|
AN1126 |
® |
APPLICATION NOTE |
|
|
|
CURRENT SHARING OF THE L4973 |
|
IN A MULTIPHASE APPLICATION |
|
|
|
by Domenico Arrigo & Giuseppe Gattavari |
INTRODUCTION
The L4973 family is a 3.5A monolithic step-down dc-dc converter, available in POWERDIP18( 12+3+3) and SO20L (12+4+4) plastic packages. The operating input supply voltage range is from 8V to 55V, and the output ranges from 3.3V (L4973D3.3) and 5.1V(L4973D5.1) to 40V. Other regulated outputs below 3.3V are also possible (See Application Note AN938).
Using two L4973D is possible to deliver up to 7A with a good sharing between the two sections or a redundant 3.5A. The two devices work at a switching frequency of 200kHz. At Vcc = 24V, Vo = 5.1V at 7A the efficiency is 87%. At 3.5A output, the efficiency is 90%.
Electrical Specifications
Input Voltage range |
8V-30V |
Output Voltage |
5.1V ±3% (Line, Load and Temperature) |
Output Voltage Ripple |
47mV (0.92%/Vo) |
Output Current range |
0 to 7A |
Max Output Ripple current |
15% |
Min Iomax Current limit |
8A |
Switching frequency |
200kHz |
Current Sharing Operating Principle
The current sharing configuration, shown in fig. 1, is based upon two L497x devices U1 and U2. Any device in the L497x family can be used for this purpose.
The U1 regulator acts as a master which regulates the output voltage.
The second section U2 works as a current follower. Its task is to deliver an output current equal to the
Figure 1. Current Sharing Operating Principle
|
|
FB |
|
I - |
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
Vcc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U1 |
OUT |
Rs |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
L497x |
|
|
|
|
COMP |
|
|
|
|
Vcc |
|
GND |
Cint |
Rint |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Vout |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
OP-AMP |
|
|
|
|
FB |
|
I + |
Cout |
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
Vcc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U2 |
OUT |
Rs |
|
|
COMP |
|
|
|
|
|
L497x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GND |
|
|
May 1999 |
1/16 |
AN1126 APPLICATION NOTE
current delivered from the first section. An op-amp compares the voltage drop through Rs which is proportional to the current delivered from the U2 section with the voltage drop across Rs proportional to the current delivered from the U1 section. The Cin and Rin components introduce a pole and a zero in the current loop which allows integration of the error signal. The current loop regulates I+ equal to I- . As a result the output current delivered to the load is Iout = 2I- = 2I+ for every load condition.
Current Sharing Accuracy
The accuracy of the current sharing between the two sections depends on the op-amp offset voltage, Voff, and the value of Rs and its accuracy . The offset voltage introduce an error in the sensing voltage , Vs=Rs Iout/2 . The relative percentage current error due to the offset is given by :
e%= (D I/I) × 100 = (Voffset × 100) / (Rs × Iout)
This error is minimum at maximum load. The larger the value of Rs, the smaller the error. Rs must be chosen as a compromise between error minimization and system efficiency.
For example with Iout = 7A choosing Rs = 25mW ,considering a maximum offset voltage of 3mV (LM358A), the maximum relative percentage error is 1.7% (120mA @ Iout = 7A).
The total error is given by the sum of this error plus the error due to the sensing resistor ( which corresponds to its accuracy of 1% ). So the maximum error is 2.7% (190mA @Iout = 7A)
Layout Hints
The PCB layout requires some care. The power paths of the two sections must be as short and symmetrical as possible. The current sensing wires must be parallel and short to avoid induced noises. The sensing resistor must be non inductive. The ground pins of the two devices must be at the same voltage and connected to the output ground point.
Figure 2. Layout hints.
|
|
FB |
L |
I - |
|
|
Vcc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U1 |
OUT |
Rs |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
L497x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to the |
|
|
COMP |
|
|
current |
Vout |
|
|
|
FB |
||
Vcc |
|
|
|
||
|
GND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cout |
GND |
|
|
to the |
|
GND |
|
|
GND |
current |
|
|
|
|
FB |
I + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vcc |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U2 |
OUT |
Rs |
|
|
COMP |
|
|
|
|
|
L497x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syncronization or Multiphase
In a current sharing application the two sections can be synchronized. This permits a reduction of noise induced from one section to another. In this case a single RC network can be used for both the oscillators and the two SYNC pins are connected.
In many application, instead of synchronizing the two oscillator, it is useful to introduce a delay between the two PWM signals in order to achieve a multiphase application. The phase shift between the two PWM signals can be easily achieved by two methods :
2/16
AN1126 APPLICATION NOTE
Case 1) Programmable Phase Delay.
Fig. 3 shows how to program a phase delay with a monostable multivibrator whose on time is equal to the desired phase delay.
Case 2) Fixed Phase Delay.
Figure 3 shows a method of setting a delay time for the 2nd PWM section to be slightly larger than the ON-time of the 1st PWM section.
Figure 3. Case 1) Programmable Phase Delay.
Vcc
R1
U1
OSC L4973D3.3
PWM OUTPUTS
Vcc
U2
OSC L4973D3.3
U1
C2 |
GND |
SYNC |
Vref=5.1 |
SYNC |
GND |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
α |
|
|
1B Vcc CLR |
|
|
||
|
|
M74HC123 |
|
U2 |
||
|
|
GND 1A |
_ |
|
|
|
|
|
1Q |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
Figure 4. Case 2) Programmable Phase Delay.
|
|
|
PWM OUTPUTS |
Vcc |
OUT1 |
|
L |
|
|
||
U1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R1 |
|
|
Rs |
L4973D3.3 |
|
U1 |
|
OSC |
|
||
C2 |
Vref=5.1 |
|
|
Vcc |
|
|
|
|
|
Vout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18V * |
|
SYNC |
L |
Cout |
Vcc |
|
U2 |
|
U2 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
OUT2 |
|
Rs |
OSC |
L4973D3.3 |
|
0 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
* necessary if Vcc>18V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/16 |
AN1126 APPLICATION NOTE
Multiphase Benefits
The main benefits are :
Minimization of the RMS current through the input capacitor therefore increasing of the efficiency and reducing of the capacitor cost and size.
Minimization of ripple current through the output capacitor and ground path.
Fast load transient response. Improved reliability /MTBF.
RMS current through the input capacitor are equivalent in Case 1) and Case 2). Even though the circuitry of Case 2) is simplifier than Case 1), Case 1) provides the opportunity to optimize this ripple current.
Minimization of the RMS Current Through the Input Capacitor.
In Case 1) , Figure 3 shows the RMS current through the input capacitor, referred to the output current (Iout), for various phase delays, a , of the two PWM sections. This assumes a duty cycle of 0.5 and a ripple current through the coil of 0.1× Iout.
For a equal to a half period (180 degrees of phase delay) the RMS current is approximately zero. If the two PWM signals are synchronized the RMS value is Irms = Iout/2. For example if Vout = 5V and Iout = 7A the Output Power is 35W. If the Input capacitor has an ESR of 100mOhm the phase delay allows a savings of 1.23W which corresponds to the 3.5% of the power delivered to the load.
Figure 5. RMS current through the input capacitor for a different phase delay, a , with a duty cycle of 0.5.
[ A ] |
|
|
|
α=120° |
α=90° |
|
|
|
Iout/2 |
|
α=180° |
0
- Iout/2
α=40 ° |
α=0 ° |
0
time
Assuming the same duty cycle for the two sections, the RMS Current through the input filter for different duty cycle, considering a phase delay of the second PWM signal equal to the Ton of the first section ( Case 2) ), is given approximately (the output current ripple can be negleted for this calculation) by the following formula:
|
``````````ç ÷ |
||
ï |
ÖæIout × Ö2 |
|
2 |
ï |
× d |
ö - (Iout × d)2 |
|
ï |
è 2 |
|
ø |
IRMS(a) = ï |
|
|
|
ï |
|
|
2 |
`````````````ê ú |
|||
ïïÖéIout × Ö2 |
× (3 |
× d -1) ù - (iout × d)2 |
|
|
ë 2 |
|
û |
where d = duty cycle
if d £ 0.5
Multiphase (1)
if d > 0.5
4/16
AN1126 APPLICATION NOTE
Iout is the total output current equal to the sum of the individual output currents delivered from the two sections.
Figure 6. Input current of the two sections for different duty cycle.
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
||
PWM1 |
PWM1 |
|
|
PWM1 |
PWM2 |
PWM2 |
|
|
PWM2 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
||
0 |
t |
0 |
t |
0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
t |
|
d<0.5 |
|
d=0.5 |
d>0.5 |
If the PWM signals are synchronized without any delay, the RMS current through the input filter as a function of duty cycle is :
Irmssync (d) = Ö```````````````````(Iout × Ö`d ) - (Iout × d) |
synchronized (2) |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Figure 7. RMS current through the input capacitor with synchronization and with multiphase.
|
[ A ] |
Iout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Iout/4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irms ( δ ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irmssync |
|
|
|
|
|
Irmssync |
( δ ) |
Iout/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iout/4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
δ |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 7 shows Equations (1) and (2) versus the duty cycle.
The maximum RMS current with synchronized PWMs is 1/2 of the total output current and it is obtained for d = 0.5.
In contrast, considering the multiphase PWM, the RMS value is 0 with d = 0.5 and the max value of the RMS value is 1/4 of the total output current. So the maximum RMS current with multiphased PWMs is a half of that syncronized PWMs.
For every duty cycle condition the RMS current with multiphase application is lower than the case with synchronized PWMs and it is quite regular for different duty cycles.
It allows to optimize the input capacitor for the real working condition. In the synchronized case the input capacitor has to be dimensioned for the worst case of d = 0.5 that can be far from the real working conditions.
5/16