similar Young’s modulus,

accurate results are obtained with the

standard calibration. In many cases, the

difference in Young’s modulus of medium-

alloy and high-alloy steels is so insignifi-

cant that the error created falls within the

allowable tolerances of the part.

However, the Young’s modulus for non-

ferrous materials require special calibra-

tions. Several readings are taken on a test

piece sample of known hardness to per-

form the calibration. The displayed aver-

age value is then adjusted to the actual

hardness. This calibrates the instrument

and also establishes a calibration offset

value for that specific material that can

be used to recalibrate the instrument.

Calibration offset values are referenced

from a factory-set value for steel. Please

note that they can be either a positive or

negative value. Table 10 contains a list of

approximate calibration values that can be

referenced for some common materials.

Ultrasonics

Sand- rough

blasted

Fig. 26:

Range of measured hardness values versus surface preparation. HVR indicates converted Vickers hardness
values measured by rebound hardness testing.

grain size

Because of the principle of the TIV based

on the Vickers test, there is no calibration

necessary when measuring on different

materials. For details see chapter 4.

Material Group HV HB HRB HRC HS N/mm

1 Steel - unalloyed, D, E, G D, E, G D, E, G D, E, G D, E, G

low-alloy or cast

2Tool steel D, E D, E

3 Stainless steel D D D D

4 Gray cast iron D, G

5 Nodular graphite iron D, G

6 Cast aluminum D D

7Brass D D

2

8 Bronze D

9 Copper D

Table 9:

Material groups and available conversions.

19

GE Inspection Technologies

6.10 Verifying instrument
performance

The performance of a hardness tester is

periodically verified using standardized

reference blocks.

The perfect functioning of the rebound

hardness testers (DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC,

and MIC 20) is based on 5 single mea-

surements on a certified Leeb’s hardness

reference block. The average of these

5 measurements should be within ± 5 HL

of the reference block’s certified value.

The MICD62 hardness reference block

has a nominal value of about 765 HL.

If these values are converted into a HRC

value, the result is a hardness value of

55 HRC with a tolerance of ±0.5 HRC.

The accuracy of the UCI and TIV hard-

ness testers (MIC 10, MIC 20 and TIV) is

based on measurements using Vickers

hardness reference blocks. The average of

5 readings should be within ± 3.6% of

Material Calibration Offset Value

Aluminium – 8800

Chromium + 0250

Copper – 5800

Cast iron – 4800

Titanium – 6500

300-series stainless steel – 1500

400-series stainless steel – 0900

Table 10:

Approximate UCI calibration offset values.

the certified value of the reference block

when using a rigid/stable support or

holder such as the MIC222 test support.

When testing freehand, a minimum of

10 readings should be averaged with the

tolerance being ± 5%. The above toler-

ances for the dfferent test principles are

summarized in table 11.

Principle Measuring tolerances

Rebound ± 5 HL deviation of average from the value of the hardness

reference block with 3 to 5 readings.

UCI ± 3,6 % deviation of average from the value of the hardness

reference block with 3 to 5 readings using the test support
MIC 222-A.
Larger deviations are possible with freehand measurements.

TIV ± 3,6 % deviation of average from the value of the hardness

reference block with 3 to 5 readings.

Table 11:

Measuring tolerances for the different test methods.

7. Summary and help with the choice
of the suitable test method

The Krautkramer product range of portable

hardness testers includes the instrument

families DynaPOCKET, DynaMIC, MIC 10,

MIC 20, and TIV. Three different physical

methods of measurement are used in

these instruments – the UCI, the rebound,

and the optical TIV method. It is neces-

sary to choose the suitable equipment for

the present application in each case, i.e.

the test method and the corresponding

instrument.

The following chapter gives you a brief

survey of the different test methods and

of the typical applications, at the same

time helping you with the choice of the

correct equipment for your hardness

test task.

20

Ultrasonics

7.1 The UCI method (MIC 20 /

MIC 10)

With the UCI method, the size of the

hardness test indentation is not measured

optically but the indentation area is de-

tected electronically by determining the

shift of ultrasonic frequency under load.

With ”soft” materials, the Vickers dia-

mond penetrates deeper into the material

leaving a relatively large indentation area

in the material, which leads to a high

frequency shift.

This is the secret of UCI hardness testing:

the frequency shift is proportional to the

size of the indentation produced by the

Vickers diamond in the material.

UCI instruments can be easily calibrated

to different test materials.

Typical applications:

Heat-treated or case-hardened mechani-

cal parts (e.g. camshafts), weld testing

(HAZ), finished precision parts, gears,

raceways of ball bearings, tooth flanks,

turbine blades, thin layers, e.g. copper or

chromium on steel cylinders, rotogravure

cylinders, coatings.

Instruments:

MIC 10, MIC 10 DL, MIC 20,

MIC 20 TFT

7.2 Rebound method (MIC 20 /
DynaMIC / DynaPOCKET)

With the rebound method, an impact

body is accelerated at a defined speed

against the surface of the test object. Due

to the plastic deformation of the surface

produced at the moment of impact, the

impact body loses some of its original

energy or velocity.

With a soft material, the test indentation

produced by the impact body is relatively

large, i.e. the impact body loses most of

its original energy and rebounds at a corres-

pondingly lower velocity. The velocities

before and after the impact are measured

in non-contact mode. A permanent magnet

in the impact body generates an induction

voltage when passing through the coil,

with this voltage being proportional to the

velocity. The rebound velocity, on the

other hand, is a measure for the hardness

of test material.

Only Krautkramer instruments can be used

in any direction without any additional

adjustments (patented non-directional

function).

Nine different material groups are already

stored in hardness testers using the rebound

method. In addition to this, the DynaMIC

and the MIC 20 can be easily calibrated to

other test materials.

Impact devices:

• Dyna D dia. 3 mm

tungsten carbide ball

• Dyna G dia. 5 mm

tungsten carbide ball

• Dyna E

diamond test tip

7.3 Optical method –
Through-Indenter-Viewing (TIV)

With the TIV method (Through-Indenter-

Viewing), the indentation size of the Vickers

diamond, i.e. the diagonal lengths, is

automatically measured under load by

viewing through the diamond by means

of an optical system using a CCD camera.

The TIV measurement of diagonal length

immediately results in a Vickers hardness

value for the test load applied.

The ”live” picture of the indentation on

the instrument’s LCD also allows an im-

mediate opinion about the reliability of

the measurement, i.e. a verification of the

quality of the displayed indentation pro-

duced by the Vickers diamond.

By viewing through the indenter, the TIV

method enables hardness tests on all

materials without any additional calibra-

tion. Even tests on thin materials, e.g.

coils and thin metal sheets, are no longer

a problem for this portable instrument.

Probes:

Handheld probes

• 10 N / 1 kgf (MIC 201-A,

MIC 201-AL)

• 50 N / 5 kgf (MIC 205-A,

MIC 205-AL)

• 98 N / 10 kgf (MIC 2010-A)

Motor probes

• 8.6 N / 0.9 kgf (MIC 211-A)

•3 N / 0.3 kgf (MIC 2103-A)

•1 N / 0.1 kgf (MIC 2101-A)

Typical applications:

Large, coarse-grained components with

surface as rolled, motor units, or mechani-

cal parts made of cast steel and cast

aluminum alloys, forgings having an inho-

mogeneous surface structure, material

differentiation in material stores and

wrought copper alloys.

Instruments:

DynaPOCKET, DynMIC, DynaMIC DL,

MIC 20, MIC 20 TFT

Typical applications:

Hardening shops and heat-treatment

companies (different materials without

calibration), aviation industry (thin-walled

components, different alloys) sheet metal

(coils),…

Instruments:

TIV

Probes:

TIV 101 (10 N / 1 kgf)

TIV 105 (50 N / 5 kgf)

21

GE Inspection Technologies

7.4 Fundamental questions to the user

1. What do you want to measure?

DynaPOCKET DynaMIC MIC 10 MIC 20 TIV

Coatings No No Yes Yes Yes

Hardened surfaces No No Yes Yes Yes

Weld (HAZ) No No Yes Yes Yes

Diffrent materials Yes* Yes* Yes* Yes* Yes
(*with calibration)

Castings/forgings Yes Yes Partly Yes Partly

Tubes Partly Partly Yes Yes Partly

Sheet metal, coils No No Partly Partly Yes

2. What is the material

DynaPOCKET DynaMIC MIC 10 MIC 20 TIV

Steel (alloy, stainless,...) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Other metals (Al, Cu,...) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Cast steel Yes Yes Partly Yes Partly

Cast Aluminum Partly Yes Partly Yes Partly

Ceramics No No Partly Partly Yes

Glass No No No No Yes

Plastics Partly Partly Partly Partly Yes

3. Are there any other requirements?

DynaPOCKET DynaMIC MIC 10 MIC 20 TIV

Data memory/ No Only DL Only DL Yes Yes
PC interfacing

Statistical evaluation No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Scale conversions Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Non-directional Yes Yes Yes* Yes* Yes
(*except motor probe)

Wall thickness <20 mm Partly* Partly* Partly Partly Yes
(*with coupling)

Mass <2 kg Partly* Partly* Partly Partly Yes
(*with coupling)

Depending on the test task, either the

UCI method, the rebound method, or

the optical TIV method is used for the

hardness test.

22

A suitable method cannot always be clear-

ly defined right away. An experienced

engineer is therefore the best person to

give the right answer about the test object

itself directly on site.

Ultrasonics

23

www.geinspectiontechnologies.com © 2005 General Electric Company. All Rights Reserved. We reserve the right to technical modifications without prior notice. GEIT-21001-sd299EN (01/06)