The cover page shows the PASCO AP-8210A Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus with a light-emitting diode (LED)
light source. A power supply for the light source, a bottle of non-volatile oil, and a spray atomizer are included
(but not shown).
The PASCO Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus is designed to conduct the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment where the
electric charge carried by a particle may be calculated by measuring the force experienced by the particle in an
electric field of known strength. Although it is relatively easy to produce a known electric field, the force exerted
by such a field on a particle carrying only one or several excess electrons is very small. For example, a field of
1000 volts per centimeter would exert a force of only 1.6 10
one excess electron. This is a force comparable to the gravitational force on a particle with a mass of 10
million millionth) gram.
-9
dyne (1 dyne = 10-5 newtons) on a particle bearing
-l2
(one
The success of the Millikan Oil Drop experiment depends on the ability to measure forces this small. The behavior
of small charged droplets of oil, having masses of only 10
-12
gram or less, is observed in a gravitational and an
electric field. Measuring the velocity of fall of the drop in air enables, with the use of Stokes’ Law, the calculation
of the mass of the drop. The observation of the velocity of the drop rising in an electric field then permits a calculation of the force on, and hence, the charge carried by the oil drop.
Although this experiment will allow one to measure the total charge on a drop, it is only through an analysis of the
data obtained and a certain degree of experimental skill that the charge of a single electron can be determined. By
selecting droplets which rise and fall slowly, one can be certain that the drop has a small number of excess electrons. A number of such drops should be observed and their respective charges calculated. If the charges on these
drops are integral multiples of a certain smallest charge, then this is a good indication of the atomic nature of electricity. However, since a different droplet has been used for measuring each charge, there remains the question as
to the effect of the drop itself on the charge. This uncertainty can be eliminated by changing the charge on a single
drop while the drop is under observation. An ionization source placed near the drop will accomplish this. In fact, it
is possible to change the charge on the same drop several times. If the results of measurements on the same drop
then yield charges which are integral multiples of some smallest charge, then this is proof of the atomic nature of
electricity.
The measurement of the charge of the electron also permits the calculation of Avogadro’s number. The amount of
current required to electrodeposit one gram equivalent of an element on an electrode (the faraday) is equal to the
charge of the electron multiplied by the number of molecules in a mole. Through electrolysis experiments, the faraday has been found to be 2.895 x 10
expressed in the m-k-s system as 9.625 x 10
14
electrostatic units (e.s.u.) per gram equivalent weight (more commonly
7
coulombs per kilogram equivalent weight). Dividing the faraday by
the charge of the electron,
yields 6.025 x 10
23
molecules per gram equivalent weight, or Avogadro’s Number.
Equation for Calculating the Charge on a Drop
An analysis of the forces acting on an oil droplet will yield the equation for the determination
of the charge carried by the droplet. Figure 1 shows the forces acting on the drop when it is
falling in air and has reached its terminal velocity. (Terminal velocity is reached in a few milliseconds for the droplets used in this experiment.) In Figure 1, v
coefficient of friction between the air and the drop, m is the mass of the drop, and g is the
acceleration of gravity. Since the forces are equal and opposite:
Figure 2 shows the forces acting on the drop when it is rising under the influence of an electric field. In Figure 2, E is the electric intensity, q is the charge carried by the drop, and v
r
is
the velocity of rise. Adding the forces vectorially yields:
In both cases there is also a small buoyant force exerted by the air on the droplet. Since the
density of air is only about one-thousandth that of oil, this force may be neglected.
Eliminating k from equations ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) and solving for q yields:
To eliminate m from equation ( 3 ), one uses the expression for the volume of a sphere:
where a is the radius of the droplet, and is the density of the oil.
To calculate a, one employs Stokes’ Law, relating the radius of a spherical body to its velocity of fall in a viscous
medium (with t
he coefficient of viscosity, ).
Stokes’ Law, however, becomes incorrect when the velocity of fall of the droplets is less than 0.1 cm/s. (Droplets
having this and smaller velocities have radii, on the order of 2 microns, comparable to the mean free path of air
molecules, a condition which violates one of the assumptions made in deriving Stokes’ Law.) Since the velocities
of the droplets used in this experiment will be in the range of 0.01 to 0.001 cm/s, the viscosity must be multiplied
by a correction factor. The resulting effective viscosity is:
where b is a constant, p is the atmospheric pressure, and a is the radius of the drop as calculated by the uncorrected
form of Stokes’ Law, equation ( 5 ).
Substituting
in equation (6) into equation (5), and then solving for the radius a gives:
eff
Substituting equations (4), (5), and (6) into equation (3) yields:
The electric intensity is given by:
Where V is the potential difference across the parallel plates separated by the distance d.
2
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A -Introduction
q
4d
3
----------
1
g
------
9
2
------
3
1
2
---
1
1
b
pa
------
+
---------------
1
2
---
v
fvrvf
+
V
------------------------
( 10 )=
Substituting equations ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) into equation ( 6 ) and rearranging yields:
The terms in the first set of brackets need only be determined once for any particular apparatus. The second term is
determined for each droplet, while the term in the third set of brackets is calculated for each change of charge that
the drop experiences.
The definitions of the symbols used, together with their proper units for use in equation ( 10 ) are:
q – charge carried by the droplet
d – separation of the plates in the droplet viewing chamber
– density of oil
g – acceleration of gravity
– viscosity of air
b – constant, equal to 8.13 × 10
-8
N/m
p – barometric pressure
a – radius of the drop in cm as calculated by equation ( 5 )
*The Squibb #5597 Mineral Oil has a measured density of 886 kg/m
.
However, the density of different lots of mineral oils may vary
slightly. Therefore, for greatest precision, you should determine the
density of the mineral oil you are using.
It is recommended that you store the equipment in the original packing
material. After unpacking, remove the foam insert from inside the
droplet viewing chamber. Store the plate charging switch on the
hook-and-loop tabs located on the top of the platform.
4
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Equipment
plate charging
switch
Figure 4: Apparatus platform
LED light source
brightness
adjustment
bubble level
LED power
jack
focusing wire
thermistor
resistance table
reticle focusing ring
viewing scope
support rod
mount
support rod
clamping
screw
ionization
source lever
droplet hole
cover
droplet viewing
chamber
housing
droplet
focusing ring
thermistor
connectors
plate voltage
connectors
Parts Diagram
Components of the Platform
•droplet viewing chamber (see details in Figure 5)
•viewing scope (30X, bright-field, erect image) with reticle (line separation: 0.5 mm major divisions and 0.1
mm minor divisions), reticle focusing ring, and droplet focusing ring
•LED (light emitting diode) light source with a brightness adjustment knob
•focusing wire (for adjusting the viewing scope)
•plate voltage connectors, 4 mm diameter
012-13093B5
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusEquipment
®
WARNING: Do not apply voltage to the thermistor connectors!
lid
housing
droplet hole
cover
upper
capacitor
plate
spacer
lower
capacitor
plate
thorium-232
electrical
connector
housing
pins
base of
apparatus
Figure 5: Droplet viewing chamber
•thermistor connectors, 4 mm diameter (the thermistor is mounted in the lower capacitor plate in the droplet
viewing chamber)
.
•thermistor resistance table (resistance versus temperature)
•ionization source lever with three positions: Ionization ON, Ionization OFF, and Spray Droplet Position.
•bubble level
•support rod mounts and screws to permit mounting of the platform on support rods (so the viewing scope can
be raised to a comfortable eye level)
•leveling feet (3)
•plate charging switch on a one meter cord (to prevent vibration of the platform during the switching activity).
Components of the Droplet Viewing Chamber
•lid (chamber cover)
•housing
•convex lens (not shown).
•upper capacitor plate (brass)
•plastic spacer (approximately 7.6 mm thick)
•lower capacitor plate (brass)
•alpha source, thorium-232, 0.00185 microcurie
•electrical connection to the upper capacitor plate
Note: Thorium-232 is a naturally occurring, low level
alpha-particle emitter with a half-life of 1.41 x 10
10
years. It is
not regulated in its use and poses no hazard to the user of the
PASCO Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus..
Equipment Setup
Adjusting the environment of the experiment room
1.Make the room as dark as possible, while allowing for
adequate light to read the multi meter and stopwatch and
to record data.
2.Insure that the background behind the apparatus is dark.
3.Select a location that is free of drafts and vibrations.
6
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Equipment
Figure 6: Equipment setup
large rod
stand
support
rods
high voltage DC
power supply
adjust to
comfortable eye
level
•NOTE: Use care when handling the brass upper capacitor plate and the plastic spacer
plate to avoid scratching them.
•NOTE: All surfaces involved in the measurement should be as clean as possible to prevent inaccurate readings.
focusing wire
upper capacitor
plate
lower capacitor
plate
spacer
Figure 7: Focusing wire
Adjusting the height of the platform and leveling it
1.Place the apparatus on a level, solid table
with the viewing scope at a height that permits the experimenter to sit erect while
observing the droplets through the scope.
One possible setup is to mount the apparatus
on two support rods (ME-8736) on the large
rod stand (ME-8735). See Figure 6.
2.Using the attached bubble level as a reference, level the apparatus with the leveling
screws on the rod stand or the leveling feet
on the apparatus (depending on your setup)..
Measuring plate separation
1.Disassemble the droplet viewing chamber
by lifting the housing straight up and then
removing the upper capacitor plate and the
space plate. (See Figure 5.)
2.Use a micrometer to measure the thickness of the spacer plate. (The thickness is equal to the plate separation
distance, d).
•Be sure that you are not including the raised rim of the spacer plate in your measurement. The accuracy of this
measurement is important to the degree of accuracy of your experimental results.
3.Record the measurement.
.
Aligning the Optical System
Focusing the viewing scope
1.Reassemble the plastic spacer and the upper capacitor
plate onto the lower capacitor plate. Replace the housing, aligning the holes in its base with the housing pins.
(See Figure 5.)
•NOTE: The thorium-232 source and the electrical connection on the lower capacitor plate fit into appropriately sized holes on the plastic spacer.
2.Unscrew the focusing wire from its storage place on the
platform and carefully insert it into the hole in the center
of the upper capacitor plate (Figure 7.)
3.Turn the brightness adjustment knob on the light to optimize the contrast between the illuminated pin and the dark background.
012-13093B7
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusEquipment
®
Check to make sure that the AC adapter is the correct voltage: 100, 117, 220, or 240 V.
Figure 8: Ionization source
lever settings
housing
ionization
ON
position
spray
droplet
position
ionization
OFF
position
ionization
lever
Measure the voltage at the plate voltage connectors and not across the capacitor plates.
There is a ten megaohm resistor in series with each capacitor plate to prevent electric shock.
4.Plug the included AC adapter into a receptacle (100 to 240 VAC) and connect the cable to the power jack on
the side of the LED light source..
5.Bring the reticle into focus by turning the reticle focusing ring.
6.View the focusing wire through the viewing scope and bring the wire into sharp focus by turning the droplet
focusing ring.
•NOTE: Viewing will be easier for experimenters who wear glasses if the viewing scope is focused without
using the glasses.
7.Return the focusing wire to its storage location on the platform.
Functions of Controls
Ionization source lever
1.When the lever is in the ionization OFF position, the ionization source
is rotated away from the area of the droplets, so virtually no alpha particles enter the area. In this position, the alpha source is shielded on all
sides.
2.At the ON position, the ionization source is rotated toward the area of
the droplets and the area is exposed to the ionizing alpha particles from
the thorium-232.
3.At the Spray Droplet Position, the chamber is vented by a small hole
that allows air to escape when oil droplets are being introduced to the
chamber.
Plate charging switch
The plate charging switch has three positions:
1.TOP PLATE –: negative binding post is connected to the upper capacitor plate.
2.TOP PLATE +: negative binding post is connected to the lower capacitor plate.
3.PLATES GROUNDED: plates are disconnected from the high voltage supply and are electrically connected
to each other.
Adjusting and Measuring the Voltage
1.Connect the high voltage DC power supply to the plate voltage connectors using banana plug patch cords.
2.Adjust the voltage to deliver about 500 VDC. Use the digital multi meter to measure the voltage delivered to
the plate voltage connectors.
.
8
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Equipment
The temperature inside the droplet viewing chamber should be determined periodically
(about every fifteen minutes).
Figure 9: Atomizer tip
tip
shaft
droplets
If repeated “squirts” of the atomizer fail to produce any droplets in the viewing area
but produce a rather cloudy brightening of the field of view, the hole in the upper
capacitor plate or in the droplet hole cover may be clogged. Refer to the Maintenance
section for cleaning instructions.
Determining the Temperature of the Droplet Viewing Chamber
1.Connect the multi meter to the thermistor connectors on the platform in order to measure the resistance of the
thermistor that is embedded in the lower capacitor plate.
2.Refer to the Thermistor Resistance Table located on the platform to find the temperature of the lower brass
plate. The measured temperature corresponds to the temperature inside the droplet viewing chamber.
.
Experimental Procedure
1.Complete the reassembly of the droplet viewing chamber by placing the droplet hole cover on the upper
capacitor plate and then placing the lid on the housing. (See Figure 5.)
•NOTE: The droplet hole cover has a hole in one side and a hole in the bottom. The hole in the bottom lines up
with the small hole in the center of the upper capacitor plate.
•NOTE: The droplet hole cover prevents additional droplets from entering the chamber once the experiment
has started.
2.Measure and record the plate voltage and the thermistor resistance (temperature).
Introducing the droplets into the chamber
1.Put non-volatile oil of known density into the atomizer, such as the included Squibb #5587 Mineral Oil, density of 886 kg/m
3
.
2.Insure that the tip of the atomizer is pointed down (90° to the shaft; see Figure 9). Prepare the atomizer by rapidly squeezing the bulb until oil is spraying out.
3.Move the ionization source lever to the “Spray Droplet Position” to allow
air to escape from the chamber during the introduction of droplets into the
chamber.
4.Place the tip of the atomizer into the hole on the lid of the droplet viewing
chamber.
5.While observing through the viewing scope, squeeze the atomizer bulb with one quick squeeze. Then squeeze
it slowly to force the droplets through the hole in the droplet hole cover, through the droplet entry hole in the
upper capacitor plate, and into the viewing area space between the two capacitor plates.
6.When you see a shower of drops through the viewing scope, move the ionization source lever to the ‘OFF’
position.
.
•NOTE: The exact technique of introducing droplets will need to be developed by the experimenter. The
object is to get a small number of drops, not a large, bright cloud from which a single drop can be chosen.
012-13093B9
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusEquipment
®
•NOTE: Remember that the droplets are being forced into the viewing area by the pressure of the atomizer.
Excessive pumping of the atomizer can cause too many droplets to be forced into the viewing area and, more
importantly, into the area between the chamber wall and the focal point of the viewing scope. Drops in this
area prevent observations of drops at the focal point of the scope.
•NOTE: If the entire viewing area becomes filled with droplets so that no one drop can be selected, either wait
three or four minutes until the droplets settle out of view, or turn off the DC power supply and disassemble the
droplet viewing chamber, thus removing the droplets.
•NOTE: When the amount of oil on the parts in the droplet viewing chamber becomes excessive, clean the
parts as detailed in the Maintenance section. Remember that the less oil that is sprayed into the chamber, the
few times the chamber must be cleaned.
Selection of the Droplet
1.From the drops in view, select a droplet that both falls slowly (about 0.02 to 0.05 mm/s) when the plate charging switch is in the “Plates Grounded” position, and can also be driven up and down by turning the plate
charging switch to “TOP PLATE –” or “TOP PLATE +”.
•HINT: A droplet that requires about 15 seconds to fall the distance between the major reticle lines (0.5 mm)
of the viewing scope will rise the same distance, under the influence of an electric field (1000 V/cm) in the
following times with the following charges:
Table 1.1:
TimeExcess electron
15 s1
7 s2
3 s3
•NOTE: If too many droplets are in view, you can clear out many of them by turning the plate charging switch
to “TOP PLATE –” (connecting power to the capacitor plates) for several seconds.
•NOTE: If too few droplets have net charges to permit the selection of an appropriately sized and charged
drop, move the ionization source lever to the ON position for about five seconds.
2.When you find an appropriately sized and charged oil droplet, fine tune the focus of the viewing scope.
•NOTE: The oil droplet is in best focus for accurate data collection when it appears as a pinpoint of bright
light.
3.Turn the brightness adjustment knob on the light to optimize the contrast between the illuminated drop and the
dark background.
Collecting Data on the Rise and Fall of the Oil Droplet
1.Measure the rise velocity (when the plates are charged) and the fall velocity (when the plates are not charged)
about 10 to 20 times. Maneuver the droplet up and down as needed using the plate charging switch.
•NOTE: The greatest accuracy of measurement is achieved if you time from the instant that the bright pinpoint
of light passes behind the first major reticle line to the instant that the pinpoint of light passes behind the second major reticle line. (These reticle lines are 0.5 mm apart.)
2.Calculate the charge on the droplet. If the result of this first determination for the charge on the drop is greater
than 5 excess electrons, you shown select slower moving droplets in subsequent measurements.
10
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Equipment
q
4
3
---
g
b
2p
------
2
9v
f
2g
-----------
+
b
2p
------
–
3
vfvr+
Ev
f
---------------
=
3.Introduce more oil droplets into the chamber using the procedure previously described and select another
droplet.
4.Measure the rise and fall velocities of the selected droplet about 10 to 20 times or until the charge changes
spontaneously or the droplet moves out of view.
5.Bring the droplet to the top of the field of view and move the ionization lever to the ON position for a few seconds as the droplet falls.
6.If the rising velocity of the droplet changes, make as many measurements of the new rising velocity as you
can (10 to 20 measurements).
7.If the droplet is still in view, attempt to change the charge on the droplet by introducing more alpha particles,
as described previously, and measure the new rising velocity 10 to 20 times, if possible.
8.Repeat step (7) as many times as you can.
9.Record the plate potential, the oil density, the viscosity of the air at the temperature of the droplet viewing
chamber (see Appendix A), and the barometric pressure for each set of velocity measurements.
•NOTE: It is desirable to observe as many different charges on a single drop as possible.
Computation of the Charge of an Electron
•The following formula is derived from equation ( 10 ) in the Introduction. Use it to calculate the charge of an
electron.*
*The formula is derived from equation ( 10 ) using SI units as defined below.
The definitions of the symbols used and SI units:
q – charge carried by the droplet [C]
d – separation of the plates in the droplet viewing chamber [m]
r – density of oil [kg/m
g – acceleration of gravity [m/s
h – viscosity of air in [N• s / m
b – constant, equal to 8.20 x 10
p – barometric pressure [Pa]
3
]
2
]
2
] (See Appendix A)
-3
Pa • m
a – radius of the drop [m]
v
– velocity of fall [m/s]
f
v
– velocity of rise [m/s]
r
V – potential difference across the plates [V]
Note: The accepted value for e is 1.60 x 10
-19
C
012-13093B11
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusEquipment
®
a
b
2p
------
2
9v
f
2g
-----------
+
b
2p
------
–=
m
4
3
---
a3=
m
4
3
---
b
2p
------
2
9v
f
2g
-----------
+
b
2p
------
–
3
=
q
mg v
fvr
+
Ev
v
----------------------------
=
q
4
3
---
g
b
2p
------
2
9v
f
2g
-----------
+
b
2p
------
–
3
vfvr+
Ev
f
---------------
=
Figure 10: Place a white paper screen in the
droplet viewing chamber.
1. Cut a 32 by 6
mm strip of white
paper and bend
back tabs of 6 by
6 mm.
2. Place the
paper screen so
the light path is
not blocked and
so the light is
reflected towards
the viewing
scope.
light path
paper
screen
spacer
viewing
scope
cross-section of
the droplet
chamber housing
Top
View
Suggested Procedure for Computation of the Charge of an Electron:
1.Use the following equation to calculate the radius, a, of the oil drop:
2.Substitute the radius, a, from the above equation to find the mass, m, of the oil droplet:
3.Substitute m from the calculation above into the equation for computing the charge of an electron:
Using a Projecting Microscope with the Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus
To demonstrate Millikan’s experiment for an entire classroom on a TV screen or computer monitor, use a projecting microscope such as the Ken-A-Vision VideoFlex Microscope (PASCO Model SE-7227).
Procedure
1.Put a white paper screen in the droplet viewing
chamber to reflect more light:
a. Prior to focusing the viewing scope (see Equipment
Setup section, Aligning the Optical System), place
a white paper screen in the droplet viewing chamber
as illustrated in Figure 10.
b. Proceed with step 1 of Aligning the Optical System.
2.Align and focus the projecting microscope:
a. Set up the projecting microscope as directed in the
manufacturer’s instructions.
b. After completing the setup and focusing of the Mil-
likan Oil Drop Apparatus on the oil droplets, care-
fully slide the eyepiece of the projecting microscope
over the eyepiece of the Millikan Apparatus.
c. Focus the projecting microscope as directed in the
manufacturer’s instructions.
12
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Historical Information
Historical Information
Historical Notes
The Greeks were the first to report the effects of electricity when they recorded that rubbed amber attracted light
objects. However, theories explaining this phenomenon did not emerge until 1747, when Benjamin Franklin proposed that an electrical fluid or fire existed in certain amounts in all matter. An excess of this fluid in matter would
produce a positive charge and a deficiency of this fluid would produce a negative charge. A slightly different theory was put forth by the physicist Symmer twelve years later. He proposed that matter in a neutral state shows no
electrical properties because it contains equal amounts of two weightless fluids, which were called positive and
negative electricity respectively.
Franklin also postulated the existence of an electrical particle small enough to easily permeate matter. Faraday’s
experiments in electrolysis, which demonstrated that when a current is passed through an electrolyte, the masses of
compounds deposited at opposite electrodes are in proportion to the chemical equivalent weights of the compounds, also supported Franklin’s concept of an elementary electrical particle. The fluid theories, along with a theory explaining electricity as a state of strain in matter, were the prime explanations of electrical phenomena until
late in the 19th century.
Early Determinations of e
The word “electron” was first suggested in 1891 by Dr. G. Johnstone Stoney as a name for the “natural unit of electricity,” namely, that quantity of electricity that must pass through a solution in order to liberate at one electrode
one atom of hydrogen or any univalent substance. It would follow that the charge of the electron multiplied by the
number of molecules in a gram mole would give the amount of electricity required to deposit one gram mole by
electrolysis. This quantity had been determined by Faraday to be 9650 absolute electromagnetic units of electricity. Using this method, Stoney obtained a value of 0.3 x l0
Stoney’s estimation of Avogadro’s number).
-10
e.s.u. (The Kinetic Theory provided the basis for
The first experimental attempt to measure the charge of an ion was made by Townsend in the late 1890’s. He had
observed that during electrolysis of sulfuric acid, positively charged hydrogen and oxygen gasses were produced
(although there were one million million neutral molecules to every charged one). This method was used to produce an ionized gas that was then bubbled through water to form a cloud. For his determination of e Townsend
proceeded in the following manner:
1.He assumed that in saturated water vapor each ion condensed moisture about it, so that the number of ions
was the same as the number of droplets.
2.He determined with the aid of a quadrant electrometer the total electrical charge per cubic centimeter carried
by the gas.
3.He found the total weight of the cloud by passing it through drying tubes and determining the increase in
weight of these tubes.
4.He found the average weight of the water droplets constituting the cloud by observing their rate of fall under
gravity and computing their mean radius with the aid of a purely theoretical law known as Stokes’ Law.
5.He divided the weight of the cloud by the average weight of the droplets of water to obtain the number of
droplets which, if assumption 1 is correct, was the number of ions, and he then divided the total charge per
cubic centimeter in the gas by the number of ions to find the average charge carried by each ion, that is, to find
1
e.
1
Condensed from Robert A. Millikan’s book, The Electron (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993, pp. 45-46 and used with per-
mission of the publishers.
Townsend achieved results in the range of 3 x l0
Townsend’s and obtained a value of 6 x l0
-l0
-l0
e.s.u. for e. J. J. Thompson, in 1900, used a method similar to
e.s.u. In both of these methods, however, the first assumption (each
012-13093B13
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusHistorical Information
®
droplet formed around only one ion) proved to be only approximately correct, and the experimental methods were
not adequate to provide a precise determination of e.
H.S. Wilson improved upon Townsend’s and Thompson’s work by adding two brass plates which could be connected to a 2000 volt battery. A cloud was formed between these plates (not charged) and the falling velocity of the
cloud recorded. A second cloud was then formed and its falling velocity observed in an electric field (the plates
being charged). Since the two velocities are proportional to the forces acting on the drops
2
, and the velocity of the
cloud with the plates uncharged determines the size and mass of the drops by Stokes’ Law, Wilson was able to
obtain a value of 3 x 10
-10
e.s.u. for e. Since Wilson’s measurements were always made on the top of the cloud, or
the drops with the smallest charge (the more heavily charged drops being driven downward faster in the field), the
assumption of one ion per drop was validated.
2
With the plates uncharged, the force is mg where m is the mass of the drop and g is the acceleration of gravity. With the plates
charged, the force is mg ± Ee
where E is the electric intensity between the plates and en is the charge on the drop.
n
Millikan’s Determination of e
Millikan improved upon Wilson’s design by using a higher potential across the plates so that the falling velocity of
the cloud could not only be impeded, but actually reversed. Some charged drops moved upward, some moved rapidly downward, while the uncharged drops were unaffected and continued to drift downward. A few drops, which
carried a charge of the proper magnitude so that the force of gravity on the drop almost equaled the force of the
electric field on the drop, remained in view. By varying the potential of the plates, Millikan could just balance
these drops. This situation proved to be a significant improvement for it permitted all measurements to be made on
a single drop. By using this balanced drop method, Millikan was able to observe the properties of individual ions
and to determine whether different ions carry one and the same charge.
In the following passage, taken from the “Philosophical Magazine” for February, 1910, Millikan describes the
actual procedure of the experiment.
“The observations on the rate of fall were made with a short-focus telescope placed about 2 feet away from the
plates. In the eyepiece of this telescope were placed three equally spaced cross-hairs. . . . A small section of the
space between the plates was illuminated by a narrow beam from an arc light, the heat of the arc being absorbed by
three water cells in series. The air between the plates was ionized by 200 mg of radium of activity 20,000 placed
from 3 to 10 cm away from the plates. A second or so after the cloud was produced
3
the radium was removed . . .
and the field thrown on by means a double-throw switch. If the drops were not found to be held suspended by the
field the potential difference was changed . . . . The cross-hairs were set near the lower plate, and as soon as a sta-
tionary drop was found somewhere above the upper cross-hair, it was watched for a few seconds to make sure that
it was not moving and then the field was thrown off and the plates short-circuited by means of the double-throw
switch, so as to make sure that they retained no charge. The drop was then timed by means of an accurate stop
watch as it passed across the three cross-hairs, one of the two hands of the watch being stopped at the instant of
passage across the middle cross-hair, and the other at the instant of passage across the lower one. It will be seen
that this method of observation furnishes a double check upon evaporation; for if the drop is stationary at first, it is
not evaporating sufficiently to influence the reading of the rate of fall, and if it begins to evaporate appreciably
before the reading is completed, the time required to pass through the second space should be greater than that
required to pass through the first space. It will be seen from the observations which follow that this was not, in
general, the case.
It is an exceedingly interesting and instructive experiment to watch one of these drops start and stop, or even
reverse its direction of motion, as the field is thrown off and on. I have often caught a drop which was just too light
to remain stationary and moved it back and forth in this way four or five times between the same two cross-hairs,
watching it first fall under gravity when the field was thrown off and then rise against gravity when the field was
thrown on . . . .
Furthermore, since the observations . . . are all made upon the same drop, all uncertainties as to whether conditions
can be exactly duplicated in the formation of successive clouds obviously disappear. There is no theoretical uncertainty whatever left in the method unless it be an uncertainty as to whether or not Stokes’ Law applies to the rate of
fall of these drops under gravity.”
3
The italicized phrases indicate a slight change in wording, for purposes of clarity, from Millikan’s original work.
14
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Historical Information
S
C
V
B
G
D
A
X
to pump
e
m
p
M
N
s
a
w
d
c
g
c
g
Figure 11: Diagram of Millikan’s Apparatus
7
A, atomizer through which the oil spray is blown into the cylindrical vessel, D. G, oil tank to keep the
temperature constant. M and N, circular brass plates, electric field produced by throwing a 10,000-volt
battery B. Light from arc lamp a after heat rays are removed by passage through w and d, enters chamber
through glass window g and illuminates droplet p between plates M and N through the pinhole in M.
Additional ions are produced about p by X-rays from the bulb X.
Experiments with the balanced water drop produced the value of 3.422 x l0
-l0
e.s.u. for e. The most important
aspect of these experiments, however, was the observation by Millikan that a rising drop would suddenly change
its velocity. This phenomenon could easily be produced by placing a radioactive source near the drop. This demonstrated that the drop had “captured” an ion, thus changing the charge of the drop and its respective velocity.
The Exact Evaluation of e
In 1909 Millikan set about building a new piece of apparatus designed for the observation of single oil drops for
extended periods of time. Since water drops had proved inadequate for prolonged observation of this ion catching
phenomenon, Millikan used oil drops, which were not affected by evaporation. The apparatus consisted of two
parallel brass plates separated by a distance of 16 mm by ebonite blocks. Non-volatile oil was sprayed into the
chamber above the plates, and small drops slowly found their way into the area between the plates through a small
hole in the top plate. The drops were illuminated by a beam from a carbon arc lamp and were observed through a
measuring scope. The details of the construction of Millikan’s final apparatus built in 1914 (which was basically
similar to his earlier devices, and for the purposes of this discussion can be considered the same as the earlier
pieces of apparatus) attest to the effort expended in obtaining the most accurate evaluation of e possible. The following passage is part of Millikan’s description of the apparatus, including a diagram of the device.
“Accordingly, I built two years ago a new condenser having surfaces which were polished optically and made flat
to within two wave-lengths of sodium light. They were 22 cm. in diameter and were separated by three pieces of
echelon plates, 14.9174 mm. thick, and having optically perfect plate surfaces. The dimensions of the condenser,
therefore, no longer introduced an uncertainty of more than about 1 part in l0,000.”
5
“Complete stagnancy of the air between the condenser plates was attained, first, by absorbing all the heat rays
from the arc lamp by means of a water cell 80 cm. long, and a cupric chloride cell, and secondly, by immersing the
whole vessel in a constant temperature bath of gas-engine oil (40 liters), which permitted, in general, fluctuations
of not more than 0.02 °C during an observation.”
6
012-13093B15
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusHistorical Information
®
5
Millikan, Robert A., p. 115, 6Millikan, Robert A., p. 110, 7Millikan, Robert A., p. 116.
With this new apparatus hundreds of measurements on different drops were made, for the purpose of both making
an exact evaluation of e and proving or disproving the atomic theory of electricity. The value of e that was
obtained from these five years of work was 4.774 x 10
precise determination of Avogadro’s number by X-ray diffraction measurements on crystals permitted the calculation of e to be 4.803 x 10
-10
e.s.u. The discrepancy was later traced to Millikan’s too low value for the viscosity of
-10
e.s.u. This value of e was accepted until 1928 when a
air.
Atomic Nature of Electricity
The atomic nature of electricity is best exemplified by the following table taken from Millikan’s data:
Table 1.2:
n4.917 x nObserved Chargen4.917 x nObserved Chargen4.917 x nObserved charge
14.917-----734.4234.471363.9263.68
29.834-----839.3439.381468.8468.65
314.75-----944.2544.421573.75-----
419.6619.661049.1749.411678.6778.34
524.5924.601154.0953.911783.5983.22
629.5029.621259.0059.121888.51-----
Millikan makes the following comments about this table.
“In this table 4.917 is merely a number obtained . . . from the change in speed due to the capture of ions and one
which is proportional in this experiment to the ionic charge. The column headed 4.917 x n contains simply the
whole series of exact multiples of this number from 1 to 18. The column headed ‘Observed Charge’ gives the successive observed values of the rising velocity of the drop plus the falling velocity. It will be seen that during the
time of observation, about four hours, this drop carried all possible multiples of the elementary charge from 4 to
17, save only 15. No more exact or more consistent multiple relationship is found in the data which chemists have
amassed on the combining powers of the elements and on which the atomic theory of matter rests than is found in
the foregoing numbers.
Such tables as these—and scores of them could be given—place beyond all question the view that an electrical
charge wherever it is found, whether on an insulator or conductor, whether in electrolytes or in metals, has a definite granular structure, that it consists of an exact number of specks of electricity (electrons) all exactly alike,
which in static phenomena are scattered over the surface of the charged body and in current phenomena are drifting along the conductor. Instead of giving up, as Maxwell thought we should some day do, the ‘provisional
hypothesis of molecular charges,’ we find ourselves obliged to make all our interpretations of electrical phenomena, metallic as well as electrolytic, in terms of it.”
8
Millikan, Robert A., pp. 74–75
8
Although the values of the charge on a specific drop were found to be exact multiples of a certain value (e), the
value of e varied for drops of different masses. This discrepancy was traced to the breakdown of Stokes’ Law.
Through experimentation the law was found to fail when the size of the drop approached the mean free path of air
molecules. When this situation occurs, the medium in which the drop falls is no longer homogeneous in relation to
the drop. This contradicts one of the assumptions upon which Stokes’ Law is based. Through his work on the electron, Millikan was able to determine a correction factor for Stokes’ Law.
By performing the experiment with mercury drops and drops of other materials, Millikan demonstrated that the
elementary electrical charge was the same for insulators, semi-conductors, and conductors. He also demonstrated
that the beta particle had the same charge as an electron (indeed, it is an electron) and that positive and negative
electrons (the positive electron referring to a proton and not a positron) are equal in charge. The experiment also
produced insights into the study of ionized gasses.
16
012-13093B
®
Model No. AP-8210A Maintenance Notes
Always handle the plastic spacer and capacitor plates carefully to avoid scratching them.
Solvents that might attack the plastic should be avoided
set screw
Figure 12: Viewing scope set screw
Few experiments that are so simple in principle have provided such a wealth of experimental evidence to confirm
the atomic theory and measure an important physical constant.
Suggested Reading
Should the student desire a more detailed back ground in this classic experiment, the following references are suggested:
1. Millikan, Robert A., The Electron
, (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1917 (reprinting in paperback
form, 1963).
2. Millikan, Robert A., “The Isolation of an Ion, A Precision Measurement of its Charge, and the Correction of
Stokes’ Law,” The Physical Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 109 – 143, June 1913.
3. Millikan, Robert A., “On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant,” The Physical Review,
Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 349 – 397, April, 1911.
4. Shamos, M.H., Great Experiments in Physics
(Holt-Dryden, New York, 1959), pp. 238 – 249.
Maintenance Notes
Cleaning
1.The housing of the droplet viewing chamber, the capacitor plates, the plastic spacer, and the droplet hole cover
should be cleaned with water and detergent, with particular attention to the droplet hole in the top capacitor
plate, the glass observation port covers on the housing, and the droplet hole cover.
2.The plastic spacer should be polished with a soft, lint-free cloth to remove any oil, finger prints, or lint.
3.The lens on the plastic spacer should be cleaned on both sides using a cotton-covered tip (“Q-tip”).
4.Apply a thin film of oil to the capacitor plates to help prevent corrosion.
5.Dry all parts completely before reassembly.
Adjusting vertical reticle and viewing scope alignments
If the alignment of the reticle or viewing scope is altered during rough handling, realign it using the following procedure:
1.Loosen the set screw in the viewing scope holder (Figure 12).
2.With the focusing wire in place and while looking through the eye-
piece, rotate the viewing scope until the vertical reticle lines are
vertical to the focusing wire.
3.Find the center of focus in the adjustment knob on the viewing
scope (this will be approximately half-way between minimum and
maximum focus).
4.Manually move the viewing scope in and out through its holder
until the focusing wire comes into focus.
012-13093B17
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusMaintenance Notes
®
Only a very small adjustment will be required.
Use care to avoid losing site of the focusing wire.
Figure 13: Location of the socket head cap
screws that anchor the viewing scope
socket head
cap screws
bottom of
platform
Do not allow paint to get on the top and bottom flat surfaces of the plastic spacer since that
would change the plastic spacer thickness.
black painted
area
Figure 14: Area on the plastic spacer that
should be painted black
5.Recheck the reticle to assure that it is still in proper alignment with the focusing wire (as in step 2).
6.Lock the viewing scope into position by tightening the set screw into the viewing scope holder.
Adjusting the horizontal reticle alignment
If the horizontal alignment of the viewing scope is altered during rough handling, realign it using the following
procedure:
1.Loosen one of the two socket head cap screws on the bottom of the platform shown in Figure 13.
2.With the focusing wire in place and while looking through the eyepiece, gently tap the viewing scope until the
focusing wire is centered in the reticle.
.
3.Lock the viewing scope into position by tightening the
two socket head cap screws into the viewing scope
holder.
Touching up the black painted surface on the plastic spacer
After prolonged use and repeated cleaning, the black paint (Figure 14) that absorbs refracted and reflected light on
the plastic spacer may begin to wear off. In that event, touch up the surface with a thin coat of flat black acrylic
paint such as that available at hobby stores. Do not use a lacquer or oil-based paint.
18
012-13093B
®
Nsm
-2
x
10
-5
1.8000
1.8040
1.8080
1.8120
1.8160
1.8200
1.8240
1.8280
1.8320
1.8360
1.8400
1.8440
1.8480
1.8520
1.8560
1.8600
1.8640
1.8680-
1.8720
1.8760
1.8800
1.8840
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
31
32
Temperature °C
Viscosity of Dry Air as a Function of Temperature
Model No. AP-8210A Appendix A: Viscosity of Dry Air as a Function of Temperature
Appendix A: Viscosity of Dry Air as a Function of
Temperature
012-13093B19
Millikan Oil Drop ApparatusAppendix B: Thermistor Resistance
®
THERMISTOR RESISTANCE TABLE
c
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
15
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
30
25
31
32
33
34
35
36
39
29
38
37
3.239
3.118
3.004
2.897
2.795
2.610
2.700
2.526
2.446
2.371
2.300
2.233
2.169
2.110
2.053
2.000
1.902
1.857
1.815
1.950
1.774
1.736
1.700
1.666
1.634
1.603
1.547
1.521
1.496
1.574
X 10
6
X 10
6
c
X 10
6
c
8
V
8
8
V
V
Appendix B: Thermistor Resistance
Millikan Oil Drop Apparatus Thermistor Resistance at Various Temperatures
20
012-13093B
Loading...
+ hidden pages
You need points to download manuals.
1 point = 1 manual.
You can buy points or you can get point for every manual you upload.