2
Actually, many network environments do. But how one environment
benefits can greatly differ from how another one does. Here are several
examples:
• Utility companies can use TDMoIP to achieve transparent
connectivity between sites for legacy services.
• Cellular operators can reduce 2G access costs with TDMoIP while
building IP networks for 3G migration.
Which network environments benefit most from TDMoIP?
T
DMoIP is simpler and less
expensive than VoIP, and it’s a
superior alternative in many other
ways— especially in applications
where the existing PBX functionality is all you need.
If voice communication is
your chief concern, TDMoIP
provides higher voice quality
with much lower latency than
VoIP. In addition, TDMoIP can
support all applications that run
over T1 circuits— not just
voice— and that’s something
VoIP just can’t do. Also, unlike
VoIP, TDMoIP can provide
Technically Speaking:TDMoIPvs.V oIP
traditional leased-line services
over IP, and it’s transparent to
protocols and signaling.
Compared to VoIP, TDMoIP
also has an evolutionary, not
revolutionary, approach to
migrating to IP or Ethernet. That
way, your investment protection
is maximized and you can get the
most use out of legacy equipment.
Last but not least, TDMoIP
supports installed PBXs with
no loss of functionality.
The chart below summarizes
the key differences between
TDMoIP and VoIP.
TDMoIP (TDM Transport over IP)
Simple and evolutionary
• Uses standard protocols, such as T1, E1, and IP.
• Low cost of ownership.
Complex and revolutionary
• Uses new and evolving protocols, like H.323, MGCP, and SIP.
• Its complexity requires the retraining of IT staff.
VoIP (IP Telephony)
Supports existing PBXs
• That means a significant cost savings to you!
• Little disruption to business.
Transparent to signaling and protocols
• No loss of PBX functionality.
• Superior voice quality.
• Much lower latency.
Configurable packet size
• Minimizes delay.
• Minimizes overhead.
Enables data, voice, and video extension
• Bandwidth can handle a variety of applications.
DS0-level bundling and cross-connect features
Forklift upgrade required (who wants to reinvent telephony?)
• You have to deal with costly upgrades and replacements.
• Compatibility issues are also a problem.
Translates between signaling formats
• Limited support for existing PBX features.
• Long call-setup times.
Packets depend on codec samples
• Longer delays as sample is recorded.
• Overhead is required on each voice session.
Primarily voice
• You’ve paid for all those upgrades, and you’re mostly limited
to a single type of application!
Voice switching per call
• Incumbent carriers can use TDMoIP to maintain their investment
in existing equipment and provide full legacy functionality over the
packet-switched network. In turn, operational costs are reduced.
• Metropolitan carriers can optimize Ethernet for multiservice
transport with TDMoIP.
• Enterprises can use TDMoIP to reduce network expenses by
running all traffic over Ethernet.