Littelfuse SPD, AC Application Note

Application Note EC635:
Fuse
MOV rated for 150V rms continuous voltage
Load
120V
120V
Designing with Thermally Protected
TMOV
Varistors in SPD and AC Line Applications
Introduction
Metal Oxide Varistors (MOVs) are commonly used to suppress transients in many applications such as: Surge Protection Devices (SPD), Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS), AC Power Taps, AC Power Meters or other products. Lightning, inductive load switching, or capacitor bank switching, are often the sources of these over­voltage transients. Under normal operating conditions, the AC line voltage applied to an MOV is not expected to exceed the MOV’s Maximum ACRMS Voltage Rating or Maximum Continuous Operating Voltage (MCOV). Occasionally, over-voltage transients may occur that exceeds these limits. These transients are clamped to a suitable voltage level by the MOV provided the transient energy does not exceed the MOV’s maximum rating.
MOVs can also be subjected to continuous abnormal voltage conditions rather than short duration transients. If an MOV is subjected to a sustained abnormal over­voltage, limited current condition (as is required in UL1449), the MOV may go into thermal runaway resulting in overheating, smoke, and potentially fire. For end products to comply with UL1449, some level of protection must be afforded to the MOV to prevent this failure mode. That protection has traditionally been a thermal fuse or Thermal Cut-Off (TCO) device.
(a)
Device
110-120V / 220-240V Split 240 110-120V
220-240V / 380-415V 3-wye 4 15 220-240V
254-277V / 440-480V 3-wye 480 254-277V
Rating Phase
110-120V Single 240 All
120V / 208V 3-wye 208 120V
220-240V Single 415 All
240V
254-277V Single 480 All
480V
347V Single 600 All
347V / 600V 3-wye 600 347V
Table 1. Test voltage Selection Table
Notes: (a)“Device” is defined as the end SPD product - example: UPS, SPD Strip etc. (b) For device ratings not specified in this table, the test voltage shall be the maximum phase voltage (if available) or twice the conductor pair voltage ratings up to 1000V max.
©2011 Littelfuse, Inc. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Please refer to www.littelfuse.com for current information.
High Leg
Delta
High Leg
Delta
Test
Voltage
240 120V
480 254-277V
Voltage Rating of
(b)
Conductor Pair
UL1449 Abnormal Overvoltage, Limited Current Requirements
In AC line applications, the loss of a Neutral-Ground connection may occur in such a way that there exists a risk that a sustained over-voltage may be applied to an MOV that is rated for a much lower continuous voltage. In an unlimited current condition the MOV will first fail to a low impedance (few Ohms), but due to the high amount of energy available, it most often ruptures instantaneously. If, however, there are loads tied to the AC line that limit current flow, the MOV can overheat and potentially cause the SPD device to overheat resulting in smoke, out-gassing and eventually fire.
For example, in a standard U.S. 120V AC Line application, two 120V AC power lines (180° out of phase) are commonly fed from a center-tapped 240V transformer. See Figure 1. Let’s assume a 150V rated MOV is present in the top 120V circuit, and some load exists on the bottom 120V circuit. Both the MOV and load share the center tap which is the Neutral-Ground Connection. If a break occurs on the center tap (X—X), then the load in the bottom phase acts as a current limiter and the line fuse may not clear. In this scenario, the 150V rated MOV is subjected to 240V at a limited current potentially resulting in thermal run away for the MOV.
This potential condition is specifically identified and addressed in the UL1449 SPD Standard. See Table 1. In many cases, it requires that end-product manufacturers include a thermal protection element for an MOV.
Table 1. defines the test voltage that should be applied to various SPD devices depending on the designer’s desired device rating. Each test voltage is applied across each conductor pair with a short circuit current of 10A for Type 1 & 2 SPD, and 5A, 2.5A, 0.5A and 0.125A for Type 3 SPD respectively across each of five SPD devices. Since this
1
Revision: May 31, 2011
Figure 1. Possible Fault Condition for a limited current abnormal overvoltage event
Designing with Thermally Protected
Fuse
Line
TCO
TCO
MOV
MOV
MOV
Neutral
Ground
TCO
120VAC
TMOV® Varistors in SPD and AC Line Applications
test is destructive, five devices are needed to test for each of the five short circuit currents. The five devices must be energized for 7 hours, or until current or temperatures within the SPD device attain equilibrium, or until the SPD becomes disconnected from the AC Line.
For example shown in Figure 1, in a standard 120V AC Line application, the requirement is for a 240VACRMS test voltage to be applied across all conductor pairs. There are three pairs; Line-Neutral (L-N), Line-Ground (L-G), and Neutral-Ground (N-G). Again, this test voltage is chosen because in the U.S., 120V AC power is commonly fed from a center-tapped 240V transformer. Thermally unprotected MOVs for this application are typically rated from 130Vacrms to 150Vacrms and will heat up, out-gas and may catch fire in such circumstances.
Thermally Protecting MOVs
A simple block diagram of a typical line voltage transient protection scheme used to meet the sustained abnormal over-voltage, limited current test requirements of UL1449 is shown in Figure 2. An MOV or several MOVs in parallel are each placed across each of the three conductive pairs; L-N, L-G, and N-G. This offers the utmost protection for any possible line transient. A standard fuse is placed in series with the line to protect the system from an over­current condition that exceeds a predetermined level. Typically, the current rating of this fuse is higher than the limited current flowing through the circuit during UL1449 testing. This requires the addition of a TCO that is placed in series with each MOV or Parallel combination of MOVs to protect it from a thermal event. Often, the MOVs used are of the radial leaded 14mm or 20mm disk diameter variety.
TCOs are available in a variety of different opening temperatures. The position and orientation of the TCO is important if it is to be effective in thermally protecting an MOV. When subjected to a sustained over-voltage, MOVs will short at a random point on the disk and will rapidly
©2011 Littelfuse, Inc. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Please refer to www.littelfuse.com for current information.
Figure 2. Typical offline protection scheme
begin to self-heat if a limited current is maintained. TCOs are activated by a combination of conducted, converted and radiated heat from the MOV, although the majority of the heat is transferred via conduction. The position of the TCO in relation to the heat source at this shorting point has a considerable effect on the speed of operation of the TCO. The most effective heat coupling has been observed to be via conduction through the varistor terminal lead to the insulated terminal of a metal jacket TCO. Thermal convection and radiation processes are effective when the heat source is immediately beside or below the TCO. Although conduction is the most effective means of heat transfer, the MOV and TCO are not in full contact in most cases. The position of the terminal leads of the TCO makes it difficult for the TCO to be located closely enough to the MOV for effective heat transfer. The result is less than efficient conduction from case to case. An example of a typical arrangement of MOVs and TCOs is shown in Figure 3. Note the TCO does not touch the case of the M O V.
Figure 3. Typical Arrangement of TCOs with MOVs ** one of the MOVs has been removed for clarity
The response time of this arrangement can be disproportionately increased if the TCO is not placed in close enough proximity to the MOV and/or the punch­through point on the MOV occurs remotely from the TCO’s insulated terminal. In such cases, considerable charring of the MOV can occur and fire is a real possibility. Shrink-wrap or other bonding materials can aid coupling, but in adverse circumstances they are a source of combustible material and may actually make things worse.
While this scheme is generally effective in removing the MOV from the circuit during abnormal over-voltage testing such that the MOV does not reach critical temperatures, the downside to this method is that TCOs can be difficult to handle during the assembly process. Because of the low opening temperatures, TCOs must be soldered carefully. When hand soldering, the iron cannot remain in contact with the lead of the TCO for prolonged periods. Another option is to use clips or pliers as a heat-sink.
2
Revision: May 31, 2011
Loading...
+ 4 hidden pages