AcuRite 75099, 75111, 75112, 75114 Instruction Manual

Application Note
Cell Analysis
Dynamic Monitoring of Cell Adhesion and Spreading
xCELLigence real-time cell analysis
Author
Brandon Lamarche, JoyceVelez, and Leyna Zhao Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Introduction
The cells that make up the various tissues and organs are held together by specific molecules that essentially serve as “biological glue”. These molecules confer shape, structure, rigidity, or plasticity to the cells. During embryogenesis, these biological molecules, referred to as extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, serve as “tracks” that direct cells to the appropriate region within the embryo. This is so they can give rise to different tissues and organ systems. ECM proteins also play a prominent role during wound healing and also are involved in directing many important cellular processes such as proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Failure of cells to interact with the appropriate biological surface or molecule can be detrimental to the fate of the cells and can contribute to cancer cell metastases.
The various ECM components, such as fibronectin (FN), collagens (CL),
laminins(LM), and vitronectin (VN), interact specifically with different cells through specialized cell surface receptors called integrins. Integrins recognize and bind to
specific motifs within the ECM proteins, mediating the ability of cells to specifically adhere to and interact with the appropriate matrix proteins.1 Integrin receptor interaction with ECM proteins also begins an intracellular signaling cascade that directs cellular processes, such as cell survival, proliferation, differentiation,
andmigration.
1
The ECM proteins must be purified from human or animal serum before any biological effects on cells can be studied. The purified ECM proteins are then applied to an appropriate surface, such as a plastic tissue culture dish or a glass surface. When applied to an appropriate surface at low concentrations, the ECM proteins precipitate and coat the surface. Cells can be applied to the coated surface and cellular events, such as cell adhesion and spreading, can be assessed by various cellular and molecular techniques. In general, these adhesion and spreading assays determine:
– If a certain cell type can adhere to a
specific adhesive substrate
– Whether the adhesive substrate is
capable of supporting spreading (a process that requires both cell adhesion and activation of intracellular signaling pathways)
– Whether cell adhesion and spreading
are sensitive to specific reagents that block cell/ECM interaction, interfere with cell signaling pathways, or disrupt cytoskeletal architecture
There are several methods for assessing and quantifying cellular adhesion and spreading on an ECM-coated surface:
1. The most widely used method involves applying the cells to surfaces coated with appropriate ECM components, allowing the cells to attach and adhere for a specified length of time, then washing away the unbound cells. The attached cells are then fixed, labeled with fluorescent reagent, such as rhodamine phalloidin, and pictured using an epifluorescence microscope or an epifluorescence confocal microscope.
2. Alternatively, cells can be labeled with a dye, such as crystal violet, and quantified. Quantification involves either manually counting the cells under a light microscope or measuring the absorbance of the
stain after it is solubilized.
3. Cells can also be prelabeled with a fluorescent dye, such as 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA), and then applied to an appropriate ECM-coated surface. The unbound cells are washed off and the bound cells are quantified using a plate reader.
4. A method that is designed to assess the role of integrins and other adhesion proteins. This method involves coating different surfaces with antibodies or peptides, which are specific for the various receptors, then seeding those surfaces with cells that express the appropriate integrin receptors. The interaction of integrin receptors on the cell surface with the antibody or peptide-coated surface allows the cells to adhere and undergo specific morphological and biological changes. These changes can then be assessed using one of the three methods discussed above.
While the assays described above have been informative, they all have limitations. All are endpoint assays, providing only a “snapshot” of the adhesion process. Further, the assays involve labor- and cost-intensive prelabeling or postlabeling of cells. Finally, they all involve fixation and
permeabilization, which destroys the cell before it can be analyzed.
The xCELLigence system allows label-free, dynamic monitoring of cell events in real time. It addresses some of the major limitations of the assays described in this application note. For instance, because the technique is noninvasive, it does not require the cells to be fixed or lysed. That means it can be used to monitor biological events that occur after adhesion and spreading, such as proliferation and differentiation.
In this application note, a series of experiments is described to demonstrate that this new impedance-based system is suitable for monitoring cell adhesion and spreading.
Materials and methods
Cells
All the cells used in this study were obtained from ATCC and maintained in a
37°C incubator with 5% CO2 saturation.
NIH3T3 cells were maintained in DMEM
media containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin. Jurkat T cells and
BxPC3 cells were maintained in RPMI
containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin.
Cell adhesion assays using impedance technology
The indicated concentration of either FN or the control PLL was added into the wells of 96-well E-Plates, then the plates were incubated for one hour at
37°C. The protein‑coated plates were
washed with PBS and incubated with
0.5% BSA solution in PBS for 20 minutes at 37°C. The wells of the treated plates
were washed with PBS before media and
cells were added. Cells were trypsinized,
spun, resuspended in serum-free media
containing 0.25% BSA and adjusted to an appropriate concentration. A 100µL
volume of the cell suspension was transferred to ECM- or PLL-coated wells on E-Plates. The extent of cell adhesion and spreading, measured as changes in impedance with the xCELLigence
2
system, was monitored every three
PLL
minutes for 1to3 hours depending
on the experiment. The assay system expresses impedance in arbitrary Cell Index (CI) units. The CI at each time point is defined as (Rn – Rb)/15, where Rn is the cell-electrode impedance of the well when it contains cells and Rb is the background impedance of the well with the media alone.
Treatment with inhibitors
For each inhibitor, cells were
pre‑incubated for 15to30 minutes with
the indicated inhibitor concentrations and then added to ECM-coated wells of E-Plates. All other steps were the same as previously mentioned.
1.2
A
Cell Index
Poly-L-
1.0
Fibronectin
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Time (hours)
siRNA Transfection
BxPc3 cells were transfected with 20 nM
of siSRC using siPORTamine at a final volume of 60 µL. Cells were assayed
for adhesion function 48 hours after transfection.
Immunofluorescence and light microscopy
Cells were seeded into PLL- or FN-coated 16-well chamber slides. The cells were allowed to attach, and then were
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at
the indicated time points. The cells
were permeabilized, stained with
rhodamine-phalloidin, then photographed using an epifluorescence microscope connected to a digital camera.
Results and discussion
Dynamic monitoring of cell adhesion and spreading on different surfaces using impedance technology
To assess the extent of adhesion and spreading, E-Plates were coated with either FN or PLL (control). NIH3T3 cells were applied to the coated wells and the extent of adhesion and spreading was monitored using the impedance-based system. Simultaneously, chamber slides were also coated with FN or PLL and the same number of cells were added to each well. To assess cell attachment and spreading, cells were stained with
rhodamine‑phalloidin and analyzed with
an epifluorescence microscope.
As shown in Figure 1A, the Cell Index (CI) increased dramatically when cells are applied to FN-coated wells. In contrast, the CI increased slowly and steadily when cells are applied to PLL-coated wells. Similarly, immunofluorescent images (Figure 1B) showed that cell attachment on FN was accompanied by immediate spreading. The spreading was
maximal after one hour. On PLL‑coated
wells, the cells tend to remain round even two hours after initial attachment.
B
5 minutes 30 minutes 60 minutes 120 minutes
25 µm 25 µm 25 µm 25 µm
FN
25 µm 25 µm 25 µm 25 µm
Figure 1. (A) Dynamic monitoring of cell attachment and spreading on PLL- and FN-coated surfaces. (B) The Cell Index correlates with the extent of cell attachment and spreading observed using conventional phalloidin staining of the actin cytoskeleton and immunofluorescence microscopy.
3
Loading...
+ 5 hidden pages