Application Guide
Gas detection in refrigeration systems
GDIR.danfoss.com
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
||
|
Commonly used abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 |
|||||||
|
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 |
|||||||
|
Sensor technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
.4 |
|||
|
|
EC - Electrochemical sensor . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
4 |
||
|
|
SC - Semiconductor sensor (solid state) . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
.5 |
||
|
|
P- Pellistor sensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
6 |
||
|
|
IR - Infrared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
6 |
||
|
|
Which sensor is suitable to a given refrigerant? . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
6 |
||
|
Sensor response time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
7 |
|||
|
The need for gas detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 |
|||||||
|
Legislation and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 |
|||||||
|
|
Requirements for gas detection according to EN 378:2016 and ISO 5149:2014 . . . . . . . . . . 9 |
||||||
|
|
F-Gas legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 |
||||||
|
|
Requirements for gas detection according to ASHRAE 15-2016 (USA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
10 |
|||||
|
|
Requirements for gas detection according to ANSI/IIAR-2 (USA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. 10 |
|||||
|
Installation guideline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 |
|||||||
|
Location of gas detectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |
|||||||
|
Number of gas detectors in a facility . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
13 |
||||
|
Calibration / test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |
|||||||
|
Calibration methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 |
||||||
|
|
Method I Calibration by means of replacing sensor heads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. 14 |
|||||
|
|
Method II Calibration of gas detectors by means of calibration gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. 14 |
|||||
|
|
Bump test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
. 15 |
|||
|
|
Alarm / sensitivity range gas detectors . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
16 |
|||
|
|
Danfoss recommendations for alarm levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 |
||||||
|
Actions |
triggered by gas detection . . . . . . . . |
. |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
18 |
|||
|
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 |
|||||||
|
Annex I - Common refrigerant data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 |
|||||||
|
Annex II - EN 378:2016 and ISO 5149:2014 . . . . . . |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 |
||||||
|
Annex III - ASHRAE 15-2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonly used |
• |
LFL |
= Lower Flammability Level |
• |
GWP = Global Warming Potential |
|
|
|
abbreviations |
• |
OEL |
= Occupational Exposure Limits |
• |
TRK |
= Technische Richtkonzentrationen |
|
|
|
• |
ATEL = Acute-Toxicity Exposure Limit |
• |
MAK = Maximale Arbeitsplatzkonzentrationen |
|
|||
|
• |
ODL = Oxygen Deprivation Limit |
• |
TLV |
= Threshold Limit Value |
|
|
|
|
• |
OSH = Occupational Safety Limit |
• |
STEL = Short Term Exposure Limit |
|
|
||
|
• |
ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential |
• |
PEL |
= Permissible Exposure Limits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |
DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 | 3 |
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
Introduction |
Gas detection and leak detection are two distinct |
|
activities that covers the same topic, but the |
|
methods are very different. |
|
Gas detection covers the analysis of air samples |
|
to determine whether they contain refrigerant |
|
gas. Leak detection is a systematic inspection |
|
of a refrigeration system to determine whether |
|
it is leaking. The terms gas detection and leak |
|
detection are not interchangeable, and must not |
|
be mixed. |
|
Leak detection equipment is normally hand- |
|
held equipment carried by people, and used for |
|
detection of leaks in refrigeration systems. There |
|
are several types of leak detectors available, |
|
ranging from simple techniques like soapy water |
|
to sophisticated electrical instruments. |
|
Gas detection equipment is usually used in |
|
a fixed installation with a number of sensors |
|
located in areas where refrigerant might be |
|
expected to accumulate in the event of a plant |
|
leak. |
These locations depend upon the layout of the machinery room and adjacent spaces, on the configuration of the plant and also on the refrigerant in question.
Before selecting the appropriate gas detection equipment, a number of questions have to be answered:
•Which gases have to be measured and in what quantities?
––Which sensor principle is the most suitable?
––How many sensors are needed?
––Where and how should they be positioned and calibrated?
•Which alarm limits are appropriate?
––How many are required?
––How is the alarm information processed?
This application guide will address these questions.
Sensor technology |
The choice of sensor technology for refrigerant |
|
gas detection will depend on the specific target |
|
refrigerant gas and ppm range required. Danfoss |
|
offers a range of different sensor technologies |
to match most commonly used refrigerants, appropriate ppm ranges, and safety requirements for refrigeration systems.
EC - Electrochemical sensor |
Electrochemical sensors are mainly used for toxic |
An oxidation / reduction reaction generates an |
|
gases and are suitable for ammonia. |
electric current that is proportional to the gas |
|
|
concentration. |
They consist of two electrodes immersed in an electrolyte medium.
max.
Tolerance range min.
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Sensitivity |
“High” gas concentration |
|
“Low” gas concentration |
||
|
Time
Max. operating time before calibration
Fig. 1: Sensitivity of electrochemical sensors
They are very accurate (+/- 2%) and tend to be used mainly for toxic gases, which cannot be detected otherwise, or where high levels of accuracy are needed (fig. 1).
Danfoss offers specific EC sensors for ammonia in ranges up to 0-5.000 ppm with an expected lifetime of 2 years, depending on exposure to target gas.
Exposure to large ammonia leaks or constant background ammonia will shorten the sensor life (fig. 2). EC sensors can be re-calibrated as long as the sensitivity of the sensor is above 30%.
They are very selective and rarely subject to cross-interference. They may react to sudden large humidity changes but settle quickly.
4 | DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 |
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
EC - Electrochemical sensor (continued)
<![endif]>Sensitivity
“Substantial” gas leak
Important!
Sensor must be calibrated or new sensor must be installed.
If the sensitivity of the sensor falls below 30%; install new sensor
Max. operating time before calibration
max.
Tolerance range min.
30% sensitivity
Time
Fig. 2: Large ammonia exposure shortens the lifetime of electrochemical sensors.
SC - Semiconductor sensor |
The semi-conductor sensor functions by |
(solid state) |
measuring the resistance change (proportional to |
|
the concentration), as gas is absorbed on to the |
|
surface of a semi-conductor, which is normally |
|
made from metal oxides. |
|
These can be used for a wide range of gases |
|
including combustible, toxic and refrigerant |
|
gases. |
|
It is claimed that they perform better than the |
|
catalytic type in the detection of combustible |
|
gases at low concentrations, up to 1.000 ppm. |
|
These are low-cost, long life, sensitive and can be |
|
used to detect a large range of gases including |
|
all the HCFC, HFC refrigerants, ammonia and |
|
hydrocarbons. |
However, they are not selective, and are not suitable for detecting a single gas in a mixture, or for use where high concentrations of interfering gases are likely to be present (fig. 3).
Interference from short term sources (e.g. exhaust gas from a truck), creating false alarms, can be overcome by enabling a delay of the alarm.
Semi-conductors for halocarbons can be used to detect more than one gas or a mixture simultaneously. This is particularly useful in monitoring a plant room with several different refrigerants.
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Sensitivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Gas 1 |
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Gas 2 |
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Gas 3 |
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Target Gas |
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Gas 4 |
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Gas 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Broad” sensitivity spectrum
–Semiconductor
–Pellistor
“Narrow” sensitivity spectrum
–Electrochemical
–Infrared
Gas specification
Fig. 3: Sensitivity spectrum of various sensor technologies
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |
DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 | 5 |
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
P- Pellistor sensor |
Pellistors (sometimes called a bead or catalytic) |
|
are mainly used for combustible gases including |
|
ammonia, and are the most popular sensors for |
|
this application at high detection levels. |
|
The sensor functions by burning the gas at |
|
the surface of the bead and measuring the |
|
resultant resistance change in the bead (which is |
|
proportional to concentration). |
|
These are relatively low-cost, well established |
|
and understood, and they have a good life span |
|
(expected life time 3 to 5 years). The response |
|
time is usually below 10 seconds. |
|
They can be subject to poisoning in certain |
|
applications. |
Poisoning is the reduction of the reaction of the sensor to the target gas due to the presence (contamination) of another substance on the surface of the catalyst, that either reacts with it or forms a layer on top of it reducing its capacity to react to the target gas. Most common poisoning substances are silicon compounds.
Pellistors are used mainly with combustible gases and are therefore suited for ammonia and the hydrocarbon refrigerants at high concentrations.
They do sense all combustible gases, but they respond at different rates to each, and so they can be calibrated for particular gases.
There are ammonia specific versions.
IR - Infrared |
Infrared technology utilises the fact that most |
|
gases have a characteristic absorption band in |
|
the infrared region of the spectrum, and this |
|
can be used to detect them. Comparison with a |
|
reference beam allows the concentration to be |
|
determined. |
|
Even though they are relatively expensive in |
|
comparison to other sensor, they have long life |
|
time of up to 15 years, high accuracy, and low |
|
cross sensitivity |
Due to its measuring principle infrared sensors can be subject to issues in dusty environments, where the presence of too many particles in the air may disturb the reading.
They are recommended and commonly used for Carbon dioxide detection. Although technology exists for other gases also, it is not common to find it in commercial solutions.
Which sensor is suitable to a given refrigerant?
Based on the target refrigerant gas and the actual ppm range the below table provides an overview of the suitability of the various sensor technologies offered by Danfoss.
Suitability of different sensor technologies:
|
|
|
|
Semi-conducter |
Electro-chemical |
|
|
Pellistor |
Infrared |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Catalytic) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonia “low” concentration |
|
– |
4 |
|
|
|
– |
– |
|||
(< 100 ppm) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonia “medium” concentration |
(4) |
4 |
|
|
|
– |
– |
||||
(< 1000 ppm) 1) |
|
|
|
||||||||
Ammonia “high” concentration |
4 |
(4)2 |
|
(4) |
– |
||||||
(<10000 ppm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Ammonia“very high” concentration |
|
– |
– |
4 |
– |
||||||
(> 10000 ppm) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Carbon Dioxide |
|
– |
– |
|
|
– |
4 |
||||
CO2 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
HC |
|
– |
– |
4 |
– |
||||||
Hydrocarbons |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
HCFC - HFC |
4 |
– |
|
|
– |
– |
|||||
Halocarbons |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Best solution |
|
|
Suitable - but less attractive |
|
|
|
Not suitable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) Measuring range 0-1000 ppm. Can be adjusted in the whole range. 2) Up to 5000 ppm. For specific applications.
6 | DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 |
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
Sensor response time |
The response time is the elapsed time for a sensor |
|
to read a given percentage of the actual value for |
|
a step change in the target gas concentrations. |
|
Response time for most sensors is given as t90, |
|
meaning the time that it takes the sensor to read |
|
90% of the actual concentration. Fig. 4 shows an |
|
example of a sensor with a reponse time t90 of 90 |
|
seconds. |
As shown in the graphic, the sensor reaction above 90% becomes slower and takes longer to read the 100%.
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Change |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Concentration |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>of |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
<![if ! IE]> <![endif]>Fraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
250 |
Time, s
Fig. 4: Sensor with a response time t90 of 90 seconds
GAS |
Sensor technology |
Response time t90, seconds |
|
|
|
|
Electrochemical 0-100/ 0-300 ppm |
<40s |
|
|
|
|
Electrochemical 0-1000ppm |
<40s |
|
|
|
Ammonia |
Electrochemical 0-5000ppm |
<40s |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
>120s |
|
|
|
|
Pellistor |
<20s |
|
|
|
Infrared |
Infrared |
<90s |
|
|
|
Halocarbons |
Semiconductor |
>120s |
|
|
|
Hydrocarbons |
Pellistor |
<15s |
|
|
|
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |
DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 | 7 |
Application Guide | Gas detection in refrigeration systems
The need for gas detection |
There are several reasons why gas detection |
Hydrocarbons are classified as flammable. Thus, |
|
is required. Two obvious reasons are to protect |
it’s critical to verify that the concentration around |
|
people, production and equipment from the |
the refrigeration system does not exceed the |
|
impact of potential gas leakages and to comply |
flammability limit. |
|
with regulations. Other good reasons include: |
Fluorinated refrigerants all have a certain |
|
• Reduced service cost (cost of replacement gas |
|
|
and the service call). |
negative impact on the environment, for which |
|
• Reduced energy consumption cost due to lack |
reason it’s very important to avoid any leaks. |
|
|
|
|
of refrigerant. |
CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) is directly involved in |
|
• Risk for damaging stock products due to a |
|
|
the respiration process and should be treated |
|
|
substantial leak. |
|
|
accordingly. Approximately 0.04% CO2 is |
|
|
• Possibility to reduce insurance costs. |
|
|
present in the air. With higher concentration, |
|
|
• Taxes or quota on non-environmentally |
|
|
some adverse reactions are reported starting |
|
|
friendly refrigerants |
|
|
with increase in breath rate (~100% at 3% |
|
|
|
|
|
The various refrigeration applications require gas |
CO2 concentration) and leading to loss of |
|
consciousness and death at CO2 concentrations |
|
|
detection for different reasons. |
|
|
above 10%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonia is classified as a toxic substance with |
|
|
a very unique smell, as such it is “self alarming”. |
|
|
However, gas detectors are required to guarantee |
|
|
early warnings, and to monitor areas where |
|
|
people are not always present, such as machinery |
|
|
rooms. It is important to be aware that ammonia |
|
|
is the only common refrigerant lighter than air. |
|
|
In many cases, this will lead to ammonia rising |
|
|
above the breathing zone making it impossible |
|
|
for people to early detect ammonia leakages. The |
|
|
use of gas detectors in the right zones ensures |
|
|
early warnings in case of ammonia leakages. |
|
Legislation and standards The requirements for gas detection are different across countries worldwide. An overview of the most common rules and regulation can be found on the following pages.
Europe:
The present safety standard for refrigeration systems in Europe is EN 378:2016.
The specified alarm levels in EN 378:2016 are set at levels to allow evacuation of an area. The levels do not reflect the effects of long term exposure to leaked refrigerants. In other words, in EN 378 a gas detector is to warn when a sudden large release occurs, while machine room ventilation and system quality measures are to ensure that small leaks are too small to cause adverse health effects.
Note!
Requirements for gas detection equipment in Europe are covered by national legislation in the different countries, and consequently may differ from the requirements specified in EN 378.
8 | DKRCI.PA.S00.A2.02 | 520H12772 |
© Danfoss | DCS (mwa) | 2018.08 |