On June 10 , 2005 Weir-Jones Engineering Consultants Ltd. (WJEC) was retained by
th
Opticom Technologies Inc. to perform a set of vibration tests on its Model CC-02-4.3 CCTV camera.
The primary objective in testing the camera was to verify its structural integrity. This was done by
subjecting the unit to the worst-case vibrational stresses expected in its application environment.
The testing consisted of vibrating the Model CC-02-4.3 CCTV camera in the two mutually
perpendicular axes in accordance with the profiles defined in Sections 4.9 of the SAE J1455 (August
1994) Standard and Method 514.5 of the MIL-STD-810F (January 2000) Standard. The testing of
the camera was performed on June 14 and 15 , 2005.
thth
2.0VIBRATION PROFILES
The vibration testing of the Model CC-02-4.3 CCTV camera comprised of subjecting the unit
to the Sinusoidal profile as defined in Section 4.9 of the SAE J1455 (August 1994) Standard and to
the Random profile as defined in Method 514.5 of the MIL-STD-810F (January 2000) Standard. The
parameters of the Sinusoidal and Random profiles are summarized below with the graphical
representation of the Sinusoidal profile shown in Figure 1 and that of the Random profile shown in
Figure 2.
Sinusoidal (truck chassis-mounted)
Amplitude*-2 G’s from 10 to 12 Hz
2.5 G’s from 12 to 14 Hz
3 G’s from 14 to 16 Hz
3.5 G’s from 16 to 18 Hz
4 G’s from 18 to 2,000 Hz
Sweep rate-0.5 octave per minute
Duration-180 minutes per axis for each axis. Unit to be operational as
intended during testing.
* the step function is intended to simulate the ramp-up from 10 to 20 Hz.
Random (Basic Transportation for U.S. Highway Truck)
Breakpoints - as per Figure 514.5C-1
10 Hzÿ 0.015 G /Hz
40 Hzÿ 0.015 G /Hz
500 Hzÿ 0.00015 G /Hz
Overall G level of 1.04
RMS
2
2
2
Duration-60 minutes is equivalent to 1,000 miles of travel. Unit is
recommended to be operational as intended during testing.
The equipment required for the vibration tests was a shaker, a vibration controller and two
feedback accelerometers (see Figure 3). The specifications of the equipment used are as follows.
Shaker:Manufacturer:Ling Dynamic Systems (LDS)
Model:V722
Rated Force:750 lbf. rms (Random)
Frequency:5 Hz - 4000 Hz
Maximum Displacement:1 inch peak-to-peak
Maximum Velocity:40 inch/sec peak
Maximum Acceleration:50g rms (Random)
Maximum Payload:220 lbs (total weight)
Driven by:LDS PA2000 2kW power amplifier
Controlled by:LDS DVC 4000 Mk3
Accelerometer:Manufacturer:PCB
Model:J357B01 (charge capacitance type)
Serial:8968, 8969
Range:±1800 g
The vibration controller and feedback accelerometers were calibrated on March 21 , 2005 by
st
Ralco Inc. in North Haven, Connecticut, in compliance with ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 and traceable to
NIST. The calibration certificates of the controller and accelerometers are provided in Appendix 1.
Power amplifier
Vibration controller
Vibration shaker
Figure 3:Weir-Jones Engineering Consultants Ltd. vibration testing equipment. Note that the