
June 2000
Compaq Computer
Corporation
Prepared by
ISSD Technology
Communications
ONTENTS
C
Executive Summary .........1
Introduction.....................3
Traditional
Networks versus
System Area
Networks ..........................3
ServerNet II SAN Technology
Improves the Response
of Clusters ............................. 5
Compaq ServerNet
II Technology...................5
ServerNet II Hardware
Components..........................6
Low Latency Techniques
Improve Performa nce.............7
ServerNet II Performance
Summary...............................7
ServerNet II Leverages VI
Architecture Features to
Improve Scalability ................. 8
Fault Tolerance at All Levels..8
Operating System Vendor and
Independent Software
Vendor Support ..................... 8
The Future with
InfiniBand ........................9
Summary ..........................9
W
.
.
.
.
.
Compaq ServerNet II SAN Interconnect for
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Scalable Computing Clusters
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
E
.
.
.
.
This paper introduces Compaq's ServerNet II system area network (SAN) interconnect
.
.
.
for use in scalable business computing clusters. Clusters generate intense server-to-
.
.
.
.
server messaging that can overwhelm traditional network technologies. The software
.
.
.
protocol overhead generated by traditional network technologies impedes server-to
.
.
.
server communication and limits the scalability, availability, and flexibility of clusters.
.
.
.
In contrast, the ServerNet II SAN interconnect is a high-bandwidth, low-latency network
.
.
.
.
technology that is proven to handle intense messaging in server clusters. A ServerNet II
.
.
.
SAN allows applications to be distributed over multiple servers, which increases cluster
.
.
.
scalability through greater parallelism and higher availability. The reader should be
.
.
.
familiar with the Virtual Interface Architecture.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Please direct comments regarding this communication to the ISSD Technology Communications Group at this Internet
.
.
address: TechCom@compaq.com
.
.
.
.
.
.
HITE
XECUTIVE SUMMARY
P
APER
Doc Number
TC000602WP
1

HITE PAPER
W
.
.
.
OTICE
N
.
.
.
.
.
The information in this publication is subject to change without notice and is provided “AS IS”
.
.
.
WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF T HE USE
.
.
.
OF THIS INFORMATION REMAINS WITH RECIPIENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL COMPAQ
.
.
.
BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE
.
.
.
OR OTHER DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
.
.
.
DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR LOSS OF
.
.
.
BUSINESS INFORMATION), EVEN IF COMPAQ HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
.
.
.
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
.
.
.
.
.
The limited warranties for Compaq products are exclusively set forth in the documentation
.
.
.
accompanying such products. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting a further or
.
.
.
additional warranty.
.
.
.
.
This publication does not constitute an endorsement of the product or products that were tested.
.
.
.
.
The configuration or configurations tested or described may or may not be the only available
.
.
.
solution. This test is not a determination of product quality or correctness, nor does it ensure
.
.
.
compliance with any federal state or local requirements.
.
.
.
.
Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, Windows NT Advanced Server, SQL Server for Windows NT
.
.
.
are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.
.
.
.
.
.
Novell and NetWare are registered trademarks and IntranetWare, NDS, Novell Directory Services,
.
.
.
GroupWise, BorderManager, and ManageWise are trademarks of Novell, Inc.
.
.
.
.
Pentium is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation.
.
.
.
.
.
Other product names mentioned herein may be trademarks and/or registered trademarks of their
.
.
.
respective companies.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
©2000 Compaq Computer Corporation. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Compaq ServerNet II SAN Interconnect for Scalable Computing Clusters
.
.
.
First Edition (June 2000)
.
.
.
Document Number TC000602WP
.
.
.
.
.
(cont.)
Doc Number
TC000602WP
2

HITE PAPER
W
.
.
NTRODUCTION
I
.
.
.
.
.
The enterprise computing systems of many businesses were built around centralized, proprietary
.
.
.
computers, which are expensive to manage and upgrade. The networks that evolved around these
.
.
.
centralized systems use traditional network technologies such as Ethernet and TCP/IP, which are
.
.
.
designed for he terogeneous computing environments. T oday, businesses can satisfy their
.
.
.
computing goals with a collection of low-cost, industry-standard servers distributed within a
.
.
.
cluster. A cluster is a group of two or more interconnected servers that act as a single computing
.
.
.
unit. Servers in a cluster can be physically distributed across various locations, yet to a user, the
.
.
.
cluster appears as a single, unified computing resource. In a parallel application cluster, for
.
.
.
example, each server simultaneously runs a copy of an application and the operating system. Client
.
.
.
requests are divided among the servers’ CPUs (central processing units), and the servers exchange
.
.
.
information about the portion of the client’s request they are processing. If one server fails, the
.
.
.
jobs it was processing are distributed across the remaining servers. Consequently, clustered servers
.
.
.
collectively generate tens of thousands of messages per second to keep track of the jobs they are
.
.
.
executing.
.
.
.
.
.
The high volume of server-to-server messaging in a cluster requires a very efficient software
.
.
.
communication interface and a highly reliable, high-speed, low-latency hardware interconnect.
.
.
.
Without an efficient server-to-server interconnect, the performance and scalability of a cluster is
.
.
.
severely limited. Traditional network technologies produce excessive software overhead, due to
.
.
.
their heterogeneous environments, and are too inefficient for intense server-to-server
.
.
.
communication. Therefore, in December 1997 Compaq and other industry leaders developed the
.
.
.
Virtual Interface (VI) Architecture specification for a distributed messaging interface that allows
.
.
.
more efficient server-to-server communication through a system area network (SAN). The VI
.
.
.
Architecture provides a common software and hardware interface standard so that customers can
.
.
.
choose the optimum SAN interconnect (Compaq ServerNet II, gigabit Ethernet, cLAN, ATM, or
.
.
.
others).
.
.
.
.
.
The Compaq ServerNet II SAN interconnect is the most complete industry-standard
.
.
.
implementation of the VI Architecture specification. Measurement of CPU utilization under
.
.
.
certain conditions shows that ServerNet II provides three times the performance of gigabit Ethernet
.
.
.
and TCP/IP. As a result, ServerNet II is quickly emerging as the interconnect of choice for
.
.
.
implementing clusters of industry-standard servers. Operating system vendor and independent
.
.
.
software vendor support for ServerNet II includes Windows 2000 Data Center, Windows 2000
.
.
.
Advanced Data Server, Linux, and SCO UnixWare 7.1.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
RADITIONAL NETWORKS VERS US SYSTEM AREA
T
.
.
.
ETWORKS
N
.
.
.
.
Clustered servers can communicate with each other by using a traditional network or a SAN.
.
.
.
Traditional network technologies allow several different types of devices to communicate with each
.
.
.
other in comple x, heterogeneous networks. Network ap plications manage communications
.
.
.
between the devices using multipoint protocols like TCP/IP and network interface controllers.
.
.
.
These protocols generate a large amount of software overhead (error checking and control
.
.
.
.
information) to ensure that messages are sent and received reliably. This software overhead
.
.
.
continually interrupts the servers’ CPUs. Consequently, the high volume of server-to-server
.
.
.
messaging in a cluster can overwhelm traditional network protocols like TCP/IP. In fact, clusters
.
.
.
that use traditional networks for messaging can lose as much as 20 to 30 percent of their capability
.
.
.
during intense messaging. This loss of system capability results in slower response times for users
.
.
.
and reduces the scalability, availability, and flexibility of clusters. When you consider the
.
.
.
unpredictable nature of Internet traffic, it becomes apparent that traditional network technologies
.
.
.
cannot handle se rver-to-server messaging in e-commerce environments.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(cont.)
Doc Number
TC000602WP
3