Belkin F5D7000CE2 User Manual

Page 1
IMMUNITY TEST REPORT
REPORT NO.: RM920221R04A
MODEL NO.:
F5D7000
TESTED: Feb. 27 ~ Mar. 7, 2003
APPLICANT: Belkin Corporation
501 WEST WALNUT STREET COMPTON,
ADDRESS:
CA 90220
ISSUED BY: Advance Data Technology Corporation
LAB LOCATION: No.47 14th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Linkou
Hsiang, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
This test report consists of 29 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any U.S. government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample.
ILAC MRA
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
0528
1
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 2
Table of Contents
1 CERTIFICATION ..................................................................................................................... 3
2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ............................................................................................ 4
3 GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 5
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT ........................................................................................5
3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE.............................................................................................6
3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARD ...........................................................6
3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNIT.......................................................................................7
4 EMISSION TEST..................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ..........................................................................8
4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ........................................................8
4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS .............................................................................................................8
4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES..............................................................................................................9
4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD....................................................................................9
4.1.5 TEST SETUP .........................................................................................................................10
4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ..........................................................................................10
4.1.7 TEST RESULTS..................................................................................................................... 11
5 IMMUNITY TEST ..................................................................................................................13
5.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................13
5.2 GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION .....................................................13
5.3 EUT OPERATING CONDITION.............................................................................................15
5.4 ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE IMMUNITY TEST (ESD) ...................................................16
5.4.1 TEST SPECIFICATION..........................................................................................................16
5.4.2 TEST INSTRUMENT .............................................................................................................16
5.4.3 TEST PROCEDURE ..............................................................................................................17
5.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD..................................................................................17
5.4.5 TEST SETUP .........................................................................................................................18
5.4.6 TEST RESULT .......................................................................................................................19
5.5 RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST (RS) .21
5.5.1 TEST SPECIFICATION .........................................................................................................21
5.5.2 TEST INSTRUMENT .............................................................................................................21
5.5.3 TEST PROCEDURE ..............................................................................................................22
5.5.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD..................................................................................22
5.5.5 TEST SETUP .........................................................................................................................23
5.5.6 TEST RESULT .......................................................................................................................24
6 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION........................................................... 26
7 APPENDIX - INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES.................................... 29
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
2
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 3
1 CERTIFICATION
PRODUCT:
MODEL NO:
BRAND NAME:
2.4GHz wireless PCI
F5D7000
Belkin
APPLICANT: Belkin Corporation
STANDARDS: EN 301 489-1 (09-2001), EN 301 489-17 (09-2000)
EN 55022:1998, Class B
EN 61000-4-2:1995 EN 61000-4-3:1995
We, Advance Data Technology Corporation, hereby certify that one sample of the
designation has been tested in our facility from Feb. 27 ~ Mar. 7, 2003. The test
record, data evaluation and Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented
herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample's immunity
characteristics under the conditions herein specified.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
3
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 4
2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications:
EMISSION
Standard Test Type Result Remarks
Meet the requirement of limit
EN 55022:1998, Class B (Conducted
Emission)
Conducted Test PASS
Radiated Test
NA NOT APPLICABLE
Minimum passing margin is –23.49dBuV/m at 0.255MHz
EN 61000-3-2:1995 +A1:1998+A2:1998, Class A
EN 61000-3-3:1995
Harmonic current emissions
Voltage fluctuations & flicker
NA NOT APPLICABLE
NA NOT APPLICABLE
IMMUNITY
Standard Test Type Result Remarks
EN 61000-4-2:1995
EN 61000-4-3:1995
EN 61000-4-4:1995
EN 61000-4-5:1995 Surge immunity test NA NOT APPLICABLE
EN 61000-4-6:1996
Electrostatic discharge immunity test
Radiated, radio­frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test
Electrical fast transient / burst immunity test.
Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields
PASS
PASS
NA NOT APPLICABLE
NA NOT APPLICABLE
Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A
Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A
Voltage dips, short
EN 61000-4-11:1994
NOTE: Please refer to Item 3.3 for more detailed description.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests
NA NOT APPLICABLE
4
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 5
3 GENERAL INFORMATION
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT
PRODUCT 2.4GHz wireless PCI
MODEL NO. F5D7000
POWER SUPPLY 3.3VDC from host equipment
MODULATION TYPE DSSS, OFDM
TRANSFER RATE Up to 54Mbps
OPERATING FREQUENCY
2.412GHz ~ 2.472GHz
NUMBER OF CHANNEL 13
CHANNEL SPACING 5 MHz
RATED RF OUTPUT POWER LEVEL
18.69dBm (Measured Max. Average)
22.87dBm (Measured Max. Peak))
ANTENNA TYPE Dipole Antenna
DATA CABLE NA
I/O PORTS NA
ASSOCIATED DEVICES NA
NOTE: For a more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications
or User's Manual.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
5
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 6
.
3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE
The EUT was tested under following conditions:
CONDITION CONFIGURATION REMARKS
1 Transmission
2 Standby
3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARD
The EUT is a kind of computer peripheral with wireless data transmission function. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards:
EN 301 489-1 (09-2001), EN 301 489-17 (09-2001) EN 55022:1998, Class B (Conducted Emission)
EN 61000-4-2:1995 EN 61000-4-3:1995
According to clause 7.1 (table 2) and clause 7.2 (table 3) of EN 301 489-1 (09-2001), all tests have been performed and recorded as per the above standards.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
6
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 7
3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNIT
The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests.
For Conducted Emission
NO. PRODUCT BRAND MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. FCC ID
1 PERSONAL
COMPUTER
2 MONITOR ADI CM100 020058T10200182FCC DOC APPROVED
3 PS/2 KEYBOARD BTC 5121W A00800777 E5XKB5121WTH0110 4 PS/2 MOUSE LOGITECH M-S61 HCA12605710 JNZ211403 5 MODEM ACEEX 1414 980020539 IFAXDM1414 6 PRINTER EPSON LQ-300+ DCGY017059 FCC DOC APPROVED
NO. SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS
1NA
2 1.8 m braid shielded wire, terminated with VGA connector via metallic frame, w/o core
3 1.6 m foil shielded wire, terminated with PS/2 connector via metallic frame, w/o core.
4 1.8 mNon shielded wire, terminated with PS/2 connector via drain wire, w/o core.
5 1.2 m braid shielded wire, terminated with DB25 and DB9 connector via metallic frame, w/o
core.
6 1.2m braid shielded wire, terminated with DB25 and Centronics connector via metallic
frame, w/o core
For EMS
NO. PRODUCT BRAND MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. FCC ID
1 PERSONAL
COMPUTER 2 MONITOR DELL E772f NA NA 3 PS/2 KEYBOARD HP 6511-PK 99P468101CY1
4 PS/2 MOUSE HP M-S48a LZE11308376AW JNZ201213 5 MODEM GVC F-1128V1R6 96-191-113003 DK4F1128VR6 6 PRINTER HP 2225C 2931S53817 DSI6XU2225 7 ACCESS POINT D-Link DWL-2000AP NA NA
HP DTPC-16 NA FCC DOC APPROVED
HP DTPC-16 NA FCC DOC APPROVED
FCC DOC APPROVED
W06S012293
NO. SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS
1NA
2 1.8 m braid shielded wire, terminated with VGA connector via metallic frame, with core
3 1.8 m foil shielded wire, terminated with PS/2 connector via metallic frame, w/o core
4 1.8 m Non shielded wire, terminated with PS/2 connector via drain wire, w/o core.
5 1.2 m braid shielded wire, terminated with DB25 and DB9 connector via metallic frame,
w/o core.
6 1.2m braid shielded wire, terminated with DB25 and Centronics connector via metallic
frame, w/o core.
7NA
NOTE: All power cords of the above support units are non shielded (1.8m).
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
7
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 8
4 EMISSION TEST
)
4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
FREQUENCY (MHz
Class A (dBuV) Class B (dBuV)
Quasi-peak Average Quasi-peak Average
0.15 - 0.5 79 66 66 - 56 56 - 46
0.50 - 5.0 73 60 56 46
5.0 - 30.0 73 60 60 50
NOTE: (1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
(2) The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15
to 0.50 MHz.
(3) All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of
conductors and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above.
4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. CALIBRATED UNTIL
ROHDE & SCHWARZ Test Receiver ESHS30 828109/007 July 03, 2003 ROHDE & SCHWARZ Artificial Mains Network (for EUT) * ROHDE & SCHWARZ 4-wire ISN * ROHDE & SCHWARZ 2-wire ISN EMCO-L.I.S.N. (for peripheral) 3825/2 9204-1964 July 02, 2003
Software Cond-V2M1 NA NA
RF cable (JYEBAO) 5D-FB Cable-C02.01 July 5, 2003
HP Terminator (For EMCO LISN) 11593A E1-01-298 Feb. 23, 2004
HP Terminator (For EMCO LISN) 11593A E1-01-299 Feb. 23, 2004
ESH3-Z5 839135/006 July 02. 2003
ENY41 838119/028 Nov. 29, 2003
ENY22 837497/016 Nov. 29, 2003
NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. “*”: These equipment are used for conducted telecom port test only (if tested).
3. The test was performed in ADT Shielded Room No. 2.
4. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-240.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
8
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 9
4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES
a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room
with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument.
b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum
conducted interference.
c. The frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz was searched. Emission levels
over 10dB under the prescribed limits could not be reported
4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
9
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 10
4.1.5 TEST SETUP
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.
4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS
a. Connected the EUT to a computer system placed on a testing table. b. The computer system ran a test program to enable EUT under
transmission/receiving condition continuously at specific channel
frequency. c. The computer system sent "H" messages to its screen. d. The computer system sent “H” messages to modem. e. The computer system sent "H" messages to printer and the printer prints
them on paper.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
10
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 11
4.1.7 TEST RESULTS
EUT 2.4GHz wireless PCI Model F5D7000
INPUT POWER
230Vac, 50 Hz
PHASE
6dB BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Freq. Corr. Reading Value
No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB)
[MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV.
1 0.255 0.10 33.16 - 33.26 - 61.59 51.59 -28.33 ­2 0.385 0.10 29.89 - 29.99 - 58.17 48.17 -28.18 ­3 0.767 0.10 26.86 - 26.96 - 56.00 46.00 -29.04 ­4 0.894 0.10 27.21 - 27.31 - 56.00 46.00 -28.69 ­5 1.402 0.10 29.45 - 29.55 - 56.00 46.00 -26.45 ­6 7.103 0.46 26.08 - 26.54 - 60.00 50.00 -33.46 -
REMARKS:
1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
22 deg. C, 68 % RH, 1005 hPa
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
Emission
Level
Limit Margin
10 kHz
Line (L)
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
11
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 12
EUT
2.4GHz wireless PCI
Model
F5D7000
INPUT POWER
230Vac, 50 Hz
PHASE
6dB BANDWIDTH
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Freq. Corr. Reading Value
No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB)
[MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV.
1 0.255 0.10 38.00 - 38.10 - 61.59 51.59 -23.49 ­2 0.384 0.10 33.92 - 34.02 - 58.19 48.19 -24.17 ­3 0.768 0.10 26.09 - 26.19 - 56.00 46.00 -29.81 ­4 0.894 0.10 28.17 - 28.27 - 56.00 46.00 -27.73 ­5 1.404 0.10 29.69 - 29.79 - 56.00 46.00 -26.21 ­6 7.427 0.36 28.20 - 28.56 - 60.00 50.00 -31.44 -
REMARKS:
1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually.
2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary.
3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value
5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value.
22 deg. C, 68 % RH, 1005 hPa
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
Emission
Level
Limit Margin
10 kHz
Neutral (N)
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
12
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 13
5 IMMUNITY TEST
5.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Product
EN 301 489-1 (09-2001), EN 301 489-17 (09-2000)
Standard
EN 61000-4-2
Electrostatic Discharge – ESD:
8kV air discharge, 4kV Contact discharge,
Basic Standard, Specification, and Performance Criterion required
EN 61000-4-3
Performance Criterion B
Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Susceptibility Test – RS:
80-1000 / 1400-2000 MHz, 3V/m, 80% AM (1kHz), Performance Criterion A
5.2 GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION
The Requirement of Performance Criteria
Performance criteria for
1
continuous phenomena applied
Criterion A of the applicable class shall apply
to transmitters (CT)
Performance criteria for
2
transient phenomena applied to
Criterion B of the applicable class shall apply
transmitters (TT)
Performance criteria for
3
continuous phenomena applied to receivers (CR)
Performance criteria for
4
transient phenomena applied to receivers (TR)
Criterion A of the applicable class shall apply
Criterion B of the applicable class shall apply
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
13
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 14
The phenomena allowed during and after test in each criterion are clearly stated in the following table
Performance criteria
Criteria During test After test
Shall operate as intended. May show degradation of performance (see note1).
A
Shall be no loss of function. Shall be no unintentional transmissions.
May show loss of function (one or more). May show degradation of performance (see note 1).
B
No unintentional transmissions.
Shall operate as intended. Shall be no degradation of performance (see note 2). Shall be no loss of function. Shall be no loss of stored data or user programmable functions.
Functions shall be self­recoverable. Shall operate as intended after recovering. Shall be no degradation of performance (see note 2). Shall be no loss of stored data or user programmable functions.
May be loss of function (one or more). Functions shall be recoverable
by the operator.
C
Shall operate as intended after recovering. Shall be no degradation of performance (see note 2).
NOTE 1:Degradation of performance during the test is understood as a degradation to a level
not below a minimum performance level specified by the manufacturer for the use of the apparatus as intended. In some cases the specified minimum performance level may be replaced by a permissible degradation of performance.
If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance degradation is not specified by the manufacturer then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation (including leaflets and advertising) and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended.
NOTE 2: No degradation of performance after the test is understood as no degradation below a
minimum performance level specified by the manufacturer for the use of the apparatus as intended. In some cases the specified minimum performance level may be replaced by a permissible degradation of performance. After the test no change of actual operating data or user retrievable data is allowed.
If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance degradation is not specified by the manufacturer then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation (including leaflets and advertising) and what the user may reasonably expect form the apparatus if used as intended.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
14
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 15
5.3 EUT OPERATING CONDITION
1. Connected the EUT to a computer system placed on a testing table.
2. The computer system ran a test program to enable all functions of EUT.
3. Prepared the access point and placed it outside of testing area to act as communication partner for EUT.
4. Sent data to EUT by command "PIN" from the communication partner.
Note: For standby mode test, connected a coupling antenna to a spectrum analyzer and placed the
antenna near the EUT to monitor any unintentional response occurring from the EUT during the test.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
15
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 16
5.4 ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE IMMUNITY TEST (ESD)
5.4.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard: EN 61000-4-2
Discharge Impedance: 330 ohm / 150 pF
Discharge Voltage:
Air Discharge - 8 kV (Direct) Contact Discharge – 4kV (Direct/Indirect)
Polarity: Positive & Negative
Number of Discharge: Minimum 20 times at each test point
Discharge Mode: Single Discharge
Discharge Period: 1 second minimum
5.4.2 TEST INSTRUMENT
DESCRIPTION &
MANUFACTURER
KeyTek, ESD Simulator MZ-15/EC 9902287 Feb. 26, 2003
EM Test ESD Simulator ESD 30C 0201-28 Jul. 15, 2003
EM Test ESD Discharge Unit P30C 0201-28 Jul. 15, 2003
EM Test ESD Discharge Unit P30C-RFCI 0601-07 Jul. 15, 2003
FCC Coupling Decoupling
Network
FCC Coupling Decoupling
Network
MODEL NO. SERIAL NO.
FCC-801-T2 020022 Jun.12, 2003
FCC-801-T4 020033 Jun.12, 2003
CALIBRATED
UNTIL
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in ESD Room No. 1.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
16
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 17
5.4.3 TEST PROCEDURE
a. Electrostatic discharges were applied only to those points and surfaces of the
EUT that are accessible to users during normal operation.
b. The test was performed with at least ten single discharges on the pre-selected
points in the most sensitive polarity.
c. The time interval between two successive single discharges was at least 1
second.
d. The ESD generator was held perpendicularly to the surface to which the
discharge was applied and the return cable was at least 0.2 meters from the EUT.
e. Contact discharges were applied to the non-insulating coating, with the pointed
tip of the generator penetrating the coating and contacting the conducting substrate.
f. Air discharges were applied with the round discharge tip of the discharge
electrode approaching the EUT as fast as possible (without causing mechanical damage) to touch the EUT. After each discharge, the ESD generator was removed from the EUT and re-triggered for a new single discharge. The test was repeated until all discharges were complete.
g. At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to
the Horizontal Coupling Plane at points on each side of the EUT. The ESD generator was positioned vertically at a distance of 0.1 meters from the EUT with the discharge electrode touching the HCP.
h. At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to
the center of one vertical edge of the Vertical Coupling Plane in sufficiently different positions that the four faces of the EUT were completely illuminated. The VCP (dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m) was placed vertically to and 0.1 meters from the EUT.
5.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
17
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 18
5.4.5 TEST SETUP
eference Ground
e
1m
0.1m
Vertical coupling plane
0.5mm Isolation Support
ESD
EUT
Generator
470k
X4
Nearest Wall
Horizontal
80cm
coupling plane
PS
PS PSPS
R
Plan
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.
NOTE:
TABLE-TOP EQUIPMENT The configuration consisted of a wooden table 0.8 meters high standing on the Ground Reference Plane. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5 meters square connected to the protective grounding system. A Horizontal Coupling Plane (1.6m x 0.8m) was placed on the table and attached to the GRP by means of a cable with 940k total impedance. The equipment under test, was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of EN 61000-4-2:1995, and its cables were placed on the HCP and isolated by an insulating support of 0.5mm thickness. A distance of 1-meter minimum was provided between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory and any other metallic structure.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
18
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 19
5.4.6 TEST RESULT
EUT
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
2.4GHz wireless PCI
Transmission
23 deg.C, 47 % RH 1005 hPa
MODEL NO.
INPUT POWER (SYSTEM)
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
TEST RESULTS OF DIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge Level (kV)
2, 4 +/- 1, 2 NOTE NA A
2, 4, 8 +/- 3 NA NOTE A
Description of test point:
1.breaket 2. Metal of Antenna connector 3.Antenna
Polarity
(+/-)
Test P oi n t
Contact
Discharge
Air Discharge
TEST RESULTS OF INDIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge Level (kV)
2, 4 +/- 1 ~ 4 NOTE NOTE A
Polarity
(+/-)
Test P oi n t
Horizontal
Coupling Plane
Ver t i c al
Coupling
Plane
F5D7000
230Vac, 50 Hz
Performance
Criterion
Performance
Criterion
Description of test point:
1. Front side 2. Rear side 3. Right side 4. Left side
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during and after the test. No unintentional
response was found during the test.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
19
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 20
EUT
2.4GHz wireless PCI
MODEL NO.
F5D7000
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Standby
23 deg.C, 47 % RH 1005 hPa
INPUT POWER (SYSTEM)
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
TEST RESULTS OF DIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge Level (kV)
2, 4 +/- 1, 2 NOTE NA A
2, 4, 8 +/- 3 NA NOTE A
Description of test point:
1.breaket 2. Metal of Antenna connector 3.Antenna
Polarity
(+/-)
Test P oi n t
Contact
Discharge
Air Discharge
TEST RESULTS OF INDIRECT APPLICATION
Discharge Level (kV)
2, 4 +/- 1 ~ 4 NOTE NOTE A
Description of test point:
1. Front side 2. Rear side 3. Right side 4. Left side
Polarity
(+/-)
Test P oi n t
Horizontal
Coupling Plane
Ver t i c al
Coupling
Plane
230Vac, 50 Hz
Performance
Criterion
Performance
Criterion
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during and after the test. No unintentional
response was found during the test.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
20
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 21
5.5 RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST (RS)
5.5.1 TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard: EN 61000-4-3
Frequency Range: 80 MHz - 1000 / 1400 - 2000 MHz
Field Strength: 3 Vrms
Modulation: 1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
Frequency Step: 1 % of momentary frequency
Polarity of Antenna: Horizontal and Vertical
Test Distance: 3 m
Antenna Height: 1.5m
Dwell Time: at least 3 seconds
5.5.2 TEST INSTRUMENT
DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. SERIAL NO.
ROHDE & SCHWARZ Signal Generator SMY01 840490/009 July 31, 2003
KALMUS Power Amplifier LA1000V 091995-1 NA
KALMUS Power Amplifier 757LC 091995-2 NA
HOLADAY Field Probe HI-4422 89915 Mar. 05, 2003
EMCO BiconiLog Antenna 3141 1001 NA
COMTEST Compact Full Anechoic
Chamber (7x3x3 m)
HP Signal Generator E4422A US37040138 Jun. 10,2003
AR RF Amplifier 80S1G3 304334 NA
W&G E-Field Sensor 3GHz TYP-8 AD-0034 Dec. 22, 2003
W&G EM Radiation Monitor EMR-20 AB-0039 Dec. 22, 2003
R&S Power Sensor NRV-Z5 837878/038 Nov. 20, 2003
R&S Power Sensor NRV-Z5 837878/039 Nov. 20, 2003
R&S Power Meter NRVD 837794/040 Nov. 20, 2003
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in RS Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
CFAC ADT-S01 Aug. 10, 2003
CALIBRATED
UNTIL
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
21
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 22
5.5.3 TEST PROCEDURE
The test procedure was in accordance with EN 61000-4-3
a. The testing was performed in a fully-anechoic chamber. The transmit antenna
was located at a distance of 3 meters from the EUT.
b. The frequency range is swept from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz / 1400 MHz to 2000 MHz, with the signal 80% amplitude modulated with a 1kHz sinewave. The rate of sweep did not exceed 1.5 x 10
-3
decade/s. Where the frequency range is swept incrementally, the step size was 1% of momentary frequency. c. The dwell time at each frequency shall be not less than the time necessary for the
EUT to be able to respond.
d. The field strength level was 3Vrms.
e. The test was performed with the EUT exposed to both vertically and horizontally
polarized fields on each of the four sides.
5.5.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD
No deviation
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
22
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 23
5.5.5 TEST SETUP
3m measurement distance in a Full Anechoic Chamber
EUT
RF Amplifier
RF Generator and control system
Monitoring system
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of EN 61000­4-3:1996 was placed on a non-conductive table 0.8 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and signal wire according to relevant installation instructions.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
23
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 24
5.5.6 TEST RESULT
EUT
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Frequency
(MHz)
80 -1000 PASS V&H 0 3
80 -1000 PASS V&H 90 3
80 -1000 PASS V&H 180 3
80 -1000 PASS V&H 270 3
Frequency
(MHz)
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 0 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 90 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 180 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 270 3
2.4GHz wireless PCI
Transmission
22 deg.C, 56 % RH 1005 hPa
Result Polarity Azimuth
Result Polarity Azimuth
MODEL NO.
INPUT POWER
F5D7000
230Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Obser-
vation
NOTE A
Obser-
vation
NOTE A
Performance
Criterion
Performance
Criterion
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during and after the test. No
unintentional response was found during the test.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
24
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 25
EUT
2.4GHz wireless PCI
MODEL NO.
F5D7000
MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Frequency
(MHz)
80 –1000 PASS V&H 0 3
80 –1000 PASS V&H 90 3
80 –1000 PASS V&H 180 3
80 –1000 PASS V&H 270 3
Frequency
(MHz)
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 0 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 90 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 180 3
1400 - 2000 PASS V&H 270 3
Standby
22 deg.C, 56 % RH 1005 hPa
Result Polarity Azimuth
Result Polarity Azimuth
INPUT POWER
230Vac, 50 Hz
(SYSTEM)
TESTED BY: Cody Chang
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Field
Strength
(V/m)
Obser-
vation
NOTE A
Obser-
vation
NOTE A
Performance
Criterion
Performance
Criterion
NOTE: There was no change compared with the initial operation during and after the test. No
unintentional response was found during the test.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
25
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 26
6 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION
CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
26
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 27
ESD TEST
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
27
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 28
RS TEST
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
28
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Page 29
7 APPENDIX - INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES
We, ADT Corp., were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following approval agencies according to ISO/IEC 17025, Guide 25 or EN 45001:
USA FCC, NVLAP, UL Germany TUV Rheinland Japan VCCI New Zealand MoC Norway NEMKO Canada INDUSTRY CANADA R.O.C. CNLA, BSMI, DGT
Copies of accreditation certificates of our laboratories obtained from approval agencies can be downloaded from our web site: www.adt.com.tw/index.5/phtml. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:
Lin Kou EMC Lab: Tel: 886-2-26052180 Fax: 886-2-26052943
Lin Kou Safety Lab: Tel: 886-2-26093195 Fax: 886-2-26093184
Hsin Chu EMC Lab: Tel: 886-35-935343 Fax: 886-35-935342
Lin Kou RF & Telecom Lab.
Tel: 886-3-3270910 Fax: 886-3-3270892
Email: service@mail.adt.com.tw Web Site: www.adt.com.tw
The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.
Report No.: RM920221R04A Reference No.: RM920221R04
29
Issued: Mar. 14, 2003
Loading...