One Technology Way • P.O. Box 9106 • Norwood, MA 02062-9106, U.S.A. • Tel: 781.329.4700 • Fax: 781.461.3113 • www.analog.com
Factors Affecting Sensor Response
by Susan Pratt
INTRODUCTION
Capacitance sensing has the potential to replace current user
input mechanisms in consumer devices. Products as diverse as
cell phones, digital cameras, MP3 players, and other portable
media players are all suitable for implementing capacitance
sensing. Capacitance sensing gives the user an interface with
greater sensitivity and control than standard mechanical input
technologies.
Analog Devices’ capacitance sensing solution has three
components: the AD7142 capacitive-to-digital converter IC,
sensors on the PCB, and software to communicate with the
AD7142. The solution consists of an excitation source
connected to a transmitter, which generates a capacitive field to
a receiver. The capacitive field lines measured at the receiver are
translated into the digital domain by a Σ-Δ analog-to-digital
converter. The total capacitance measured at the receiver
decreases when a grounded object, such as a finger, comes close
to the induced capacitive field. The excitation source and Σ-Δ
CDC are implemented on the AD7142, while the transmitter
and receiver are constructed on the sensor PCB.
The sensor PCB is glued to the underside of the case or
covering of the finished product. The capacitive field lines
extend above the sensor PCB for about 4 mm. The field also
extends above any covering material over the sensor PCB. One
advantage of this sensor arrangement is that the user is never in
contact with the sensor PCB itself, so there is no wear on the
sensor.
The case or covering material housing consumer products such
as MP3 players, digital still cameras, and handsets, is made from
a variety of materials. Materials such as plastic or glass are
suitable covering materials for use with capacitance sensing;
metal cannot be used.
The response of the capacitance sensor depends on three
factors:
• The size and type of the sensor element
• The size of the object touching the sensor
• The thickness and type of the covering material
Each of these factors affects the magnitude of change measured
by the CDC when the sensor is touched. If the change in CDC
output is very small, then it becomes difficult to differentiate
between the sensor-touched and the sensor-not-touched
conditions. This application note details how each of these
factors affects the sensor response and can be used as a
guideline when deciding the size and form of the sensor
RX
16-BIT
DATA
Σ-Δ
ADC
Figure 1. Capacitance Sensing
TX
EXCITATION
SIGNAL
240kHz
05849-001
configuration, as well as the covering plastic specification.
The size of the sensor element determines the size of the
capacitive field induced between the transmitter and receiver.
A smaller sensor element has a smaller field to interfere with
than a larger sensor element. If the sensor element is too small,
there is not a sufficient change in capacitance measured by the
CDC when the sensor is touched.
The type of sensor element is also important. For a button
sensor, only on/off or touch/no touch information is required.
A button can tolerate some loss of sensor response, as long as it
is possible to determine if the button is touched or not. A slider
sensor, however, must output position data relating to the
length of the slider. A reduction in sensor response for a slider
reduces the number of CDC codes that are used to describe a
full traverse of the slider, thus affecting the resolution and
accuracy of the slider sensor position data.
OBJECT TOUCHING THE SENSOR
For all applications, the object touching the sensor is a finger or
hand, which is naturally grounded. However, the size of the
object touching the sensor is not constant; finger size can vary
from person to person, or indeed the same person can use
different fingers at different times to activate the sensors.
Consumer devices need to be designed for a range of finger
sizes, from small to large, to ensure that everyone can operate
the device successfully.
Any grounded object can activate Analog Devices’ sensors. For
this application note, a grounded metal probe was used to
simulate a finger during the data gathering experiments. Three
probes of different sizes were used to simulate different finger
sizes: 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm diameter probes.
COVERING MATERIAL
The properties of the material covering the sensor must be
looked at closely. The capacitive field extends about 4 mm to 5
mm above the sensor PCB. This field must extend above any
covering material in order for the sensor to work. The material
must not absorb too much of the capacitive field. Some types of
plastic are more conductive than others, and so more of the
capacitive field gets through.
factor for a variety of plastic polymers. The dissipation factor is
a measure of how lossy the material is. The lower the dissipation
factor, the more of the capacitive field passes through the
material.
Table 1.
Polymer Material
LDPE 0.15 0.08
HDPE 0.24 .20
PP 0.4 0.5
PVC-plasticized 80 120
PS 0.1 to 0.4 0.05 to 0.4
ABS 3 to 8 2 to15
PMMA 40 to 60 4 to 40
POM 5 5
PTFE 0.2 0.2
PCTFE 1 20
PC 0.7 10
PET 2 20
PI 2 5
PUR-linear 120 70
PUR-thermoset 50 50
PUR-thermoplas 30 60
CAB 6 21
Silicone 5 to 13 7
Glass is also a suitable covering material. However, metal
cannot be used as a covering material
For this application note, the sensor PCBs were covered in ABS
that ranged in thickness from 0.5 mm to 4 mm.
Tabl e 1 shows the dissipation
Dissipation Factor (x 10-3)
@50 Hz @1 MHz
Rev. 0 | Page 3 of 8
AN-830
BUTTON SENSOR
A button sensor is the simplest sensor element to implement.
The button can be circular, square, or a custom shape. A button
sensor can be any size, from 5 mm × 5 mm square upwards.
Figure 2 shows a typical button sensor design.
05849-002
Figure 2. Button Sensor
BUTTON SENSOR RESPONSE
A10 mm × 10 mm square button sensor was used to gather
typical button sensor response data. To simulate a user’s finger,
grounded metal probes of various sizes were used to activate the
button. The sensor PCB was placed under plastic varying from
0.5 mm thick to 4 mm thick. The sensor response is defined as
the change in CDC output code between the sensor-touched
condition and sensor-not-touched condition.
The measured output from the CDC is shown in
data shows clearly that the response from the sensor decreases
with respect to increasing plastic thickness. The response from
the button sensor becomes insufficient when the CDC output
falls below 500 codes. At this point, it becomes difficult to
differentiate between a true sensor activation and noise in the
CDC codes. A 10 mm button can be successfully used with up
to 4 mm plastic on top. For smaller sensors, the response is less
Figure 3. The
than that of larger sensors. For a 5mm button, the sensor
response could fall to about 500 codes. For 5 mm buttons, it is
recommended that the covering plastic be 2 mm or less to
ensure proper sensor operation.
Also noteworthy is the effect the probe size has on the sensor
response. A small probe can only decrease the measured
capacitance at the receiver by a small amount. This trend holds
for finger size also—the smaller the finger, the smaller the
response from the sensor.
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
CDC OUTPUT CODE CHANGE
2000
0
15mm PROBE
10mm PROBE
5mm PROBE
0.54.03.53.02.52.01.51.0
PLASTIC THICKNESS (mm)
Figure 3. Button Sensor Response
05849-003
Rev. 0 | Page 4 of 8
AN-830
SLIDER SENSOR
A slider sensor element is useful for scrolling through menus, or
lists of data, quickly and easily. Slider sensors should be greater
than 25 mm in length and greater than 5 mm in width to give
sufficient response to implement scrolling functions. The
maximum length recommended is about 45 mm.
Figure 4
shows a typical slider sensor design.
05849-004
Figure 4. Slider sensor
SLIDER SENSOR RESPONSE
The slider has two responses that can be measured: the
activation response (is the slider touched?) and the position
data output or scrolling movement response. The data gathered
for this application note used a slider of 12 mm in width and
28 mm in length. To simulate a user’s finger, grounded metal
probes of various sizes were used to touch the slider. The sensor
PCB was placed under plastic of thickness varying from 0.5 mm
thick to 4 mm thick. Both the slider activation and slider
position response were measured, with the slider response
being defined as the change in CDC codes between the sensor
touched and sensor not touched conditions.
Figure 5 shows data gathered from the slider to measure the
activation level. The data clearly shows that the thicker the
plastic, the smaller the response from the sensor. The activation
measurement tells us when the slider has been touched. In this
way, the slider’s functionality is similar to a button’s on/off
functionality and can tolerate some degree of reduction in the
sensor response.
Figure 6 shows the response of the slider while scrolling. Again,
the same trends are clear: the best response from the sensor is
achieved using thin covering plastic and a large probe. The
scrolling or position data response from the slider is not
tolerant to reductions in sensor response. If the sensor response
is good, the difference in codes for the slider is 14000; this
means that there is a large code change while scrolling the
length of the slider. When the sensor response falls, there is a
much smaller change in code while scrolling the length of the
slider. This translates into less resolution or accuracy in the
scroller position data.
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
CDC OUTPUT CODE CHANGE
1000
0
0.54.03.53.02.52.01.51.0
15mm PROBE
10mm PROBE
5mm PROBE
PLASTIC THICKNESS (mm)
Figure 5. Slider Sensor Activation Response
05849-005
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
CDC OUTPUT CODE CHANGE
2000
0
15mm PROBE
10mm PROBE
5mm PROBE
0.54.03.53.02.52.01.51.0
PLASTIC THICKNESS (mm)
Figure 6. Slider Sensor Position Data Response
05849-006
Rev. 0 | Page 5 of 8
AN-830
RECOMMENDATIONS
To achieve the best response from any sensor element, here are
a number of recommendations.
•The covering plastic should have a maximum thickness of
2 mm. This is a general guideline, based on measurements
taken with ABS. Other materials may tolerate thickness
above or below this. Because sensor size and finger size
also affect the sensor response, it may be possible to alter
the design to operate at plastic thicknesses above 2 mm.
•Sensor elements should be as big as the design allows.
When designing the sensor elements, they should always
meet the minimum size requirements set for that sensor
type.
•Thought should be given to the target market to ensure
that the sensor responds well to the upper and lower
distributions of finger size in that market. If designing a
toy, then the sensor should be designed to operate best
using a child’s average finger size.
For further information on Analog Devices’ capacitance
sensing, go to www.analog.com.