This CD is a compilation of articles I have found, been given or written, which are specifically for 100's,
or are of a general nature that may be of interest to 100 owners. Every owner whether they are concourse,
runner or modifier types should be able to find something of interest, there are over 480 pages so you
have a lot of reading ahead of you.
I would like to thank Barry Campbell, Chris Dimmock, John Dowsett, John Harper and Ian Howard
for permission to include their articles.
Barry’s articles were published in Flat Chat (The Monthly Magazine of the Austin Healey Owner’s Club
of NSW (Inc) Australia.), similarly with Chris Dimmock’s, John Dowsett’s and Ian Howard’s. John
Harper’s were published in Rev Counter the magazine of one of the English Clubs. Internet Downloads
are from various websites. My articles are either titled Real Healey Natter (published in Flat Chat) or 100
Technical (this is their first publication).
The Austin Service Bulletins are from the collection of the Late Bill Johnstone and I would like to thank
Margaret and Scott Johnstone for supplying them.
John Harper's Disclaimer - “Whilst every effort is made to check the information incorporated
in this series, no responsibility can be accepted for errors” - should also be taken to apply to all
the articles.
P.S.
I haven’t tried all these ideas, so let me know if the ones you try work or don’t.
Page 3
REAL HEALEY NATTER
100 ENGINE AND CHASSIS Nos.
OCTOBER 1997
A perusal of the just received Year Book showed that the 100 in front of me, and the one behind but
one, on the assembly line at Longbridge are alive and well (?) and living in Western Australia.
A list was drawn up of all BN1's with chassis numbers beginning with 224 to see if anything else
stood out, but all that was obvious was that there a lot of numberless cars on the states lists and
South Australia showed only the Model. If any one can find some pattern or has a comment to make
please send it to the Editor for Publication.
What stood out to me was that I am the onlyone without an original engine.
DAVID MOULD................... N.S.W.................BN1/224020.................1B224020M
ANDREW NOBLE............... VIC.....................BN1/224322.................
RUSSELL SEDUNARY........ N.S.W.................BN2/224323.................1B224323
JOSEPH HOMSEY............... VIC.....................BN1/224315.................1B224315
PETER RUTZOU..................VIC.....................BN1/224328.................1B224328M
RICHARD BRAY ................. N.S.W.................BN1/224588.................1B224588
DON STEVENS ................... W.A. ...................BN1/224894.................H1B224894M
DMH-000
(The Hardie's 100)
P.S. I don't know how a BN2 and two 224441's got in there, but I
suspect Gremlins were helping the list makers.
PAGE 1 OF 1
Page 4
INTERNET DOWNLOAD
LE MANS CONVERSION KIT
100 M PARTS LIST
PAGE 1 OF 3
Page 5
PAGE 2 OF 3
.
Page 6
Downloaded from www.acmefluid.com.au/larry/
PAGE 3 0F 3
Page 7
100 THREADS
The parts of the 100 that Donald Healey designed were all UNF because
this thread by that date had become the British standard. However Austin
designed parts, going back in a few cases to before W.W.II, were BSF.
Therefore the engine BN1 gearbox, spiral bevel rear axle, suspension and
hubs etc. were BSF.
All chassis parts including such things as the grease nipples were UNF
When BMC introduced onto the 100 the Hypoid rear axle, the BN2
gearbox, the BN2 front suspension and hubs they had UNF threads, these
major units having been designed for the A90 Westminster after W.W.II.
If one uses this simple guide it will hold good for about 99% of all
cases.
It is also worth noting that some early Austin parts have B.A. threads.
These were replaced later with 10-32 UNC threads.
Page 8
JOHN HARPER’S ARTICLES
No 5
A70 and 2.2 Litre Engines
Simon Tyrrell's article on page 43 of the August 1990 Rev Counter has raised some
interesting questions which will no doubt provoke many readers to put pen to paper and
send in their contributions to Rev Counter. In anticipation of this I have produced my
own input whilst the subject is "topical".
My first comment on Simon's article is that it is not just the A70 engine, which is worth
considering, but the whole four-cylinder petrol range from the Austin 16 right through to
the 2.2 litre used in taxis and commercial vehicles. It is also well worth including the 2. 5
litre which was the last application of our family of engines used in the rather mundane
EA van (engine type 25U). This variant was mounted 'under floor' tilted over on its left
(manifold) side by 55 degrees.
There were many changes to the later engines, the major one being the crankshaft, which
had a completely different flywheel flange with a conventional oil seal. The main
difference in the cylinder block, other than the bore size, between these engines and the
type used on the 100 was the lack of the tachometer drive assembly. I know of an A90
Atlantic fitted with an A70 engine, which has got around this problem by using an
electronic, positive earth rev counter fitted into the mechanical case so as to blend with
the rest of the instruments.
I personally doubt whether there is enough metal in the 2.2 litre cylinder wall to bore it
out much past the maximum .060 inch oversize. To make the bore the same as a standard
100 would equate to an oversize of .3125 inches, over five times the recommended
maximum! I have tried to measure the wall thickness on both engines with the core plugs
removed. Although this is difficult to measure accurately the wall thicknesses do seem to
be about the same. I for one would not risk going much beyond the maximum
recommendation. One might, however, just get away with boring a 2.5 litre block out to
2.6 litre standard size but no more because this is now .0975 inch oversize. The height of
the 100 pistons will need to be checked in the 2.5 litre block.
I doubt whether it is worth the risk in effort and expense of trying to fit a sleeve into a
cracked block.
The question of using Rover V8 pistons has come up before but I have not been able to
trace the source of the suggestion. Some initial, investigations have shown that the
diameter is .61 inch larger than the 100 against the maximum recommended oversize of
.040 inches. It in shorter and will not reach the top of the bore by about one eighth of an
inch. The bowl is a slightly different shape and detailed calculations are needed to see
whether a satisfactory compression ratio can be achieved and whether the high
compression ones used in the V8 saloons or the low compression used in 'the Range
Rover are the best. There are only three rings on the Rover piston against 4 or 5 on the
100 and the gudgeon pin in slightly different.
Page 1 of 3
Page 9
JOHN HARPER’S ARTICLES
No 5
Again a personal view, I would not fit valve inserts purely for running "lead free'.
The 100 head is particularly prone to cracking across the valve seats and good cylinder
heads are in short supply. The extra pressure created by a tightly fitted seat is likely to
increase the risk of cracking and the insert could become loose and cause major damage.
If a seat is badly worn then an insert may be the only answer, but I would recommend
"cutting back" the seat if at all possible before resorting to this.
I have two friends who have run their cars with an unmodified A70 head. The Only thing
to watch is that a later WA-XSTAT type of thermostat with a small diameter bulb
is used. The larger bellows type will not always go in because it is fitted in a housing
mounted on top) of the head on an A70.
One of these cars per forms well against other 100's on the track. The owner of the other
has managed to obtain a correct head, which is now fitted. The change that he noticed
was not to the performance as one might expect, but in the smoothness of running. It is
not necessary to skim anything off the head as the compression ratio with the A70 head is
reasonable at approximately 8: 1 against the standard 7,5: 1. In Geoffrey Healey's book,
AUSTIN HEALEY he describes on PAGE 232 an experiment made with an A70 engine
which was dropped because it was more fussy and “not liked". Perhaps we have
experienced something similar here!
The push rods that Simon refers to are almost: certainly the hydraulic versions fitted co
the early Austin 16. 1 drove one of these for about four years and after the initial rattle
when cold they made for a very quiet engine. They worked by allowing the oil pressure
in the rocker shaft and rockers to enter the push rod through an oil way drilled through
the centre of the push rod top cup. This filled the push rod with oil and made it 'solid".
The slight oil leakage allowed the push rod to shorten slowly as the components changed
temperature. They were replaced I believe on cost grounds and occasional failure due to
blockage caused by dirty oil. As an interesting experiment this type of push rod could be
fitted to a 100 if they were shortened to match the later valve gear. The engine would run
quieter and tappet adjustment would be eliminated.
Page 2 of 3
Page 10
JOHN HARPER’S ARTICLES
No 5
In conclusion Simon is right to point out that there are many useful parts to be obtained
from 2.2 litre engines, but these need to be checked carefully before use because of all the
minor changes and improvements that took place.
Fan Belt & Dynamo Pulley Size
The length of the fan belt is fairly critical as at one extreme the dynamo is up tight against
the cylinder block and at the other the dynamo fan could cut into the top hose particularly
if this is fitted a bit too low.
One problem sometimes Met is that a slightly larger pulley has been fitted from an
Austin A70 or early A90. This in itself will not cause a problem but a slightly longer
belt may be needed.
The two pulley sizes are 3 5/8' and 4 1/8" inches diameter. The larger one has two holes
for a special puller. The smaller, correct one has to be pulled on the flange and can easily
be broken, as it is a brittle casting.
The original BMC part number for the belt: is 2H 4238, but the most readily obtainable
and best fit replacement is the Ferodo V150 with the following dimensions:
A near equivalent, and sometimes recommended alternative, is the Ferodo V104 with an
O.C. of 46.1”. This is rather tight: and may need the dynamo to be partly removed to fit it.
Other equivalents are; Mintex TK 474 or Romac C738
But I recommend checking these for size before attempting to fit.
DISCLAIMER: Whilst every effort is made to check the information
incorporated in this series, no responsibility can be accepted for errors. However,
corrections, improvements, suggestions & additional information will be very
welcome (in writing please).
COPYRIGHT: This is held by the author. This article therefore may not be
copied or republished without his permission. To contact the author please write to
him at: 7 Cedar Avenue, Ickleford, Hitchin, Herts. SG5 3XU. or
Telephone 0462-51970.
Page 3 of 3
Page 11
A70 HEAD
The A70 head is narrower than the Healey one and has to be built up with weld to cover the water
passages in the block adjoining each cylinder.
Mine was built up with a MIG Welder by John Dowsett (a NSW Club Member) who runs Classic
Connections at Riverstone a restoration business specialising in Austin Healeys.
I cleaned up the welds on the sides to make them look nice and had the head surface ground to get the new
welded sections level with the rest of the face of the head. I then extended the water passages in the head to
line up with those in the block and gasket. It’s not an easy job but a lot cheaper than an alloy head.
The combustion chambers are smaller because of the A70’s 2.2 litre capacity, this raises the compression ratio. I
don’t know what this ratio is now, but I have to use 98 octane petrol to stop running on.
At No 4 cylinder a crack developed and I had it fixed by MG Metalock a company at Bankstown, who drill
holes along the crack and fit threaded plugs (no welding). No 2 Cylinder has now got a similar crack (you can
see the rust in the 3rd picture) and I will soon have to get that fixed.
The modified A70 head has now done abt 50,000 miles and the repair was done abt 30,000 miles ago when
the engine was rebuilt, hardened exhaust valve seats and Chev valves fitted for unleaded petrol.
Don Hardie 09 03 2009
Page 1 of 3
Page 12
After 14 ½ years and 58,509 miles after the welding, the second was repaired by Metalock Australia at
Ingleburn, the pictures below shows how. (D.H. 31/10/2009)
Page 2 of 3
Page 13
First crack repaired 1999
Second crack repaired 2009
You can see how the water holes had to be extended to match up with the Head Gasket, which would have a
source of a leak, as the original Healey head was prone to leaking at these points with full coverage out to the
edge of the gasket.
Page 3 of 3
Page 14
REAL HEALEY NATTER
FITTING A LUCAS 18ACR ALTERNATOR
Back in 1996 I returned from the South Coast via the Princes Highway after dark. As all know
Lucas (The Prince of Darkness) headlights are not their best on dark country roads. When I
joined the Hardie Household I was presented with a pair of Cibe Quartz headlight units fitted
with 120/80-watt globes and powered through a twin relay. Things were a lot brighter but this
resulted in the ammeter showing a discharge when the drain of those two 120 watt high beams
was combined with tail lights, dash lights, ignition, fuel pump and some times windscreen
wipers and heater. This meant that the 22amp generator had reached its maximum charge rate,
thus couldn't keep the system voltage up to scratch resulting in the lights not running to their full
potential. Neil Dunn had mentioned to Barry Campbell, some time ago, that running the
generator at full charge for extended periods could result in it throwing the solder out of the
commutator joints, so after many years of procrastination, I insisted on an alternator being fitted.
First change the electrical system to NEGATIVE EARTH if it is still Positive to Earth. See
relevant article.
The fitting a narrow fan belt had already been done (see relevant article) and a 45amp Lucas
18ACR, with built in regulator, was purchased from my friendly Wrecker (sorry - Auto Parts
Recycler) and painted engine green. The stiffener strip welded across the generator bracket had
to be removed, but with less strain and vibration from the narrow belt it is figured that this
should be ok, but it will be closely watched for any problem. The alternator was secured to the
bracket by a 7 1/2" length of 5/16" threaded rod and two pieces of 5/16" ID stainless steel tube
of suitable length. The original adjusting linkage was used and with the fan belt fitted and
everything tightened, SURPRISE, the pulleys lined up exactly.
See the Wide Belt Alternator article if to still have one.
The Hardies 100
Page 1 of 5
Page 15
THE WIRING WAS UPDATED 28/06/2010
The way I first wired up the alternator in 1996 was rather clumsy so I changed it. The existing
generator wires are now connected to the alternator, the yellow to one of the large spade
terminals and the yellow/green to the small lower spade terminal, I connected another wire from
the other large spade terminal to the headlight relays mounted on the right hand inner guard. The
relays originally had a wire up to the regulator, and I left it connected, so there are now two
wires supplying current to the regulator, which is now only used as a junction box.
There was an old regulator in the “precious spares” bin, so all its innards were removed leaving
the copper and steel strips underneath intact and two pieces of 20 amp wire stripped of their
insulation were soldered across them all, except the earth terminal (the one on the right of the
photo below).
Page 2 of 5
Page 16
This was then mounted in place of the original and all the wires connected to the four left hand
terminals, except the yellow/green and small yellow (the ignition light wires), which were both
connected to the right hand one (the old earth one).
From above the regulator box is still there and the changes in the wiring are hard to see.
Page 3 of 5
Page 17
USING THE REGULATOR WITHOUT MODIFICATION
IGNITION
SWITCH
Page 4 of 5
Page 18
Another way of doing it, the wires are joined with electrical connectors, wrapped in electrical
tape and secured with plastic ties.
From above the regulator box is still there and the changes in the wiring are hard to see.
Don Hardie 28/06/2010
Page 5 of 5
Page 19
100 TECH 09
WIDE BELT ALTERNATOR
In a discussion with Brad Robinson about fitting an alternator where the wide fan belt is still fitted, he mentioned
that he had seen an alternator with a split pulley (i.e.- the pulley is made in two parts) and by spacing the parts
apart with washers, it can be made to fit a 100’s wide fan belt. I don’t know if he pursued this, but what follows
is how I have done it since.
ALTERNATOR
These come in many different types so we will concentrate on Bosch ones, make sure the one you get is the split
pulley type i.e. the pulley is made up of two identical steel pressings NOT the cast iron type. If you can’t get the
split type pulley you can part the cast iron pulley, in the centre of the “V” on a lathe, into two pieces. Space out
the outer pulley side to fit the wide belt, if you can’t refit the spring washer use ‘Loctite’.
It might also be an idea to check the carbon brushes in the regulator (new ones can be purchased from most Auto
Electricians) and fit new bearings as the load of the wide belt could be greater than that of the narrow one.
Mounting and adjusting lugs are of a couple of different types the front views are shown below -
Page 1 of 2
Page 20
CHANGES TO EXISTING GENERATOR BRACKET
Remove the stiffener strip welded across the generator bracket. Secure the alternator to the bracket by a 7 1/2"
length of 5/16" threaded rod and two pieces of 5/16" ID stainless steel tube of suitable length.
Keep an eye on the generator bracket as the wide belt may put more strain and vibration on it.
For wiring see the article “ALTERNATOR – FITTING”, the Bosch alternators have a spade terminal to fit the
yellow/green wire to and a threaded terminal with a nut for the yellow wire.
Page 2 of 2
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Subject: Aluminum door finishers
How do you get the finish back on the Aluminium door finishers?
Jim
Use #00 or #000 steel wool, with a medium touch, takes time. Finish with clear, (flat / semigloss), rattle can paint. The clear will dull the shiny alu after steel wool.
I have parked next to concourse cars, hard to tell the difffff.
Kirk Kvam
Page 28
Adjusting the firmness of Armstrong lever shock absorbershttp://home.comcast.net/~rhodes/shock.html
M
Armstrong lever arm shocks are available in a variety of damping grades.
The variations are made primarily in the valving. The way these devices
work is that there are two pistons pushing oil back and forth through an
orifice. This orifice is small, so there is resistance to flow due
to the viscosity of the oil in the piston chambers. If the size of the
connecting hole was not allowed to vary, the damping would be VERY strong
for sudden jolts. It would be so strongly damped that it would be rigid
for all practical purposes. In order to accomodate sudden jolts, the oil
is allowed to force its way past the small orifice through a larger
spring-loaded valve. There are actually two separate valves in the valve
assembly. One to control the upward jolts (bounce)(#13 in the diagram) and
another to control the downward return of the suspension to its rest
position (#15).
The springs (#17,18) adjust the damping. When these units were new, there
were alternate compression springs available. Kastner said that certain shocks
had as standard a steel (grey) colored compression spring, but other shocks
had a bright copper colored spring as standard. Mine have the bright copper springs.
The "competition" spring has a dull copper or bronze color. I have seen none
of these competition springs available nor do I know the various spring
strengths to try to get new ones. There are "heavy duty" valve assemblies
for certain cars, but none that I know of for the TR's, and I doubt that they are
completely interchangeable.
In order to adjust damping today, we can tighten the nut holding the
rebound spring and insert spacers (washers)under the compression spring.
I have two sources that pretty much agree on what modifications to make.
First use 30wt oil for the hydraulic fluid (Kastner recommended 40wt).
Next adjust the springs. I have been told to use Harley-Davidson fork oil
because engine oil has detergents which will damage the rubber seals, and the
fork oil has anti-foaming additives to cut down foam when stressed to the max. You
have to use H-D oils because the others use stuff that is maximum 20wt.
My first source says to tighten the nut on the rebound spring "all the way down",
and install a 0.070" spacer under the compression spring at the bottom of the bore.
My other source says to tighten the nut on the rebound spring 2 to 4 full turns,
and a spacer of 0.040" to 0.080" under the compression spring. Select the amount
of adjustment depending on how much damping you want. I decided to try settings
near the maximum and ease off from there if they were too harsh or if there was
some other problem.
My experience is limited, but successful. I tightened the rebound spring nut
by 4 turns (which is almost all the way down). I used 2 brass washers under each
compression spring. The washers were obtained from my local hardware store for
about 15 cents each. They measured just over 1/2" diameter and 0.038" thickness.
I used a file to smooth and slightly thin the washers. I had to ream the center
holes large enough to easily pass the rebound spring. The four washers were
matched in pairs and I got 0.073" combined thickness on each side. The outer
diameter of the washers was 0.563", and the inner diameter was 0.322".
I have found that the damping is quite nice. I am using the TriumphTune 4212
rear springs (420 lbs/inch and about stock ride height). This
combination seems very satisfactory. Good damping without being harsh. Total
cost for the upgrade: $4.95 for a pint of "heavy duty" (about 30wt) fork oil
and about $1.50 for the washers.
Let me know your experiences!
Back to HOME
1 of 225/12/2008 5:11 P
Page 29
Adjusting the firmness of Armstrong lever shock absorbershttp://home.comcast.net/~rhodes/shock.html
M
2 of 225/12/2008 5:11 P
Page 30
REAL HEALEY NATTER
SEPTEMBER 1995
AUSTIN LINEAGE
The current issue of BMW Australia's Magazine has an article "Where have all the
badges gone", which looks at all the marques that BMW acquired when they bought
Rover.
The lineage of the current Rover company reads like War and Peace ie:- Austin Rover,
British Leyland, British Motor Holdings, Leyland, Rover, Alvis, Triumph, Standard,
BMC, Austin, Vanden Plas, Morris, Wolseley, Riley, MG etc.
The article starts with a double page spread of the Unipart sponsored red 2754DK with
the caption "Very British: The Austin Healey 3000 was one of the most popular sports
cars of its time, made for "real men" only."
Other extracts are as follows:"... Suffice to say that numerous members of the fairer sex have long been seriously
flirting with those mean machines of yesteryear,"
"The history of Rover reads like Liz Taylor's catalogue of spouses."
"Names like Austin Healey, MG or Triumph evoke very different associations (from
Rover and Land Rover - DMH).
The air begins to vibrate, tyres squeal, petrol gets into the blood stream: we are talking
about hot-blooded tarmac-burners, an all out driving experience, the ultimate joys of
motoring."
"Austin Healey, MG and Triumph were fierce rivals right into the sixties."
"... the big Austin Healeys belonged to the exclusive luxury car sector."
"The "Big Healeys" meanwhile, were proving powerful but highly unpredictable ..."
"Top international rally drivers dubbed them "The Pig"."
"The very first BMW was an the Austin Seven built under licence." (1928 –Don H)
"BMW is going to help Rover assert itself as an independent marque."
Page 1 of 2
Page 31
"And Rover chairman John Towers confesses that there a number of badges he
personally would like to see back on the roads. Watch this space ..."
After the recent release of the MG -F it will be interesting to see if the Healey family will
be favourable to the resurrection of the Austin Healey name on a modern design.
Last months Flat Chat had a BMW 635CSI on page 18 and The Sydney Morning Herald
article on page 25 and now this month the above. Does this mean we are being
clandestinely taken over ?
DMH-000
(THE HARDIE'S 100-4)
P.S. Barry Campbell's Technical Report last month about 10 Million points openings
on a 6, equates to only 6.67 Million on a 4. More proof that us 4s are more efficient!
Page 2 of 2
Page 32
INDEX FOR AUSTIN SERVICE JOURNALS
PAGE
Bill Johnstone’s 2 weeks old 100 in 1954..........19
Accelerator control Rods & Ball Joints 1...........20
Accelerator control Rods & Ball Joints 2...........21
Amendments to Literature 1 ..............................22
Amendments to Literature 2 ..............................23
Amendments to Literature 3..............................24
Amendments to Literature 4 ..............................25
Amendments to Literature 5 ..............................26
Amendments to Literature 6 ..............................27
Amendments to Literature 7 ..............................28
Amendments to Literature 3 ..............................29
Amendments to Literature 9 ..............................30
I tracked down the cheapest price on the Internet to Bearing King in the UK. When I got them I found that the
outer bearing was 0.25” wider than the original angular contact ball bearing which would have moved the nut
out so that the split pin couldn’t be fitted.
I was talking to John Dowsett and he said he fitted a BN2 hub to a BN1 stub axle by using a brass bush to
bring the outer end of the stub up to 7/8” from ¾”, so I checked in the Timkem catalogue and found a new
Cone (1380), with a bore of 7/8”, that would fit the Cup (1330) and reduce the bearing width to only 0.10”
wider than the original bearing, which made it possible the fit the split pin. I tracked 2 down to RockAuto in
the US. I got 2 bronze bushes (3/4” ID x 7/8” OD x 1¼” Long) from Small Parts & Bearings in Queensland.
The bushes had the inside of one end tapered to the same angle as the stub axle, cut to length and the outside
skimmed down so the bearing cone was a push fit over it. They were then fitted to the stubs using Loctite
Super Bearing mount.
To fit the Inner Bearing the hub had to be machined to allow for the wider Timken bearing. The length of the
machining differed from the Austin Service Bulletin’s 0.267” due to the actual bearing dimensions being
different to the Timken Catalogue; it turned out to be 0.2405”.
The bearing spacer’s small end had it’s inside diameter turned out to fit over the bronze bush and the large
end shortened to give an overall length of 1.2145”.
The bearing cups were fitted to the hubs and the end play adjusted as per the BJ8 manual with BN2 to early
BJ8 shims from AH Spares in the UK.
The bearings were then packed with wheel bearing grease fitted to the stubs (don’t forget the split pin,
awkward but necessary) and the brakes and wheels reinstalled.
Have fun
Don Hardie 13 02 10
Page 1 of 2
Page 60
Page 2 of 2
Page 61
NOTE: -
The 100 Workshop Manual says that later models have a
spacer which must be correctly adjusted. See the BN2
supplement in that manual.
Don Hardie
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
TECHNICAL REPORT(Part)
BALANCING WIRE WHEELS
SEPTEMBER 1998
Balancing splined wire wheels on a computerised dynamic balancer is not always successful and on
car balancing is usually done. However, on-car balancing only corrects static balance and you may
still experience shimmy.
I’ve made up a splined hub adapter that overcomes the fitting problems so the
dynamic balancing can now be done.
There is two sizes available to suit 28.56mm (1 1/8 “) shafts and 40mm shafts of balancing
machines. Other sizes are not catered for. These two sizes are the most common and the kit is
available to all members, give me a call when you want to borrow the kit.
Have fun
Barry Campbell
The adaptor is in the hands of the Club’s Equipment Officer.
Barry is the Equipment Officer at present.
DON HARDIE 22/07/02
May 1999
Installation & Balancing Instructions
for Spline Drive Wire Wheels
Used with permission of British Wire Wheel
Balancing
There are many opinions and misconceptions regarding balancing of "spline-drive" or
“center-lock" wheels. To properly balance this special type of wheel, it must be centered in
exactly the same manner that it is centered on your par. Figure #1 illustrates the two "seating
surfaces" (the inside rear bevel, and the outside front bevel) that center the wheel. These two
bevels are typically "machined" surfaces -- as opposed to exact surfaces that remain "rough cast".
Note that the actual splines drive the wheel but do not center it - in fact, worn splines (on either
the wheel or the hub of the car) can negatively affect the centering of the wheel, and cause the
wheel to appear out-of true.
PAGE 1 OF 5
Page 100
Figure 1 Figure 2
What Won't Work
With the advent of the state-of-the-art computer spin-balance machine, accuracy of balancing
wheels was increased many-fol d over the most popular prior method - the bubble balance.
However, the computer spin-balancer cannot properly balance the spline-drive wheel unless it is
centered in the manner described above. In most cases the operator of the spin-balancer will
attem pt to center wheels with the use of two cones (see Figure 42). The cones rarely center the
wheel properly. The computer will advise the operator to apply weights to this non-centered
wheel, which will usually throw the balance off even more than if there were no weights on the
wheel at all. For those of you who doubt this, or get convinced by your local tire shop that they
can balance your wire wheel on their spin-balancer with the "cone" method, try the following. If
they get as far as putting weights on the wheel (that is, they haven't told you that the wheel is outof -true -- remember -- it's not centered), it doesn't necessarily mean that it is balanced. As they're
removing the wheel from the machine, ask them to rotate the wheel 180 degrees, put it back on the
machine, and spin it again. If the wheel were properly centered and is balanced, their readings
should indicate that no weights are needed. If the readings show that more than a quarter ounce is
required-remove the weights and re-read the above.
What Will Work
The alternative is to find a spin-balancer (probably 1 chance in 100) that has a set of centering
adapters made for center-lock wheels. These were made by Hoffman Co. about 20 years ago;
don't confuse Hoffman spin-balancer machines with the center-lock adapters. Those adapters
duplicate the rear bevel and include a "cap" which duplicates the outside bevel of the
knock-off. In our opinion, this is the best way to balance your spline-drive wire wheels. A
properly balanced wheel will almost always require weights on both tl-.e front and rear sides of
the rim.
Excellent alternatives to the above include the simple bubble balance - this is the manner in which
many of our wheels were balanced when the cars were new. Spin balancing on the car is another
alternative. It is very useful when the car's suspension is worn and/or brake drums are out of
balance. On-the-car balancing can be used after either of the above methods, to "fine tune" the
balance on the car. Draw-backs of on-the-car balancing are that you can't rotate tires, and if you
remove a tyre or wheel you must ensure it is returned in exactly the same position on the splined
hub.
PAGE 2 OF 5
Loading...
+ hidden pages
You need points to download manuals.
1 point = 1 manual.
You can buy points or you can get point for every manual you upload.