![](/html/8e/8e18/8e18a9d2d6b28da2b692fdf4c756e8ac92547576b3b180a3ef2a66962a7a6215/bg1.png)
APPLICATION GUIDE
For Nellcor™ Forehead SpO2 Sensor
with OxiMax™ Technology
To ensure reliable, accurate pulse oximetry
readings from Nellcor™ forehead SpO2
sensors, always remember to:
Think PIRATE
1
(Place It Right Above The Eye)
Prepare t he site with alcohol
∙
Remove the adhesive backing strip
∙
Always use the NellcorTM forehead
2
SpO2 headband positioned over the
sensor and adjust the tension to align
green arrows with indicator
Alternate the sensor site from above
3
one eye to the other every 12 hours
Prepare t he site with alcohol
∙
Change the adhesive layer
∙
when ne cessary
Reapply the headband
∙
Because individual skin condition aff ects the
ability of the skin to tolerate sensor placement,
with some patients it may be necessary to
change the sensor site more frequently.
The Nellcor™ OxiMax™ forehead SpO2 sensor
is more closely aligned to arterial blood gas
(ABG) draws than digit sensors.
*1-3
![](/html/8e/8e18/8e18a9d2d6b28da2b692fdf4c756e8ac92547576b3b180a3ef2a66962a7a6215/bg2.png)
Forehead sensors detect
hypoxemic events faster
than other sensors
The forehead of a healthy adult
∙
expose d to cold tempera tures stays
warm while the ngers, ears and
nose lose h eat (Figure 1)
Cold causes vasoconstriction and
∙
low peripheral perfusion
Forehead SpO2 measurements are
∙
more accurate than nger SpO2
measurements in critically ill patients
4-6
Do not use digit
sensors on a patient’s
head or ears
When used on foreheads,
digit sensors give inaccurate,
often overestimated SpO
levels (Graph 1)
110
100
2
90
SpO
Digit (reference) SpO
7
80
70
0:00:00 0:02:00 0:04:00 0:06:00 0:08:00 0:10:00 0:12:00 0:14:00 0:16:00
8
Graph 1
2
Digit sensor on forehead SpO
2
Elapsed Time (h:min:s)
2
Nellcor™ pulse oximetry with
OxiMax™ technology provides
accurate measurement of
SpO2, even in some of the most
Figure 1
* Comparison between the Nellcor™ N595 monitor with the Nellcor™ OxiMax™forehead SpO2 sensor, Nellcor™ MAXN sensor,
Nellcor™ MAXA
1. Fernandez M, Burns K, Calhoun B, George S, Martin B, Weaver C. Evaluation of a new pulse oximeter sensor. Am J Crit Care.
2007;16(2):146-152.
2. Bebout DE, Mannheimer PD, Asbagh NA. Detection of hypoxemia during peripheral vasoconstriction at the radial artery and
various pulse oximeter sensor sites. Critical Care Med. 2003;31(2):A72 [Abstract].
3. Berkenbosch JW, Tobias JD. Comparison of a new forehead reflectance pulse oximeter sensor with a conventional digit
sensor in pediatric patients. Respir Care. 2006;51(7):726-731.
4. Bebout DE, Mannheimer PD, Wun C-C. Site-dependent differences in the time to detect changes in saturation during low
perfusion. [Abstract] Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):A115.
5. MacLeod DB, Cortinez LI, Keifer JC, et al. The desaturation response time of finger pulse oximeters during mild hypothermia.
Anaesthesia. 2005;60(1):65-71.
6. Fernandez M. Evaluation of a new pulse oximeter sensor in patients with low cardiac outputs. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14(3):264.
7. Nesseler N, Fre´nel JV, Launey Y, Morcet J, Malle´dant Y, Seguin P. Pulse oximetry and high-dose vasopressors: a comparison
between forehead reflectance and finger transmission sensors. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(10):1718-1722.
8. Internal data on file.
9. Sponsored study, Pulse oximetry—performance during severe signal interference. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01720355.
First received October 3, 2012. Last updated February 12, 2013. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
© 2016 Medtronic. All rights reserved. Medtronic, Medtronic logo and Further, Together
are trademarks of Medtronic. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company.
04/2016–13-PM-0265(1)–[WF#853580]
6135 Gunbarrel Avenue
Boulder, CO 80301
800.635.5267
challenging patients.
medtronic.com/covidien
9