AMX DX-TX-WP-BL User Manual

Cabling for Success with DXLink
Author: Curry Kinyon Co-Author: Jeff Howes Co-Author: Ann Yanecek
CABLING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
TM
Page 1 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
CAB LING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4
Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 4
DXLINK PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................. 5
Basic Cable Information ............................................................................................................................ 5
Installed Cable Channel Performance ...................................................................................................... 6
Enova DGX Link Quality Reporting ........................................................................................................... 6
CABLE QUALITY ............................................................................................................................... 6
Cable Type ................................................................................................................................................ 6
Internal Channel Parameters .................................................................................................................... 6
External Channel Parameters ................................................................................................................... 7
Cable Shielding ......................................................................................................................................... 7
Cable End Termination ............................................................................................................................. 8
Bandwidth Performance ........................................................................................................................... 9
CABLE TOPOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 9
Cable Length ............................................................................................................................................. 9
Cable Management ................................................................................................................................ 10
Patch Panels ............................................................................................................................................ 11
Patch Cables............................................................................................................................................ 11
ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................. 12
Grounding ............................................................................................................................................... 12
Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) .................................................................................................................. 13
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) ....................................................................................................... 14
Electrical Motors ..................................................................................................................................... 14
Proximity ESD Events .............................................................................................................................. 14
Ambient Operating Conditions ............................................................................................................... 15
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 15
Appendix A .................................................................................................................................... 16
Page 2 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
CAB LING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cabling For Success with DXLinkTM
After a full year of supporting deployments of DXLink solutions, it has become clear that using unshielded cable is problematic. Installations with unshielded cable often have reliability issues with the DXLink connection caused by changing environmental conditions. Therefore, our revised minimum required cable type for DXLink systems is shielded CAT6 and that it’s installation follow the recommended guidelines in this document.
DXLink™ delivers 10.2 Gb/s throughput over shielded category cable. It accomplishes this by leveraging the transport layer of HDBaseT technology. audio / video content at distances up to 100 meters when properly deployed and configured. The following white paper provides detailed information on how cable quality, cable topology and the environment affect the performance of DXLink systems. In summary, suffice it to say that looping, poor cable end termination, using patch blocks, inadequate grounding of the cable/rack/building and running cables near noisy devices will negatively affect the quality of the signal path and cause issues such as offline events and blinking of video. Below are some helpful guidelines to follow when deploying your DXLink system.
Best Practices
For best “it just works” results shielded Cat6A cable is recommended If you have a cable deployment scheme running many cables in a bundled structure through
conduit or cable trays and have runs that traverse near large EMI or ESD generators you should use shielded Cat6A cable to achieve reliable 100 meter performance
For optimal performance:
Keep the cable runs as short as possible Follow cable shielding and termination techniques defined in this document Follow Equipment and Building Ground requirements defined in this document DXLink twisted pair cable runs for DXLink equipment shall only be run within a common building Keep the DXLink cables as isolated as possible from noisy power cables Avoid running cables in parallel with power runs, try to cross at 90 degree angles Avoid running near noisy devices (motors) or inductive loads Avoid tie wrapping and/or tightly bundling DXLink cables together Avoid making sharp corners/bends in cable runs Minimize coiling of the cables Minimize patch panels & patch cables (every connection introduces losses) Make sure connectors are properly terminated, higher quality shielded cables require
more intricate terminations
DXLink is state of the art technology capable of delivering
Page 3 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
CAB LING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
INTRODUCTION
A multitude of aspects contribute to the overall system performance of DXLink products when installing structured cabling solutions. The capabilities of this solution to pass Uncompressed HDMI Video, Uncompressed HD Audio, Ethernet, Serial, IR and Power require a cable bandwidth of 250 MHz or greater and cabling infrastructure performance that supports throughput of 10 Gb/s. Based on the bandwidth required to transmit this amount of information we recommend following industry standard practices designed for 10 Gigabit Ethernet. In order to perform at its best, the HDBaseT transport layer utilized in DXLink requires specific rules which include management of not only to the cabling system back-bone but also the patch locations and end-point runs. The primary focus of this paper is to review the key challenges and solutions facing the structured copper cabling media required to properly support the DXLink technology.
OVERVIEW
To achieve a high performing and reliable installation, several key factors need to be considered and managed which all have a combined impact. When any one of these factors is not adhered to the likelihood of inconsistent performance or sporadic video, audio and network drop-outs increase, to the point where the products can fail to function at all if faced with several conditions not being met.
Three main areas need to be addressed in order to optimize the performance of DXLink installations. They all have a direct impact on the performance of the overall DXLink system and also have relational impact on each other, such that improving in one area can often provide ability to overcome shortcomings in one of the other areas. A balancing of these three roles will allow for a successful and robust DXLink system.
Page 4 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
Cat6A F/UTP (shielded and bonded) Belden 10GX 10GX62F (Riser) Belden 10GX 10GX63F (Plenum)
Cat6 F/UTP (shielded cable) Belden 2412F DataTwist (Riser) Belden 2413F DataTwist (Plenum)
CAB LING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
DXLINK PERFORMANCE
Depending on the link quality between DXLink devices over structured cabling, the product performance can vary from a solid and reliable system to a system which may have intermittent problems or links that fail to function altogether. The most common symptom of poor link quality due to deficiencies in the structured cabling is intermittent momentary dropping of video and audio but can also degrade to the point that end-points fall offline and can even cause a link not to function at all, incurring a failure to link.
This section touches on specific guidelines which can be referenced to ensure success from the beginning of the project all the way through installation providing validation of link quality after the job has been completed.
BASIC CABLE INFORMATION
Pre-installation cable selection should be the first order of business when designing the overall installation. The cable selection should be determined by the combination of these factors: the environment, the length of DXLink cable runs and the planned cable topology. As shown in this document they all play a role in overall system performance.
The primary goal is to negate any of the external environmental factors that can impact performance while ensuring a quality transport path from end-point to end-point. The minimum required cable to provide a successful system installation is a shielded Cat6 cable. To ensure robust performance in installations with unmanaged environmental factors, stepping up to Cat6A STP or Cat7 is recommended. STP is used in this document to cover the wide range of Shielded Twisted Pair implementations listed below; the severity of environmental factors should be considered when selecting between them: SF/FTP, S/FTP, F/FTP, SF/UTP, U/FTP and F/UTP
‘S’ represents Screened braid shielding (also sometimes referenced as ‘Sc’) ‘F’ represents Foil shielding ‘U’ represents Unshielded ‘TP’ represents Twisted Pair
And notations left of the ‘/’ defines outer cable shielding while right of the ‘/’ defines shielding of the individual wire pairs. Some graphical examples are shown on page 8 of this document.
Note: Not all cable manufacturers use the same definitions regarding shielding nomenclature.
For best performance a shielded Cat6A cable is suggested, we recommend the following (or equivalent) to provide a good price vs. performance point while minimizing environmental impact.
When using a Cat6 F/UTP cable we recommend the following (or equivalent).
A complete Belden shielded Cat6A cable and cable management solution is available here:
http://www.belden.com/docs/upload/CheatSheet_10GX_FT_Shielded_Systems.pdf
Page 5 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
CAB LING F O R SUCC E SS WI TH DX L I NK
White Paper
INSTALLED CABLE CHANNEL PERFORMANCE
Once cable is installed there are generally several factors that can affect link quality such as cable quality, cable termination, grounding techniques, building ground differences, cable length, cable
topology, service loops, patch panel quality and quantity, cable kinks, etc… In order to understand how
the overall cable paths perform from one end of DXLink to the other end of DXLink, you can utilize tools such as the Fluke DTX 1800 to characterize a number of specifications defined by TIA-568-C.2. Any cable type chosen should have its end-to-end performance meet the installed Channel Requirements specified by TIA-568-C.2.
ENOVA DGX LINK QUALITY REPORTING
Another method for determining the link integrity for a given DXLink path is provided if it is connected to an Enova DGX populated with DXLink Input/Output boards. The Enova DGX 64, 32, 16 and 8 Enclosures can report measured link integrity values which are useful in qualifying the overall system or troubleshooting paths that are presenting problems. When connected to the Enova DGX Enclosure, reporting of each DXLink Input/Output port can be captured which presents a decibel value for each of the four twisted pairs on a given port. If any of these MSE values reports >= -15dB (i.e. -13dB) the link quality is in a range that can affect performance. See Appendix A for instructions and examples of how link quality reporting through the Enova DGX Enclosure can be acquired.
CABLE QUALITY
CABLE TYPE
AMX requires as a minimum using CAT6 shielded cable installed per the recommended guidelines in this document.
As you might expect, the higher the quality of the category cable the more robust the DXLink system will perform. The gains to be made in this area are improved bandwidth, improved internal channel parameters, improved external channel parameters and reduced susceptibility to environmental EMI and ESD events.
When using Cat6 STP, Cat6A STP and Cat7 which meet their correlating TIA-568-C.2 performance requirements, the DXLink runs can fully reach the 100m specification when bundled in groups of 6+1 (TIA-568 Alien Crosstalk Bundle). Using the heavier shielded versions of them, such as S/FTP, provide improved resistance to uncontrolled environmental EMI and ESD events.
The benefits of these increasing grades of cable type provide significant improvement in both internal and external channel parameters. Specifically of note are:
INTERNAL CHANNEL PARAMETERS
Insertion Loss / Max Attenuation: The measure of signal loss that occurs from transmitter to
receiver.
o
Often referred to as the cable bandwidth, typical factors that affect insertion loss include conductor size, insulation and jacket material type, frequency bandwidth, number of patch connections and cable length.
Return Loss: The measure of how much signal gets reflected back to the source due to impedance
variations in the Channel.
Page 6 AMX White Paper | Cabling for Success with DXLinkTM | V 3.1 6.2013
Loading...
+ 11 hidden pages