IR2 0 manual v 1604 25/39
5.2 Reliability of the measurement
A measurement is reliable if it measures within required uncertainty limits for most of the
time. We distinguish between two causes of unreliability of the measurement:
related to the reliability of the pyrgeometer and its design, manufacturing, calibration
(hardware reliability).
related to the reliability of the measurement uncertainty (measurement reliability),
which involves hardware reliability as well as condition of use.
Most of the hardware reliability is the responsibility of the instrument manufacturer.
The reliability of the measurement however is a joint responsibility of instrument
manufacturer and user. As a function of user requirements, taking into account
measurement conditions and environmental conditions, the user will select an instrument
of a certain class, and define maintenance support procedures.
In many situations there is a limit to a realistically attainable accuracy level. This is due
to conditions that are beyond control once the measurement system is in place. Typical
limiting conditions are:
the measurement conditions, for instance when working at extreme temperatures
when the instrument temperature is at the extreme limits of the rated temperature
range.
the environmental conditions, for instance when installed at a sub-optimal
measurement location with obstacles in the field of view.
the environmental conditions, for instance when assessing net radiation, the
downfacing pyrgeometer measurement may not be representative of irradiance
received in that particular area.
The measurement reliability can be improved by maintenance support. Important aspects
are:
dome fouling by deposition of dust, dew, rain or snow. With pyrgeometers the most
important source of unreliability is deposition of water on the dome. Water completely
blocks the longwave radiation flux between sensor and sky. In particular at clear
nights this causes very large errors. Water deposition under clear-sky nighttime
conditions can largely be prevented by using the instrument heater. Fouling results in
undefined measurement uncertainty (sensitivity and directional error are no longer
defined). This should be solved by regular inspection and cleaning.
sensor instability. Maximum expected sensor aging is specified per instrument as its
non-stability in [% change / year]. In case the sensor is not recalibrated, the
uncertainty of the sensitivity gradually will increase. This is solved by regular
recalibration.
moisture condensing under pyrgeometer domes resulting in a slow change of
sensitivity (within specifications). This is solved by regular replacement of desiccant
or by maintenance (drying the entire sensor) in case the sensor allows this. For nonserviceable sensors like Hukseflux flat window pyrgeometers (for example model