When is an ‘O’ ring not an ‘O’ ring?
The history of Rega drive belt design and development.
Rega has always championed the use of a circular drive belt and a ‘V’ shaped pulley as the
optimum method of delivering energy from the turntable motor. However, achieving the
accuracy required to transform this motor energy into accurate and stable rotational speed
is not as straightforward as one might think.
In the 1970’s the British standard tolerance for a rubber ‘o’ ring was a variation of 0.15mm
in the cross-sectional diameter. Rega required more than ten times this level of accuracy, (ie
a variation of 0.0125mm) a tolerance unachievable with a standard moulded ‘o’ ring.
In usual Rega style we searched for and found a specialist company that would supply us
extruded rubber. This gave us much smaller variations across the diameter and was
considerably more suitable for use on a turntable. The downside was that each drive belt
had to be cut at 45 degrees and carefully glued together by hand to make a working drive belt,
this was a difficult process, produced many rejects and could be time consuming. In the early days
this was a relatively small problem as Rega was only producing one hundred turntables per month.
However, by the second year of trading monthly production had tripled and making this many handmade drive belts became an onerous task. (A task that would often result in the operative requiring
urgent assistance to prise their fingers apart thanks to the exceptionally fast curing time of
cyanoacrylate adhesives)! It was clearly time to find a better solution to Rega’s drive belt supply
requirements.
Our first contact was with Dunlop, then British owned, and fortunately for us they employed an
intrigued salesman called Tony Anthony. Tony was happy to work with Rega to push the boundaries
of what was currently possible in regard to improving drive belt accuracy.
Their first attempt at a moulded belt was slightly less accurate than the extruded handmade version
however, production demand meant that they had to be used (a decision Roy Gandy was very
uncomfortable making) and this discomfort motivated him to work even harder. After a couple of
years and many trials we made experimental tools in batches of four and then selected the best one
or two. At this time, we could only mould 1000 belts at a time from a single tool before wear made it
unacceptable.
After a few years, Dunlop management became concerned that Tony Anthony was spending too
much time on Rega (for what was a relatively small production) and ordered him to stop supplying
us. Roy wrote a (rare) pleading letter outlining that Rega could source better drive belts from a
company in Japan who specialised in highly accurate drive belts for cassette players but stressed he
really wanted to continue working with a skilled UK supplier. This letter got a surprising response!
Roy was informed that some shop floor workers at Dunlop had been held in Japanese prisoner of
war camps and did not like the idea of this job heading to Japan. The management changed their
minds and continued to work and develop with us for some years until ironically, they were
eventually bought out by a Japanese company. The new owners immediately stopped production of
the Rega drive belt!
Rega then found an English company with a technical director who had experienced making drive
belts for the small UK cassette industry and a whole new set of developments began. At this time