soundfield. Decay of instrumental
and vocal sounds was also enhanced,
which lead to a more textured and
dimensional rendering of all images.
For me, these attributes are
particularly appreciable on
minimally processed recordings of
acoustic instruments. Apollo [North
Star CD2390] features local Toronto
musicians Daniel and Carey Domb
performing music for cello accompanied by guitar. There was no echo added here apart from
the natural ambience of the church where the recording was made, which the Reference Two
reproduced very nicely. The sound of the cello was rendered with convincing body and
purity of tone. The decay produced as the guitarist gently tapped the body of her instrument
in time with the music on "50 Variations on a Theme of Corelli" was beautifully captured.
While the spaciousness of the sound and enhanced texture and dimensionality of images
were what the Reference Two most obviously brought to the sonic table, there was really
very little that it took away. It did not bleach or darken the overall tone, and instrumental
timbres were not only presented faithfully but also instilled with vibrancy. The music
appeared to remain true to the source without significant editorializing or artifact. Don’t let
those 300Bs fool you into thinking there was anything SET-like about this preamp’s sound.
Dynamics were lifelike without being exaggerated. There was satisfying extension at both
frequency extremes, although the midrange was where the preamp excelled.
However, all of this applied to the line stage. In contrast, the phono stage proved a little
disappointing. While there were no issues with noise and gain was more than adequate, the
soundstage seemed to collapse when I listened to Joni Mitchell’s Blue [Reprise MS 2038]
and the late Michael Hedges’ Aerial Boundaries [Windham Hill Records WH-1032].
Mitchell’s vocals sounded somewhat recessed and two-dimensional. Turning up the volume
knob did nothing to ameliorate the situation. Several cuts on Aerial Boundaries feature
startling dynamics and, like The Well, generously processed echo. Unfortunately these were
attenuated and truncated when played through the Reference Two’s phono stage. Without
having heard the line stage first, the performance of this phono stage could be considered
acceptable although not terribly involving. Knowing what the line stage was capable of,
however, elevated the standards by which the phono stage needed to be judged, and I found
the disparity between the performance of the two more than a little surprising. Perhaps
something was amiss with the review sample. I should note that these albums sounded
spectacular when played through a modest Bel Canto PHONO1 phono stage plugged into the
Reference Two’s line input.
I did have one operational issue with the Reference One: Tube microphonics were evident
and a distraction at times. However, if my experience with the Reference One amplifiers is
any indication, the ingenious folks at Audio Space will come up with a solution to this
problem.
What else?
I have owned and thoroughly enjoyed my CAT SL1 Ultimate Mk 1 preamp ($5950 when still
available) for over five years now. I am enamored of its ability to resolve musical detail and
nuance combined with its utterly neutral presentation, and it has a seriously good phono stage
that's equal to separate units that cost almost as much as the preamp itself.
When the CAT preamp was reinstalled in place of the Audio Space Reference Two, the
changes in the sound were subtle but at the same time obvious. The CAT preamp's line stage
provided for a drier, cleaner presentation lacking some of the harmonic richness that the
Reference Two offered up. However, the CAT is about dynamics, control and extension, and
while the Audio Space preamp was not left wanting in these areas, it is really more about
spaciousness and musical flow. The Jennifer Warnes CD demonstrated this ably, as the
Reference Two had the indescribable clarity that really brought Warnes' voice to life. In
terms of their phono reproduction, the SL1 Ultimate Mk 1 clearly bettered the Reference two
in terms openness and three-dimensionality.
If these preamps were the stock with which long-simmering stews were made, the CATbased dish would allow for a heightened appreciation of the individual ingredients that went
into the mix. The Audio Space-based ragout would allow all the individual flavors to
optimally meld together into a wonderful-tasting whole. Both are very satisfying.
Water to wine
Even with my reservations about its phono stage and microphonics, the Audio Space
Reference Two set a new standard in preamplification for me -- or rather line-stage
performance. A few seconds after first installing it, I made a mental note that I was listening
to something very special, and that impression remained after a lengthy evaluation. Listening
to it was as if a small dam had broken that allowed my line-level sources to flood the room
with previously pent-up sound in which I was happily awash.
In fact, the Reference Two so impressed me that it caused me to reevaluate my longstanding
relationship with the CAT SL1 Ultimate. I’ve yet to purchase any review item, and that string
transparent while retaining the amps' original sense of
effortless power and control.
They were so much more musically engaging that I
sorely regretted having them wrested from my room
after only a few days of listening. Such is the existence
of an audio reviewer!
...Ken Choi
Page 3 of 4SoundStage! Equipment Review - Audio Space Reference Two Preamplifier (4/2008)
2011-5-24file://D:\Peter Files\Review-web\SoundStage! Equipment Review - Audio Space Reference Two Preamplifier (4-2008).htm