ANALOG DEVICES ADP3088 Service Manual

查询ADP3088供应商
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
a
1 MHz, 750 mA Buck Regulator
Preliminary Technical Data ADP3088
FEATURES 1 MHz PWM Frequency Automatic PWM to Power Saving Mode at Light Load Fully Integrated 1 A Power Switch 3% Output Regulation Accuracy over Temperature,
Line, and Load 100% Duty Cycle Operation Simple Compensation Output Voltage: 1.25 V to 10.5 V Small Inductor and MLC Capacitors Low Quiescent Current while Pulse Skipping Thermal Shutdown Fully Integrated Soft Start Cycle-by-cycle Current Limit
APPLICATONS PDAs and Palmtop Computers Notebook Computers PCMCIA Cards Bus Products Portable Instruments
IN
IN
COMP
GND
GND
FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM
CURRENT
SENSE
AMP
PWM
COMPARATOR
PROTECTION
LOGIC
(ILIM, OT)
ERROR
AMP
g
m
+
REF
1.245V
1MHz
SQ
R
RUN/STOP
COMPARATORS
SOFT-START
TIMER
SW
DRV
FB
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The ADP3088 is a high frequency, non-synchronous PWM step-down DC-DC regulator with an integrated 1A power switch in a space-saving MSOP8 package. It provides high efficiency, excellent dynamic response, and is very simple to use.
The ADP3088’s 1 MHz switching frequency allows for small, inexpensive external components, and the current mode control loop is simple to compensate and eases noise filtering. It operates in PWM current mode under heavy loads and saves energy at lighter loads by switching auto­matically into Power Saving mode. Soft start is integrated completely on chip, as is the cycle-by-cycle current limit.
Capable of operating from 2.5 V to 11 V input, it is ideal for many applications, including portable, battery power appli­cations, where local point-of-use power regulation is re­quired. Supporting output voltages down to 1.25 V, the ADP3088 is ideal to generate low voltage rails, providing the optimal solution in its class for delivering power effi­ciently, responsively, and simply with minimal printed cir­cuit board area.
The device is specified over the industrial temperature range of -40 °C to +85°C.
VIN
3.3V
10µF
0.1µF
4.7pF
220pF
20k
ADP3088
IN
IN
GND
COMP
SW
DRV
GND
FB
3.3µH
1N5817
10.0k
22.4k
Figure 1. Typical Application
10µF
VOUT
1.8V
REV. PrK 3/28/02
Information furnished by Analog Devices is believed to be accurate and reli­able. However, no responsibility is assumed by Analog Devices for its use, nor for any infringements of patents or other rights of third parties which may result from its use. No license is granted by implication or otherwise under any patent or patent rights of Analog Devices.
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
1
ADP3088–SPECIFICATIONS
Parameter Symbol Conditions Min Typ Max Units
SUPPLY
Input Voltage Range V Quiescent Current Operating I
Quiescent Current Operating I
Shutdown I
Ground Current I
Normal Operation VIN = 11 V, IL = 500 mA, 2.5 3.6 mA
Thermal Shutdown Threshold T
OSCILLATOR
Oscillator Frequency f Minimum Sleep Duty Cycle D Maximum Duty Cycle D Wake up Hysteresis V
OUTPUT SWITCH
Switch On Voltage V
Current Limit Threshold I Leakage Current VIN = 12 V 0.5 µA
ERROR AMPLIFIER
Reference Voltage Accuracy V Reference Voltage Line FB = COMP, .02 %/V
Regulation V Feedback Input Bias Current I Sink/Source Current I Short Circuit Current I
Transconductance gm,
MODULATOR
Transconductance gm, Control Offset Voltage V Soft Start Time t Shutdown Threshold Voltage V Slope Compensation m
NOTES 1 All limits at temperature extremes are guaranteed via correlation using standard Statistical Quality Control (SQC). 2 For higher efficiency operation, tie the DRV pin to the output for IL < 250 mA, and VIN > 3 V. 3 V(IN) - V(SW), includes voltage drop across internal current sensor.
Specifications subject to change without notice.
IN
Q
Q SD
2
GND
SD
SW
PSM MAX
HYST
3
IO
LIM
REF
FB COMP COMP, SD
EA
MOD
PWM, OS
SS
COMP, SD
SC
(VIN = +3.3 V, TA = -40°C to +85°C, unless otherwise noted)
DRV = GND 2.5 11 V VIN = 10 V, IL = 500 mA, 6 mA DRV = GND No load 150 250 µA V
= 0 V 15 40
COMP
DRV = 2 V
160 °C
0.75 1 1.25 MHz
IL = 500 mA 14 %
100 %
FB voltage drops below V
REF
20 30 40 mV
IL = 500 mA, FB and DRV = 0.25 0.4 V
GND
1.0 1.2 1.4 A
FB = COMP 1.222 1.245 1.265 V
= 3 V to 12 V
IN
soft start expired -50 1 50 nA
35 60 85 µA
V
= 0 V, activating 20 40 µA
COMP
shutdown FB = COMP 480 µA/V
V
COMP
to I
L
1 A/V
0.90 V 250 600 µs
340 750 mV
Effectively summed to I
SW
0.7 A/µs
–2– REV. PrK
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
ADP3088
ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM RATINGS*
Input Supply Voltage ............................... –0.3 V to +12 V
Voltage on any pin with respect to GND .. –0.3 V to +12 V
(voltage on any pin may not exceed V
)
IN
Operating Ambient Temperature Range .. –40°C to +85°C
Operating Junction Temperature ......................... +125°C
(4-layer board)........................................... +116°C/W
θ
JA
θ
(2-layer board)........................................... +159°C/W
JA
Storage Temperature Range .................. –65°C to +150°C
Lead Temperature Range (Soldering, 10 sec.) ..... +300°C
Vapor Phase (60 sec) ........................................ +215°C
Infrared (15 sec) ............................................... +220°C
*This is a stress rating only; operation beyond these limits can cause the device
to be permanently damaged. Unless otherwise specified, all voltages are referenced to GND.
ORDERING GUIDE
Temperature Package Branding
Model Range Option Information
ADP3088ARM -40°C to +85°C MSOP-8 P0A
PIN FUNCTION DESCRIPTIONS
Pin Mnemonic Function
1, 2 IN Power Supply Input. Both pins
must be connected.
3,6 GND Ground. Both pins must be con-
nected.
4 COMP Feedback Loop Compensation
and Shutdown Input. An open drain or collector used to pull the pin to ground will shutdown the device.
5 FB Feedback Voltage Sense Input.
This pin senses the voltage via an external resistor divider.
7 DRV This pin provides a separate
path for drive current to be con­nected to ground.
8 SW Switching Output.
PIN CONFIGURATION
GND
COMP
1
IN
2
IN
ADP3088
3
4
8
SW
7
DRV
6
GND
5
FB
CAUTION
ESD (electrostatic discharge) sensitive device. Electrostatic charges as high as 4000 V readily accumulate on the human body and test equipment and can discharge without detection. Although the device features proprietary ESD protection circuitry, permanent damage may oc­cur on devices subjected to high energy electrostatic discharges. Therefore, proper ESD precautions are recommended to avoid performance degradation or loss of functionality.
–3–REV. PrK
ADP3088
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
THEORY OF OPERATION
The ADP3088 is a fixed frequency buck switching regula­tor in an MSOP-8 package using an external Schottky recti­fier. It features an integrated 1A power switch and switches at 1MHz. ADP3088 utilizes PWM operation and incorpo­rates soft-start for controlled start-up sequence and over temperature switch protection. The ADP3088 draws low current while running in power saving mode, and even lower current in shutdown.
Refer to the functional block diagram on page 1. The sys­tem shown is configured for a 1.8 V output using a 10 µH inductor. At the beginning of a cycle the 1 MHz oscillator enables an SR latch, enabling the internal 1 A power switch. The current sense amplifier and the protection logic block monitor the current flowing between the IN and SW pins. The switch is turned off when the current reaches a level determined by the protection logic block or PWM comparator, whichever is lower. The error amplifier mea­sures the output voltage through an external resistor divider tied to the FB pin. This amplifier servos the switch current to regulate the FB pin voltage to 1.245 V. An internal regu­lator provides power to the control circuitry. The COMP pin can be used to shutdown the ADP3088. When pulled low it turns off the internal regulator, thus biasing down the chip, reducing the input current and disconnecting the output from the input. Anti-saturation circuitry is used to drive the switch to the edge of saturation. This allows the driver to quickly switch at 1 MHz and maintain good effi­ciency. And for improved efficiency, the DRV pin may be connected to the output provided that the input voltage is at least 1 V greater than the output.
If the output load increases, the error amplifier will detect a lower voltage on the FB pin, via the resistor divider on the output, and send a signal to the PWM comparator to in­crease the on time of the switch. This in effect increases the duty cycle and provides more current to drive the increased load during the transient event, until a new operating point is established.
Reference
The ADP3088 incorporates an internal bandgap reference, it includes curvature correction for extremely low tempera­ture coefficient. The reference can be disabled by ground­ing the COMP pin which also turns off the bias for the rest of the chip.
Error Amplifier
The error amplifier provides a control voltage to the PWM stage to set the peak inductor current which sets the output current of the regulator. It is a g is a current to the COMP pin.
Protection Logic
The protection logic block provides current limit and over­temperature protection. The over temperature protection is enabled when the temperature of the chip exceeds a speci­fied preset temperature; the switch will be disabled until the temperature drops below a specified level, then normal operation will resume. The thermal shutdown only stops switching, but does not put the chip to power saving mode, nor does it re-initiate soft start. As the chip cools slightly, it will cycle in and out of thermal shutdown rapidly, maintain­ing the die temp at 150°C, but allowing the output voltage
amplifier in that its output
m
and current to swing up and down. The current limit pro­tection overrides the PWM comparator; if this occurs then the switch pulse will be terminated and the soft start mode will be reset.
Current Sense Amplifier
The voltage on the internal current sense resistor is sensed and passed to the ramp input of the PWM comparator. This current sense signal is also passed to the current limit comparator for peak current limit shutdown . At current limit the soft-start capacitor is reset and soft-start is re­initiated. The current limit is normally 1.2 peak switch current. Slope compensation is added to ADP3088 to sta­bilize the loop. A generated ramped signal is summed with the current sense signal to provide slope compensation. Slope compensation is needed to close the inner loop so subharmonic oscillation is avoided. The ramp is reset with each clock cycle so that the ADP3088 is capable of true 100% duty cycle.
Run/Stop Comparators
This block creates the 1 MHz signal sent to the SR latch which is used for the switching frequency. It also takes the FB voltage and decides when to go into and wake up from power saving mode. The decision to induce power saving mode is based upon duty ratio. During steady-state con­tinuous operation, the duty ratio of a PWM buck regulator is simply a function of input/output voltage ratio, with sec­ond order effects including the voltage drop of the internal switch and the external diode. Once the load drops to a certain point, discontinuous operation occurs, and the duty ratio begins to modulate to maintain regulation. In the ADP3088, the regulator goes to sleep when the integrated duty ratio measurements drops to less than half of the mini­mum expected integrated duty ratio. The minimum ex­pected duty ratio occurs at max input voltage, min output voltage in continuous mode operation.
PWM Comparator
The PWM comparator looks at the signal from the current sense amplifier and the error amplifier to determine the correct switch on time to regulate the output voltage under a given load.
Soft-Start Timer
Soft start will prevent saturating the inductor which could cause uncontrolled overshoot of the output voltage and electrical stress to the system at start up. When first pow­ered up, an internal soft start capacitor is discharged and the soft start circuitry provides a gradually decaying offset to the error amplifier to prevent it from saturating and from commanding maximum switch current to charge the output capacitor. The output voltage approaches the final regula­tion voltage with a smooth exponential decay. This will reduce electrical stress to the system.
Output
The output stage contains the bipolar power switch, and the circuits necessary to switch it on and off quickly. The pass switch is driven to the edge of saturation and the result is a fast switching response and low switch resistance. For improved efficiency, the DRV pin may be connected to the output provided that the input voltage is at least 1 V higher than the output. This will send the current needed to drive the bipolar switch to the output load instead of routing it to
–4– REV. PrK
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA


X
ADP3088
ground. For some VIN and I
configurations, the DRV
LOAD
pin must be grounded for reliable operation.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Output Voltage Setting
In its standard usage, the output voltage of the ADP3088 is programmed to a desired fixed value by a resistor divider from the output voltage into the feedback node, the pin FB, at which node the control loop ensures regulation at the reference level, V
. The divider should be designed to
REF
satisfy the formula:
(1)
VV
+
OUT REF
R
B
1

R
A
where RA is the upper divider resistor (between the output and FB) and R
and RB are recommended to have values in the range of
R
A
is the lower one (between FB and ground).
B
2~200 k and are likely to require a 1% tolerance or better to attain acceptable output voltage tolerance.
In less conventional applications described separately, the resistor feedback configuration can be modified or tapped with other resistors to affect current flow into the FB node that, in turn, influences the output voltage. Even a switched voltage can be summed into the FB node as long as it is sufficiently integrated and does not intolerably compromise the transient response. This latter application is considered further below in an application for powering a DSP.
Input Voltage, Power Dissipation Considerations, and Power Savings Mode
The input voltage range is not typically considered a critical parameter for electrical functionality, but there are several considerations, upon which there is further elaboration below:
must never exceed the maximum rated voltage
1. V
IN
2. V
must be within the specified operating range when
IN
normal operation is expected
3. V
must be greater than V
IN
by at least the specified
OUT
headroom when DC regulation is expected
4. V
, if not sufficiently greater than V
IN
, may limit the
OUT
large signal transient response of a buck converter
5. V
, if much greater than V
IN
, may give rise to such a
OUT
low duty ratio that it activates power savings mode even at static higher load conditions or upon dynamic load changes when it is not desired.
6. V
affects the device power dissipation (a lower value
IN
causes higher dissipation), which in turn affects die temperature that must be kept below a maximum rat­ing.
The lowest input voltage together with the maximum out­put voltage and maximum current create the conditions for maximum power dissipation in the device, which determine maximum temperature rise that should be checked against the maximum junction temperature rating. The formula for maximum power dissipation in the device is given by:
VV
+
@,
PIV
DMAX O MAX SW IO MA
OFIOMAX
×
V
IN
,@,
(2)
where VF is the diode forward voltage drop and VSW is the drop across the internal switch and current sensing resistor that appears between the VIN and SW pins of the ADP3088 during the on state of the switch. Both of these variables can be approximated from a combination of worst-case specs and typical graphs. Multiply the power dissipation by the thermal resistance from junction to case or ambient, as desired, to determine internal temperature rise.
If the input voltage were so much higher than the output voltage that it required an average duty ratio less than an internally preset threshold, then power savings mode (“PSM”) – that is characterized by periodic shutdown and wakeup of the device that reduces average quiescent cur­rent – would be active for all load conditions rather than only at lighter loads, for which it is intended. PSM opera­tion is characterized by low-frequency ripple on the output that appears similar to the behavior of a hysteretic regula­tor. This is usually not a factor for consideration and may be ignored if PSM operation is acceptable for all load con­ditions, but in case it is relevant, the following recommen­dation is offered:
IN
D
PSM MAX
()
(3)
+
VV
OF
<
V
It is not possible to prevent the duty ratio from tending towards zero in non-synchronous buck converters below a certain minimum load current level called "borderline cur­rent" or "critical current" for the power converter. That corresponds to the inductor ripple current reaching zero at its bottom peak - sometimes called the "valley current". If PSM activation strains the lower regulation limit due to the hysteretic ripple, the output voltage can be offset slightly upward by readjusting the nominal voltage setpoint with the resistor divider.
Even though a buck converter may have a low dropout voltage that allows the static regulation to be maintained as the input voltage drops near to the output voltage, in buck converters the slew rate limitation of inductor current can compromise the dynamic regulation in response to load current step increases. That is because the maximum rate that current can be increased in the inductor is proportional to the voltage available to impress across it, which is com­promised as the input voltage reduces toward the output voltage. This is not a limitation of the device but of buck converters in general. The limitation is considered as part of the output filter design, although it could also be consid­ered in terms of a minimum acceptable input voltage for a given output filter that will ensure that the dynamic re­sponse is acceptably maintained.
Output Filter Components
In most applications it is desirable to use the smallest induc­tor value that does not introduce practical problems, as this tends to yield the lowest cost inductor. One reason for using an even larger inductor than the minimum tolerable might be to reduce output ripple voltage further, but cost being
–5–REV. PrK
ADP3088
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
equal, this is generally better accomplished with a better quality or proportionally larger output capacitor instead, since a larger inductor degrades the large-signal transient performance capability.
A conservative nominal design target value for the inductor of a typical application circuit is that which creates a peak­to-peak ripple current, ∆I
, for the nominal input voltage
L
that is approximately a third of the nominal 500mA rating of the ADP3088. The reason for not suggesting to base the ripple current on the maximum load current is for concern of overload protection. Scaling of the ripple currents with lower load currents would yield higher inductor values that might give satisfactory operation, but in order for overload operation up to the current limit level of the ADP3088 to be satisfactory, it would be necessary to choose an inductor rated up to that higher current, which would likely yield an unsatisfactory inductor size and cost. In any case, having chosen a target level for ∆I
, the recommended inductor
L
value is given by:
−× +
1
DVV
()
L
=
()
OF
×∆
fI
SW L
(4)
where D is the duty ratio - the suffix indicating continuous inductor current - and is given by:
VV
+
D
=
OF
VVV
+−
IN F SW
(5)
and VSW and VF are assessed at full load, and fSW is the fixed switching frequency of the ADP3088. The formula sug­gests the calculation of L using a nominal input voltage, and for applications requiring a large ranges of V tions of transient response at V ripple at V
may warrant deeper consideration of how
IN(MAX)
versus the higher
IN(MIN)
the limita-
IN
to optimize the design. In applications where load tran­sients are not severe, this conservative design for L is rec­ommended. A more aggressive minimization of L is outlined below, but a few restrictions are noted.
As inductance becomes smaller the ripple current becomes larger. If the ripple becomes particularly large or, as an additional factor, if the load is particularly dynamic, then there is an increasing possibility that the peak inductor cur­rent will undesirably reach the current limit shutdown threshold, ICL. This should be avoided by restricting the minimum inductor value to keep the ripple current moder­ated. An alternate way to prevent excessive dynamic over­shoot of inductor current during a load transient is to reduce the DC gain of the error amplifier by adding resis­tive feedback; this idea is discussed below.
Another important restriction of the minimum inductor value may apply. The design should ensure against possible subharmonic oscillation that can occur in all fixed-fre­quency current-controlled switching power supplies when switching at high duty ratios. The subharmonic oscillation phenomenon will not be explained here - there are plenty of papers written on the subject - except to say that it is characterized by alternating high and low duty ratios - i.e., every other cycle - that produces additional ripple on the
output. To prevent subharmonic oscillation the following restriction for the minimum inductor value is recom­mended:
VV
H
2
µ
LVV
> ×+×
VV
The value used for V
()
OF
should be only the minimum
IN(MIN)
+
OF
IN MIN
()
0.35
(6)
input voltage for which normal high performance operation must be assured. Note the value returned for L may be negative in which case the restriction does not apply. If the preceding formula yields a lower inductor value than the conservative recommendation given previously, as is likely for most applications, then it is time to consider further limitations to see how low the value can be minimized.
For a given inductor selection, the earlier formula is rear­ranged for convenience and skewed to the worst case input voltage to determine the maximum inductor ripple current, I
:
L
VVV
∆= ×
I
LMAX
()
IN MAX
VVVfL
IN MAX
−−
()
()
OSW
+− ×
FSWSW
VV
+
F
O
(7)
Performance degradation of the inductor - consisting of some loss of inductance or excessive power loss - may be encountered at higher ripple currents, so the ripple current figure, together with knowledge of the expected DC cur­rent should be checked against specifications of the induc­tor.
If the ESR of the output capacitor is substantial - as it is likely to be if a MLC capacitor is not used - then the ripple voltage on the output, dominated by the ESR, may be substantial and of concern for regulation specifications. The resistive component of the output voltage ripple is simply the ripple current times the ESR, and if it is more than a few millivolts it will dominate the output capacitance in contributing to output ripple voltage.
The boundary condition of the inductor reaching the bor­derline current, I
VVV VV
+−
OF INOSW
I
OBL
()
2
fLV V V
SW IN F SW
can be determined by the formula:
O(BL)
+−
(8)
Below this output current level, the inductor current will be discontinuous and the duty ratio will be modulated to lower values, by factors substantially more than thus the losses that cause only a small amount of modulation in continuous inductor current operation. PSM is initiated automatically by a proprietary technique comprising a duty ratio amplifier with an internal time constant. As load current drops well into the low current region and the duty ratio passes below the threshold of D
for a sufficient time, PSM is acti-
PSM
vated. The corresponding level of output current is given by:
VVV VVV
1
ID
×
OPSM
()
PSM
2
+− −−
2
IN F SW IN SW
VV f L
OF SW
0
(9)
It can be seen in the formula that this current threshold is inversely proportional to inductance, so although it is usu­ally not a relevant concern, it is noted that an aggressively
–6– REV. PrK
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
ADP3088
low output inductance should be avoided to keep the PSM threshold current at a desirably low level.
For the user's reference, when current is below the border­line level, the duty ratio is modulated according to the for­mula:
VV f L
DI
2
=×× ×
DO
OF SW
VVV
+−
IN F SW
−−
VVV
IN O SW
(10)
where the suffix indicates that the inductor current is dis­continuous.
For controlling the capacitive component of the output ripple voltage, the following constraint on the minimum output capacitance should be applied:
I
>
fV
8
SW R
L
(11)
C
O
where ∆VR is the tolerable ripple voltage. However, this constraint is rarely relevant, as the typical capacitance re­quirement is driven more by dynamic response require­ments than by ripple concerns. In a typical application circuit, a 10 µF capacitor produces a capacitive output voltage ripple component of only about 2 mV. 10 µF is usually sufficient for applications that do not impose par­ticularly HF load transients, which imposes additional con­straints that are elaborated upon in the next section.
Load Characterization
Optimization of the compensation, as well as the output filter, requires some knowledge of a fundamental charac­teristic of the load. Qualitatively, there are two types of loads with which we are concerned: fast-slew-rate and slow-slew-rate. These slew rates are assessed with respect to the minimum [absolute] inductor [current] slew rate as given by:
VVV

IN MIN
 

MIN and
,
dt L L

=<
 

−−
()
SW O
MAX MAX
VVdI
+
OFL
(12)
where the "<" sign indicates a selection of whichever of the bracketed terms is the lesser.
If the slew rate of the load is fast compared to the minimum inductor slew rate, then the ability of the power converter to contain the output voltage deviation following a load change is limited not only by the response of the control loop - i.e., by its speed to demand zero or maximum duty ratio from the modulator - but by the power stage as well. In such a case, beginning with the recognition that output voltage deviation would be substantial even if the loop re­sponse were instantaneous, it can be shown that one can achieve better overall voltage containment by degenerating the DC loop gain. As a technical matter, it should be noted that there will always be some minimum output voltage deviation downward due to a load step even if the inductor slew is as fast as the load slew rate, because, during a switching cycle, the modulator latches its "decision" to turn off the switch and it cannot rescind that decision but must wait for the next clock cycle to turn on the switch again and
begin slewing the inductor current upward. This is only a second order consideration.
Slow slew rate loads may be referred to simply as conven­tional loads, since these have been the more prevalent type of load. Optimally compensating a conventional load is synonymous with small signal AC considerations: the objec­tive is to maximize the AC gain up to the crossover fre­quency, ensure sufficient phase margin at the unity gain crossover frequency, and keep the gain rolling off at higher frequencies to avoid gain margin problems.
Fast slew rate loads may be referred to as digital loads since, from the perspective of the power converter, they have a digital characteristic when changing between two extremes, and also because such fast slew rates tends to characterize modern digital circuits, which often feature power management interrupts - i.e., interrupt signals used to turn on and off circuitry on an as-needed basis during normal system operation. Optimally compensating a digital load is more a task of impedance matching and DC gain determination than a task of AC loop optimization.
Returning to constraints for choosing the output capacitor, for digital loads another criteria for ensuring sufficient out­put capacitance applies:
2
I
C
>
O
2
O
dI
L
VMIN
O
dt
(13)
where ∆IO is the maximum HF load step. It should be noted that the formula results strictly from the physical limitation of the output filter; the compensation must also be optimized to maximize the response of the control loop to avoid substantial additional output voltage deviation. The formula might be also written in to describe a maxi­mum inductance for a given capacitance, but it is generally better practice to choose the inductor first and add capaci­tance as needed.
The he impedance of the output capacitor together with a digital load creates some limiting considerations, also. Se­ries resistance (ESR) rather than capacitance can be a dominant design consideration with non-MLC capacitors. If the load is essentially digital, then the dynamic deviation of the output voltage cannot be limited to any better than the dynamic load current step times the ESR. In a for­mula:
VIESR
∆≥∆×
OO
(14)
In such a case, it is often important to choose a capacitor that controls the ESR to a sufficiently small value, and MLC capacitors are often chosen to practically eliminate the consideration of ESR entirely.
Closing the Loop - Compensation
The factors determining the response of the power con­verter are noted: the feedback input resistor divider, a lead network if applicable, the transconductance of the error
–7–REV. PrK
ADP3088
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
amplifier, its frequency response limitation (i.e., as ad­equately modeled by a capacitance from output to ground) its external termination impedance (i.e., the compensation, that may or may not include DC feedback), the modulator transconductance, and the power converter's termination impedance (i.e., the output capacitor and load resistance).
Since the ADP3088 has a current controlled loop, the par­ticular inductor value does not by first order consideration affect small signal stability. However, slew rate limitations as discussed earlier - a large signal limitation consideration ­set boundaries that are often relevant for optimizing com­pensation of the feedback loop. If the compensation of the current control signal, i.e., the COMP pin, is designed to promote a current response that is faster than the inductor current can slew, then when a step load is applied the con­trol signal will tend to initially respond in excess (of the actual current change that is occurring) and then allow an overshoot of the current and output voltage as it is delayed in correcting its excess.
For conventional loads, the following describes how the frequency corners (poles and zeroes) are positioned or should be chosen to optimize the loop gain, beginning in the low frequency spectrum:
1. The DC loop gain is limited by the applied load resis­tance and the output resistance of the error amplifier, but it is not important to determine how high the DC gain is.
2. Two poles in the LF spectrum begin to roll off the gain, one determined by the load resistance and output ca­pacitor, C
, and the other by the error amplifier's out-
O
put resistance and its termination capacitance - the equivalent feedback capacitance and the added com­pensation capacitance C
; determining the location of
HF
these poles is not relevant to compensation design - it suffices to know that both are decades below the cross­over frequency.
3. A lead network is especially desirable for a variable out­put voltage application in order to keep a fairly constant crossover frequency and phase margin for all output voltages; if used, this lead network consists of simply a capacitor, C vider resistor, R
, in parallel with the upper feedback di-
FF
; this creates a closely spaced zero/pole
A
pair that provides a gain boost before crossover so that, above the pole frequency, the loop gain and phase are similar for all output voltages; if the lead network is used for a fixed voltage application, the pole should be cho­sen to align with the following described zero; for vari­able voltage applications, the maximum frequency of the pole should be placed as high as is comfortable with­out substantially degrading phase margin (e.g., not within an octave or, more conservatively, a half decade of the crossover frequency).
4. A zero turns the gain rolloff back to 1-pole sufficiently in advance of the crossover frequency to create ample phase margin, e.g., half a decade; the zero could feasi­bly be that of the output capacitor itself - i.e., the zero formed by the ESR and the capacitance C
- but that is
O
both unlikely (since the zero frequency will likely be higher than where the loop zero is desired) and gener­ally imprudent (since the loop performance would de-
pend on the stability of the ESR, which often is poor or unknown); as recommended, the zero, f an R
circuit terminating the COMP pin (a resistor, RC,
C
in series with a capacitor, C terminating the error amplifier, C with R
to cancel the zero of the output capacitor, or, if
C
), while the capacitance
C
HF
, is created by
Z
, forms a pole, fP,
the zero is well above the crossover frequency, as may be the case when using an MLC output capacitor, that pole is set high enough above the crossover frequency, again e.g., half a decade, so that it doesn't cut substan­tially into the phase margin at crossover, but still ensures continued gain rolloff so that the gain margin is accept­ably high; note that the previous guidelines suggest that
10 × CHF.
C
C
5. The gain crosses 0 dB (unity) at a crossover frequency that is typically a tenth and advisably not greater than a fourth of the switching frequency - one primary reason for this approximate upper limit being the extra phase margin loss due to the switching interval that is not pre­dicted by the linear model.
Assuming no lead network is used, the open loop gain is given by:
V
where V

600
µ× ×

A
OL
is the nominal DC level. This equation to-
OUT

ZZ
COMP O
2
V
OUT
(15)
gether with the preceding recommendations should suffice to determine compensation component selection for users familiar with loop design. This begins with deciding the crossover frequency, f frequency, and setting the open loop gain, A By example, f
= 125 kHz is chosen.
C
Assuming a well chosen C
, evaluating the impedances at that
C
as described previously - i.e.,
HF
, to unity.
OL
such that it creates a pole well above crossover or approxi­mately matches the zero of the output capacitor, the fol­lowing equation approximates the calculation of the crossover frequency:
=+
1
f
C
where k1 = CO×V
()

Ω×
21 /
kAk
()
OUT/RC
and fZ = 1/2πRCCC - the zero
1
Z
(16)
1
+Ω××
150 /
kAfk

frequency set by the compensation - and the units are shown with the constants in the equation for clarification.
The preceding equation cannot readily be solved in terms of k
, but it can be solved closely enough by a few iterations
1
beginning with values for k example below, set the zero about a half decade below f previously advised, that is, choose f Using the previously stated values for f
= 800 p(FA) satisfies the equation. RA and RB are pre-
k
1
around 1×109 (FA). For the
1
~ fC /10 = 40 kHz.
Z
and fC, the value of
Z
C
sumed to be already chosen per earlier guidelines to set the output voltage. As an example, R
= RB = 10 k (imply-
A
ing an output voltage of 2.5 V). Similarly it is presumed that C then also C simple formulas previously given. The example yields R 47 k and C
was chosen; let CO = 15 µF. Then, finally, RC and
O
can be determined by rearrangement of
C
~ 82 pF. Assuming an MLC output capaci-
C
C
as
~
–8– REV. PrK
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
ADP3088
tor of reasonable quality, the pole setting capacitor could be chosen to be C
= 4.7 pF.
HF
A general purpose application circuit is shown in Figure 2.
6.8µH
1A SCHOTTKY
10µF
MLCC
VOUT
1.5V
R
A
10k
R
B
48.7k
5V
MLCC
C
4.7pF
1µF
HF
C
C 470pF R
C 10k
ADP3088
IN
IN
GND
COMP
SW
DRV
GND
FB
Figure 2. +5 V to 1.5 V, General Purpose Application
Another application circuit features a voltage inversion and regulation design such that the output voltage is negative, see Figure 3. Negative output voltages are allowed in the case that the input plus the output voltage does not exceed the rating of the device. In the voltage inverting configura­tion, the ground reference of the ADP3088 is the negative output voltage and the conventional output voltage point is tied to ground. Operation is bootstrapped: the power con­verter behaves as if the input voltage were equal to the actual input voltage plus the magnitude of the output volt­age and as if the output voltage were not inverted. This implies that it is possible to have the input voltage be less than the magnitude of the output voltage - provided that the input voltage alone is sufficient to start the operation of the IC - i.e., before the negative output voltage has been developed. (The circuit below with a -3.3V output works fine over an input range from 2.5 V to 7.5 V.) Since the ADP3088 features a current controlled loop, the feedback effect of essentially boosting the input voltage atop the out­put (with respect to the ground connection of the ADP3088) is reduced to a negligible second-order effect.
just enough so that the static load regulation allows a similar voltage deviation with current as would be the peak voltage deviation, ∆V
, that could not be avoided in the event that
O
a step change of current were to occur even if the loop response were instantaneous. The reason for even an in­stantaneous response in the control loop allowing an output voltage deviation is that the slew-rate of current in the out­put is limited by to the inductor, and a corresponding dy­namic burden is placed on the output capacitor to maintain the output voltage. Therefore, inductor value minimization is desired both for concern of its size and cost, and also to maximize the slew rate of current to the output so that a smaller output capacitor is needed.
To implement voltage positioning, a resistor, R
, should
FB
be placed between the COMP and FB pins according to the formula:
IR
OA
=
R
where g
FB
gV
×∆
MOD O
is the modulator gain and ∆IO must be assessed
MOD
(17)
over the entire operating load range as the difference be­tween maximum and minimum load. C least large enough to support the targeted ∆V
must be chosen at
O
according to
O
the earlier stated formula governing the relationship be­tween minimum output capacitance, voltage deviation, and load current. In order to ensure that the output voltage will be constrained within the limitations of ∆V
, the limitations
O
noted earlier for PSM hysteretic ripple if applicable in the operating load range and ESR. Also an experimental ad­justment downward to the value of R
may be needed, as
B
the DC bias point of the COMP node is usually a little higher than V
, which would result in a slight downward
REF
shift of the nominal output voltage. Having chosen this design approach, the series RC of the
compensation network can be removed and the single re­maining capacitor, C
, should be increased to approxi-
HF
mately:
4.7µH
1A SCHOTTKY
10µF
MLCC
+
R
A
10k
+
R
B
3.04k
-3.3V
5V
MLCC
C
4.7pF
1µF
HF
C
C 220pF R
C 20k
ADP3088
IN
IN
GND
COMP
SW
DRV
GND
FB
Figure 3. +5V to -3.3V, General Purpose Inverting
Application
Voltage Positioning Designs
For digital loads a different compensation technique is rec­ommended that involves implementing "voltage position­ing", that is now commonly used on CPUs but is equally applicable to any dynamic device. Voltage positioning is the intentional and controlled variation of output voltage with load current, such that the power supply appears to have a substantial output resistance. The key to voltage positioning optimization for a digital load is to degenerate the loop gain
CESR
×
O
=
C
HF
R
FB
(18)
If an MLC capacitor is used for CO, the value of CHF might be calculated to be less than a few picofarads, in which case it is recommended to use a 4.7~10 pF capacitor. The for­mula is derived from a patented design technique called ADOPT
TM
- Analog Devices' Optimal Positioning Tech­nology. This creates AC and DC impedance matching, and the increased complexity of the DC regulation design is moderated by the simplicity of the frequency compensa­tion.
In this design approach, at higher currents the output volt­age will be appreciably lower than at low currents. This is equivalent to saying that the load regulation appears to be poor. But, paradoxically perhaps to the user unfamiliar with voltage positioning, the overall containment of voltage within a given window will be improved, and that tends to be of particularly importance in many highly dynamic loads.
The application circuit in Figure 4 features a 3.3 V input and a 2.5 V output at 100~400 mA which constrains the
–9–REV. PrK
ADP3088
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
output voltage within a ~100 mV range with only a 4.7 µF output capacitor, even when the load slew rate is extremely fast. This does not include the initial tolerance of the volt­age setting that is separately accounted with voltage posi­tioning designs. Note that the lower resistor, R
, of the
B
feedback divider is reduced from the 10 kvalue that one would use for a standard (non-voltage-positioned) design that had no voltage positioning resistor R
3.3µH
1A SCHOTTKY
3.3V
C
HF
4.7pF
1µF
MLCC
ADP3088
IN
IN
GND
COMP
R
VP
51k
SW
DRV
GND
FB
VP
4.7µF
MLCC
.
-2.5V 100-400 mA
R
A
10k
R
B
8.75k
Figure 4. Application Circuit using Voltage Positioning,
Allowing Small Output Capacitance
Extra-Low-Voltage Outputs
Some newer power management applications require volt­age levels below the normal adjustable voltage range of the ADP3088, i.e., below 1.25 V. Such applications can be accommodated using the ADP3088 by modifying the appli­cation circuit to sum in a resistor-weighted portion of an­other regulated system voltage, e.g., 3.3 V, to the feedback node (FB). The tolerance of the ADP3088's output voltage will increase by an amount proportional to the tolerance of the summed in system voltage times the ratio of the con­ductance from that node to that of the output voltage. The below example in Figure 5 shows an implementation of this technique together with another special implementation described below. The resistor R
sums from a 2.5 V sys-
TT
tem voltage to the FB node that will reduce the output volt­age according to the formula:
feature in the ADP3088, it can readily be accommodated with a few components. Dynamic voltage control can be implemented either by parallel bus control or by PWM. In both cases, the output voltage is modified by summing either switched bits with, presumably binary, weighting resistors or a switched PWM node via a single resistor into the FB pin. (The switched PWM node refers to an external PWM control signal, not the switched node of the power converter itself.) Since the PWM technique modulates a current into the FB node, it is necessary both to integrate that signal and to avoid slowing down the response of the power converter to output voltage transitions. This can be accomplished by placing a capacitor between the output voltage and the feedback node, which serves to provide a zero/pole pair in the main regulation loop, and appears as an integration pole to the PWM signal.
The design of either parallel bit or PWM type of voltage control must consider whether the interface node(s) - from parallel switched bits or a single PWM signal - has an active pullup state (in which case it must be to a known voltage) or a passive pullup (open drain) that floats up to the FB node voltage, 1.25 V, in its high state. If at least the lower extreme of the desired output voltage range must be lower than 1.25 V, either technique can be combined with the technique for lowering the output voltage below 1.25 V. Such an example of an application having this requirement is the BlackFin™ DSP. Figure 5 shows an implementation of this technique.
Input Voltage: 4.75 V ~ 7.5 V Output Voltage: 0.9 V ~ 1.5 V Dynamic voltage control interface technique: PWM,
active high to V
IO
System voltage used for lowering output voltage below
1.25 V: V
= VIO = 2.5 V
TT
Maximum output current: 700 mA
R
VV
∆=−×
OUT TT
A
R
TT
(19)
Dynamic Voltage Control
Some newer power management applications also require an ability to adjust the voltage being delivered to a load during operation. Although there is no integration of this
C
C 470pF R
C 20k
ADP3088
IN
IN
GND
COMP
SW
DRV
GND
FB
5V - 8V
C
HF
10pF
V
IN
MLCC
2.2µF
Figure 5. BlackFin DSP Application
10µH @ 1A
1N5817
C
FF
2.2nF
3×10µF
MLCC
R
A
10.0k
R
TT
287k
R
PWM
41.2k
V
OUT
0.9V-1.5V @700 mA
V
2.5V
TT
PWM 0-2.5V
–10– REV. PrK
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DATA
RM-8
8-Lead Mini/micro SOIC Package [Mini_SO]
0.122 (3.10)
0.114 (2.90)
ADP3088
0.122 (3.10)
0.114 (2.90)
0.006 (0.15)
0.002 (0.05)
SEATING
PLANE
85
1
PIN 1
0.0256 (0.65) BSC
0.120 (3.05)
0.112 (2.84)
0.018 (0.46)
0.008 (0.20)
0.199 (5.05)
0.187 (4.75)
4
0.043 (1.09)
0.037 (0.94)
0.011 (0.28)
0.003 (0.08)
0.120 (3.05)
0.112 (2.84)
33 27
0.028 (0.71)
0.016 (0.41)
–11–REV. PrK
Loading...