Part 1
CAR 704 / 705 Air Operator
Maintenance Requirements Checklists
Table of Contents
(March 2001)
AOC-01 Previous Transport Canada Audit..................................................................3
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual...........................................................................5
AOC-03 Person Responsible for Maintenance..........................................................13
AOC-04 Evaluation Program........................................................................................15
AOC-05 Technical / Regulatory Publications..............................................................19
AOC-06 Technical Records..........................................................................................22
AOC-07 Weight & Balance...........................................................................................26
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)...............................................29
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs....................................................................38
AOC-10 Reserved.........................................................................................................49
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning....................................................................................50
AOC-12 Defect Recording, Rectification, Deferral, and Control Procedures.........55
AOC-13 Airworthiness Directive, Service Bulletin.....................................................60
AOC-14 ETOPS - Extended Range Operations........................................................62
AOC-15 Minimum Equipment List - MEL, OMEL, GMEL.........................................67
AOC-16 All Weather Operations - Category II, III........................................................71
AOC-17 Technical Dispatch Procedures....................................................................74
AOC-18 Flight Authorities - Test / Ferry......................................................................78
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements..........................................................................81
AOC-20 Training Program............................................................................................86
AOC-21 Personnel Records.........................................................................................89
AOC-22 De-Icing Procedures......................................................................................91
AOC-23 Elementary Work, Servicing..........................................................................93
AOC-24 Reserved.........................................................................................................96
AOC-25 Servicing - Fueling, De-fueling & Lubrication, Oxygen...............................97
AOC-26 Control of Parts, Parts Pooling....................................................................100
AOC-27 Service Difficulty Reporting SDR................................................................103
March 2001 Page 1
Intentionally Blank
March 2001 Page 2
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-01 Previous Transport Canada Audit
File 5015Date:
What was the purpose and date of
1.
the previous audit?
Were there a significant number of
2.
Audit Findings?
• What conclusions were drawn
from the audit?
Was the audit follow-up
3.
completed?
• List any outstanding audit
findings respecting the
previous audit?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Since the last audit, are there
4.
indications of high managerial staff
turnover?
Is there any indications of high
5.
staff, flight crew or maintenance
personnel turnover?
Have there been any changes in
6.
the company's scope, size,
aircraft, type of service since the
previous audit?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 3
AOC-01 Previous Transport Canada Audit
Have there been any additional
7.
Operations Specifications or a
change to the Maintenance Scope
of Approval / Authorized since the
previous audit?
8.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 4
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
complying with the Canadian
Company:
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
Maintenance Control - Administrative
File 5015Date:
Does the manual have a table of
1.
contents?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(a)
Does the manual reflect the
2.
business or trade name?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(b)
Does the company have a fixed
3.
place of business?
Ref: CAR 706.04(2)(a)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the manual have a
4.
description of the
• organization and size?
• state the geographic location
and sub base facilities?
• state the type and number of
aircraft operated?
• the nature and operation?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(c)
Does the statement reflect
5.
approvals listed on the Operations
Certificates / Limitations?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(c)
Is there a signed statement (by
6.
the certificate holder) indicating
that the manual is their means of
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 5
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
Aviation Regulations?
• Is there a listing of the
incorporated documents?
• Is the list covered by the
certification statement made
by the certificated holder?
Note: there’s no compelling
regulation for the AOC to change
certification if the certificate holder
position changes
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(d)
Has each Incorporated by
7.
Reference Document been
“certified” by the PRM or person
responsible for that management
function as the Air Operator’s
means of compliance with the
CARs?
Ref: CASS 726.08(2)(d)
Does the manual describe an
8.
amendment procedure?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(e)
Does the manual describe the
9.
page identification process?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(f)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is there an LEP and is it approved
10.
by Transport Canada?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(f)
Do the pages contained in the
11.
manual match those listed in the
LEP?
March 2001 Page 6
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
depicting the organizational
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(f)
Does the manual specify
12.
distribution procedures and the
identity of manual holders /
locations?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(g)
Is the amendment procedure
13.
followed?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(e)
Are manuals up to date?
14.
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(e)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are distribution procedures
15.
followed?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(e)
Are manuals physically located at
16.
the designated site or with the
specified person?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(e)
Complete separate PRM
17.
Checklist ….
Does the manual contain a chart
18.
March 2001 Page 7
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
responsibilities?
• If not, is one required for
clarity?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(h)(iii)
Does the manual state the
19.
communication equipment to be
used in the conduct of the type of
business intended?
• Is it adequate?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)(b)
Are they able to contact the
20.
aircraft / crew when away from the
main base or remotely operated?
Ref: CASS 726.06(2)
How is updating of the control
21.
manual actioned or the need
generated?
Ref: CASS 726.04(1)(h)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the company have facilities
22.
adequate for the control of
maintenance, elementary work
and servicing?
Ref: CAR 706.04 / CASS 726.04(2)(a)
Complete separate Evaluation
23.
Program Checklist ….
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
Maintenance Control - Operational
Is there sufficient number of
24.
personnel to control all of the
required maintenance, scheduling,
elementary work, servicing?
Ref: CASS 726.04(1)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 8
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
Complete separate Technical,
25.
Regulatory Publication
Checklist …
Complete separate Technical
26.
Records Checklist …
Complete separate Weight &
27.
Balance Checklist …
Does the manual specify how
28.
maintenance actions are to be
recorded?
Ref: CAR 726.08(1)(k)
Complete separate
29.
Maintenance Development
Checklist …
Complete separate Reliability
30.
Monitoring Checklist …
Complete separate Corrosion
31.
Control & Aging Aircraft
Checklist …
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
Is there a person identified that is
32.
responsible for developing a
maintenance schedule?
Ref: CASS 726.04(1)(a)
Does the manual identify the
33.
maintenance schedules
appropriate to the type of
equipment / aircraft operated by
the company?
• Have any maintenance
schedules been omitted?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(l)
Does the manual indicate a
34.
procedure for adding additional
aircraft to the operating certificate?
• If so, do they follow the
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 9
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
procedure?
Ref:
Complete separate
35.
Maintenance Planning
Checklist …
Complete separate Defect
36.
Control Checklist …
Complete separate
37.
Airworthiness Directive /
Service Bulletin Checklist …
Complete separate instructions,
38.
job cards …
Complete separate Technical
39.
Dispatch Checklist …
Complete separate MEL / GMEL
40.
/ OMEL Checklist …
Complete separate EROPS
41.
Checklist …
Complete separate CAT II
42.
Checklist …
Complete separate Flight
43.
Authority - Test - Ferry Flight
Checklist ….
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
Complete separate
44.
Maintenance Arrangements
Checklist ….
Complete separate Training
45.
Program Checklist ….
Complete separate Personnel
46.
Records Checklist ….
Complete separate Elementary
47.
Work / Servicing Checklist ….
Complete separate Ramp
48.
Procedures Checklist …
Complete separate De -Icing
49.
Procedures Checklist …
Complete separate Complete
50.
separate Servicing - fuel, oil,
lubricants Checklist …
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
March 2001 Page 10
AOC-02 Maintenance Control Manual
Complete separate Control of
51.
Parts / Parts Pooling Checklist
…
Are sufficient spare parts available,
52.
located where needed?
Ref: CAR 706.04(1)(e)
Are sufficient supplies and spare
53.
parts available to ensure timely
rectification of defec ts / MEL
provisions?
Ref: CAR 706.04(2)(e)
Complete separate SDR
54.
Checklist ….
Complete separate Sample
55.
Aircraft Checklist ….
N/A Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
56.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 11
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 12
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-03 Person Responsible for Maintenance
File 5015Date:
Review TC company files, is there
1.
documentation to support the
evaluation of the PRM?
• completion of the CARs
examination (AMEs exempt)?
• check for convictions under
Section 7.3 of the AA or CAR
605.84/85/86?
• assessment by interview?
Ref: CASS 726.03(1)(a) & (3) / CASS
726.03(4) & (5) / CASS 726.03(1)(b)(ii)
If the AOC holder also holds an
2.
AMO Certificate, is the PRM for
the Air Operator the same person
as the PRM for the AMO?
Ref: CAR 706.03(2)
Does the PRM fully understand
3.
the responsibilities of the position?
Ref: CAR 706.03(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is there evidence to suggest that
4.
the PRM did not remove aircraft
from service when they failed to
comply with airworthiness or
operational requirements?
Ref: CAR 706.03(1)c) / CASS 726.03(7)
Does the PRM sub delegate any
5.
of the responsibility?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• If so, is the identity / position
of the individual and their
duties fully described in the
manual?
• Does the description specify
which functions or activities
that are to be assigned?
March 2001 Page 13
AOC-03 Person Responsible for Maintenance
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(h)
6.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 14
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-04 Evaluation Program
File 5015Date:
Is the requirement to evaluate the
1.
company maintenance system
identified in the manual?
Ref: CAR 706.07 / CASS 726.07(1)
Is the person responsible for
2.
evaluating the program identified in
the manual? If not the PRM, are
this person’s duties clearly defined
in the manual?
Ref: CAR 706.03(3) / CASS 726.07(2)
Has the operator conducted an
3.
initial evaluation at the end of 12
months?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(a)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the evaluation program cover
4.
all functions defined in the
manual?
Ref: CASS 726.07(2) & (3)
Does the evaluation program cover
5.
regulatory changes?
Ref: CASS 726.07(2)
Is there evidence (records)
6.
indicating that formal review of
maintenance requirements have
been undertaken?
• Were records kept according
to the requirements specified
in the manual?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 15
AOC-04 Evaluation Program
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(c)
Does the operator use checklists
7.
for the evaluation process?
• Are examples available and
are they comprehensive?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)
Does the operator follow the
8.
frequency of evaluation as
specified in the manual?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(a)
Does the operator follow the stated
9.
corrective action process?
(sample, are persons required to
provide input in the process,
involved?)
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(c)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are the correct forms as stated in
10.
the manual in use?
Ref: CAR 706.07
Has action taken as a result of a
11.
non-compliance finding included
immediate and long term action to
correct the root cause of the
finding?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(e)
Is there any evidence to suggest
12.
that follow-up activities have been
carried out?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)(f)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 16
AOC-04 Evaluation Program
Is there any record of a
13.
maintenance schedule review
being carried out or the evaluation
of supplemental maintenance
requirements for applicability and
inclusion to the operators
program?
• Were they included?
• Does the outcome deviate
from manufacturers
recommendations; are the
conclusions stated and
decisions substantiated? (see
std 625)
Ref: CASS 726.07(4) / 625.86(5)(b)(I)
Are aircraft operational and
14.
environmental conditions
considered in the evaluation
program? (sample, review actual
process)
Ref: CASS 726.07(3)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*Is there evidence that the operator
15.
has reviewed and evaluated
Service Bulletins and other
technical information for
applicability to their fleet?
• Is there evidence of a
maintenance specialist being
involved in the decision
process?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4) / ANB055
How would the company handle a
16.
service bulletin issued today which
affects their fleet? (sample /
interview, does the response
reflect stated procedures, follow
process through?)
Ref: CAR 706.07
17.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 17
AOC-04 Evaluation Program
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 18
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-05 Technical / Regulatory Publications
File 5015Date:
Is the person responsible for
1.
keeping publications current aware
of his / her responsibilities
(interview)?
Ref: CASS 726.12(1)
Does the operator have technical
2.
and regulatory publications
according to the list in their
approved manual? Note: CASS
726.04(2) is not explicit in the
requirement for technical or
regulatory information, the
following is a possible list ….
• Aeronautics Act
• Canadian Aviation Regulations
& appropriate standards
• type certificates;
• supplemental type certificates;
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• FAA Advisory Circulars 43.13
• Airworthiness Directives,
applicable to the aircraft /
equipment operated;
• manufacturer’s maintenance,
illustrated parts, overhaul
manuals, and service bulletin
and service letters,
• MCM or MPM
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
Are publications / manuals
3.
current, i.e. amendments up-todate?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
*Is the system for monitoring
4.
manual currency effective?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 19
AOC-05 Technical / Regulatory Publications
Ref: CASS 726.07
Are appropriate portions of
5.
publications made available to
company personnel, contractors
as outlined in the manual?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)/CASS 726.08(1)(j)
How is the operator made aware of
6.
technical information, updates,
bulletins, etc. applicable to the
aircraft type they operate?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
Does the company have
7.
equipment, i.e. Computers, fiche
reader / printer etc., necessary for
reproducing this information?
• Does the equipment function?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
If regulatory publications are to be
8.
available via the Internet, have the
company demonstrate their
access to and navigate the
information.
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
If publications are to be made
9.
available to the operator via a
contract for maintenance, does the
operator ensure that the technical
manual applies to their particular
aircraft via serial number or model
or year?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
How does the operator control out
10.
of date / historical publications /
training notes?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 20
AOC-05 Technical / Regulatory Publications
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
Is the library distributed and is
11.
there a master list which identifies
each publication and location?
(sample locations)
Ref: CASS 726.04(2)
12.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 21
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-06 Technical Records
File 5015Date:
Is the location of records in
1.
accordance with the manual?
Ref: CAR 726.04(2)(f)
Does the use of job / segmented /
2.
task cards, require the operator to
update a computer software
program after completion?
• If so, is there any evidence of
missed entries or incorrect
times being input?
Ref:
*Supplemental worksheets used
3.
for recording and actioning defects
discovered during maintenance
activities, are they the operator’s
or the AMO’s?
• Is this according to manual
requirements?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the operator ensure that
4.
completed inspection packages
are reviewed?
Ref: Std. 625.96(2)
Are the maintenance check
5.
sheets used as described in the
manual?
Ref: Approved Maintenance
Schedule
Cross check completed check
6.
sheets with the aircraft log books,
is there evidence of maintenance
being completed prior to certifying
the Technical Log entry? (sample).
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 22
AOC-06 Technical Records
Ref: CAR605.92(1)
Sample aircraft technical records
7.
(including Journey Log). Do the
recorded actions meet regulatory
requirements? For example:
• certifications;
• time between checks;
• weight and balance report;
• inspections completed on
time;
Ref: CAR 605.86 / CAR 605.96 / CAR
571 / Std. AWM 571 Appendix C
Are established procedures being
8.
followed to record and control
maintenance items? For example:
• scheduled maintenance and
inspection;
• Ad’s and special instructions;
• components;
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• TBOs and life-limited times;
• calendar-time items;
• pitot-static and altimeter
calibration checks;
• compass calibration;
• weight and balance
• independent control checks /
CMR / critical maintenance
tasks.
Ref: CAR 605.96 / CAR 571.10(4) / CAR
726.08(1)(m)
Are maintenance records
9.
acceptable for completeness and
final certification? (sample)
Ref: Std. AWM 571.10(2) -(4)/
CAR605.92(1)
Does the operator transfer
10.
information from the journey log to
the permanent technical record in
accordance to regulatory and
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 23
holder identified in the
AOC-06 Technical Records
MCM requirements?
Ref: CAR 605.96(2)
Does the operator maintain
11.
technical records in a dry, secure
area?
Ref: CAR 706.04(2)(f)
*Do company personnel record
12.
information and defects in the
journey log or other technical
record in accordance with MCM
procedures?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(k)
Is the technical record (including
13.
journey log) a consecutive,
unbroken history?
Ref: CAR 605.93(4)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is computer software used as a
14.
sole support technical history?
• If so, is there evidence of
original entries being updated?
• Is the original entry protected?
Ref: CAR 605.93(2) / CAR 103.4(a) /
Std. 625.93(3)
*Is the primary method for
15.
controlling maintenance tasks
generated / tracked by computer?
• If so, it must be a secure
system, (see technical
records)?
Ref: CAR 103.04
Where computer maintenance
16.
software is used, is the ACA
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 24
AOC-06 Technical Records
computerized record ?
Ref: CAR 605.93(1)(b)
Is there evidence of maintenance
17.
releases, which are issued
“subject to satisfactory test flight”,
not having the corresponding final
certification by the pilot -incommand?
Ref: Std. AWM 571.10(4)
18.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 25
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-07 Weight & Balance
File 5015Date:
Is the person responsible for
1.
weight and balance control
knowledgeable of their duties and
responsibilities?
Ref: CASS 726.12(1)
Are any of the aircraft operated
2.
subject to the five year re-weigh
requirement? (sample)
Ref: Std. 625 Appendix C, (8)
Are weight and balance reports
3.
carried on board each aircraft?
• Is there more than one report
which may be contradictory?
Ref: Type Certificate
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is there evidence of changes being
4.
made to aircraft basic weight
without amendments to the weight
and balance report?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C (2)
Does each amendment to the
5.
weight and balance report include
revision dates and revised
equipment lists?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C
Are empty weight and c of g
6.
calculations computed in the
amended report?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 26
AOC-07 Weight & Balance
Has a maintenance release been
7.
signed for each change to the
weight & balance report?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C
Does each aircraft’s weight &
8.
balance report demonstrate
continuity back to the time the
aircraft was weighed?
Ref: CAR605.92 / Std. 571 Appendix C
Do company personnel follow the
9.
approved procedures when moving
from one aircraft configuration to
another?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C (3)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
For each aircraft configuration
10.
established, has a maintenance
release been signed? (note: the
current configuration must be
identified however a maintenance
release is not required for the entry
when changing from one
configuration to another)
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C
Does the system of control ensure
11.
accurate weight and balance
information is used by the pilot -incommand?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(u) / Std. 571
Appendix C
Does the weight and balance
12.
report / equipment list include all
items specified in the aircraft type
certificate?
• Does it also include additional
equipment required / installed
for the operation of the
aircraft?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 27
AOC-07 Weight & Balance
• Does it include any equipment
installed as a result of an STC
or modification?
Ref: Std. 571 Appendix C (1)(a)
13.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 28
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Program Application
File 5015Date:
Does the manual state the
1.
objective of the maintenance
development program?
Does the manual state policy of
2.
how Maintenance Development
activities will influence the
maintenance schedule?
Is the maintenance schedule /
3.
program, or portion thereof, to be
affected by the program clearly
defined?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the operator have internal
4.
maintenance capabilities i.e. QA /
production systems (essential for
effective control) and access to
engineering support (aid in
evaluating)?
Administration
Is the MPD a self contained
5.
document?
• If so, does the MCM enable
it’s use by reference?
If self contained, is there an
6.
amendment process described?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 29
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Policy Changes & Authority
Does the program require TC
7.
approval before changes are to be
instituted?
Does the document specify
8.
procedures for establishing or
policy with regards to the
program?
Does the program include a
9.
graphic portrayal of the program
operation?
• Is one required for clarity?
(process chart)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is reliability monitoring to be part
10.
of this program?
• If so, complete separate
Reliability Monitoring
Checklist.
Initial Maintenance Requirements
Does the manual describe how an
11.
initial maintenance schedule is to
be developed or what it is based
upon?
• Is it based upon an MRB and
other operator data?
Does the manual specify the
12.
amount of in service data needed
prior to making considering
changes to the maintenance
schedule?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 30
or product performance or is
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Is the MPD process dependent on
13.
reliability monitoring process?
Evaluation of Information
Does the program consider
14.
information from other sources, for
example: manufacturers, other
operators, airworthiness
authorities?
How is this information obtained
15.
from other sources controlled and
processed within the organization?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the description of the
16.
program contain a diagram of the
organizational structure?
• If not, is one required for
clarity?
Does the manual define lines of
17.
authority and responsibility
Does the scope of maintenance
18.
activity to be control under this
program require a comprehensive
system for evaluating aircraft fleet /
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 31
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
simple means acceptable?
Performance Influences:
Does the program consider the
19.
operating environment, where and
when aircraft fly, land and layover
such as hot, cold, humid, dusty,
salty, etc.
Does the program consider the
20.
operating schedule, flight hours
per cycle, cycles per day, flight
hours per day, variation within
fleets due to short / long routing.
Does the program consider the
21.
effect of adding or deleting aircraft
on the population samples,
resource and maintenance
capabilities?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the program consider the
22.
modification status of components
in the program?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the program consider the
23.
integration of used equipment /
aircraft?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the system of data collection
24.
fully described and does it specify
typical sources of information?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 32
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
If sampling is used, the method,
25.
number of samples, time on the
samples, when sampling and
intervals spelled out.
Does the operator define tasks
26.
such as “inspection”, “check” for
their scope of purpose?
Escalation procedure - required
27.
series or sequence of checks?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are task interval parameters
28.
tailored to operators desired units?
Does the operator participate in
29.
the MRB process?
• If so is their utilization
comparable to that of the
world fleet leaders?
Are alternate or substitute
30.
inspection methods used to qualify
maintenance requirements, i.e. Xray substituted for ultrasonic?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 33
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Does the operator have a
31.
procedure or the capability to
enhance manufacturers
maintenance instructions?
Are the enhancements driven by
32.
reliability processes or other
feedback mechanisms?
Procedures for making other
33.
changes from one primary
maintenance process to another,
for example changing from Hard
Time to On Condition
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the system obtain data from
34.
units only under operational
conditions?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the manual provide samples
35.
of how data justifying actions is to
be collected?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Data Analysis & Application to the Maintenance Program:
Does it describe how data
36.
analysis will influence adjustments
to maintenance control ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 34
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Are the duties and responsibilities
37.
for initiating program revision
clearly defined?
Does the operator use trending as
38.
a means for determining
maintenance requirements?
Is the documentation required to
39.
be used to effect changes in
maintenance program described?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Procedures provided to assure that
40.
any TBO adjustment or other
program change does not conflict
with a corrective action program
established by a previous reliability
analysis.
Program contains a statement that
41.
the TC Office will be advised when
increases to time limitations or
other program changes controlled
by the program occur.
Does the program include a
42.
graphic display of major
system/component TBO
escalation.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Maintenance Schedule Amendment:
March 2001 Page 35
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
Does the program identify
43.
organizational elements
responsible for approval of
amendments to the maintenance
schedule?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is it singular or quorum based?
44.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Procedures for Maintenance Control Changes :
Program describes the procedures
45.
used for making changes to
maintenance controls.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Organizational elements
46.
responsible to prepare
substantiation reports to justify
maintenance control changes
identified.
Procedures included relative to
47.
manual revisions concerning time
increases and what will be
required prior to pursuing a
subsequent time increase.
Procedures provided for revision to
48.
the Operations Specifications
when and if required.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 36
AOC-08 Maintenance Development Program (MPD)
49.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 37
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Program Application: FAA AC / AMA
Does the reliability program clearly
1.
define the components, systems,
or complete aircraft which are to
be controlled?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the maintenance program, or
2.
portion thereof, to be controlled by
reliability program clearly defined?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the program reference the
3.
operator’s MCM where details
pertaining to overhaul and
inspections periods, work content,
and other maintenance program
activities that are guided by the
program may be found?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
File 5015Date:
Organizational Structure:
Does the description of the
4.
program contain a diagram of the
organizational structure?
• If not, is one required for
clarity?
Does the manual define lines of
5.
authority and responsibility.
Is the appropriate authority
6.
delegated to each organizational
element?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 38
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Definitions:
Does the program clearly define
7.
significant terms?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are acronyms or abbreviations
8.
peculiar to the program defined?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Data Collection System:
Is the data collection system fully
9.
described and does it specify
typical sources of information?
Does the system obtain data from
10.
units only under operational
conditions?
Does the data relate directly to
11.
established levels of performance?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the manual provide samples
12.
of data and how it is to be
collected?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 39
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
If sampling techniques are to be
13.
used, is the method of sampling number of / in service time /
intervals, specified?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Establishing Performance Standards and Revision:
Does the program include an initial
14.
performance standard that defines
acceptable performance
requirements?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the manual describe
15.
methods used to evaluate and
control performance? Are various
methods in use?
Are performance standards for
16.
system or component failures
expressed in mathematical
terms ? For example:
• 1000 hours of aircraft
operation ?
• Number of landings ?
• Operating cycles ?
• Departure delays ?
• Pilot reports ?
• Other findings under
operational conditions ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
When a performance standard is
17.
exceeded, is an active
investigation required ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 40
combination of past performance
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Are statistical techniques used in
18.
reliability measurement supportive
of maintenance control actions ?
• Are actuarial or engineering
studies used to determine
maintenance changes.
• Are studies made involving
inspection frequency and
content, overhaul limits and
times ?
• Do they show aircraft, system,
or component modification ?
• Does it show other actions
peculiar to prevailing
conditions ?
Are there provisions for the re-
19.
evaluating performance standards
that lose their value ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are there provisions to establish
20.
initial performance standards for
new aircraft being placed in
service ?
Are there provisions for the initial
21.
alert values to be adjusted based
on carrier’s first year of
experience ?
If PIREPS per 1000 departures is
22.
the standard, is 5 PIREPS per
1000 added to rate for past year to
set alert value?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are alert levels set up on a
23.
March 2001 Page 41
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
plus “good judgment” ?
Is a statistical approach used to
24.
establish alerts ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are alert values equal to mean
25.
plus 3 standard deviations?
• If not, what criterion is used?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Data Analysis Methodology & Application to Maintenance:
Does the manual contain a
26.
description of the data analysis
process?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does it describe how the analysis
27.
will influence adjustments to
maintenance control ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Types of action appropriate to the
28.
trend or level of reliability
experienced.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are procedures for evaluating
29.
critical failures established?
March 2001 Page 42
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
essential information for each item
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Are the statistical techniques that
30.
are used to determine reliability
levels described?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the manner in which information
31.
is exchanged between
organizational elements fully
described?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are the activities and responsibility
32.
of each organizational element
defined?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the program include a
33.
graphic portrayal of the program
operation?
• Is one required for clarity?
(process chart)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Data Display & Corrective Action Process:
Does the program describe the
34.
reports, charts, operating
experience in use?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the description contain
35.
March 2001 Page 43
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
controlled by program?
Is each system and component
36.
identified by appropriate ATA code
number? If not what method is
used?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the data display method
37.
show trends as well as the current
month’s performance?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is there a description of the
38.
corrective action process?
Does the corrective action process
39.
include a requirement to establish
planned completion dates?
Is there a status (real time) of
40.
corrective action available?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is corrective action description
41.
appropriate to circumstances ?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 44
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Program Revision:
Does the manual contain
42.
procedures for implementing
changes to the reliability program?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the program identify which
43.
organizational elements are
responsible for approving
amendments to the reliability
program?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• Is this a quorum approach?
Are the duties and responsibilities
44.
for initiating program revision
clearly defined?
Do procedures identify and isolate
45.
areas which will require TC
approval prior to implementation?
Does the program require periodic
46.
reviews be accomplished which
would validate the performance
standard in use is still realistic?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is a method of distribution and
47.
implementation of approved
revisions to the reliability program
March 2001 Page 45
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
included in the manual?
Procedures for Implementing Maintenance Control Changes:
Does the program describe
48.
procedures which are used for
making changes to maintenance
controls?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the documentation used to
49.
effect changes in maintenance
program described?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are substantiation reports
50.
justifying maintenance control
changes required / prepared /
produced by the organizational
elements responsible for such
changes?
Are specific parameters identified
51.
which are to be used to determine
changes in maintenance control?
Are procedures provided which
52.
cover all maintenance program
activities controlled by the
reliability program?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are procedures specified for
53.
changing items from “Hard Time”
to “On Condition” or “Condition
March 2001 Page 46
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Monitoring?”
Are procedures specified for
54.
making other changes from one
primary maintenance process to
another?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are procedures included
55.
concerning maintenance interval
changes and the subsequent
action required should an
additional time increase be
pursued?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is a feedback process described
56.
for influencing revision to
Operations Specifications if and
when required?
Has a procedure been established
57.
to ensure that any program
change / TBO adjustment, does
not conflict with a corrective action
process established by a previous
reliability analysis?
Does the program include a
58.
graphic display detailing major
system / component TBO
escalation process?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are details of Airworthiness
59.
Directives or Service Bulletins
taken into consideration or
evaluated for applicability to the
program?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 47
AOC-09 Reliability Monitoring Programs
Program Approval:
Are procedure describing approval
60.
process clearly identified?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the manual contain a
61.
requirement to notify / advise the
TC Office responsible when
increases to time limitations or
other processes / changes
controlled by the program occur?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
62.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
I tems completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 48
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-10 Reserved
File 5015Date:
Reserved
March 2001 Page 49
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
File 5015Date:
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning
Note: As maintenance planning is procedural specific to the operator, a supplemental checklist may need to be developed from the
approved manual in support of the audit.
Is the individual responsible for the
1.
program knowledgeable of the
procedures described in the
manual?
Ref: CASS 726.12(1)
Is the method or process used to
2.
monitor / schedule maintenance
activities / repetitive AD’s
(computer / status system / other)
being followed by the
organization?
• Does this include
supplemental maintenance
items (such as STC’s added
after MS approval, floats &
skis etc., safety equipment)?
Ref: CAR 706.04(2)c) / CASS
726.08(1)(m)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are the same method(s) used at
3.
all locations and sub bases?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
*Is the primary method for
4.
controlling maintenance tasks
generated / tracked by computer?
• If so is it a secure system,
(see technical records)?
Ref: CAR 103.04 / CAR 605.93(2)
Is the method used up-to-date and
5.
current?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 50
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
*Is there operational or additional
6.
equipment that is not addressed in
the maintenance schedule?
(sample)
Ref: Std 625.86
Is there evidence that maintenance
7.
requirements have been missed or
actioned late?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
Are there service bulletins that
8.
were or should have been adopted
/ installed / integrated into the
maintenance program? (sample)
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m) / CAR
625.86(6)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the frequency and use of
9.
tolerances planned or excessive?
Ref: Std. 625.86(8) / TP13094
Are maintenance releases made
10.
to facilitate the use of the
tolerance prior to it’s use?
Ref: Std. 625.86(8)
Is aircraft operating information
11.
(aircraft daily flight time / condition
/ status) relayed to the individual
making decisions on maintenance
requirements?
• Is this in accordance with the
instruction / procedures
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 51
applicable areas of the aircraft as
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning
specified in the manual?
• Does this information include
a requirement for - defects,
MELs, special
inspections,hard landings,
lighting strikes, etc
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
*For aircraft operating under MEL
12.
authorities, how is repair interval
planned and actioned?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
Is the liaison between the operator
13.
and the maintenance contractor
effective?
• Is there any evidence that the
communication process does
not work?
Ref: CAR 706.09(2)(a) / CASS
726.04(1)(g)
*Is the maintenance contractor
14.
consulted in the defect deferral
process?
Ref: CASS 726.04(1)(g) / CASS
726.08(1)(v)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are maintenance requirements
15.
communicated to the AMO in
accordance with manual
requirements?
Ref: CASS 726.04(1)(g) / CASS
726.08(1)(v)
Does the operator maintain current
16.
inspection sheets as identified in
the Maintenance Schedule?
Ref: CAR 605.86 / Approved
Maintenance Schedule (TP13094)
Do inspection sheets cover all
17.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 52
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning
described in the program?
Move to MS Checklist !!
Are the appropriate forms and
18.
information supplied to the
maintenance organization or are
they to be reproduced by the
AMO?
• Is this in accordance with the
stated process?
Ref: CAR 605.86 / Approved
Maintenance Schedule (TP13094)
Did AMO personnel use the latest
19.
check sheet (revision) during the
last few inspections?
Ref: CAR 605.86 / Approved
Maintenance Schedule (TP13094)
Where the operator writes or re-
20.
writes job / segmented / task
cards, does the operator follow the
process stated in the manual for
controlling revision of the cards?
• Does the card contain a
reference link to the original
instructions?
Ref: Std. 625 Appendix D (3)(a)(vi)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
For computer controlled
21.
maintenance planning, is the
repeat interval self generated or is
this a manual input operation?
• Is the process consistent with
the description in the manual?
• Is there any evidence that
repeat interval maintenance
requirements have been
overlooked or entered
incorrectly?
Ref: CAR 706.08(1)(m) / CAR 605.86 /
Approved Maintenance Schedule
(TP13094)
22.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 53
AOC-11 Maintenance Planning
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 54
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
File 5015Date:
AOC-12 Defect Recording, Rectification, Deferral, and Control
Procedures
Recording
Does the company record defects
1.
in accordance with the procedures
specified in the manual?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(o) / CAR
605.94(1)
Are defects recorded in the proper
2.
record / log; are they identified
appropriately and handled in
accordance with stated
procedures?
Ref: CAR 706.05(a) / CAR 605.94(1)
Does this recording procedure
3.
apply to defects found by flight
crew during normal operations?
• Does the method indicated
conflict with regulatory
requirements?
Ref: CAR 706.05(a) / CAR 605.94(1)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are defects found during
4.
maintenance recorded in
accordance with procedures
stated by the operator or by the
maintenance contractor?
Ref:
*Supplemental worksheets used
5.
for recording and actioning defects
discovered during maintenance
activities, are they the operator’s
or the AMO’s?
• Is this according to manual
requirements?
Ref: CAR 706.05(a)
Is there evidence of defects not
6.
being recorded:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 55
AOC-12 Defect Recording, Rectification, Deferral, and Control
Procedures
• by the flight crew?
• while the aircraft is away from
base?
• during maintenance?
Ref: CAR 605.94(1)
How does the company handle
7.
self generated / recorded fault logs
(Built In Test Equipment)?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(o)
Deferral
For aircraft that released under
8.
MEL authority, complete MEL
Checklist …
How does the operator determine
9.
a defects suitability for deferral?
• Are technical / regulatory
manuals and type certificate
information available /
consulted in the process?
Ref: CAR 605.06(a)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are defects assessed against
10.
mandatory or required operating
equipment limitations (also
includes Type Certificates Data
Sheets and basis of certification)?
Ref: CAR 605.09 / CAR 605.10 / CAR
605 General
*Are environmental factors and
11.
operational role of the aircraft
considered in the defect’s
assessment?
Ref: CAR 602 Division II /CAR
605.06(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 56
highlight defects that recur to
AOC-12 Defect Recording, Rectification, Deferral, and Control
Procedures
*Is the maintenance contractor
12.
consulted in the deferral process?
Ref: CAR 706.08(1)(o)
Are deferrals entered in the
13.
journey log or other recording
system in accordance with stated
procedures?
Ref: CAR 706.08(1)(o) / CAR 605.94(1)
Are procedures for placarding
14.
deferred defects being followed?
Ref: CAR Std 625.08 CAR 605.10(2)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are personnel that defer
15.
authorized?
Ref: CAR 605.10(2)(c) / CAR
706.08(1)(o)
Recurring Defect
Is there any evidence indicating
16.
recurring defects are not being
addressed according to stated
procedures?
Ref: CAR 706.05(2) / CASS 726.05(1)
Is the operator’s stated procedure
17.
effective in detecting the
reoccurrence of defects?
• Does the defect system
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 57
AOC-12 Defect Recording, Rectification, Deferral, and Control
Procedures
the flight crew and
maintenance organization?
Ref: CAR 706.05(a) / CASS 726.05(1)
Does the operator’s criteria, for
18.
classifying recurring defects, meet
regulatory requirements?
Ref: CASS 726.05(3)
Control
*For aircraft operating under MEL
19.
authorities, how is repair interval
planned and actioned?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m)
Troubleshooting, part removal.
20.
Does the manual indicate how a
part removed for troubleshooting
purposes must be handled?
• If so, does the company follow
procedures for storage, time
limits and maintenance
release requirements?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• parts removed from another
aircraft for troubleshooting?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(r) / CAR 571.13 /
CAR 706.08(1)(m)
21.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 58
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 59
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-13 Airworthiness Directive, Service Bulletin
File 5015Date:
Does the operator have all
1.
Airworthiness Directives applicable
to their fleet?
Ref: CASS 726.04(2) / Std. AWM 593
Appendix B (2)(a)
Does the operator ensure timely
2.
action of Airworthiness Directives?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(m) / CASS
726.07(4)
Are the details, of maintenance
3.
actions used during the
accomplishment of Airworthiness
Directives, recorded in the
appropriate technical record?
• For Service Bulletins?
Ref: CAR 605.94(1) / Std. AWM 571.03 /
Std. AWM 571.10(4) / Std. 625
Appendix H (1)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the operator have direct
4.
access to Service Bulletin and
other technical information
applicable to their fleet?
• If access is by way of a
contract, is the access
adequate? (sample, have
operator demonstrate)
Ref: CASS 726.07(4)
*Is there evidence that the operator
5.
has reviewed and evaluated
Service Bulletins and other
technical information for
applicability to their fleet?
• Is there evidence of a
maintenance specialist being
involved in the decision
process?
Ref: CASS 726.07(4) / ANB055
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 60
AOC-13 Airworthiness Directive, Service Bulletin
Is the implementation of AD / SB
6.
or other technical information
actioned directly from the
manufacturers technical
information or is the process re
written into task cards or action
sheets?
• If re written, is there a control
process or review mechanism
in place which ensures the
accuracy of the information?
Ref: Std. 625 Appendix D (3)(vi)
7.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 61
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-14 ETOPS - Extended Range Operations
File 5015Date:
Is the individual responsible for the
1.
program knowledgeable of the
procedures described in the
manual?
Ref:
Is propulsion system reliability
2.
data forwarded to Transport
Canada on a monthly basis?
Ref: TP 6327 4.9.1
Is the engine and APU oil
3.
consumption being monitored as
described in the manual?
Ref: TP 6327 4.4
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the curriculum for the
4.
ETOPS training consider all
factors and consideration of the
program?
Ref: TP 6327 4.10
Have personnel that certify ETOPS
5.
departure checks been trained and
authorized? (sample)
Ref: TP 6327 4.10
Parts / components may be
6.
sensitive to ETOPS requirements;
does the operator have a program
to control modification status of
individual components?
Ref: TP 6327 4.2.1
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 62
AOC-14 ETOPS - Extended Range Operations
Do part pooling activities consider
7.
ETOPS CMP requirements?
Ref: TP 6327 4.11
Does the aircraft configuration and
8.
modification status conform to the
requirements specified in the CMP
document? (sample, component
changes)
Ref:
Is there any evidence to suggest
9.
that the operator has conducted a
verification process after engine
shutdown or primary system
failure or critical maintenance
activities? (sample)
Ref: TP 6327 4.6
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the operator continue to
10.
input unscheduled / scheduled
engine removal data into the
ETOPS program?
Ref: TP 6327 4.9.2
Are thrust reductions due to
11.
abnormal causes logged and
tracked for program input?
Ref:
Does the operator adhere to the
12.
approved reliability program and
are ETOPS sensitive items
covered by the program, i.e.
propulsion, systems, structure?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 63
AOC-14 ETOPS - Extended Range Operations
Does the operator continue to
13.
collect and advise TC of data
relevant to the health of the
approved ETOPS program as
defined in the approved document
or MCM?
Ref: TP 6327 4.7.1
Does the operator adhere to
14.
maintenance procedures and
tasks specified in the manual,
maintenance schedule or
operator’s ETOPS control
document?
Ref: TP 6327 4.2
Are ETOPS aircraft being
15.
maintained in conformance with
the manufacturer’s ETOPS type
configuration?
Ref: TP 6327 4.2
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the ETOPS program now in use
16.
in line with the program approved
by TC?
Ref:
Is the operator incorporating
17.
changes required by configuration
document amendments?
Ref: TP 6327 4.2.1
Is the operator reviewing and
18.
modifying the ETOPS program to
reflect control document
amendments in a timely manner?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 64
AOC-14 ETOPS - Extended Range Operations
Ref:
Is the operator following the
19.
ETOPS control document or
program as outlined in the
manual?
Ref:
*Does the operator release aircraft
20.
participating in the ETOPS
program in accordance with the
approved MEL document?
Ref: TP 6327 3.4.2
Does the operator adhere to the
21.
enhanced training, approved in the
manual or operator’s ETOPS
control document?
Ref: TP 6327 4.10
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is there any evidence of the
22.
operator dispatching aircraft
(ETOPS qualified) after a power
unit or primary failure without
reference to the approved MEL?
Ref:
23.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 65
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 66
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-15 Minimum Equipment List - MEL, OMEL, GMEL
File 5015Date:
Is the MEL TC Civil Aviation
1.
approved?
Ref: CAR 605.07(3) / CAR
704.07(2)(d) / CAR 705.07(2)(e)
Does the operator have a MEL
2.
training program?
• Does the program include
training of contract
maintenance personnel?
Ref: TP9155 - 3.16
Is a copy of the approved MEL
3.
carried on board the aircraft?
(sample)
Ref: CAR 605.09(1)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the on-board copy at the
4.
corrective revision? (sample)
Ref: CAR 605.09(1)(b)
Are MEL numbers entered in the
5.
journey log for deferred MEL
items?
Ref: TP9155 Appendix R1.3
Are only authorized personnel
6.
releasing or dispatching aircraft
with inoperative items?
Ref: TP9155 Appendix R1.3 / R1.4
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 67
or untimely actioning of the
AOC-15 Minimum Equipment List - MEL, OMEL, GMEL
Are appropriate maintenance
7.
instructions carried on board the
aircraft to facilitate conformance to
the MEL?
Ref: TP9155
Are aircraft with multiple deferred
8.
MEL items operated for extended
periods through maintenance
bases and terminating airports?
Ref: TP9155
*For aircraft that released under
9.
MEL authority, are they done so in
accordance with the correct
procedure?
• placarding
• authorized person
• category
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• time limits
Ref: CAR 605.09
Does the operator implement
10.
revisions to their MEL within a
reasonable time after the release
of a revision to the Master MEL?
Ref: TP9155
*Does the company have MEL self
11.
extension authority?
• Are MEL self extensions
coordinated between
operations and maintenance?
Ref:
Is there any evidence to suggest
12.
that this privilege is being abused,
i.e. excessive or repetitive
extensions for the same item; late
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 68
AOC-15 Minimum Equipment List - MEL, OMEL, GMEL
defect?
Ref:
Is there evidence of notification
13.
being sent to Transport Canada
when MEL self extensions are
granted?
Ref:
Does the organization follow the
14.
policies and procedures for
conformance to the MEL as
described in the manual?
Ref:
*Does the operator release aircraft
15.
participating in the ETOPS
program in accordance with the
approved MEL document?
Ref: TP 6327 3.4.2
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*Have individual aircraft MELs
16.
been reviewed / amended to reflect
the additional maintenance
procedures necessary for the
ETOPS operation?
Ref: TP 6327 3.4.2 a)
*Does the ETOPS departure
17.
check cover items such as
maintenance sensitive items, MEL
deferral review, deferred item
review, system verification, log
book review?
Ref: TP 6327 4.2.1 c)
How is aircraft configuration
18.
management (CMP) integrated /
factored / coordinated into the
ETOPS and MEL processes?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 69
AOC-15 Minimum Equipment List - MEL, OMEL, GMEL
Ref:
19.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 70
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-16 All Weather Operations - Category II, III
File 5015Date:
Does the operator have All
1.
Weather Operations (AWO)
approval to Category II - III limits?
Ref: TP 1490
Does the operator have an
2.
approved maintenance program in
support of the AWO?
Ref: TP 1490
Are aircraft down graded / returned
3.
to Category II - III status in
accordance with approved
procedures?
Ref: TP 1490
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are the equipment and systems
4.
required for an AWO maintained in
accordance with the approved
maintenance schedule?
Ref: TP 1490
Are modifications to Cat egory II -
5.
III equipment and systems
approved in accordance with
Chapter 513 of the Airworthiness
Manual?
Ref: TP 1490
Does the operator maintain a
6.
current list of personnel authorized
to certify the company aircraft to
Category II - III?
• Is the list available to the
person responsible for
dispatching the aircraft?
Ref: TP 1490
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 71
AOC-16 All Weather Operations - Category II, III
Have Category II - III certified
7.
maintenance personnel received
initial and recurrent training?
Ref: TP 1490
Does the operator utilize contract
8.
maintenance?
• If so, can it be verified that the
contracting maintenance
organization is approved by TC
Civil Aviation to properly
maintain the Category II - III
systems?
Ref: TP 1490
If a foreign maintenance
9.
organization is used, does it meet
the minimum requirements for
approval to properly maintain the
Category II - III systems?
Ref: TP 1490
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are defects which effect AW
10.
Operations rectified in a timely
manner?
Ref: TP 1490
Is there any evidence to suggest
11.
that aircraft are operated to limits
which do not meet configuration
requirements?
Ref: TP 1490
12.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 72
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 73
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-17 Technical Dispatch Procedures
File 5015Date:
Are maintenance entries attesting
1.
to serviceability and continuation
of safe operation made each time
a tolerance is used?
Ref: Std. 625.86(8)
Have authorized personnel issued
2.
the tolerance in accordance with
the manual requirements?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1) / CASS 726.06(1)
Is there any evidence to suggest
3.
that Airworthiness Directives are
also given the tolerance?
Ref: Std 625.86(8) / CAR 605.84(10)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does tolerance use conflict with
4.
the requirements outlined in the
respective maintenance
schedules?
Ref: CAR Std 625.86 Appendix C
Is there any evidence to suggest
5.
that the pilot -in-command is given
adequate notification of the next
scheduled maintenance activity?
(particular attention to operations
from remote locations)
Ref: CASS 726.06(2)
Do the procedures ensure that
6.
aircraft are not operated in an
unairworthy condition?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(q)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 74
AOC-17 Technical Dispatch Procedures
How is the PRM advised of the
7.
status while aircraft are away from
base?
Ref: CAR 706.06(1)(a) / CASS 726.06(2)
*Are environmental factors and
8.
operational role of the aircraft
considered in the dispatch of an
aircraft with a defect?
Ref: CAR 602 Division II
Is the procedure followed for
9.
returning the aircraft to service
when aircraft become
unserviceable away from base?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(q)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are procedures followed for
10.
transmitting maintenance
information to aircraft operating
away from the base?
Ref: CASS 726.08(1)(q)
Is deferred maintenance taken into
11.
consideration when dispatching
aircraft?
Ref: CAR 706.05(d)
For aircraft that have additional
12.
(dual) flight authorities, are
procedures followed for invoking
the applicable flight authority?
Ref: CAR 706.06(2) / CASS 726.08(1)(q)
/ CAR 507.08
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*For companies that have self
13.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 75
AOC-17 Technical Dispatch Procedures
flight permit authority issuance
privileges, are procedures followed
for invoking or issuing the flight
permit?
• Check Company Operations
Manual for complimentary
procedures?
Ref: CAR 706.06(2) / CASS 726.08(1)(q)
/ CAR 507.08 / CAR 507.04(4) AWM 505
Appendix F
*Does the fleet weight and balance
14.
control program for dispatching
aircraft meet requirements?
• Is the pilot -in-command
always aware of the aircraft’s
operating weight and
configuration?
Ref: CAR 706.06(3) Note: 2000-12-14
Fleet W&B presently undefined in
the CARs
Are maintenance entries regarding
15.
aircraft weight and balance status
recorded in the journey log?
Ref: CAR 605.94(1) / CAR Std 571
Appendix C
For aircraft operated under ETOPS
16.
or All Weather Operation, are the
operations and technical dispatch
in accordance with stated
procedures. (refer to separate
checklists)
Ref: TP 6327
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
17.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 76
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 77
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
has the company followed
Company:
AOC-18 Flight Authorities - Test / Ferry
File 5015Date:
*Does the technical dispatch
1.
system flag to the pilot -incommand when test flight
requirements are to be used?
• Are operations and
maintenance required to
communicate with each
other?
Ref:
For maintenance test flights, is the
2.
final certification of “satisfactory
flight” made by the pilot in
command?
• Is there any evidence to
suggest passengers may have
carried on board during the
test flight?
Ref: CAR 571.10(4) / Std. 571.10(4)
Table Item F / CAR 605.85(2) & (3)
*For aircraft that have additional
3.
(dual) flight authorities are
procedures followed for invoking
the applicable flight authority?
Ref: CAR 507.08(1)&(3), CAR 571.06(3)
/ CAR706.06(2) / CASS 726.08(1)(q)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are flight and maintenance crews
4.
familiar with "away from base"
ferry-flight procedures as
described in the manual?
Ref:
Does the operator follow the
5.
procedures described in the
manual when exercising ferry -flight
authorization?
Ref:
Where self flight permit
6.
authorization is given, when used
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 78
AOC-18 Flight Authorities - Test / Ferry
has the company followed
procedures and have the required
company authorizations been
obtained?
Ref:
Is the proper (company) form being
7.
used? Does the F/P form become
part of the permanent record?
Ref:
Is there any evidence of misuse or
8.
aircraft positioning that may have
taken place under flight permit
authority?
• Do the conditions specified
seem reasonable or
complete?
Ref:
Are ferry flights being reported to
9.
the TC Civil Aviation as described
in the manual?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
10.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Comments/Summary:
March 2001 Page 79
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 80
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements
File 5015Date:
Does the manual state a policy for
1.
initiating or governing maintenance
contracts?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Does the manual specify criteria
2.
which must be identified or
included in the maintenance
contract?
• Does it include a description
of contract administration and
the scope of work?
• If the manual does not contain
specific procedures, are
maintenance contracts to be
individually approved by TC?
Ref: CASS 726.09 Info note.
How is the provision of emergency
3.
maintenance services addressed?
• Does the manual specify
procedures for obtaining these
services?
• If so, is the process followed?
Ref: CASS 726.09(1) / CASS 726.09
Info note.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is a communication procedure
4.
included in the arrangement to
advise maintenance contractors of
planned or unscheduled
maintenance requirements?
• Does the procedure identify
responsibilities of the
maintenance coordinator?
• *Does this include how AD
requirements are to be
communicated between the
parties?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Is direction included specifying
5.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 81
support approved reliability
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements
which maintenance instructions
are to be used by the contractor
when performing maintenance?
• Does the process include the
provision / use of forms and for
providing copies of the
appropriate maintenance
schedules?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Are all contracts entered into,
6.
identified in the manual?
Ref: CAR 706.08(v)
*Does the contract permit operator
7.
evaluation (evaluation program) of
the contracted organization?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
For individual contracts,
8.
• Are all parties' responsibilities
clearly defined in the manual
and the contract?
• Does the company follow the
procedures for transmitting
records between parties as
established in the manual?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
• Are requirements for
maintenance releases
specified, which documents
and what entries in which
technical record?
• Is a requirement for contractor
feedback specified in the
maintenance arrangement, i.e.
problems, SDR information,
evaluation program, …?
• Does it include providing
feedback information in
March 2001 Page 82
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements
program where required?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Where the work is performed
9.
outside of Canada, has the person
been approved by a manual
approved under the Foreign States’
requirements?
• Is a “maintenance
specification” required for work
that is routinely carried out in
a Foreign State?
Ref: CAR 571.11(3) / CASS 726.09(2)
Are both parties in possession of
10.
contract-substantiating documents
for reliability programs and
MPM/MCM?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Does the contractor have the
11.
facilities, capability and the
excess capacity to perform the
additional work?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is the contractor approved to
12.
operate and maintain the same
type of aircraft as the operator?
• If the operator utilizes the
contractor’s maintenance
information / systems, has
compatibility been established
between the operator's and the
contractor's aircraft?
• Does the maintenance
program address equipment
unique to the operator?
• Have inspections intervals,
cycle / calendar time and
other variances been adjusted
to suit the operator?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 83
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Have the applicability and authority
13.
of the publications been delineated
in the contract?
• Has the operator adopted any
contract facility processes,
i.e. repair methods and/or
techniques?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Does the contract state the
14.
responsibilities and involvement of
both parties in all or part of the
reliability program?
• Is the operators fleet
combined with the contractors
aircraft for reliability and
statistical purposes?
• Do the aircraft operate in
similar environments?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the contractor subcontract to
15.
a third party any part of the work?
• Where actioned, does the
main contract identify the
contracting responsibilities
between the operator and the
first AMO?
• Have all phases of the
subcontractor's arrangements
been investigated using the
same procedures as for the
main contractor?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
Is the contract significant enough
16.
to warrant Transport Canada
review?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 84
AOC-19 Maintenance Arrangements
Have all phases of aircraft
17.
maintenance (e.g. heavy and light
engine maintenance / structural
maintenance) been established?
Ref: CAR 726.08(v)
18.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 85
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-20 Training Program
File 5015Date:
Does the operator state a policy
1.
with respect to training for those
individuals required to action
functions of the organization?
Ref: CAR 706.12
Does the operator’s manual
2.
contain a description of training
requirements with respect to other
duties carried out CAR 706
requirements? (note: this statement is
broadly applied, training may be required
for technical dispatch, weight and
balance, etc.)
• Has training covering
regulations and standards
pertinent to the activity or
function, been carried out?
Ref: CAR 706.12 / Std. 706.12
Has training for critical or
3.
independent maintenance tasks
been provided to those individuals
who will exercise the privilege?
Ref: CAR 706.13)(b)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*Are training records for
4.
Elementary Work and Servicing
available?
Ref:
Is training conducted according to
5.
the training cycle specified in the
approved manual or is it driven by
the results of the evaluation
program?
Ref: Std. 726.12(5) / Std. 726.12(2)(c)
Does the manual specify a update
6.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 86
AOC-20 Training Program
training cycle (3 years) or is it
driven by the results of the
evaluation program?
Ref: Std. 726.12(5)
Is there evidence of update training
7.
that has been carried out?
• Was it conducted as a result
of regulatory or operator
program changes?
Ref: Std. 726.12 / Std. 726.12 (2)(c)
Is there evidence of training that is
8.
/ was a direct result of a finding
made in conjunction with the
evaluation program?
• Is there training that should
have transpired as a result of
a finding made under this
program?
Ref: Std. 726.12 (2)(c)
The Commercial Air Service
9.
Standard permits certain elements
of the training program to be
administered under an AMO’s
MPM.
• If so, does the MCM must
make reference to items in the
contained in the MPM?
Ref: Std. 726.12(6)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
10.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Comments/Summary:
March 2001 Page 87
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 88
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-21 Personnel Records
File 5015Date:
Do personnel records consist of
1.
the items described in the manual
and are they being maintained?
Ref: Std. 726.08(t)
Are there records in use which are
2.
not described in the manual?
Ref:
Does the operator keep records of
3.
training provided for two years
since the last ent ry?
Ref: CAR 706.13(1)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Is a record provided to the person
4.
who has received the authorization
to accomplish the function?
Ref: CAR 706.13(2)
Do the personnel records for
5.
management assigned personnel
contain their “qualifications”?
Ref: CAR 706.13(1)(a)
Are any management functions
6.
sub delegated?
• If so, is there a record of the
individuals qualifications
available?
Ref: CAR706.13(1)(a)
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*Is there a list of personnel
7.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 89
AOC-21 Personnel Records
indicating their qualifications and
authorizations?
Ref:
8.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 90
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
File 5015Date:
AOC-22 De-Icing Procedures
Note: check with C&BA de -icing requirements may be covered under the company’s COM.
Does the manual have a policy
1.
statement regarding de-icing
activities?
Ref:
Does the operator have it’s own
2.
de-icing capabilities or is this
function contracted?
• Does this include de-icing
activities at any of the line
stations?
Ref:
Does the manual specify how de-
3.
icing will be conducted by the
contractor?
• Where a de-icing contractor is
utilized, is the requirement for
inspecting the contractor and
equipment specified in the
manual?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Ref:
Are personnel conducting the de-
4.
icing operation trained and
knowledgeable with de-icing
procedures?
Ref:
Is a record of training held by the
5.
operator?
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Ref:
Does the manual specify the type
6.
March 2001 Page 91
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
AOC-22 De-Icing Procedures
of fluids to be used?
• Are these fluids types
considered for maintenance
problems?
Ref:
Is there a requirement to identify
7.
container of de-icing fluids?
Ref:
8.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
Items completed by:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Date:
March 2001 Page 92
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-23 Elementary Work, Servicing
File 5015Date:
Does the company use
1.
procedures other than
manufacturers stated in the
performance of Elementary Work
or Servicing?
• Are these procedures
specified in the manual?
Ref: Std. 726.08(1)(j)
Are authorization records for
2.
elementary work and servicing
available and current?
• Does the company follow the
training process as described
in the manual?
• Are the authorizations
supported by an available
training record?
Ref: CAR 706.04(1)(f) / CAR 706.10 /
CAR 706.13(b)
Do any of the authorized tasks
3.
conflict with Appendix A, Subpart
625?
Ref: Std. 726.10
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Do authorizations include the
4.
performance of certain AD
requirements?
• If so, has the training
remained up to date with
revisions to the AD, if issued?
Ref:
Is the system of control for
5.
Elementary Work and Servicing
adequate?
Ref: CAR 706.11 / Std. 726.08(1)(j)
Does the company follow
6.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 93
AOC-23 Elementary Work, Servicing
procedures for the recording of
Elementary Work and Servicing?
Ref: Std. 726.08(1)(k)
For flight crew members that
7.
request contract servicing, have
they been trained in the proper
methods and techniques
themselves?
Ref:
Are the necessary tools and
8.
equipment for elementary work
and servicing available?
Ref: CAR 706.04(2)(d)
Does the company have facilities
9.
adequate for the performance of
maintenance and servicing?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
10.
Ref.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Comments/Summary:
March 2001 Page 94
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 95
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-24 Reserved
File 5015Date:
Reserved
March 2001 Page 96
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
File 5015Date:
AOC-25 Servicing - Fueling, De-fueling & Lubrication, Oxygen
Does the company follow stated
1.
procedures for fuel handling and
controlling?
Ref: Std. 706.08(1)(r)
Is the fuel regularly monitored and
2.
tested for quality?
Ref:
What standard is used for the
3.
companies in support of their fuel
handling?
• Are their practices in
conformance with the
standard?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Are there records for inspection of
4.
the fueling facility?
• For each base or fueling
facility?
Ref:
Drum fueling; is the method used
5.
to filter the fuel as described in the
manual?
Ref:
Is there a time limit for storage of
6.
fuel in being respected as
described in the manual?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 97
AOC-25 Servicing - Fueling, De-fueling & Lubrication, Oxygen
Is the condition of the fueling
7.
facility, i.e., hoses (bonded),
nozzle caps, filters, grounding
cables and fire extinguishers being
monitored?
Ref:
Is the fueling / defueling equipment
8.
properly identified and maintained?
Ref:
*Are the aircraft refueling points
9.
properly identified and placarded?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
*Is the training program for
10.
personnel operating fueling /
defueling equipment followed as
described in the MCM?
Ref:
11.
Ref.
Comments/Summary:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 98
Items completed by:
Date:
March 2001 Page 99
CAR 704 / 705 Aircraft Operator Requirements (CAR 706)
Company:
AOC-26 Control of Parts, Parts Pooling
File 5015Date:
Are parts and materials owned or
1.
used by the company acquired
and stored per the procedures
described in the manual?
Ref:
Is the individual responsible for the
2.
control of parts / material
knowledgeable about the
procedures described in the
manual?
Ref:
Does the company use a
3.
quarantine storage system?
• Are there procedures stated
for limited access and
control?
• Is it segregated, locked?
Ref:
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
Does the quarantine store contain
4.
unserviceable parts, components,
material and equipment?
• Are these parts being
handling according to
procedures?
• Are these items properly
identified and held in
temporary transit status?
Ref:
Does the company’s system
5.
ensure that there are no
unserviceable, unidentified or
untagged parts in bonded stores?
Ref:
Is there a stated policy and
6.
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
N/A OK Finding Not Checked
March 2001 Page 100
Loading...