PD2028B Pulseflow D/A converter
chips, which are actually stereo devices,
with left and right audio outputs. To improve low-level linearity, an entire chip is
devoted to each channel, configured in a
differential mode. The balanced outputs
from the D/A chips are fed to the ±inputs
of a 5532 op amp. The unbalanced output from the op amp is fed to a second
5532, which functions as an output
buffer. The filter/DAC combination
should provide resolution comparable to
conventional 20-bit converters.
Deemphasis is accomplished in the
analog domain, using a shunt filter located between the first and second 5532.
The deemphasis network is activated
with a single bipolar transistor. The
CDR–800 does not apply emphasis to CD
recordings. Only a handful of commercial CDs, mainly from Denon, are recorded with high-frequency emphasis, and
modern high-resolution converters make
it unnecessary. Overall, the construction
of the CDR–800 is extremely impressive.
This unit should stand up to demanding,
day-in, day-out professional use.
Performance
In order to evaluate the accuracy of
CD–R recordings, I made a demonstration disc cloned from a number of tracks
on commercial CDs that I normally use
for equipment evaluation. I made the
test disc by connecting my CD transport, a modified Denon DCD–1015, to
the S/PDIF input on the CDR–800. My
DCD–1015 has a Canare 75Ω BNC out-
put connector—the two units were connected with a DH Labs D–75 S/PDIF in-
terconnect fitted with a Canare 75Ω
BNC connector on one end, and a
Canare 75Ω RCA connector on the
other.
Every self-respecting, golden-eared audiophile will desire to know exactly
how the CDR–800’s copies compared to
the original CDs. Unfortunately, the answer is not at all straightforward. I can’t
honestly state that the copies were indistinguishable from the originals. However, any differences I heard are no greater
than those caused by substituting one
high-quality digital interconnect for another. The differences were normally far
less than those I associate with changing
CD transports.
In my opinion, digital copies made on
the CDR–800 are faithful reproductions
of the original, and any observed differences may well be attributed to external
factors. The performance of the
CDR–800 will depend primarily on the
quality of your source and the intercon-
nect between your source and the HHB
recorder.
The dated op amps mentioned previously undoubtedly limit the performance of the CDR–800 when used with
its analog inputs and outputs. However,
the excellent performance of the A/D
and D/A converters used in this recorder
make up, in part, for the performance
of the op amps. I have no doubt that replacement of the op amps with the best
dual devices currently available would
significantly improve the analog performance of the CDR–800, allowing the excellent digital circuitry to perform to its
potential.
Conclusions
The HHB CDR–800 is a remarkable product, and a real breakthrough in affordable
professional CD recorders. Used with external digital sources, via its digital input,
the CDR–800 will make compact discs
that are virtual sonic clones of the original digital source. Recently, HHB introduced the CDR–850 rewritable Compact
Disc Recorder (CD–RW), which is priced
about $200 less than the CDR–800. Readers may wonder whether it renders the
800 obsolete. Not at all! The new
CDR–850, also based on a consumer Pioneer product (the PD–R555RW), does
not have the Stable Platter mechanism.
For the ultimate in CD–R mechanical stability, the CDR–800 will continue to be
the recorder of choice.
Home users in need of a CD recorder
should not hesitate to purchase this pro
product. Because of the Stable Platter
mechanism, the CDR–800 will probably
outperform your existing CD transport,
so you may be able to dispense with your
existing playback machine.
When the time came to purchase a
CD recorder for use in my studio at the
Crane School of Music at SUNY Potsdam, where I am employed as audio engineer, I chose the CDR–800. I could not
give a more enthusiastic endorsement. ■
Audio Electronics 2/00
37