Cabletron Systems reserves the right to make changes in specifications and other information
contained in this document without prior notice. The reader should in all cases consult Cabletron
Systems to determine whether any such changes have been made.
The hardware, firmware, or software described in this manual is subject to change without notice.
IN NO EVENT SHALL CABLETRON SYSTEMS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT,
SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOST PROFITS) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS MANUAL OR THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN IT, EVEN IF CABLETRON SYSTEMS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF, KNOWN, OR
SHOULD HAVE KNOWN, THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
Copyright
Printed in the United States of America.
Order Number: 9032094 January 1997
Cabletron Systems, Inc.
P.O. Box 5005
Rochester, NH 03866-5005
Cabletron Systems , SPECTRUM , BRIM , FNB , LANVIEW , Multi Media Access Center , are
The Cabletron Systems Networking Guide - Workgroup Solutions is intended
to provide much of the information necessary to allow Network Managers to
design and evaluate workgroup networks using the Cabletron Systems family of
standalone and stackable networking products. This guide also provides the
methods for associating these workgroups into larger networks or incorporating
them into existing facility networks.
Chapter 1
This document was written with the assumption that the reader has some
familiarity with four networking technologies; Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Token
Ring, and FDDI. If you are unfamiliar with these technologies, Cabletron Systems
produces instructional and reference materials that may be of assistance in
learning these networking technologies. The available instructional materials are
referred to in Related Documentation , later in this chapter. For those already
familiar with the Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, and Token Ring technologies, a brief
refresher in the main design-specific aspects of these technologies is provided in
later chapters.
NOTE
This document assumes that the reader has read the
Systems Networking Guide - MMAC-FNB Solutions
document is available on the Cabletron Systems Hardware
Manuals CD-ROM. If you are unable to locate a copy of that
document, you may also order a printed version of any
document listed above from Cabletron Systems.
Cabletron
. The
1-1
Introduction
Document Organization
The following summarizes the organization of this manual:
Chapter 1, Introduction , provides basic information about this document,
including the organization and format of the document.
Chapter 2, Review of Networking , describes the important design restrictions
and characteristics of three basic networking technologies.
Chapter 3, The Workgroup Approach , explains the history and product
philosophy behind standalone and stackable workgroup networking devices.
Chapter 4, PIMs and BRIMs , details the operation and use of Cabletron Systems’
various speciality interface modules.
Chapter 5, Network Design , covers the information and decisions involved in the
identification of networking needs and formation of solutions which meet those
needs.
Chapter 6, Ethernet , explains and illustrates the network design process involved
in creating Ethernet workgroups.
Chapter 7, Fast Ethernet , provides information and examples that show the
design issues that must be dealt with when configuring a Fast Ethernet network.
Chapter 8, Token Ring , supplies design and configuration information for Token
Ring workgroup solutions.
Appendix A, Charts and Tables , provides a centralized source for the design
tables found throughout this document, and useful information relating to the
networking technologies that are discussed.
1-2Document Organization
Document Conventions
Warnings and Notifications
Introduction
NOTE
Note symbol. Calls the reader’s attention to any item of
information that may be of special importance.
Formats
References to chapters or sections within this document are printed in boldface
type.
References to other Cabletron Systems publications or documents are printed in
italic type.
Additional Assistance
The design of a network is a complex and highly specialized process. Due to the
different nature of each and every cabling installation and the special problems
and concerns raised by any facility, there may be aspects of network design that
are not covered in this guide.
If you have doubts about your network design, or if you require installation
personnel to perform the actual installation of hardware and cabling, Cabletron
Systems maintains a staff of network design personnel and highly-trained cabling
and hardware installation technicians. The services of the Networking Services
group are available to customers at any time. If you are interested in obtaining
design assistance or a network installation plan from the Networking Services
group, contact your Cabletron Systems Sales Representative.
In addition to the availability of Networking Services, the Cabletron Systems
Technical Support department is available to answer customer questions
regarding existing Cabletron Systems networks or planned expansion issues.
Contact Cabletron Systems at (603) 332-9400 to reach the Technical Support
department with any specific product-related questions you may have.
Document Conventions1-3
Introduction
Related Documentation
The following publications may be of assistance to you in the design process.
Several of these documents present information supplied in this guide in greater
or lesser detail than they are presented here.
•Cabletron Systems Networking Guide - MMAC-FNB Solutions
•Cabletron Systems Cabling Guide
•Cabletron Systems Ethernet Technology Guide
•Cabletron Systems Token Ring Technology Guide
•Cabletron Systems FDDI Technology Guide
For additional product or other information, visit us at
http://www.cabletron.com or contact Cabletron Systems by phone at
(603) 332-9400.
1-4Related Documentation
Chapter 2
Review of Networking
This chapter discusses the defining characteristics of three major Local Area Network (LAN)
technologies.
Before discussing the selection of networking hardware for workgroup design, an
understanding of the major standardized networking technologies available for
these designs is necessary. This chapter provides a brief review of the three major
networking technologies that are to be treated in this document: Ethernet, Fast
Ethernet, and Token Ring.
This section is intended to be a review of the most important aspects of these
technologies, and is not expected to stand alone. For more detailed information,
Cabletron Systems publishes a series of other documents that treat these
technologies in greater detail. For introductory information, the Cabletron Systems Networking Guide - MMAC-FNB Solutions manual provides extensive training
information in the basics of these technologies. Further technical detail is
available in the Cabletron Systems Technology Overview Guides. A list of associated
publications, including these titles, is supplied in the Related Documentation
section of Chapter 1.
2-1
Review of Networking
Ethernet
Ethernet is a local area networking technology that was initially developed in the
1970s by the Xerox Corporation. It is based on the principles of workstations
being responsible for their own transmissions and operation. It is sometimes
referred to as 802.3 networking, in reference to the number of the IEEE standards
body which subsumes all Ethernet operations.
Ethernet networks provide an operating bandwidth of 10 megabits per second
(Mbps). Bandwidth is a networking term which describes the operating speed of a
technology. In the case of Ethernet, a perfectly operating, theoretical Ethernet
network, can move 10,000,000 bits of data each second between two stations on
the network.
Ethernet is a Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Detection (CSMA/CD)
LAN technology. Stations on an Ethernet LAN can access the network at any time.
Before sending data, Ethernet stations “listen” to the network to see if it is already
in use. If so, the station wishing to transmit waits and examines the network again
later. If the network is not in use, the station transmits. A collision occurs when
two stations listen for network traffic, “hear” none, then transmit simultaneously.
In this case, both transmissions are damaged and the stations, sensing this
collision, must retransmit at some later time. Backoff algorithms determine when
the colliding stations retransmit.
Ethernet is a broadcast network. In other words, all stations see all frames
(collections of data), regardless of if they are an intended destination. Each station
must examine received frames to determine if it is the destination. If so, the frame
is passed to a higher protocol layer for appropriate processing.
Ethernet transmits data frames over a physical medium of coaxial, fiber optic, or
twisted pair cable. The coaxial and fiber optic cable typically represents the
backbone of an Ethernet LAN, while twisted pair is used as a low cost connection
from the backbone to the desktop.
Ethernet LANs have the following media restrictions in order to adhere to IEEE
802.3 standards:
•Bus Length: The maximum bus length for an Ethernet LAN for all media types
are as follows:
-500 m for 10BASE5 coaxial cable
-185 m for 10BASE2 coaxial cable
-2,000 m for multi mode fiber optic (10BASE-F) cable
(5,000 m for single mode)
-100 m for twisted pair (10BASE-T) cable.
NOTE
These media lengths are not precise values. Actual maximum
cable lengths are strongly dependent on the physical cable
characteristics.
2-2Ethernet
Review of Networking
•AUI Length: The maximum Attachment Unit Interface (AUI) cable length is
50 m for connections from a transceiver to an Ethernet device. The 50 m
distance is the allowable maximum for standard AUI, while a maximum
length of 16.5 m has been set for office AUI.
•Number of Stations per Network: IEEE standards specify that the maximum
allowable number of stations per un-bridged network is 1,024, regardless of
media type. The 10BASE5 networks are allowed 100 taps per segment, while
10BASE2 networks are allowed 30 taps per segment with a maximum of
64 devices per tap each. (Fiber optic and twisted pair cable are point-to-point
media which do not allow taps or branches).
NOTE
•Maximum Signal Path: The maximum allowable signal path is 4 repeaters, 5
There are other limitations involved in the IEEE 802.3 standard and the various
cable specifications, which are more detailed and complex. These limitations are
covered in detail in the Cabletron Systems Cabling Guide and the Cabletron Systems Ethernet Technology Overview.
Fast Ethernet
Fast Ethernet is a networking technology that grew out of the popular Ethernet
technology described above. Fast Ethernet uses the same CSMA/CD media
access method and basic network operation. The main differences between
Ethernet and Fast Ethernet are the available bandwidth and media limitations.
Fast Ethernet increases the available bandwidth of a single network to 100 Mbps,
ten times faster than normal Ethernet. This increase in transmission speed,
however, comes at a cost to the flexibility of the network. By increasing the speed
of transmission by a factor of 10, the required characteristics of Ethernet links
were likewise reduced.
If it becomes necessary to extend the network beyond the IEEE
limit of 1,024 devices, a bridge can be used to connect another
full specification Ethernet network.
segments (with at least 2 segments being unpopulated Inter-Repeater Links),
and 7 bridges for all media types.
Fast Ethernet networks only support UTP and multimode fiber optics as standard
transmission media. The two standards for these media are 100BASE-TX for
Category 5 UTP, and 100BASE-FX for multimode fiber optics.
The IEEE 802.3u standard defines two different types of Fast Ethernet repeaters:
Classes I and II. All Cabletron Systems Fast Ethernet products discussed in this
document are Class I repeaters. A Fast Ethernet network designed with Class I
repeaters allows a signal path from one station, through a Fast Ethernet link, to a
Class I repeater, through another Fast Ethernet link, to a receiving station. No
other Class I repeaters may be placed in this signal path.
Fast Ethernet2-3
Review of Networking
This signal path, two end stations and the repeaters between them, is called the
network radius. Unlike standard Ethernet networks, Fast Ethernet networks have
a maximum network radius that may restrict the lengths of station cabling to less
than the maximum allowable distances for single links. Typically, network radius
calculations are only important when mixing 100BASE-TX and 100BASE-FX
networks. The maximum network radius limits are provided later in this section.
As the imposition of a maximum network radius on mixed 100BASE-TX and
100BASE-FX networks severely limits the design options of Fast Ethernet
networks, Fast Ethernet devices may incorporate buffered uplinks. A buffered
uplink is a Fast Ethernet port on a repeater which allows the repeater to ignore the
collision domain of the uplink. This allows the buffered uplink to be a
maximum-length segment even in mixed media environments.
NOTE
connection only for purposes of determining cable length.
Fast Ethernet LANs must meet the following media and network restrictions in
order to adhere to IEEE standards:
•Cabling Quality: All 100BASE-TX links require UTP cabling meeting or
exceeding the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) Category 5
specification. The link must be compliant from end to end, including all
connectors and patch panels.
•Link Length: No single link in the Fast Ethernet network may exceed the
limitations given below, including jumper cables and patch cables:
-100 m for 100BASE-TX networks
-400 m for 100BASE-FX networks
•Network Radius: Network radius is the distance traveled from the station with
the longest media link to the Fast Ethernet repeater and out to the station with
the second-longest media link. In order to meet IEEE standards, Fast Ethernet
networks constructed with Class I repeaters must not exceed the following
maximum network radii:
-200 m for homogenous 100BASE-TX networks
-260 m for mixed 100BASE-TX and 100BASE-FX networks
-272 m for homogenous 100BASE-FX networks
A buffered uplink is considered a bridged or switched
NOTE
maximums will lead to poor network performance.
2-4Fast Ethernet
These media lengths are fixed values. Deviation from these
Review of Networking
Fast Ethernet networks designed using Class II repeaters may not exceed the
following maximum network radii:
-200 m for homogenous 100BASE-TX networks
-320 m for homogenous 100BASE-FX networks
•Buffered Uplinks: If a buffered uplink is used to make a connection, the
allowable length of the buffered uplink itself does not change, but the
maximum network radius calculations will change. Assuming that the
buffered uplink is the longest link in the repeater radius, the maximum
allowable network radius will change to the values given below:
-500 m for mixed 100BASE-TX and buffered 100BASE-FX uplink
-800 m for homogenous 100BASE-FX networks
•Number of Stations per Network: IEEE standards specify that the maximum
allowable number of stations per single-segment network is 1,024, regardless
of media type.
Token Ring
NOTE
•Maximum Signal Path: The maximum allowable signal path for a Fast
Token Ring network operation is based on the principle that the operation of the
entire network determines when a station may transmit and when it will receive.
Stations monitor one another, and one station acts as an overall ring monitor,
keeping track of important statistics. Token Ring stations are connected to one
another in a predetermined order, and network frames pass from one station to
the next, following that order. A specialized network frame, called a token, is
passed around the ring at regular intervals. The transmission of the token helps
establish some of the operational statistics for the network, and receiving it allows
a station to transmit.
The Token Ring technology is designed to operate at either of two speeds: 4 Mbps
or 16 Mbps. This speed selection is made when the network is installed, and the
speed must apply equally to all stations (you may not split a ring into groups of
16 Mbps and 4 Mbps stations).
If it becomes necessary to extend the network beyond the IEEE
limit of 1,024 devices, a bridge or switch can be used to
connect another full specification Fast Ethernet network.
Ethernet network is one Class I repeater, two segments for all media types. The
use of bridges, switches, or routers can allow the creation of larger networks.
Token Ring2-5
Review of Networking
The transmission and reception of the token determines the amount of time that
any station will have to transmit data during its turn, offering a measure of
predictability not available in Ethernet or Fast Ethernet. This predictability also
allows Token Ring networks to incorporate special error-detection and correction
functions which can locate and correct network problems without human
intervention.
The predictability of the Token Ring technology also leads to a number of
limitations on the number of stations that can be connected to a network and the
maximum cable lengths that a signal may be passed across. Since the stations are
configured to expect reception of the token at certain increments of time,
exceeding the maximum number of stations or the maximum length of cabling
between stations can delay the token’s progress, causing the Token Ring network
to suffer errors and poor performance.
In order to stretch the capabilities of a Token Ring network, various technologies
are available which extend the distance a signal can travel before suffering
degradation or loss of signal timing due to cable lengths or high station count.
One method of increasing the resilience of a Token Ring network is the
incorporation of what is called “active circuitry.” Token Ring station ports with
this active circuitry regenerate, strengthen, and re-time any Token Ring signal
received by or transmitted from that interface.
NOTE
products incorporate active circuitry on all ports.
Token Ring devices can also extend the distance that a ring can cover through the
use of Ring-In/Ring-Out, or RI/RO cables. RI/RO cables are designed only to
make connections between Token Ring concentrator devices, and extend the area
that a ring can support by allowing long-distance links to other Token Ring
devices.
RI/RO connections are not bridge or switch interfaces. They do
All Cabletron Systems stackable and standalone Token Ring
NOTE
not create a new Token Ring network.
2-6Token Ring
Review of Networking
Token Ring networks can use a variety of physical cabling, including Unshielded
Twisted Pair (UTP), Shielded Twisted Pair (STP), or fiber optic cabling. The
characteristics of the various cables can directly impact the operational limitations
of a Token Ring network which uses a particular media.
•Lobe Cable Lengths for 4 Mbps Token Rings: The operation of a 4 Mbps Token
Ring network imposes some relatively generous limitations on the maximum
length of any station cable (also called a lobe cable) connected to an active port
in the network as shown in the following list:
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 300 m
-IBM Types 6, 9 STP: 200 m
-Category 5 UTP: 250 m
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 200 m
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
•Lobe Cable Lengths for 16 Mbps Token Rings: 16 Mbps Token Ring networks
also impose limitations on the maximum length of any media connected to an
active port as shown in the following list:
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 150 m
-IBM Types 6, 9 STP: 100 m
-Category 5 UTP: 120 m
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 100 m
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
•RI/RO Cable Lengths for 4 Mbps Token Rings: 4 Mbps Token Ring networks
also require that Ring-In/Ring-Out (RI/RO) connections be no longer than a
certain amount. This amount is dependent upon the media being used for the
RI/RO connection as shown in the following list:
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 770 m
-Category 5 UTP: 250 m
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 200 m
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
•RI/RO Cable Lengths for 16 Mbps Token Rings: 16 Mbps Token Ring networks
also require that Ring-In/Ring-Out (RI/RO) connections not exceed the
lengths given below:
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 346 m
-Category 5 UTP: 120 m
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 100 m
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 2000 m
Token Ring2-7
Review of Networking
•Number of Stations Per 4 Mbps Token Ring: In the same fashion as the limits
imposed on cable lengths due to the operating speed of the network and type
of cabling used, there are limitations on the number of stations that may be
connected to a single ring using active circuitry. If these numbers are exceeded,
a bridge, switch, or other segmentation device must be used to break the ring
into two or more smaller rings as detailed in the list below:
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 250 stations
-IBM Types 6, 9 STP: 250 stations
-Category 5 UTP: 150 stations
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 150 stations
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 250 stations
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 250 stations
•Number of Stations Per 16 Mbps Token Ring: The limitation on the number of
stations in the Token Ring also applies to 16 Mbps networks. In one case, the
number of stations supported by these faster Token Ring networks is
significantly lower than the number supported by the 4 Mbps rings.
-IBM Types 1, 2 STP: 250 stations
-IBM Types 6, 9 STP: 136 stations
-Category 5 UTP: 150 stations
-Categories 3, 4 UTP: 150 stations
-Multimode Fiber Optics: 250 stations
-Single Mode Fiber Optics: 250 stations
The Token Ring limitations that are described above are summarized for your
ease of reference in Table 2-1. This table is also repeated in Appendix A, Charts and Tables.
Table 2-1. Token Ring Maximums
Max Lobe Cable
Length
Media
Cable
Type
Max # of Stations
4 Mbps16 Mbps4 Mbps16 Mbps
STPIBM Types 1, 2250250300 m150 m
IBM Types 6, 9
a
250136200 m100 m
UTPCategory 5150150250 m120 m
Categories 3, 4150150200 m100 m
Fiber OpticsMultimode2502502000 m2000 m
Single Mode2502502000 m2000 m
a. IBM Type 6 cable is recommended for use as jumper cabling only and should not be used for
facility cabling installations.
2-8Token Ring
Review of Networking
There are other limitations involved in the IEEE 802.5 standard and the various
cable specifications that are more detailed and complex. These limitations are
covered in detail in the Cabletron Systems Cabling Guide and the Cabletron Systems Token Ring Technology Overview.
Token Ring2-9
Review of Networking
2-10Token Ring
Chapter 3
The W orkgroup Approach
This chapter describes the basic operation and design of stackable and standalone devices and the
methods used to meet common networking needs with these devices.
Standalone and stackable networking devices are specialized and important parts
of any end-to-end network design strategy. Understanding the design philosophy
and product evolution of these products can greatly aid a Network Designer in
determining where, and to what extent to implement standalone and stackable
devices in a new or existing network.
Standalones
A standalone device is one which, as the name implies, “stands alone” in the
network. A standalone device does not rely on any other network device to
operate, nor does it provide for the operation of other devices itself. This is a
distinct difference from networking devices such as modular networking chassis,
which require combinations of discrete modules be plugged into them for their
own operation.
3-1
The Workgroup Approach
Standalones, the Original Networking Devices
Standalone devices are the second oldest devices in Local Area Networking,
having been developed shortly after transceivers. The basic and most
straightforward standalone device is the repeater or concentrator, a device that
allows a network signal received on one interface, or port, to be strengthened,
regenerated, and sent out another port. Figure 3-1 illustrates the operation of a
repeater, receiving a weak signal and transmitting a cleaner, stronger signal.
incoming signaloutgoing signal
repeater
Figure 3-1. Repeater Operation
2094n01
These simple, inexpensive devices were designed to expand the limitations and
capabilities of early networks, allowing them to grow beyond the limitations
imposed by the cabling they were based upon. As time went on, and networks
grew in size, the standalone devices began to offer greater control and
expandability. The design of multiport repeaters allowed one signal to be sent out
several interfaces simultaneously, and the standalone bridge offered the ability to
localize network traffic for security and improved performance.
The other most common standalone device in early networks was the standalone
bridge. The standalone bridge was commonly a two-port device which performed
segmentation functions between two networks. The multiport bridge was
eventually followed up by the multiport switch, which made switched
connections between several network interfaces.
The use of these standalone devices allowed simple networks to expand beyond
the limits of the cabling and the physical constraints of the technologies being
used. The standalone networking devices were relatively simple, however, and
did not always support the numbers of users that facilities contained.
3-2Standalones
Management of Standalones
As standalone devices became more complex, the need to control them became
greater. The need to have some form of troubleshooting and control process in
place for an eight-port repeater is minimal. In a repeated network where more
than 200 users are connected to a single repeater, management capabilities are no
longer luxuries, they are a necessity. The advent of standalone bridges, which
required software configuration and monitoring, marked the introduction of
management capabilities to the standalone devices.
While the most basic standalone devices were unable to support any management
and control operations, networking hardware vendors such as Cabletron Systems
began to incorporate management functions into their devices, making intelligent
networking devices. The growth of networks and the control offered by these
intelligent devices paved the way for the modular networking chassis, or hub.
Standalones could handle the growing size of networks, but not always the
growing complexity. The modular chassis allowed facility networks to support far
greater numbers of users from a single location than was possible with standalone
devices.
The Workgroup Approach
Limitations of Standalones
In time, the networking market broke into facilities that were small enough to use
standalone networking devices and facilities that required the control and
flexibility of the modular hub. As this trend continued, a gap widened between
the low-cost, low-flexibility standalone devices and the more expensive, more
flexible modular chassis. Facilities that had opted to use standalone devices were
painting themselves into a corner. The standalone devices had no option for
adding more users other than expanding the network. There were no options
available for adding new networking technologies to the standalone devices, and
any upgrade to the capabilities of the network would involve a costly,
all-or-nothing replacement of all equipment.
At the same time, the limitations that nobody thought they would reach became
very real threats to the continued growth of networks reliant on standalones. That
old repeater rule, which Network Managers had been able to get around with
clever tricks of physical layout, was looming on the horizon, and user counts
continued to climb.
Standalones3-3
The Workgroup Approach
Stackables
To cope with the limited flexibility and expandability of standalones, the
stackable hub, or stackable, was developed. The stackable design allowed a series
of devices to act as a single device. With a stackable hub system, five separate
devices could act as a single device. From the point of view of network design,
this was a master stroke. A single stack, which operated as one big device, could
support as many users as four or five standalone repeaters. To the network, the
separate devices appeared to be a single device, as shown in Figure 3-2.
physical organizationlogical organization
2094n02
Figure 3-2. Physical and Logical Views of Stackables
The stackable has a smaller network footprint than an equivalent number of
standalone devices. In effect, the stack fools the network into thinking that the
users connected to the stack are in a single repeater or concentrator.
By placing stackables together in a collection called a stack, the available options
for user connections at individual workgroup locations grew dramatically. Also,
the ability to simply add stackables to the stack in order to accommodate new
users gave some measure of an upgrade path to users of stackable devices.
NOTE
Stackables, being less expensive than modular hubs and more flexible and
expandable than standalones, helped to fill in the chasm between the high-end
and low-end network strategies.
Stackable hubs of diff erent technologies cannot be mixed. Each
stack must use a single networking technology. For example,
you cannot combine Ethernet and Fast Ethernet stackables in a
single stack.
3-4Stackables
How Stacks Work
Stackable hubs communicate with one another through proprietary
interconnection cables. The cables used in Cabletron Systems’ stackable hub
solution are called HubSTACK Interconnect Cables. In Ethernet stackable
environments, these cables are short, multistrand cables with special, D-shaped
connectors that attach to ports on the backs of the stackable hubs, as shown in
Figure 3-3. In Token Ring stackable solutions, the interconnect cables are short
twisted pair segments that connect each stackable unit directly to the base unit.
The HubSTACK cables handle the communications between stackable devices,
including network traffic and management communications. The use of these
custom, short cables allows the stack to act as a single repeater or concentrator. In
essence, the cables and connectors used to chain the stackable hubs together
mimic the operation of the backplane of a modular hub.
OUT
SEH100TX INTERCONNECT
IN
OUT
SEH100TX INTERCONNECT
IN
WITH
LANVIEW®
OUT
SEHI100TX INTERCONNECT
IN
Figure 3-3. HubSTACK Interconnect Cables
HubSTACK
Interconnect Cable
2094n03
Stackables3-5
The Workgroup Approach
HubSTACK Interconnect Cables are connected in a particular sequence, from the
OUT port of the first device in the stack to the IN port of the next. This
arrangement is repeated from device to device as more stackable hubs are
incorporated in the stack, as shown in Figure 3-3.
NOTE
If it becomes necessary to disconnect a HubSTACK
Interconnect Cable from a device in the stack, disconnect the
cable at the OUT port of the previous device in the stack to
ensure proper termination of the Interconnect Cable chain.
Intelligence in the Stack
Once stackables became accepted in networks, users demanded management for
them. The response from manufacturers was to make intelligent stackable
devices. The design of intelligence and management capabilities for the stackable
devices followed a path similar to the incorporation of management into modular
chassis. Rather than requiring that all the stackables in a stack be intelligent in
order for management functions to be performed, stackable intelligence is
contained in only one device and is extended to the non-intelligent devices in the
stack. Thus, only one intelligent device is needed to manage a full stack, keeping
the costs of management down.
The basis of the intelligent stack is that the first device in each stack is the only one
that requires this management intelligence. This intelligent stackable, or base,
provides management services for the rest of the devices in its stack over the same
connection that is used for stackable to stackable communications. The
management traffic moves across the artificial backplane that is set up through
the interconnect cables.
Internetworking for Stacks
As stackable devices and stacks are easy to design and configure, and often have a
lower cost than modular networking chassis for these small-scale, simplistic
network implementations, they are often found in large enterprise networks
acting as fringe devices. These devices operate at the frontier areas of the network,
where users connect to small shared network segments.
The use of stackable devices in these frontier workgroup environments often
necessitates the use of a differing network technology, such as Fiber Distributed
Data Interface (FDDI) or Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) to make
high-bandwidth connections to the enterprise network backbone or a central
campus switch. The basic design of stackable hubs does not allow for the
incorporation of different network technologies as does a modular networking
chassis such as the Cabletron Systems Multi-Media Access Center, or MMAC.
3-6Stackables
The Workgroup Approach
Initially, Network Designers wishing to make connections from stacks to
backbone technologies would be forced to add an additional standalone device to
the network at the workgroup area. The addition of a standalone switch, bridge,
or router that supported the technology of the stack and the technology of the
backbone would allow for the interconnection, or internetworking, of the stack
and the backbone.
To assist Network Designers in creating a flexible and elegant solution to the
problem of internetworking for stacks, and to reduce the number of separate
devices that had to be shepherded at any facility, Cabletron Systems introduced
Bridge/Router Interface Module (BRIM) technology to the stackable and
standalone product line.
The BRIM is a specialized module that can be added to any BRIM-capable
Cabletron Systems device. The BRIM provides two interfaces: one to the internal
network segment of the device that it is placed in, and one to an external network.
Several BRIMs are available to support a wide variety of networking
technologies. The available BRIMs and their configuration options are detailed in
Chapter 4, PIMs and BRIMs.
By incorporating the BRIM technology into a number of standalone and stackable
devices, Cabletron Systems makes it easy to use stackable hubs and standalone
switches as frontier devices for an enterprise network, or as a small workgroup
solution at any location. The availability of Wide Area Network (WAN)
technology BRIMs also makes the BRIM-capable stackable devices ideal choices
for branch office scenarios.
Limitations of Stacks
While stackables are very well suited to a number of network implementations,
they have their limitations. As stackables were developed to fill the gap between
standalone devices and modular chassis, some networking capabilities are better
handled by modular hubs.
Modular chassis allow for the mixing of multiple technologies in a single location
much more readily than stackables. If a network implementation requires 43
Ethernet users, 11 Token Ring users, and four FDDI stations, a single modular
chassis will support these requirements, while a series of stackable and
standalone devices would have to be purchased, installed, and maintained to
accommodate the same need.
Stackables3-7
The Workgroup Approach
In addition, stackable and standalone devices are typically available for only the
most common of networking media: UTP and STP. In situations where several
users connect to the network with UTP, a few make their connections with fiber
optics, and there is a handful of existing coaxial cable segments, a solution using
stackables would have to provide a series of external transceivers at each location.
While not extremely expensive, these external transceivers can become
maintenance and design hurdles when troubleshooting or expanding the
network. Modules for modular chassis, with support for a wider variety of
networking media, are more able to accommodate different existing and future
needs.
The design of a modular chassis also allows for the segmentation and
interconnection of networks within a single chassis, the incorporation of power
redundancy and added fault-tolerance, and a longer path of growth and
expansion, both to add new users and incorporate new technologies.
3-8Stackables
Loading...
+ 102 hidden pages
You need points to download manuals.
1 point = 1 manual.
You can buy points or you can get point for every manual you upload.