ST AN3232 Application note

AN3232
Application note
Mounting recommendations
for STAC
Introduction
®
boltdown packages
The general purpose of this application note is to provide guidelines for mounting various types of STAC by soldering. Specific attention is paid to the STAC244B and STAC265B boltdown styles and the STAC244F and STAC265F flangeless styles, which are used to encapsulate numerous VDMOS and LDMOS technology products.
This application note is intended to provide mounting tips and design guidelines. For actual data please refer to the relevant product datasheet.
STAC
is a registered trademarks of STMicroelectronics.

Figure 1. STAC boltdown packages

®
packages in amplifiers or application boards (PCB) by means of bolting or
August 2011 Doc ID 17594 Rev 3 1/26
www.st.com
Contents AN3232
Contents
1 Epoxy sealed, non-hermetic RF power packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 Exceptional thermal performance potential of the STAC package
concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3 Heatsink selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4 Core preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5 Mounting base surface conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6 Thermal interface material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7 Seating plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8 Printed circuit board (PCB) considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
9 Package attachment to core by means of boltdown method . . . . . . . 16
9.1 Required hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
9.2 Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
9.3 Procedure summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
10 Package attachment to thermal base by means of soldering . . . . . . . 20
10.1 Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
10.2 Solder reflow equipment and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11 Electrical connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
12 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
13 Revision history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2/26 Doc ID 17594 Rev 3
AN3232 List of tables
List of tables
Table 1. Preferred copper core thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table 2. Surface conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 3. Common TIMs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 4. Recommended screw torque . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Table 5. Pb-free process - package classification reflow temperatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 6. Document revision history . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Doc ID 17594 Rev 3 3/26
List of figures AN3232
List of figures
Figure 1. STAC boltdown packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Figure 2. Drying times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 3. Infrared imaging of a STAC package . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Figure 4. Pocket depth consideration (mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 5. Lead bending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 6. Package cut and pads layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 7. Ideal screw-center spacing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Figure 8. First boltdown mounting steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 9. SEHO FDS “MAXIPOWER” reflow oven . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 10. Component level temperature profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4/26 Doc ID 17594 Rev 3
AN3232 Epoxy sealed, non-hermetic RF power packages

1 Epoxy sealed, non-hermetic RF power packages

Epoxy sealed products, such as the STAC package family, should be received in an N2­backfilled, vacuum-sealed ESD bag containing a desiccant. This decreases the possibility of moisture uptake by the package materials during transit and long-term storage. STAC packages carry a moisture sensitivity rating of 3 (MSL3), but have demonstrated capabilities of up to MSL1.
Even with such shipping methods, it is advised to store epoxy sealed packages in the original containers, or in a dry box, until required for soldering. When the environmental history of devices is not well-known, such as after a prolonged storage period, it is a well­practiced safety measure to bake non-hermetic packages for 24 hrs at 125 °C prior to soldering operations. These conditions can be accelerated or lengthened as a function of temperature, up to the limits imposed by shipping containers, by trays, or by device maximum ratings. Refer to Figure 2 for recommended baking conditions.

Figure 2. Drying times

Under no circumstances should any epoxy-sealed package be treated as a hermetically sealed package, due to the fact that such sealing materials are not impervious to moisture ingress. However, it is important to point out that RF Power packages are typically constructed using engineering ceramics and polymers which, on their own, demonstrate high resistance to moisture penetration, such as the proprietary liquid crystal polymer materials upon which STAC packages are realized.
Doc ID 17594 Rev 3 5/26
Epoxy sealed, non-hermetic RF power packages AN3232
Power RF packages typically require a reliable, low thermal resistance attachment to a heatsink. In this respect, nothing out-performs a direct attachment of the device flange, or thermal base, to the heatsink by means of soldering. This can be accomplished using any of the PbSn or Pb-free soldering methods used throughout the electronic industry. The final soldering step may be preceded by a hot-solder dip of the package base and/or leads, as required for situations that require attention to Au content of the solder joint. Alternatively, the packages may be inserted into an amplifier using a pick-and-place methodology, so that complete soldering is accomplished in a single reflow.
Some amplifier assemblies require a manual approach for device positioning on a PCB while soldering bases to copper core heatsinks. In such manual operations STAC boltdown style packages have the unique possibility of serving as a built-in clamp to accomplish both tasks expeditiously. These manual efforts are rewarded by an extremely low thermal resistance, achieved by an ultra-thin solder joint case-to-heatsink, referred to as the Rth
. At the same time, the need to allocate valuable amplifier real estate to specialized
HS
C-
clamping fixtures is eliminated.
The approaches to soldering RF transistors in amplifier housings are as numerous as the quantity of RF package outlines. While the traditional demand for high levels of ruggedness in RF devices assures an intrinsic high tolerance to a wide variety of assembly methods, the high-stress nature of any soldering operation requires careful consideration. Users ultimately assume responsibility for developing and qualifying their soldering processes, and therefore it is strongly recommended to fully evaluate temperature profiles at all steps in the soldering procedure to avoid excessive peak temperatures and ramp rates.
When amplifier assemblies require cleaning after soldering operations, the use of a non­reactive cleaning agent is recommended. All residue from reactive flux should be removed according to the flux supplier's recommendations.
If a non-aqueous cleaning method is employed, it must be followed by cleaning with DI water to remove all ionic contamination. It is recommended to periodically check the conductivity of the DI rinse to insure that levels of ionic contamination are as low as possible. In cases where heavy ionic contamination is present, multiple DI rinses in isolated baths should be used. Proceed from the most to the least contaminated rinsing system to maximize cleaning effectiveness.
In general it is recommended to minimize the use of flux, to use no-clean flux, or to adopt fluxless soldering techniques. When there is doubt as to the behavior of residual flux or flux levels, consider a two-step solder approach. Since the PCB and other components may involve flux, an initial soldering step of the majority of non-critical components can be done, followed by a thorough cleaning. The second solder step, with greatly reduced flux content, can be planned for more critical components such as epoxy sealed RF transistors. An added benefit of a two-step operation is that non-solder thermal interface materials (TIMs), such as thermal compounds, are not influenced by aggressive flux cleaning.
Following DI rinsing operations, the entire assembly should be baked, as determined by user experimentation, before power is applied. It is suggested to perform this drying at 125 °C for 24 hrs, if all components are rated for this condition. A longer bake time is recommended at lower temperatures. Refer to Figure 2 for some suggestions.
OEM equipment operating conditions should be specified for operation only in a “non­condensating” environment. If there is a question of humidity in ambient conditions in power cycling, a heating/drying cycle is recommended before power is applied.
6/26 Doc ID 17594 Rev 3

AN3232 Exceptional thermal performance potential of the STAC package concept

2 Exceptional thermal performance potential of the
STAC package concept
RF Power transistors are made up of hundreds of thousands of heat generating cells, organized in an ultra-compact geometry at the silicon chip level. The necessity to generate RF power at ever-increasing frequencies leads directly to the shrinking of silicon geometries to ever-smaller portions of electrical wavelength. The result is unprecedented power density, unmatched by most devices in the semiconductor industry. Indeed, such a power density approaches those frequently encountered in the realm of high-energy physics.
The highest priority of the power transistor package is efficient evacuation of the incredible thermal flux from the active regions of semiconductor chips to the external environment. Great advances made to improve packaging systems and materials have enhanced this effect, including the use of high thermal conductivity materials, the reduction of thermal path length, and the improvement of thermal interfaces by way of superior flatness coupled with enhanced TIMs.
A demonstration of the high power density of one device in the STAC family is shown in
Figure 3 by way of infrared imaging. In this example, the junction temperature of the
semiconductor chips, dissipating a total of 400 W continuously, is maintained uniformly below the maximum allowable temperature of 200 °C, while the case is elevated almost to its maximum of 85 °C.

Figure 3. Infrared imaging of a STAC package

As is the case with many RF power devices, thermal resistance is dominated by the chips themselves, as can be ascertained in Figure 3. In addition, the thermal conductivity of silicon decreases with increasing temperature, therefore it is common practice to evaluate power transistors near the maximum operating temperatures. Taking this into account, the observed thermal resistance, or R
of approximately 0.30 °C/W for this STAC product, is
thJ-C
Doc ID 17594 Rev 3 7/26
Exceptional thermal performance potential of the STAC package concept AN3232
approximately 30 % lower than it's ceramic package cousin, the ubiquitous GEMINI package.
This situation affords amplifier designers extreme flexibility in terms of trade-offs between power dissipated, output power, power density, and MTTF. For example, higher power can be dissipated for a target junction temperature, or, on the other hand, increased MTTF can be achieved for a target case temperature with equivalent power density.
While such flexibility often shifts the burden of cooling to system level, this decision is often the more cost effective solution or easier to manage. Alternatively, such a solution could translate into the ability to move an amplifier system from ground level to pole top. In the end analysis, the choice of heatsinking system depends on the specific device and application needs.
8/26 Doc ID 17594 Rev 3
Loading...
+ 18 hidden pages