Ericsson Review No. 2, 1997
61
single cabinet with battery backup can provide a 3 kW power supply for nearly two
hours. A 6 kW power supply is sufficient to
operate approximately 15 AXE cabinets,
which more or less corresponds to a highend mobile switching centre (MSC) in a mobile telephony system.
Most hardware in the BYB 501 equipment practice is fed with a redundant power
supply to each subrack through two branches of –48 V. Each branch of power is filtered
and distributed to the subrack backplane,
from which each board is supplied through
a double-diode configuration. This arrangement increases reliability, since the subrack
continues to work even if one branch of the
power supply is lost.
The power distribution system also allows
boards to be inserted into a subrack that is
in service, which greatly simplifies procedures when boards in the subracks must be
replaced.
Results
At the system level, recent developments
in the AXE hardware evolution programme have reduced the number of board
types used in AXE and made them smaller and much more power-efficient. For example, it was possible to reduce the size of
a base station controller (BSC) for a GSM
configuration that supports approximately 300 transceivers by nearly 90% – including power supply, battery backup
(Figure 11) and transcoders. Today, power
consumption for a complete base station
controller of this type is less than 1500 W.
Moreover, when the BSC is delivered for
installation, very little additional work is
required, since the cabinets are equipped
with subracks and internal system cables at
the factory.
For the first time, a complete AXE exchange fits into a single cabinet (Figure 12).
This configuration can be used for a home
location register (HLR), signalling transfer
point (STP), service control point (SCP), or
for a base station controller application.
Conclusion
The AXE hardware evolution programme
has successfully reduced the size of hardware
by between 70% and 90%; cabling in the
exchange has been reduced by 90%, and
power has been reduced by 75%. Therefore,
operators can expect that the time and re-
sources needed for installing the hardware
will also decrease by between 70% and 90%.
The delivery of fully equipped and tested exchanges will further simplify installation.
The following aspects contribute towards
reducing operator costs for running the new
exchanges:
• smaller footprints require less floor space
(reduced overhead);
• costs of power (batteries, rectifiers and
kW) and cooling are reduced (reduced
overhead);
• fewer spare parts are needed (smaller
facilities, smaller stores);
• operations have been simplified (less staff,
less training);
• less hardware implies that the mean time
between failures (MTBF) increases, while
the repair time decreases – in that way,
the total down time, due to hardware fail-
ures, will decrease;
• pooled devices;
• programmable platforms.
The hardware evolution described in this article represents only a first step in Ericsson’s
AXE hardware evolution programme. In
subsequent phases of the programme, AXE
will be migrated towards an open hardware
architecture that supports datacom functionality, asynchronous transfer mode
(ATM) switching, high-speed interfaces and
multiprocessor configurations.
References
1 Hägg, U., Persson, K.: New hardware
in AXE 10. Ericsson Review
63(1986):2, pp 86-92.
2 Stockman, B. and Wallers, A.:
BYB 501 metric equipment practice.
Ericsson Review 74(97):2, pp. 62-67.
3 Hansson, U., Paone, T.: The group
switch subsystem – an enhanced competitive group switch. Ericsson Review
74(1997):2, pp 68-73.
4 Eriksson, A., Eriksson, G., Karlsen, J.,
Roxström, A., Vallon Hulth, T.:
Ericsson echo cancellors – a key to
improved speech quality. Ericsson
Review 73(1996):1, pp 25-33.